filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it
possible to configure The Bat! to Filter my email by adding:
X-Text-Classification: - to the Header line.
Yes
I have ticked this option
in Configuration/K9 but then am lost as to how to get this to work
with The Bat!.
I have simply set up
Hi Granville,
on Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:41:55 +0100GMT (30.09.2006, 11:41 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
GC Thursday, September 28, 2006, 8:02:14 PM, you wrote:
GC Can you tell me where I can view the X-Text-Classification: spam
GC marker in emails that have been designated as Spam by The Bat!?
GC
Hallo Granville,
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:41:55 +0100GMT (30-9-2006, 11:41 , where I
live), you wrote:
GC Can you tell me where I can view the X-Text-Classification: spam
GC marker in emails that have been designated as Spam by The Bat!?
GC This is just to see that it is working correctly.
Press
Hello Roelof,
Saturday, September 30, 2006, 11:33:34 AM, you wrote:
Roelof Hallo Granville,
Roelof On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:41:55 +0100GMT (30-9-2006, 11:41 , where I
Roelof live), you wrote:
GC Can you tell me where I can view the X-Text-Classification: spam
GC marker in emails that have been
On 26 Sep 2006, at 11:09, Marten Gallagher wrote:
Hello TBUDL,
I am using K9 Spam filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it
possible to configure The Bat! to Filter my email by adding:
X-Text-Classification: - to the Header line.
Yes
I have ticked this option
in Configuration/K9
Hello Granville Cousins everyone else,
on 28-Sep-2006 at 15:41 you (Granville Cousins) wrote:
Where can I find this configuration in The Bat! filters section? I have
looked in there and cannot see any place where I can request The Bat!
to filter my email using the header classification. I
Since recent version of TB a filter I have had set up seems to not be
working anymore.
I have as part of filter, the content of the message appended to a plain
text file - the contents of which I then process to provide a summary of
online orders.
Now all I am getting is two bytes (looks like
to filter for headers/header contents,
or does he?
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de)
May you live all the days of your life. -- Johnathan Swift
Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com
Hello Marten,
A reminder of what Marten Gallagher typed on:
Wednesday, September 27, 2006 at 10:19:28 GMT +0100
MG Since recent version of TB a filter I have had set up seems to not be
MG working anymore.
MG I have as part of filter, the content of the message appended to a plain
MG text
Hello Marten,
A reminder of what Marten Gallagher typed on:
Wednesday, September 27, 2006 at 10:19:28 GMT +0100
MG Since recent version of TB a filter I have had set up seems to not be
MG working anymore.
MG I have as part of filter, the content of the message appended to a plain
MG text
problems with extra characters being exported,
line feeds I think. Has the file being sent changed in any way,
perhaps from a text file to an HTML file? You could copy and paste the
filter here so we could check it out further.
--
Best regards,
Stuartmailto:[EMAIL
incremented.
You could copy and paste the
filter here so we could check it out further.
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [83421330.01C4C837.1789AB65.7D40F0FD]
Name: ATM\20Order\20Details
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`7`Subject`0`ATM\20Order\20Details\20-\20atm\0D\0A}
ExportMessage FmtText filename
C
to your filter by adding the %Text macro to the
template. Maybe it will help, maybe not.
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [3EF07AB8.01C6E23E.429FD63F.69982F3F]
Name: ATM\20Order\20Details
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`7`Subject`0`ATM\20Order\20Details\20-\20atm\0D\0A}
ExportMessage FmtText filename
C
to your filter by adding the %Text macro to the
template. Maybe it will help, maybe not.
Now I'm confused... From my understanding of it, there isn't a
template involved. This below seems the same as my original.
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [3EF07AB8.01C6E23E.429FD63F
Hello Marten,
A reminder of what Marten Gallagher typed on:
Wednesday, September 27, 2006 at 15:34:46 GMT +0100
I made one change to your filter by adding the %Text macro to the
template. Maybe it will help, maybe not.
MG Now I'm confused... From my understanding of it, there isn't a
MG
When you open the Export dialog box and select export format as plain
text there is a template box beside it. If you don't change anything
in there it just takes the default text from the document, but if you
put something in there it uses that as the template for the export. I
added %Text%-
this addition...
MG Cheers muchly.
You're most welcome. As you say it can be quirky and it is giving me
grief on the filter side right now. I have a need for it to do
something like you described, but the IMAP side has a problem of
inconsistency that makes it impossible to use.
I think though
Hello TBUDL,
I am using K9 Spam filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it
possible to configure The Bat! to Filter my email by adding:
X-Text-Classification: - to the Header line. I have ticked this option
in Configuration/K9 but then am lost as to how to get this to work
with The Bat
Hello TBUDL,
I am using K9 Spam filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it
possible to configure The Bat! to Filter my email by adding:
X-Text-Classification: - to the Header line.
Yes
I have ticked this option
in Configuration/K9 but then am lost as to how to get this to work
Hello Peter,
Tuesday, September 26, 2006, 10:55:31 AM, you wrote:
Peter Hi Granville,
Peter on Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:44:50 +0100GMT (26.09.2006, 10:44 +0200GMT here),
Peter you wrote:
GC I am using K9 Spam filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it
GC possible to configure The Bat
Hallo Granville,
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:09:03 +0100GMT (26-9-2006, 12:09 , where I
live), you wrote:
GC Can't quite figure out how to do that in The Bat!. Could you give me a
GC littel more step by step help please?
The first step to follow Peter's instructions would be to upgrade to
v3, what
Hi Granville,
on Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:44:50 +0100GMT (26.09.2006, 10:44 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
GC I am using K9 Spam filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it
GC possible to configure The Bat! to Filter my email by adding:
GC X-Text-Classification: - to the Header line. I have ticked
Can't quite figure out how to do that in The Bat!. Could you give me a
littel more step by step help please?
Click Account Sorting Office/Filters
Account Drop Down Box: click on Common Filters
Click on the funnel top left
Right hand side: Name change 'new filter' to 'K9 Junk' or something
advice. Seeing that I am running version 1.62r.
What do you recommend as a solution? The problem is that my ISP is
already marking quite alot of my email as Spam. So I would like to
filter out such mail with a very different way of marking it. Can I
still do this with my current version and mark my
Hello all,
Please see:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6028
and add a supporting note if you think it would useful to you.
TIA.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.85.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
Hello Chris,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 22:48:36 -0400 GMT (08/08/2006, 09:48 +0700 GMT),
Chris W. wrote:
How did you do that? My account filters are just not triggered. Or do
you have continue with other filters checked in the account filters?
CW My common filters have Continue processing other
Hallo Thomas,
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 22:43:19 +0700GMT (6-8-2006, 17:43 , where I live),
you wrote:
TF 3.) Run the common filters first, and only if continue is checked,
TF also run the account filters. (This seems to be the case.)
This is what happens. A message is compared with the common filters
Hello Roelof,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 10:50:16 +0200 GMT (07/08/2006, 15:50 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
TF 3.) Run the common filters first, and only if continue is checked,
TF also run the account filters. (This seems to be the case.)
RO This is what happens. A message is compared with the
Hallo Thomas,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 19:05:46 +0700GMT (7-8-2006, 14:05 , where I live),
you wrote:
TF One more thing I want to achieve: Mark the original message as read
TF (but not the copy). I haven't an idea yet how to achieve that.
I haven't tested that, but what about first copying it and
Hello Roelof,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:26:50 +0200 GMT (07/08/2006, 19:26 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
TF One more thing I want to achieve: Mark the original message as read
TF (but not the copy). I haven't an idea yet how to achieve that.
RO I haven't tested that, but what about first copying
Hello Thomas,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 19:53:29 +0700GMT Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF I can copy using mark copy as read. That is not what I want. I want
TF mark original as read. Seems to be difficult.
why not move the copy to the place of the original and the original to
the place of the copy and
Hello Feli,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:00:36 +0200 GMT (07/08/2006, 20:00 +0700 GMT),
Feli Wilcke wrote:
TF I can copy using mark copy as read. That is not what I want. I want
TF mark original as read. Seems to be difficult.
FW why not move the copy to the place of the original and the original to
Hallo Thomas,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:13:49 +0700GMT (7-8-2006, 15:13 , where I live),
you wrote:
TF If I move (instead of copy) to folders in account X, how do I copy
TF back to account A/B/C?
With a second action in the same filter.
1st action: move to whatever
2nd action: copy to account
Hello Roelof,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:46:14 +0200 GMT (07/08/2006, 20:46 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
TF If I move (instead of copy) to folders in account X, how do I copy
TF back to account A/B/C?
RO With a second action in the same filter.
RO 1st action: move to whatever
RO 2nd action: copy
action in the same filter.
RO 1st action: move to whatever
RO 2nd action: copy to account of origin
How do you copy to account origin? The common filters do not
discriminate, the are shared between accounts A, B, and C.
--
Cordialement,
ArianeCourriel : [EMAIL
Hello Thomas,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 21:02:11 +0700GMT Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF How do you copy to account origin? The common filters do not
TF discriminate, the are shared between accounts A, B, and C.
subfilter for each account? (I did not test it)
--
Regards,
Feli
The Bat! 3.81.14 Beta on
filters are not trigeered.
If I mark message as read in the account-related common filter,
wouldn't the copy in the archive folder be marked as read as well?
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Wer am Ende ist, kann von vorne anfangen.
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/
Message reply created
Hello Thomas,
Monday, August 7, 2006, 7:53:29 AM, you wrote:
Roelof Otten wrote:
TF One more thing I want to achieve: Mark the original message as read
TF (but not the copy). I haven't an idea yet how to achieve that.
RO I haven't tested that, but what about first copying it and mark it as
RO
Hello Stuart,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 10:45:32 -0500 GMT (07/08/2006, 22:45 +0700 GMT),
Stuart Cuddy wrote:
I can copy using mark copy as read. That is not what I want. I want
mark original as read. Seems to be difficult.
SC I have not been following too close so pardon me if I am getting this
Hallo Ariane,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 16:07:48 +0200GMT (7-8-2006, 16:07 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
AF Please
AF I receive so many e-mail, stop your answer.
AF Best regards
AF Ariane
Hello Roelof,
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the
Dear Ariane,
@7-Aug-2006, 16:07 +0200 (07-Aug 15:07 here) Ariane Furer [AF] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Thomas:
AF I receive so many e-mail, stop your answer.
You have been moderated for top-posting. I feel I should at least
explain to you where you are - you seem to be experiencing
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF The only way I can think of is adding a subfilter to all (over
TF 100) common filters. That isn't practical.
It's good you're leaning away from a solution that involves common
subfilters, since it probably wouldn't work:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4021
--
Thomas Fernandez @ 2006-8-07 8:05:46 AM
Filter: Add Block? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would have thought that when the common filters are finsihed, a
new session with the account filters is started. It's a matter of
design, and obviously the developers decided otherwise.
The way I have things
Hello Chris,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 19:48:45 -0400 GMT (08/08/2006, 06:48 +0700 GMT),
Chris W. wrote:
I would have thought that when the common filters are finsihed, a
new session with the account filters is started. It's a matter of
design, and obviously the developers decided otherwise.
CW The
Hello George,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 11:24:34 -0700 GMT (08/08/2006, 01:24 +0700 GMT),
George Mitchell wrote:
GM It's good you're leaning away from a solution that involves common
GM subfilters, since it probably wouldn't work:
GM https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4021
Good that you mention
Thomas Fernandez @ 2006-8-07 10:00:07 PM
Filter: Add Block? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The way I have things setup, that would render most of my common
filters useless. I have a number of common filters that set user
parameters that account filters then use to do various things, like
sort
Hello TBUDL,
I'm still having some problems with my filtering system: When common
filters are triggered, account-level filters are ignored.
I cannot add Continue... to all over 100 filters, because that would
slow mail-download and automatic sorting down to an unacceptable
level.
I wonder what
triggers
an account filter it doesn't trigger any other filters either, unless
the triggered filter has 'continue processing ...' enabled.
TF I cannot add Continue... to all over 100 filters, because that would
TF slow mail-download and automatic sorting down to an unacceptable
TF level.
Of course you
filters first, and only if continue is checked,
also run the account filters. (This seems to be the case.)
4.) Run the account filters first, and only if continue is checked,
also run the common filters. (This would cause problems at my setup.)
RO After all when a message triggers an account filter
Hello Thomas,
On Thursday, July 20, 2006, 3:33:13 AM, you wrote:
T The problem is that some of these filters are empty on the share ..
T I could not solve it by deleting the filter and create it again.
T How do you create it, from scratch (New Filter...) or by copy and
T paste from an account
Lately I am getting a lot of spam with no subject. I use Bayes Filter,
which doesn't put it in the spam folder.
How can I set up my incoming filter for indicating subject: empty.
I would place it after the filter for known therefore in case one of
my correspondent forget to put a subject line
..
page the next time I open TB. Some filters will hold the selection
others will not.
I could not solve it by deleting the filter and create it again.
I could not find it in the bug reports.
Does any one have some sollution for this (or is it known?)
In addition to this When copying and pasting
this.
EvD I could not solve it by deleting the filter and create it again.
EvD I could not find it in the bug reports.
Hm. That's how I solved it, by deleting and creating again. How do you
create it, from scratch (New Filter...) or by copy and paste from an
account filter?
I also noticed that when
Hello Bat-Folk!
Hey Team Bat! Rich here running TB! v2.12 and I now have a filter that
REDIRECTS certain incoming mssgs. OK? OK.
PROBLEM: They sit in the Outbox UNSENT! How can I force an instant send
for this filter?
Thx all
RG
--
Beautiful Butterfly Displays
http://FramedButterflyArt.com
Hello Bat-Folk!
a filter that REDIRECTS certain incoming mssgs.
How can I force an instant send?
Account Sorting Office/Filters
Highlight filter in left pane
Right pane Options
Bottom box 'Send generated messages'
Click Radio button: 'Immediately'
--
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web
the mails come from, or for certan
customers.
I have at least two active accounts (B and C), which are the correspondence
accounts, such as sales or accounting.
By way of common filter, mails incoming to B and C are copied into the country
folders of A. This way, when I use the folder tab Unread
Hallo Thomas,
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 11:29:51 + (UTC)GMT (6-7-2006, 13:29 , where I
live), you wrote:
TF How could I get the mails in Inboxes of accounts B and C automatically
marked
TF read, while the copies in the folders of account A remain unread?
Create sub-filters for your common filters
filters and have those subfilters
RO set the message as read.
Apart from creating over 100 subfilters: Would these only mark the
originals as read, not the copies?
And if so, is there a way use just one filter, instead of having to
create so many subfilters?
RO Something else that might work is set
Hi,
this is probably something really simple, but I can't figure
out what I'm missing:
I am trying to set up a new filter to have mail by several
senders put into a new folder.
I *think* having their email addresses in the strings as
sender and presence yes should do that, but I've had no
luck
Hallo Susanne,
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:38:51 -0700GMT (23-6-2006, 20:38 , where I
live), you wrote:
S I am trying to set up a new filter to have mail by several
S senders put into a new folder.
S I *think* having their email addresses in the strings as
S sender and presence yes should do
Hi,
Friday, June 23, 2006, 12:25:26 PM,[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should take care that every address is combined as an OR
condition and not as AND.
Okay, after putting three of the addresses into the
Alternatives it appears to be working!
I hadn't realized that anything listed under
Hi,
Friday, June 23, 2006, 12:25:26 PM,[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It should work as you describe it. Is the filter et as active?
Yes.
Is it
your intention to have mail from all senders moved to your new folder?
Yes, though just from four specific senders. All other are still supposed
I have a filter that allows me to change the Subject header which, on save
and close, sends the reuslting amended email to a sub-folder of an account.
Now what I want to do is: whenever an email arrives in that sub-folder to
trigger anoither filter automatically to re-direct teh email to another
Hello Admin,
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:59:10 +0100 GMT (20/06/2006, 05:59 +0700 GMT),
Admin at AK wrote:
AaA I cannot see a filter condition that means:
AaA As soon as an email arrives in this sub-folder, re-direct it.
AaA There is nothing common about the messages apart from
I'm trying to get a filter to match the header string
X-Spam-Level: **--with notible lack of success. Can anyone tell me
what I have to do to get this to work?
Thanks in advance.
--
Best wishes,
M-K
Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL
Hello Munango-Keewati everyone else,
on 16-Jun-2006 at 01:39 you (Munango-Keewati) wrote:
I'm trying to get a filter to match the header string
X-Spam-Level: **--with notible lack of success. Can anyone tell me
what I have to do to get this to work?
The best is to first add the header
Munango-Keewati wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm trying to get a filter to match the header string
X-Spam-Level: **--with notible lack of success. Can anyone tell me
what I have to do to get this to work?
Header match ^X-Spam-Level:\s\*\*
should do it.
--
Mike
The Bat! v. 3.80.06
Hello Alexander,
On Sunday, June 18, 2006 at 9:36:37 PM Alexander [ASK] wrote:
I'm trying to get a filter to match the header string
X-Spam-Level: **--with notible lack of success. Can anyone tell me
what I have to do to get this to work?
ASK The best is to first add the header field you
Hello Peter Palmreuther everyone else,
on 18-Jun-2006 at 21:59 you (Peter Palmreuther) wrote:
I'd make this match and ^\*\*\s*$, unless the OP wants to filter
all mail that contains *at least* two asterixes in X-Spam-Level:.
I assumed this, yes.
My provider adds the same header
Peter Palmreuther wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sunday, June 18, 2006 at 9:36:37 PM Alexander [ASK] wrote:
I'm trying to get a filter to match the header string
X-Spam-Level: **--with notible lack of success. Can anyone tell me
what I have to do to get this to work?
ASK The best
On Sunday, June 18, 2006, 2:36:37 PM, you wrote:
on 16-Jun-2006 at 01:39 you (Munango-Keewati) wrote:
I'm trying to get a filter to match the header string
X-Spam-Level: **--with notible lack of success. Can anyone tell me
what I have to do to get this to work?
Thanks to everyone who
Michael L. Cusac @ 2006-6-18 4:07:01 PM
Simple Filter mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go to Options / Preferences / Messages / Message Headers.
Click on Add and type the information for the header field
(uncheck all three checkboxes).
This step is not necessary...
I believe it's necessary, else X
Hello Robert,
yes. OK. I made a test; subject contains xyzzy then KILL.
but, this is seemingly useless in that
the offending message remains on server (forever)
...
I was able to see that (using dispatcher window) that the Read became
unchecked.
I just see I had an error in my last mail.
Hello Robert,
Martin Schuster waved a wand then said : '
M Try activating the dispatcher:\
hehe, did I? ;-)
I put a nonsense filter under the Selective Download tab. It looks to
see if qwerty is in the Sender position.
When I hit shift-ctrl-F2, I see the *Read* is still checked. I also
It is said that Martin Schuster concocted the following rebuttal : '
M Hello Robert,
Martin Schuster waved a wand then said : '
M hehe, did I? ;-)
indeed, you did, then the message turned to a frog.
M An example maybe says more: I have a selective download filter
M Subject contains any
Martin Schuster waved a wand then said : '
M Try activating the dispatcher:\
I put a nonsense filter under the Selective Download tab. It looks to
see if qwerty is in the Sender position.
When I hit shift-ctrl-F2, I see the *Read* is still checked. I also
never see Statistics Tab *Tested
Hello Robert,
Also, now that I am playing around trying to make a Selective DL
Filter ... just how does one invoke Selective Download so that one may
verify operation of S-D/L filters?
Try activating the dispatcher: for mails where the selective download
filter would be activated the read
It is said that Chris concocted the following rebuttal : '
C Feature request?
Yes. Indeed! I'll try it. Although, after the last one I did; and
then reading several comments about the lack of action ON Feature
Request, it might be like p*ing in the wind.
--
Regards,
Robert D.
:flag-us-ky:
50k on
emails.
I would prefer to narrow THAT option down to some specific criteria
and have the filter choose to trash or send to me. I get tired of the
lack of automation available to that particular List to which I
(did) belong.
It's become tedious to see twenty of those [Large Message] emails. TB
Robert D. @ 5/19/2006 6:48:50 AM
Filter on Message Size mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyway, lacking the ability in TB!, I unsubscribed from the
otherwise enjoyable list.
Feature request?
--
Chris
Quoting when replying to this message is good for you and me.
Using The Bat! v3.80.03 on Windows XP
Hallo Robert,
On Wed, 17 May 2006 21:22:19 -0400GMT (18-5-2006, 3:22 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RD Does anyone know of a way to filter inbound messages based on the size
RD of the message?
The sorting office has a 'message size' condition, did you try that?
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Veni
It is said that Roelof Otten concocted the following rebuttal : '
R The sorting office has a 'message size' condition, did you try
R that?
Yes it does.
However, that choice never appears when constructing a filter within
the pseudo-account called 'Selective Download'. Rather a considerable
It is said that Robert D. concocted the following rebuttal : '
R Rather a considerable downsized list of selections occupies the
R pop-up as seen in the jpeg hopefully attached to this reply
which I see did not
so look here at it:
http://www.denstarfarm.us/Public/bats.jpg
--
Regards,
Robert
Hallo Robert,
On Thu, 18 May 2006 07:13:59 -0400GMT (18-5-2006, 13:13 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
R The sorting office has a 'message size' condition, did you try
R that?
RD However, that choice never appears when constructing a filter within
RD the pseudo-account called 'Selective Download
Recently, Roelof Otten squawked : '
R In that case you're out of luck.
Pity that. It seems to me that since they knew how to read the message
size and incorporated that in other Sorting Office Filters, that they
could have just as easily placed the same Size filter in the selective
download
Hello Robert,
On Thu, 18 May 2006 18:05:58 -0400 GMT (19/05/2006, 05:05 +0700 GMT),
Robert D. wrote:
RD In fact, personally, it makes more sense to use it BEFORE one has to
RD download ten 512mb Fido pictures not after the fact. What is the
RD pragmatic use of filtering on message size when you
Hello Robert,
On Tue, 16 May 2006 23:34:11 -0400 GMT (17/05/2006, 10:34 +0700 GMT),
Robert D. wrote:
RD Also, now that I am playing around trying to make a Selective DL
RD Filter ... just how does one invoke Selective Download so that one may
RD verify operation of S-D/L filters? I tried Alt
Does anyone know of a way to filter inbound messages based on the size
of the message?
--
Regards,
Robert D.
:flag-us-ky:
_
The Bat! Version: 3.80.06
Windows ME
FireFox
Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL
I would like to run the mail dispatcher and {IF} it sees mail from a
certain list {AND} the mail size is over 30k {THEN} delete it {ELSE}
download the email in this account's Inbox on the server.
I can't seem to find a way to do that; no references to Size;
seemingly no way to make a filter under
on the server.
That's not the despatcher's job; Selective Download filters do that.
RD I can't seem to find a way to do that; no references to Size;
RD seemingly no way to make a filter under the 'Selective Download'
RD name in the account's tree.
Why not? Main menu: Account / Sorting Office
filter on the size. See below ... I mixed the two
T Why not? Main menu: Account / Sorting Office / Selective Download.
T What do you see there?
OK ... I see it ... I was kind of mixing Mail Dispatcher and Selective
Download into the same bag. Wrong on my part ... However, I still see
I can
Recently, Thomas Fernandez squawked : '
T Why not? Main menu: Account / Sorting Office / Selective Download.
T What do you see there?
Also, now that I am playing around trying to make a Selective DL
Filter ... just how does one invoke Selective Download so that one may
verify operation of S-D
these as junk mail. Any
TH preset mailbox filter should override any other filter in TB.
I have to disagree on that. It regularly happens to me that I'm
receiving spam via non-moderated mailing lists. I like it very much
for those messages, that they're not processed by the matching mailing
list
Hallo Roelof,
On Fri, 12 May 2006 10:46:20 +0200GMT (12-5-2006, 10:46 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO that they're not processed by the matching mailing list, but
^
filter
Hello Roelof,
Friday, May 12, 2006, 1:46:20 AM, you wrote:
There is a solution for your problem. So don't use an anti-spam
plug-in, but you have to use an anti-spam proxy.
Do you think it has anything to do with the fact that I am using AGAVA
AntiSpamServant 2.1.6? Do you think I'd have
Hello TBUDL,
On certain occasions I'm finding mail that I have created filters
for in my Junk folder. TB has been doing this on and off for some
time now... Anyone have any insight on this?
--
Regards,
Tim
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! Version 3.80.03
Windows XP Version 5.1
Hallo Tim,
On Thu, 11 May 2006 11:53:07 -0700GMT (11-5-2006, 20:53 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
TH On certain occasions I'm finding mail that I have created filters
TH for in my Junk folder. TB has been doing this on and off for some
TH time now... Anyone have any insight on this?
Hello Roelof,
Thursday, May 11, 2006, 2:51:38 PM, you wrote:
That's because those messages trigger your anti spam plug-in
That's my point... what kind of intelligence is that? The whole point
in setting mailbox filters is so TB does not see these as junk mail. Any
preset mailbox filter should
Is there any way to filter on a property of the message being replied
to (in an Outgoing filter). What I want to do is if the original
message is in a given color group, add my reply to that color group as
well.
Also, is there any way to filter on thread membership? What I want to
do is have
Hallo Chris,
On Tue, 9 May 2006 01:25:06 -0500GMT (9-5-2006, 8:25 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
C I have a suspicion that I won't be able to do either...
You're completely right about that.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Wizard's Guild Parking Only: Violators will be Toad.
The Bat! 3.80.03
Windows
401 - 500 of 3249 matches
Mail list logo
