Re: Problem with replying
Hallo Tony, On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 14:28:12 +0100GMT (28-11-2005, 14:28 +0100, where I live), you wrote: RO>> Could you post your reply template here? T> See below Well, nothing odd there. Were you replying with TB? TB is supposed to insert In-Reply-To: and References: when replying to messages, but they weren't present in your reply. And to confuse things even more, they were present in your original message and that was supposed to be a newly created one. Something is messing up your system (unless you're doing that deliberately) Could it be that you're using folder templates that are confusing the matter? -- Groetjes, Roelof "Windows 95: Making Windows work just like a Mac did 10 years ago!" The Bat! 3.62.14 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpeFimtrZKox.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with replying
Hello , RO> Could you post your reply template here? See below, excluding the === Hello %OFromFName, %ODateEn, %OTimeLongEn, you wrote: %quote %cursor -- Best regards, Tony %Cookie -- Best regards, Tony 43% of all statistics are worthless. Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with replying
Hallo Tony, On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 07:58:49 +0100GMT (28-11-2005, 7:58 +0100, where I live), you wrote: T> Lately I've problems with replying to posts like the one below. T> There is no quoted text. Could you post your reply template here? -- Groetjes, Roelof "Imagination is more important than knowledge." - Albert Einstein The Bat! 3.62.14 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpiQT0OmLYD7.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with replying
Recently, Tony squawked: > Lately I've problems with replying to posts like the one below. > There is no quoted text. **IF** the following line, from your email, is at the top, as it is in your email, then you may want to check your Reply Template for the way it personally handles the cut-mark --- XXX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: this used to stop all reply text in my emails until I fixed a regex problem I had in a reply-template I had mistakenly _tweaked_. Since I am horrible with constructing Regex', I totally goofed it up. -- Bye Now, Robert D. _ The Bat! Version: 3.63.05 (Beta) Windows ME FireFox Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Problem with replying
Lately I've problems with replying to posts like the one below. There is no quoted text. Same problem with messages that contain something similar to: --- XXX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is a forwarded message From: forex5x <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Saturday, November 26, 2005, 6:55:14 PM Subject: [ForexSystemBuilders] MT3 versus MT4 - and the API ===8<==Original message text=== At the time work was started on this and I believe still the API for MT4 is not yet available and InterbankFX is going to keep the server for MT3 running as long as there are clients that want to use it. As things become available we can upgrade or move to the next step. Hopefully, the lessons we learn along the way will make the process easier and easier. Also, we want it to be more and more dependable as it develops so that we can pretty much let it go without watching it. We can use this forum to keep each other informed. I had several people request to work on the API so there will be more people helping out than was listed in the first emails. Glad to see some people working on this, Steve AKA Forex5x From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 9:06 AM To: ubu_77 Subject: Re: [ForexSystemBuilders] Re: Has anyone gotten the data feed to come in on the Ami/MT API? Hello ubu_77, Saturday, November 26, 2005, 3:24:50 PM, you wrote: U> I was a little surprised to see that the plug-in was for MT3. That's because there is no API for MT4. According to MetaQuotes there never will be one because a/the API gives security issues. -- Best regards, Tony Friendship is what binds the world together in peace, may we all become friends. SPONSORED LINKS Business finance uk Business finance course Business finance online course Business finance class Small business finance Business finance schools YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "ForexSystemBuilders" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. ===8<===End of original message text=== -- Best regards, Tonymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with replying to mailing lists
Dear Paul, @10-Apr-2004, 17:59 -0400 (10-Apr 22:59 UK time) Paul Cartwright [PC] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MDP>> Okay, okay! I'll bite. PC> no, don't bite! I heard you were a nice sharing kinda guy:) ! MDP>> PC> ok, I'll make SURE I add the: "%TO=''" string ;) PC> wait, I had it as this way: PC> %To=""%To="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Okay. That will work. PC> you used single quotes.. use either - use underscores - use hash signs. Any matched character pair will do: %To=""%To="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" %To=''%To='[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.05 Beta/16 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 ' pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with replying to mailing lists
On Saturday, April 10, 2004, 3:45 PM, you wrote: DW>> I just searched the archives, and can find a reference by Marck to his DW>> 'folder templates are evil lecture', but not the post itself. MDP> Okay, okay! I'll bite. no, don't bite! I heard you were a nice sharing kinda guy:) MDP> ok, I'll make SURE I add the: "%TO=''" string ;) wait, I had it as this way: %To=""%To="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" you used single quotes.. -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.05 Beta/14 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Mar2004 (4.1.357) (avast! version number) 0404-6 (09.04.2004) (avast! DB version number) 4.1.357 (avast! plugin version number) Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with replying to mailing lists
Dear Doug, @10-Apr-2004, 21:38 Doug Weller [DW] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: >> There are "dangers" in using Folder Templates that are not there >> when you use AB templates. DW> Ok. I want all my lists to work the same way. Nice ideal but, in fact, there are two different types of list - ones that supply the correct "Reply-To" header to help you write back to the list and ones that don't. I maintain 2 distinct AB groups too for lists I write to with PGP signing and list that I write to without signing. DW> At the moment I'm used to clicking on the sender's address in DW> the header field if I want to reply to the sender, and on the DW> reply button if I want to reply to the list, so I'm not too DW> worried about doing it the wrong way with a Folder Template. Well you should be!!! The first option will *fail* when there is a folder template. All other options will be fine. You will be impeded from replying privately to any posting in a folder which has a reply template that changes the "to" address. DW> However -- I'd like to try address templates. I can't find them DW> in the Help file. They're there. Just look up "Address book" in the index. Every group in the AB can have its own reply templates. There's a link on the first page of AB help to the templates. DW> ... (and how to set a group one for my mailing list group) Same as any other. My unsigned list group template (translated slightly) looks something like this: Dear %ABofromHandle(%ABofromFIRSTNAME(%OFROMFNAME)),%- %SINGLERE%QINCLUDE="QSUBJ" %wrapped="@%odate, %otime %OFROMNAME [%qinclude(Initials)] %- in %QINCLUDE(MSGID)" said %QINCLUDE="StrippedQuotes"%- %TO=''%TO='"%ABOFROMNamePrefix(%ABOFROMName(%OFROMNAME)) %- on %ABOREPLYHANDLE(%ABOREPLYFIRSTNAME)" <%OREPLYADDR>'%- (cutmark excluded to avoid confusion, but this is where it goes). %QINCLUDE="sig" -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.05 Beta/16 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 ' pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with replying to mailing lists
Hi Marck, Saturday, April 10, 2004, 8:45:55 PM, you wrote: [SNIP] > There is nothing else for which folder templates can be used that > can't be covered and even improved upon using Address Book templates. > There are "dangers" in using Folder Templates that are not there when > you use AB templates. Ok. I want all my lists to work the same way. At the moment I'm used to clicking on the sender's address in the header field if I want to reply to the sender, and on the reply button if I want to reply to the list, so I'm not too worried about doing it the wrong way with a Folder Template. However -- I'd like to try address templates. I can't find them in the Help file. This is probably because I'm looking in the wrong place, but I also tried the archives and turned up too many pages to go through. Is there a quick guide to these? I've done a web search also and found a bit, but I'm still unclear as to how I'd use these for my purpose (and how to set a group one for my mailing list group) Thanks. Doug -- Doug Weller Moderator, sci.archaeology.moderated Submissions to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Doug and Helen's Dogs: http://www.dougandhelen.com Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.co.uk Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with replying to mailing lists
Dear Doug, @10-Apr-2004, 20:33 Doug Weller [DW] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Jonathan: >> Something like that, I think it's been mentioned in the past for >> folder templates, if you do a search for Marck's "folder >> templates are evil" reply, you can normally find a bunch of >> suggestions ;) DW> I just searched the archives, and can find a reference by Marck to his DW> 'folder templates are evil lecture', but not the post itself. Okay, okay! I'll bite. I have a pet hate in TB. That pet hate is named "Folder Templates". In 150 folders I have two and only two that have folder templates. They are for two specific lists which don't set the reply address properly. There is nothing else for which folder templates can be used that can't be covered and even improved upon using Address Book templates. There are "dangers" in using Folder Templates that are not there when you use AB templates. The dangers are all complacency based and are at their worst in templates which use the "%TO=" macro. If, at the instant you start a new message you happen to be focused on the wrong folder, the message gets given the wrong address. This happens when you click a mailto without changing folders. The results vary from embarrassing to excruciating depending upon the content of the misdirected mail. BTW - another mistake in such templates is to use the construct %TO="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" without a "%TO=''" before it. So any pre-existing addresses are retained. Back to the lecture: every time I say this, someone takes exception to something I've said with comments like "'danger' is a bit harsh" or "I've used Folder templates for ages and it's never gone wrong for me". Here's a fact for you: it goes wrong. That's why I'm writing this message yet again. It works exactly as designed and that design has a fundamental flaw. The flaw is that it places too much responsibility on the user to make sure that the addresses given on a new message are those intended. With address book templates, there is never a mistake of this kind. Replies are perfectly directed. New messages are "a bit trickier". Instead of clicking to the folder then clicking for a new message, you have to click to the right of the new message button and select the list address from the favourites (having denoted that the address *is* a favourite in the address book). -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.05 Beta/16 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 ' pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with replying to mailing lists
Hi Jonathan, Saturday, April 10, 2004, 6:09:12 PM, you wrote: > Something like that, I think it's been mentioned in the past for > folder templates, if you do a search for Marck's "folder templates are > evil" reply, you can normally find a bunch of suggestions ;) I just searched the archives, and can find a reference by Marck to his 'folder templates are evil lecture', but not the post itself. DOug -- Doug Weller Moderator, sci.archaeology.moderated Submissions to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Doug and Helen's Dogs: http://www.dougandhelen.com Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.co.uk Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with replying to mailing lists
On Saturday, April 10, 2004, Paul Cartwright wrote... DW>>> But it's now going to both the sender and the list. How do I get DW>>> rid of the sender's address? RO>> Change it to: RO>> %To=""%To="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" RO>> The first %To macro empties the To: header (see the help) > nice, I like that! I just used that for my list: > %To=""%To="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" There is some extra safety that you can put in in the case of folder templates which has been suggested if you _have_ to use them... it's an IF :) I don't remember the exact syntax, but something like this: %IF:%TO="":%TO="[EMAIL PROTECTED]":%- Something like that, I think it's been mentioned in the past for folder templates, if you do a search for Marck's "folder templates are evil" reply, you can normally find a bunch of suggestions ;) -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Using The Bat! v2.05 Beta/16 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Support your local medical examiner: die strangely! pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with replying to mailing lists
On Saturday, April 10, 2004, 7:18 AM, you wrote: RO>NOTE THAT THIS IS DANGEROUS!!! Whenever you might want to reply off RO>list (with a personal message) you can be very embarrassed or even RO>financially duped (depending on the message) by sending a message RO>to the list without intending to do so. Don't think that this won't RO>happen to you, it will, it happens to everybody with folder RO>templates hardcoding the intended recipient. I have caught a number of people using folder templates, I understand the concept and issues involved. RO> I thought I'd better mention it again before calling Marck's eternal RO> wrath over me. what, that kind and sharing moderator??? -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.05 Beta/14 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Mar2004 (4.1.357) (avast! version number) 0404-6 (09.04.2004) (avast! DB version number) 4.1.357 (avast! plugin version number) Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with replying to mailing lists
Hallo Paul, On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 06:55:33 -0400GMT (10-4-04, 12:55 +0200, where I live), you wrote: PC> nice, I like that! I just used that for my list: PC> %To=""%To="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Well, just keep in mind what i said in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTE THAT THIS IS DANGEROUS!!! Whenever you might want to reply off list (with a personal message) you can be very embarrassed or even financially duped (depending on the message) by sending a message to the list without intending to do so. Don't think that this won't happen to you, it will, it happens to everybody with folder templates hardcoding the intended recipient. I thought I'd better mention it again before calling Marck's eternal wrath over me. -- Groetjes, Roelof Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies or rabbits. Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with replying to mailing lists
DW>> But it's now going to both the sender and the list. How do I get rid of DW>> the sender's address? RO> Change it to: RO> %To=""%To="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" RO> The first %To macro empties the To: header (see the help) nice, I like that! I just used that for my list: %To=""%To="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.05 Beta/14 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Mar2004 (4.1.357) (avast! version number) 0404-6 (09.04.2004) (avast! DB version number) 4.1.357 (avast! plugin version number) Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with replying to mailing lists
On Saturday, April 10, 2004, 4:41 AM, you wrote: DW>> I searched and thought I'd found an answer to the problem of replying DW>> to a list when the list is set to reply to the sender. DW>> I put %Reply-To="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" in my reply template for the DW>> folder, but it didn't have an affect. RO> When you want to do a list reply, you might choose for several RO> options: RO> 1) Right mouse click on the To: header of the incoming message and go RO>for 'Reply to this address' RO> I'd go for the first option. I have that same problem with a list I'm on, and I use method #1 also, because sometimes I DO reply off-list:0) -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.05 Beta/14 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Mar2004 (4.1.357) (avast! version number) 0404-6 (09.04.2004) (avast! DB version number) 4.1.357 (avast! plugin version number) Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with replying to mailing lists
Hallo Doug, On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 10:46:35 +0100GMT (10-4-04, 11:46 +0200, where I live), you wrote: DW> Thanks. I've also now found the appropriate help file. Now if I could DW> figure out how to make the reply macro also capitalise the first letter DW> of the recipient's name in "Hi %tofname". From the same helpfile: CAPITAL = "text"Convert text to title case with a capitalised first letter for every word in the string. CAPITALFIRST = "text" or UCFIRST = "text" Convert text to sentence case capitalising the first character of the first word -- Groetjes, Roelof Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies or rabbits. Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with replying to mailing lists
Hi Roelof, Saturday, April 10, 2004, 10:21:45 AM, you wrote: [SNIP] DW>> But it's now going to both the sender and the list. How do I get rid of DW>> the sender's address? > Change it to: > %To=""%To="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > The first %To macro empties the To: header (see the help) Thanks. I've also now found the appropriate help file. Now if I could figure out how to make the reply macro also capitalise the first letter of the recipient's name in "Hi %tofname". Is there anyway I can put Ctl+/ in there? Doug -- Doug Weller Moderator, sci.archaeology.moderated Submissions to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Doug and Helen's Dogs: http://www.dougandhelen.com Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.co.uk Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with replying to mailing lists
Hallo Doug, On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 10:04:54 +0100GMT (10-4-04, 11:04 +0200, where I live), you wrote: DW> I think I can live with this on the mailing lists I have in mind. DW> Knowing what what I've done is wrong and why, thanks to your response, Just be aware of the risk... DW> I've just now put this in the reply template: DW> %To="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" DW> But it's now going to both the sender and the list. How do I get rid of DW> the sender's address? Change it to: %To=""%To="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" The first %To macro empties the To: header (see the help) -- Groetjes, Roelof Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies or rabbits. Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with replying to mailing lists
Hi Roelof, Saturday, April 10, 2004, 9:41:54 AM, you wrote: > Hallo Doug, > On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 08:58:32 +0100GMT (10-4-04, 9:58 +0200, where I > live), you wrote: DW>> I searched and thought I'd found an answer to the problem of replying DW>> to a list when the list is set to reply to the sender. DW>> I put %Reply-To="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" in my reply template for the DW>> folder, but it didn't have an affect. > That wouldn't influence the address your replies are beingsent to, but > that changes the address that answers to your messages are being sent > to. I don't know whether that was what you intended Nope, I see what you mean now. > When you want to do a list reply, you might choose for several > options: > 1) Right mouse click on the To: header of the incoming message and go >for 'Reply to this address' Trouble is, I forget to do it! When I remember, I do that. > 2) Use or via the menu Message->Reply to All in >order to reply to the message, that way the message both gets sent >to the original poster and the list. This might cause the OP to >answer you off list, but you can't get everything. True, not a bad solution but I know I don't like getting 2 replies. > 3) Create a folder reply template that sets the To-address to the >list. NOTE THAT THIS IS DANGEROUS!!! Whenever you might want to >reply off list (with a personal message) you can be very >embarrassed or even financially duped (depending on the message) by >sending a message to the list without intending to do so. Don't >think that this won't happen to you, it will, it happens to >everybody with folder templates hardcoding the intended recipient. I think I can live with this on the mailing lists I have in mind. Knowing what what I've done is wrong and why, thanks to your response, I've just now put this in the reply template: %To="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" But it's now going to both the sender and the list. How do I get rid of the sender's address? [SNIP] DW>> I found this as a change in recent versions of TheBat! DW>> "Don't use From name for Reply-TO addresses" option. DW>> However, I can't find the option so haven't been able to test it. > Unless I'm mistaken by your question, this has nothing to do with what > you intended, but you can find it at: > Account -> Properties -> Templates -> Reply -> somewhere below Thanks. Yes, thinking about it again it has nothing to do with what I want to do.:-) Thanks for such a full and fast response. Doug -- Doug Weller Moderator, sci.archaeology.moderated Submissions to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Doug and Helen's Dogs: http://www.dougandhelen.com Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.co.uk Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with replying to mailing lists
Hallo Doug, On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 08:58:32 +0100GMT (10-4-04, 9:58 +0200, where I live), you wrote: DW> I searched and thought I'd found an answer to the problem of replying DW> to a list when the list is set to reply to the sender. DW> I put %Reply-To="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" in my reply template for the DW> folder, but it didn't have an affect. That wouldn't influence the address your replies are beingsent to, but that changes the address that answers to your messages are being sent to. I don't know whether that was what you intended When you want to do a list reply, you might choose for several options: 1) Right mouse click on the To: header of the incoming message and go for 'Reply to this address' 2) Use or via the menu Message->Reply to All in order to reply to the message, that way the message both gets sent to the original poster and the list. This might cause the OP to answer you off list, but you can't get everything. 3) Create a folder reply template that sets the To-address to the list. NOTE THAT THIS IS DANGEROUS!!! Whenever you might want to reply off list (with a personal message) you can be very embarrassed or even financially duped (depending on the message) by sending a message to the list without intending to do so. Don't think that this won't happen to you, it will, it happens to everybody with folder templates hardcoding the intended recipient. 4) Even though I warned against it. Create a folder forward template that acts like a reply template with the list address hardcoded, use the %ModifyOnce macro to ensure that you can manually edit the To: header in case of a real forward. 5) Use a third party tool (a pop3 proxy ore a mail server) that's able to insert headers. Use it to insert Reply-To headers in those list messages that don't have one, thus causing TB to automatically send replies to the address indicated by the Reply-To header. You'd need to take care that your tool doesn't alter Reply-To headers already present, because the OP might prefer off list replies. 6) Use a filter that saves your list messages to a file by means of a template like this: | Reply-To: list-address | %Headers | | %Text Furthermore the filter should delete the original message and run TB as an external program with the /Import parameter to import the message into TB's message base. (Preferably to the folder you'd like to save those list messages, as imported messages aren't filtered anymore.) Note that this might cause duplicate Reply-To: headers in the list messages and I don't know how TB reacts to that, as there should only be one. I'd go for the first option. DW> I found this as a change in recent versions of TheBat! DW> "Don't use From name for Reply-TO addresses" option. DW> However, I can't find the option so haven't been able to test it. Unless I'm mistaken by your question, this has nothing to do with what you intended, but you can find it at: Account -> Properties -> Templates -> Reply -> somewhere below -- Groetjes, Roelof Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies or rabbits. Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Problem with replying to mailing lists
Hello, I searched and thought I'd found an answer to the problem of replying to a list when the list is set to reply to the sender. I put %Reply-To="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" in my reply template for the folder, but it didn't have an affect. I found this as a change in recent versions of TheBat! "Don't use From name for Reply-TO addresses" option. However, I can't find the option so haven't been able to test it. Sorry for what must have been asked and answered before, but I have spent some time trying to figure it out but gave up. :-) Doug -- Doug Weller Moderator, sci.archaeology.moderated Submissions to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.co.uk Doug and Helen's Dogs: http://www.dougandhelen.com Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with Replying
On Monday, August 4, 2003, 11:28:30 AM, Chris wrote: > I'm having a problem with replying to messages in The Bat! The problem > is that The Bat! will only include some of the original message in the > reply - not all of the text. Is there an option to set how much of the > text The Bat! includes in the reply, or is this some sort of bug? I > want The Bat! to include all the text of the message I'm replying to, > no matter how long it is. You don't say how you are replying, or what text is missing, but two things spring to mind: - TB! does not quote sigs in replies, so everything below the sig delimiter will be cut (-- ) - f4 only quotes the highlighted text. One way to get round the chopping of the sig is to use the %text macro in your reply template. This appears to quote the whole of the original text, including the text below the sig delimiter. If you changes the template you use for the list, don't forget you will need to manually trim your reply to get rid of the sig text, or use f4 on the text you want to reply to. Julian -- Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with Replying
Some time around 8/4/2003 06:28:30, I think I heard Chris say: > Hi, > I'm having a problem with replying to messages in The Bat! The problem > is that The Bat! will only include some of the original message in the > reply - not all of the text. You are refering of course to the body of the message, not the headers, right? dZ. -- Powered by The Bat! v1.62r Hindered by MS Windows 2000 build 5.0.2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with Replying
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 C> I'm having a problem with replying to messages in The Bat! How are you generating your reply? - -- Stuart Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com ... Lotus 6-6-6 Spreadsheet of the Beast -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0 iQA/AwUBPy41ndttnLhkydF1EQJAkACeLMX6pLWsn3p00acRJLT1fqTbrdYAn0R5 wonpUPZN9qGeXla++Cwvqt2i =v7Qx -END PGP SIGNATURE- . Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Problem with Replying
Hi, I'm having a problem with replying to messages in The Bat! The problem is that The Bat! will only include some of the original message in the reply - not all of the text. Is there an option to set how much of the text The Bat! includes in the reply, or is this some sort of bug? I want The Bat! to include all the text of the message I'm replying to, no matter how long it is. -- Chris Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
