Re: Registration question

Dear Nick, @19-May-2004, 14:24 -0400 (19-May 19:24 UK time) Nick OHare [NO] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MDP>> ... v1 and v2 keys are *not* interchangeable. You may not use MDP>> a v1 key for v2 or vice versa. You or your friend will have to MDP>> grab a v2 to go with that v2 key. Oh y

Re[2]: Registration question

Hello Marck, Tuesday, May 18, 2004, 8:34:49 PM, you wrote: MDP> Dear Nick, MDP> @18-May-2004, 20:30 -0400 (19-May 01:30 UK time) Nick OHare [NO] in MDP> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: NO>> The only other thing I can think may be complicating this is that I NO>> downloaded and set up the Bat! v. 1.

Re: Registration question

Nick Ohare, [NO] wrote: NO> It's been years since I went through the registration process and NO> obviously forgot one of the steps. The email he received clearly NO> shows the Bat! key and the Bat! key checksum but he's confused as NO> what the Key password is. He was asked to define a password w

Re: Registration question

Dear Nick, @18-May-2004, 20:30 -0400 (19-May 01:30 UK time) Nick OHare [NO] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: NO> The only other thing I can think may be complicating this is that I NO> downloaded and set up the Bat! v. 1.62 on his machine and he bought a NO> license for v.2 It is the only thing. v

Registration question

Hi All, After many years of pitching the Bat! I finally convinced a friend to switch over to the Bat! (that makes a total of 5 happy converts!). However he called me with a problem last night regarding registering his copy of the Bat! that I couldn't help him with. It's been years since I went th

Re: Registration question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, January 17, 2002, at 4:01:31 PM PST, ETM wrote: > I think I am going to go eat some worms. I registered last night. Unless I'm just hallucinating (entirely possible), I seem to remember reading on the TB! web site - during the "Holiday

Re[2]: Registration question

I think I am going to go eat some worms. I registered last night. Elaine > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > Hi Peter, > On 17 January 2002 at 21:31:08 +0100 (which was 20:31 where I > live)Peter Palmreuther wrote to Nicholas on TBUDL and made these > points: N>>> i just re

Re: Registration question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Peter, On 17 January 2002 at 21:31:08 +0100 (which was 20:31 where I live)Peter Palmreuther wrote to Nicholas on TBUDL and made these points: N>> i just registered (literally haven't gotten my key yet) any way N>> will i have to buy a new key

Re: Registration question

Hello Nicholas, On Thursday, January 17, 2002 at 8:58:13 PM you wrote (at least in part): N> i just registered (literally haven't gotten my key yet) any way will N> i have to buy a new key will 2.0.0 comes out? To our latest informations: yes. To the same information it might be there an di

Registration question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello tbudl, i just registered (literally haven't gotten my key yet) any way will i have to buy a new key will 2.0.0 comes out? - -- Best regards, Nicholas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version

Re[2]: Registration question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello GJim, Wednesday, January 16, 2002, 8:32:15 PM, you wrote: G> Howdy Nicholas, G> Wednesday, January 16, 2002, 6:27:27 PM, G> you wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> Hello tbudl, >> when should my registration arr

Re: Registration question

Howdy Nicholas, Wednesday, January 16, 2002, 6:27:27 PM, you wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > Hello tbudl, > when should my registration arrive? i registered at 2:00 PM it is now > 8:27 PM any ideas? > - -- > Best regards, > Nicholas ma

Registration question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello tbudl, when should my registration arrive? i registered at 2:00 PM it is now 8:27 PM any ideas? - -- Best regards, Nicholas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQA/AwUBPEYogr

Re: Registration Question (boxed ver.)

> From: Alan Poulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Randy Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Registration Question (boxed ver.) > > Monday, December 31, 2001, 9:49:58 AM, Randy Burns wrote: > > > How long should I wait for a reply to an emailed registrat

Re: Registration Question (boxed ver.)

Monday, December 31, 2001, 9:49:58 AM, Randy Burns wrote: > How long should I wait for a reply to an emailed registration form > before I decide that my registration attempt didn't work? I'm trying > to register a boxed disk version. When trying to update the disk's > ver. 1.49f to ver. 1.53d,

Re[2]: Registration Question (boxed ver.)

On 2:24 AM, David van Zuijlekom wrote: > I don't know but I received my registration number within two hours. But I > didn't buy the boxed version and I bought it on internet from a computer > store nearby. I made a few telephone calls and I was up and running within > two hours. I registered th

Re: Registration Question (boxed ver.)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Randy, On 31 Dec 2001 at 18:49:58 +0100 (MET), Randy Burns [RB] wrote concerning 'Registration Question (boxed ver.)': RB> How long should I wait for a reply to an emailed registration form RB> before I decide that my regi

Re: Registration Question (boxed ver.)

Hello Randy, On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 18:49:58 +0100 (MET) GMT (01/01/2002, 01:49 +0800 GMT), Randy Burns wrote: RB> How long should I wait for a reply to an emailed registration form before I RB> decide that my registration attempt didn't work? I'm trying to register a RB> boxed disk version. When

Registration Question (boxed ver.)

How long should I wait for a reply to an emailed registration form before I decide that my registration attempt didn't work? I'm trying to register a boxed disk version. When trying to update the disk's ver. 1.49f to ver. 1.53d, I seem to need that registration password, etc. (sample) -

Re: stupid registration question ( that would be cool if it is. )

On Mon, 31 Jan 2000 23:02:01 +0100, Nico Schirwing wrote: > Can you please forward this mail to me? Didn't get it... -- CU, Allie ... Using The Bat! v1.39 «‡» Windows NT4.0 (Service Pack 6) --- ** There is no dark side of the moon. Really. ** -- --

Re: stupid registration question ( that would be cool if it is. )

Hello Angel, > The following is from an eail "Interview With Ritlabs! FINALLY!" > Dated: 10 January 2000: [...] Can you please forward this mail to me? Didn't get it... Nico __ <---<--{@ http://inferiamoris.dreamhost.com

Re: stupid registration question ( that would be cool if it is. )

Hi phil, On Mon, 31 Jan 2000 09:11:58 -0800GMT (01/02/2000, 01:11 +0800GMT), phil wrote: AVK>> What the hell this was supposed to mean???;-) p> what font do you use? I use Courier New - and that applies to the US-ASCII set. However, you are using high characters down there, which of course disp

Re: stupid registration question

On Monday, January 31, 2000, Gary wrote: > Thanks for your (and others) for the help. I know, it must be that > RIT labs is awaiting for the simultaneous release of W2K and TB! v2. > That's it. W2K? Do you think the developer is aware that their release will be completely overshadowed by

Re[2]: stupid registration question

Hello Oleg Zalyalov, On Mon, 31 Jan 2000 19:33:39 +0400 GMT your local time, which was Monday, January 31, 2000, 10:33:39 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Oleg Zalyalov wrote: > Hello, the Bat! list recipients, > Monday, January 31, 2000, phil wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about > stupid reg

Re[3]: stupid registration question ( that would be cool if it is. )

Hello phil, On Mon, 31 Jan 2000 09:11:58 -0800 GMT your local time, which was Tuesday, February 01, 2000, 12:11:58 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, phil wrote: AVK>> What the hell this was supposed to mean???;-) > what font do you use? > €•—š > ùùv2.00 I hope this doesnt say: the Ba

Re[2]: stupid registration question

Hi Angel, On Monday, January 31, 2000, 1:54:13 PM, you hammered out: A> From the "Interview..." email, I understood it to be "soon", A> *possibly* in Feb. (NOTE: that's not a "promised" date for the Beta A> release). So that's an estimated time anyways... Thanks for your (and others) for the

Re: stupid registration question

On Monday, January 31, 2000 at 09:10:54 ,Gary scribbled: >>> When is Version 2 scheduled to be out, anybody know? A>> Nah, it seems to me that nobody knows;-( G> well, sign me up for the first invisible version 2. I just hope I G> live long enough :-) >From the "Interview..." email, I underst

Re: stupid registration question ( that would be cool if it is. )

On Monday, January 31, 2000 at 08:21:25 ,phil scribbled: p>>> are we registered for thebat v2.xx if we paid for 1.xx? p>>> simple yes/no is all i need. MDP>> No. There was discussion of a discount for more recent purchasers. AVK>>> The initial question still stays unanswered, though;-) The follo

Re: stupid registration question ( that would be cool if it is. )

Hi there! On 31 Jan 00, at 9:11, phil wrote about "Re[2]: stupid registration question": > AVK> What the hell this was supposed to mean???;-) > what font do you use? >  > ùùv2.00 > ùùv1.41 It doesn't really matter: in the Western scri

Re[2]: stupid registration question ( that would be cool if it is. )

AVK> What the hell this was supposed to mean???;-) what font do you use? €•—š ùùv2.00 ùùv1.41 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click

Re[2]: stupid registration question

Hi Alexander, On Monday, January 31, 2000, 10:29:53 AM, you hammered out: A> Hi there! >> When is Version 2 scheduled to be out, anybody know? A> Nah, it seems to me that nobody knows;-( well, sign me up for the first invisible version 2. I just hope I live long enough :-) -- Best regard

Re: stupid registration question

Hi there! On 31 Jan 00, at 10:12, Gary wrote about "Re[2]: stupid registration question": > When is Version 2 scheduled to be out, anybody know? Nah, it seems to me that nobody knows;-( -- SY, Alex (St.Petersburg, Russia) http://mph.phys.spbu.ru/~akiselev --- Though

Re: stupid registration question ( that would be cool if it is. )

Hi there! On 31 Jan 00, at 8:21, phil wrote about "stupid registration question...": > ùùv2.00 > ùùv1.41 What the hell this was supposed to mean???;-) -- SY, Alex (St.Petersburg, Russia) http://mph.phys.spbu.ru/~akiselev --- Thought for the day: Anythin

stupid registration question ( i hope they decide to do it. )

C>> The more complex answer is that it hasn't been fully decided what will C>> happen, how much of an upgrade charge there may be, etc. I hope they decide to do it. €•—š ÛÛv2.00 ÛÛv1.41 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at

stupid registration question ( that would be cool if it is. )

p>> are we registered for thebat v2.xx if we paid for 1.xx? p>> simple yes/no is all i need. MDP> No. There was discussion of a discount for more recent purchasers. welp i hope €•—š ÛÛv2.00 ÛÛv1.41 -- -- View the TBUDL

stupid registration question ( y/N=no ) at least i got 59 more versions at least. ;o)

R> hth €•—š ÛÛv2.00 ÛÛv1.41 how much is 1ea v2.x + 1.x discount = ? -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:

Re[2]: stupid registration question

Hi Chuck, On Monday, January 31, 2000, 9:42:42 AM, you hammered out: phil>> are we registered for thebat v2.xx if we paid for 1.xx? simple phil>> yes/no is all i need. When is Version 2 scheduled to be out, anybody know? C> The more complex answer is that it hasn't been fully decided what wil

Re: stupid registration question

On Monday, January 31, 2000 at 9:26 AM or thereabouts, phil wrote the following about stupid registration question: phil> are we registered for thebat v2.xx if we paid for 1.xx? phil> simple yes/no is all i need. The simple answer, as I understand it, is no. The more complex answer is t

Re: stupid registration question

Hi phil, On 31 January 2000 at 07:26:31 GMT -0800 (which was 15:26 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points: p> are we registered for thebat v2.xx if we paid for 1.xx? p> simple yes/no is all i need. No. There was discussion of a discount for more recent purchasers. -- C

Re: stupid registration question

Hello, the Bat! list recipients, Monday, January 31, 2000, phil wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about stupid registration question: p> are we registered for thebat v2.xx if we paid for 1.xx? p> simple yes/no is all i need. No, only discount promised. -- Best regards, Oleg Za

Re: stupid registration question

\\\|/// / ~ _ \ (- O o -) --oOOo-(_)-oOOo--- Hello phil, p> are we registered for thebat v2.xx if we paid for 1.xx? p> simple yes/no is all i need. no, but you will get a discount if you upgrade

stupid registration question

Yo all, are we registered for thebat v2.xx if we paid for 1.xx? simple yes/no is all i need. phil running theBAT1.39 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double

Re[4]: Registration Question

Hi Mary, > X-Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] your return address bounces, so I have to write you through the list :-( MS> UNSUBSCRIBE Each and every mail in this list contains the instructions how to unscubscribe: >>To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: >>

Re[3]: Registration Question

Wednesday, November 17, 1999 Hello Thomas, Wednesday, Wednesday, November 17, 1999, you wrote: Thomas> Hi tracer, Thomas> on Wednesday, November 17, 1999, 2:32:10 PM GMT+0800, tracer wrote: Thomas>>> my friend registered TB but did not get the registration details as he Thomas>>> requests bel

Re: Re[2]: Registration Question

UNSUBSCRIBE *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 11/17/99 at 2:48 PM Thomas Fernandez wrote: >Hi tracer, > >on Wednesday, November 17, 1999, 2:32:10 PM GMT+0800, tracer wrote: > >Thomas>> my friend registered TB but did not get the registration details as he >Thomas>> requests below. A

Re: Registration Question

Hello Thomas Fernandez, On Wednesday, November 17, 1999, 10:43:44 AM you told us: TF> Kindly take a look at his question below and advise. Send mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - syafril - Name: Syafril Hermansyah | C

Re[2]: Registration Question

Hi tracer, on Wednesday, November 17, 1999, 2:32:10 PM GMT+0800, tracer wrote: Thomas>> my friend registered TB but did not get the registration details as he Thomas>> requests below. As my own registration was so long ago, I don't Thomas>> remember whether I got an email with the Key and Checks

Re: Registration Question

Wednesday, November 17, 1999 Hello Thomas, Wednesday, Wednesday, November 17, 1999, you wrote: Thomas> Hello TBUDL, Thomas> my friend registered TB but did not get the registration details as he Thomas> requests below. As my own registration was so long ago, I don't Thomas> remember whether I

Registration Question

Hello TBUDL, my friend registered TB but did not get the registration details as he requests below. As my own registration was so long ago, I don't remember whether I got an email with the Key and Checksum or how did it work. Kindly take a look at his question below and advise. Thanks, Thomas.