Hello Bat'ers
just wondering if anyone has come across this problem.
If I doubleclick on a link it opens 2 instances of my browser, this only started
happening after I upgraded to 2.12
Another question, can I disable the confirmation every time I click on Send the
message - it's annoying.
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 22:00:49 +0100, AceMan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Registered users are expected to pay for the upgrade to v3.bugs
included.
I'll stick with v2.12 until it implodes, or whatever, and after that I
won't be a Ritlabs customer again, ever.
My story - I bought v1.62r in
Hi Mike,
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 04:51:20 [GMT+0100] (which was 13:51:20 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
JM 2. What exactly *are* the differences between the Home Edition and the
JM Professional Edition?
The Professional Edition is twice the size (8.2M as opposed to
4.0)
Apart from
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 @ 11:06:54 AM, Roman Katzer wrote:
[snips]
Roman It's hardly a year since version 2 came out and I was wondering why there
Roman were so few minor releases in the last weeks. Now RITLabs is releasing
Roman version 3 without functioning IMAP support in V2
Hi Bat! Fans,
I see there is a new category for Common Filters.
Presumably these filters apply to all mail accounts where there is more than
one? (Which IMO is great).
How to move existing filters into a common filter folder?
--
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia
Using The Bat! v3.0 on
Hi ritlabs-news,
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004, at 01:48:04 [GMT+0300] (which was 8:48:04 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
The Bat! 3.0 has taken the developers a year of work in close contact
with users to achieve their goals.
It takes that long to draw icons?
--
John Phillips, Sydney,
Hi Bat Users,
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004, at 01:48:04 [GMT+0300] (which was 8:48:04 Australian
Eastern Time) Rit Labs wrote in a self congratulatory e-mail:
The Bat! 3.0 has taken the developers a year of work in close contact
with users to achieve their goals.
It takes ~that long~ to draw icons?
If I doubleclick on a link it opens 2 instances of my browser, this
only started happening after I upgraded to 2.12
Another question, can I disable the confirmation every time I click on
Send the message - it's annoying.
I had the same some time ago and found this solution on the web (can't
Ok people...
What's the feature difference between The Bat! Pro and The Bat! Home?
The website implies a feature difference (for Advanced Users) but
there's not explaintion (that I can find).
--
Jim
PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Jack,
...especially anything regarding the user interface, which was
supposed to be *new* (Amongst all the improvements the most visually
outstanding is the new look user interface...).
Are you using a glyphs.bmp? If so, go into Preferences and untick High
colour images and re-start TB.
Hello John,
Presumably these filters apply to all mail accounts where there is more than
one? (Which IMO is great).
In Common Filters there is 'Share with..' tab where you can select which
accounts will use each filter.
How to move existing filters into a common filter folder?
So far I
Hello,
Thursday, September 2, 2004, 1:43:19 AM, you wrote:
SMN I just filled out a Refund Claim form over at element5.
Based on what?
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 2.12.03
Current version is 3.00.00 |
Hello Roman,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 4:06:54 AM, you wrote:
RK This is a slap in the face of all users - to get bugs fixed now (in
RK software you paid for) you have to get the next version. I suppose version
RK 4 will be out six months from now, and version 5 three months after that?
Hello M,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 8:46:07 AM, you wrote:
MicCullen Reading the beta list is reasonably entertaining at the moment
No it isn't. Most comments are showing how low reasoning power can get. :-(
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 2.12.03
Mark,
On 01-09-2004 10:06, you [MP] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MP No it isn't. Most comments are showing how low reasoning power can
MP get. :-(
Please elaborate!
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten /author
thebat version 2.13 Lucky Beta/8 /thebat version
os
Hello Gabor,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 9:33:22 AM, you wrote:
If I doubleclick on a link it opens 2 instances of my browser, this
KPG only started happening after I upgraded to 2.12
Another question, can I disable the confirmation every time I click on
KPG Send the message - it's
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 4:16:29 AM, Jack wrote in message:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
J 2. What exactly *are* the differences between the Home Edition and the
J Professional Edition?
As I understand it the Home version is the existing TB! that
we're all used to, and the Pro version includes
Hello Graham,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 10:13:21 AM, you wrote:
GD Hello Gabor,
GD Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 9:33:22 AM, you wrote:
If I doubleclick on a link it opens 2 instances of my browser, this
KPG only started happening after I upgraded to 2.12
Another question, can I disable
Hi TBUDL,
I woke up this morning to see an e-mail from Ritlabs saying version
3 of TB! is available.
I am a little shocked at this. It took them several years to make
TB!2 and now about 1 year after TB!2 was released they release TB!3.
I can't really see any major differences between
Hi Morgan,
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 10:39:22 [GMT+0100] (which was 19:39:22 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
I can't really see any major differences between TB!2 and TB!3 to be
honest. Also I can't find any information on what is different
between TB!3 Home and TB!3 Pro other than a
Hi John,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 10:43:48 AM, you wrote:
JP Hi Morgan,
JP On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 10:39:22 [GMT+0100] (which was 19:39:22 Australian
JP Eastern Time) you wrote:
I can't really see any major differences between TB!2 and TB!3 to be
honest. Also I can't find any
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 08:32:52 +0200, Alexander S. Kunz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have enough of Ritlabs. As soon as this v2.12 doesn't do what I need
anymore, I'm off for another email client ...
I fully agree. Add to that the lack of support from Ritlabs (we're
totally left on our own here at
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 17:26:07 +1000, John Phillips
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Bat! 3.0 has taken the developers a year of work in close contact
with users to achieve their goals.
I've received this annoucement too. BULLSHIT!! Hey, RitLabs, you hear
that? BULLSHIT!!
Most annoying bugs in
Hello Cory,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 11:47:57 AM, you wrote:
C On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 08:32:52 +0200, Alexander S. Kunz
C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have enough of Ritlabs. As soon as this v2.12 doesn't do what I need
anymore, I'm off for another email client ...
C I fully agree. Add to
At 09/01/04 00:32, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
I'll stick with v2.12 until it implodes, or whatever, and after that I
won't be a Ritlabs customer again, ever.
. . .
I have enough of Ritlabs. As soon as this v2.12 doesn't do what I need
anymore, I'm off for another email client, be it PocoMail or
Hi Graham,
on Wed, 1 Sep 2004 08:22:21 +0200GMT, you wrote:
GD just wondering if anyone has come across this problem.
GD If I doubleclick on a link it opens 2 instances of my browser,
GD this only started happening after I upgraded to 2.12
Hasn't happened here yet.
GD Another question, can I
Hi Cory,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 10:57:47 AM, you wrote:
C On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 17:26:07 +1000, John Phillips
C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Bat! 3.0 has taken the developers a year of work in close contact
with users to achieve their goals.
C I've received this annoucement too.
Graham Dodd wrote on 01 September 2004 11:13:
Anyone got any other suggestions for mail clients ?
I joined this list because I saw the announcement and thought - perhaps they
fixed the smart word wrapping/justification issues within the Micro Ed text
editor and also fixed some of the other
Hi Morgan,
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 11:15:27 [GMT+0100] (which was 20:15:27 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
The funny thing is Outlook is now a better client than TB!. Outlook
2003 has virtual folders, an excellent filtering system, secure
e-mail reading features such as not downloading
Morgan Pugh wrote on 01 September 2004 11:03:
I am seriously thinking of installing Outlook 2003. It is a very good
client (have to use it at work) and is pretty damn secure these days.
It still has a few annoying issues, such as I can't touch any messages in
the Outbox once I've sent/queued
Hello Morgan,
All i can see is an ugly UI.
I don't like it either, but some people do. So, it's not a matted of
being ugly or not, it is a matter of liking it or not. Anyway, it allows
you to use a customised glyphs.bmp to your liking. I'm using the same I
was using with v2.
I think I will
GD If I doubleclick on a link it opens 2 instances of my browser, this
GD only started happening after I upgraded to 2.12
Have you installed Mozilla or anything related lately?
--
Cheers
Gabor
Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL'
John Phillips wrote on 01 September 2004 11:33:
Does it still top post?
Unfortunately it does. But thankfully somebody came up with a solution to
that and this is what I've been using for many months without any issues:
http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/
There's also a
Hello Morgan,
The funny thing is Outlook is now a better client than TB!.
I doubt it.
Outlook 2003 has virtual folders
TB has VFs and, from what I have heard, with more functionality or
possibilities than Outlook.
an excellent filtering system,
I again doubt it. Does Outlook allow you to
Hello Gabor,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 12:39:51 PM, you wrote:
GD If I doubleclick on a link it opens 2 instances of my browser, this
GD only started happening after I upgraded to 2.12
KPG Have you installed Mozilla or anything related lately?
Yes, that was the problem I found a fix
Hello Peter,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 12:20:35 PM, you wrote:
PM Hi Graham,
PM on Wed, 1 Sep 2004 08:22:21 +0200GMT, you wrote:
GD just wondering if anyone has come across this problem.
GD If I doubleclick on a link it opens 2 instances of my browser,
GD this only started happening after
St:
I just filled out a Refund Claim form over at element5.
MP:
Based on what?
Well, like someone else said: To get bugs fixed now (in
software you paid for) you have to get the next version,
and I should add: and pay for it once more.
I don't want to go into details, but they
Hello Morgan,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 12:15:27 PM, you wrote:
MP Hi Graham,
GD Anyone got any other suggestions for mail clients ?
GD Graham
MP The funny thing is Outlook is now a better client than TB!. Outlook
MP 2003 has virtual folders, an excellent filtering system, secure
MP
Hello Martyn,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 12:38:28 PM, you wrote:
Does it still top post?
MD Unfortunately it does. But thankfully somebody came up with a solution to
MD that and this is what I've been using for many months without any issues:
Does it still uses loads of memory for doing
Hi tbudl,
I am trying out TB!3 to see what it is like (as you all know I am
not very happy with it).
I am stuck with this new filtering system. I want to make a filter
to auto move all of the message on TBUDL. Personally I preferred the
old system however others are saying that this
Hello St,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 12:54:13 PM, you wrote:
SMN St:
I just filled out a Refund Claim form over at element5.
SMN MP:
Based on what?
SMN Well, like someone else said: To get bugs fixed now (in
SMN software you paid for) you have to get the next version,
SMN and
Hi Graham,
on Wed, 1 Sep 2004 08:22:21 +0200GMT, you wrote:
GD If I doubleclick on a link it opens 2 instances of my browser,
GD this only started happening after I upgraded to 2.12
I just read something on TBBeta that might be related:
Carsten Knobloch wrote:
,- [ mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
Hi
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 7:32:52 AM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Registered users are expected to pay for the upgrade to v3.bugs
included.
ASK they release v3 and want to charge their users again? I don't
ASK know how others feel about that
As a new user who bought my v2 licence
A major problem with 2.x was that it wouldn't render Outlook email properly. It
often concatenates words. Very annoying, especially when one wants to
reply/forward the message.
The bug was reported long ago but was never fixed. Does 3.0 fix this?
jon
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Mark,
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 13:09:17 [GMT+0200] (which was 21:09:17 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
That being said, I must say that as far as the law is concerned,
you won't get far with this argument. Sorry.
Depends what country he is in.
--
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 @ 4:06:51 PM, Mark Partous wrote:
[snips]
MicCullen Reading the beta list is reasonably entertaining at the moment
Mark No it isn't. Most comments are showing how low reasoning power can get. :-(
If you're a blind defender of the appalling way that this process
Hello Martyn,
TB! is just a huge let down now :( I hope Ritlabs go bust, nobody
should pay for TB!3, it just isn't worth the money.
I think that's a bit harsh - I wouldn't wish anybody to be unemployed.
People do have the choice whether or not to buy it - the upgrade is not
being forced
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 @ 6:59:51 PM, Mark Partous wrote:
[snips]
Does it still top post?
MD Unfortunately it does. But thankfully somebody came up with a solution to
MD that and this is what I've been using for many months without any issues:
Mark Does it still uses loads of memory
Hello Morgan,
I am stuck with this new filtering system. I want to make a filter
to auto move all of the message on TBUDL. Personally I preferred the
old system however others are saying that this new system will be
much better. Lets see how much better.
With NFS you should be able
Hello Graham,
Any idea how I can get all my mails from TB into Outlook
You should ask that in an Outlook users mailing list, don't you think?
;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0
Current version
Hi MAU,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 12:25:03 PM, you wrote:
M Hello Martyn,
TB! is just a huge let down now :( I hope Ritlabs go bust, nobody
should pay for TB!3, it just isn't worth the money.
I think that's a bit harsh - I wouldn't wish anybody to be unemployed.
People do have the
Hi MAU,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 12:28:36 PM, you wrote:
M Hello Morgan,
I am stuck with this new filtering system. I want to make a filter
to auto move all of the message on TBUDL. Personally I preferred the
old system however others are saying that this new system will be
Hello Morgan,
Perhaps the problem was how Ritlabs announced this?
Yes, that did upset me quite a bit. But it does not mean the upgrade is
not worth.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0
Current
Hello Mike,
As a new user who bought my v2 licence on 20th August, try *very*
annoyed.
I am quite sure Ritlabs will consider that fact. A 10 days old user
should not be charged for the upgrade.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0
Well, I think I've figured out what the cause of the problem was with
The Bat! version 3 not being able to pick up mail from my cPanel server
earlier this morning.
As the certificate contains a different host name to that what I'm using
for the server, I must have somehow just clicked
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 12:45:24 +0200, MAU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Outlook 2003 has virtual folders
TB has VFs and, from what I have heard, with more functionality or
possibilities than Outlook.
The so called search folders in Outlook 2003 look good at first, but
they are, as with every MS
Hello Morgan,
quote
Set up a filter for incoming mail which looks for Strings Location
Presence Reply-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Kludges Yes Options: Regular
expressions (Checked).
/quote
How do I do this in the NFS? I can't find all the options that were in
OFS. Maybe I am just being
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 12:54:21 PM, you wrote:
For me, proper formatting of text-only messages, including the ability
to re-flow quotes, is very important, and neither Outlook nor Opera's
M2 or AK-Mail or Thunderbird (haven't tried others) has any function
like that of TB's ALT-L
I am quite sure Ritlabs will consider that fact. A 10 days old user
should not be charged for the upgrade.
You KNOW this do you? After all, as the one beta tester who appears to
have rushed in and bought a new licence, Ritlabs would have thrown a
welcome party for you. (No smiley - I hate
Hi,
I amusing V3
Can anyone tell me how to move all my filters to common so that I can
then share them with the relevant accounts?
Also is there any reason not to put all the filters in common and
share them as appropriate?
Thanks
PJ
Current
Hello ,
I knew that I'd eventually have to do this, but I didn't predict that
it would be now, especially with all that has been recently happening.
Though they may seem to be connected, they really aren't.
I'll be stepping down as one of the moderators of the lists (TBUDL,
TBBETA and TBTECH),
Hello,
Ok with all the other mail going on in both BETA AND TBUDL it is
hard to find one good explanation on how to transfer to the new V3
filter system.
I was wondering for the sake of clarity if someone from Ritlabs or a
moderator could possible take a few minutes to clarify the
Hello Martyn,
It's irritating when an email client (not just The Bat!) doesn't do it
for you - more so in Thunderbird than any other client. When you do
Rewrap (or ALT-L in The Bat!) it does it wonderfully - but why can't it
do this when you hit the Reply button so that the user is left with
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 @ 7:47:03 PM, MAU wrote:
[snips]
As a new user who bought my v2 licence on 20th August, try *very*
annoyed.
MAU I am quite sure Ritlabs will consider that fact. A 10 days old user
MAU should not be charged for the upgrade.
But where's the cut-off point? Should
Hello,
I'm not quite sure where I'm going with this, but:
I wonder what Ritlabs' revenues are, and how they break down? New vs.
repeat business.
I suspect that v3 will result in a wave fresh positive reviews in the
press. Probably praising the new up-to-date look and feel (not that
I've seen
Hello Graham,
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 12:00:10 PM, you wrote:
Hello Morgan,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 12:15:27 PM, you wrote:
MP Hi Graham,
GD Anyone got any other suggestions for mail clients ?
GD Graham
MP The funny thing is Outlook is now a better client than TB!.
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 20:01:38 +0800, M i c C u l l e n [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The real problem here is, as ever, the complete lack of meaningful
communication from Ritlabs.
Makes me wonder how a company selling email products can't handle it...
:-) I mean... I subscribed to their newsletter
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 @ 6:36:56 PM, Martyn Drake wrote:
[snips]
TB! is just a huge let down now :( I hope Ritlabs go bust, nobody
should pay for TB!3, it just isn't worth the money.
Martyn I think that's a bit harsh - I wouldn't wish anybody to be unemployed.
Martyn People do have
Hi Alexander,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 1:40:10 PM, you wrote:
ASK On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 20:01:38 +0800, M i c C u l l e n [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ASK wrote:
The real problem here is, as ever, the complete lack of meaningful
communication from Ritlabs.
ASK Makes me wonder how a company selling
Hi MAU,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 12:59:41 PM, you wrote:
M Hello Morgan,
quote
Set up a filter for incoming mail which looks for Strings Location
Presence Reply-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Kludges Yes Options: Regular
expressions (Checked).
/quote
How do I do this in the NFS? I can't
How Ritlabs can believe that somebody will pay more expensive for Pro version 3
without any explanation of differences with Personal version ?
--
WilWilWil (France)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TB 2.12.00
Windows XP
Service Pack 1
Current version is
Alexander,
On 01-09-2004 14:40, you [ASK] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ASK who *has* the information? Did beta testers know that everything in
ASK v2.13beta would turn into a new v3?
If you by beta testers mean (the majority of?) the people who have
been finding and reporting bugs on tbbeta@,
Ritlabs policy is not so great...
I've lost my Job last year and bought TB for manage my Job research. I'm not so
happy to pay again for being up to date with TB when my order is just 3 months
old !
I thing that I've not to pay for a debugging version of TB2 named TB3 ! And
surtout when the bugs
Dear Jim,
@1-Sep-2004, 03:34 -0400 (01-Sep 08:34 UK time) Jim Dever [JD] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
JD Ok people...
JD What's the feature difference between The Bat! Pro and The Bat! Home?
,--/ From a RITlabs mailing I got earlier \--
What are the differences between Home and
Hi Marck,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 1:59:15 PM, you wrote:
MDP Dear Jim,
MDP @1-Sep-2004, 03:34 -0400 (01-Sep 08:34 UK time) Jim Dever [JD] in
MDP mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
JD Ok people...
JD What's the feature difference between The Bat! Pro and The Bat! Home?
MDP ,--/ From a
Anne, [A] wrote:
As I understand it the Home version is the existing TB! that
we're all used to, and the Pro version includes the features
previously found in SecureBat - i.e. hardware tokens etc.
To add to that, all the Security features available previously
available in SecureBat! are not
My behavior with IT is to never pay for a soft.
That why I always use free software (GNU, open office, ...)
(And for windows XP : XP was packaged with my labtop ! :-) )
Watch out, I don't speak about illegal version ! It's not a good behavior to...
For the first time of my life, I take my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 08:22:21 +0200,
@ @ when Graham Dodd wrote:
Another question, can I disable the confirmation every time I click
on Send the message - it's annoying.
You can, but sending
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 14:46:07 +0800,
@ @ when M i c C u l l e n wrote:
Reading the beta list is reasonably entertaining at the moment :-)
temptation -- (the desire to have or do something that you know you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 03:34:50 -0400,
@ @ when Jim Dever wrote:
Ok people...
What's the feature difference between The Bat! Pro and The Bat! Home?
The website implies a feature difference (for Advanced
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 10:46:56 +0100,
@ @ when Morgan Pugh wrote:
a jump for 2.12 to 3.x is pretty impressive, you would think loads of
new features would have been added but I can't find them.
I got
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was Wed, 01 Sep 2004, at 11:47:57 +0200,
@ @ when Cory wrote:
Personally I've been using and advocating TB for over 5 years now, but
this definitely is the end.
I stopped advocating when versions 1.6... had
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was Tue, 31 Aug 2004, at 22:16:29 -0500,
@ @ when Jack Morrison wrote:
PS: Memo to self: Never, ever upgrade to another version of The Bat!
without there being a GOOD reason to do so. I should have known
Hello Allie,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 7:05:32 AM, you wrote:
AM I'll be stepping down as one of the moderators of the lists (TBUDL,
AM TBBETA and TBTECH), effective as of now.
I for one will miss your even handed approach, but I'm glad to hear
you will still be around to provide your
Dear Martyn,
@1-Sep-2004, 13:01 Martyn Drake [MD] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Alexander:
... snip
like that of TB's ALT-L keyboard shortcut - I'm using it all the
time.
MD The question is - when will the Micro Ed editor have the ability
MD to properly re-flow quoted text without the need
Dear Morgan,
@1-Sep-2004, 14:02 Morgan Pugh [MP] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
... snip
MDP ,--/ From a RITlabs mailing I got earlier \--
MDP What are the differences between Home and Professional package:
MDP Professional version supports hardware authentication and
Hello John,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 1:17:18 PM, you wrote:
That being said, I must say that as far as the law is concerned,
you won't get far with this argument. Sorry.
JP Depends what country he is in.
Well, to start with, fill me in on the Australian situation. How much time
(after
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 @ 8:03:43 PM, Paul Jansen wrote:
[snips]
Paul I amusing V3
Fascinating typo. (Assuming it is that, of course :-)
--
cheers, Mic (reply address works)
Get all the fools on your side and you can be elected to anything.
Frank Dane
Hello M,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 1:18:01 PM, you wrote:
Mark Does it still uses loads of memory for doing practically nothing? :-)
MicCullen But if it's already your calendar because it syncs with yer Palm...
Must be you didn't try Time Chaos (that does sync too)! :-)
--
Best
Hi The Bat! User DL,
Well I just installed every e-mail I could find and have spent the
past 5 hours testing them all out. I have not found one that is as
good as TB!
I have also been talking to a friend of mine who is currently
using a trial copy TB! after I told him to give it a try
Hello Graham,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 5:13:28 AM, you wrote:
GD Anyone got any other suggestions for mail clients ?
The best suggestion that I have heard is stay with 2.12. It works
well enough for me (but I don't need IMAP ... which was promised for 2
... wasn't it? :-/ )
--
Best
Hi Mark,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 2:35:24 PM, you wrote:
MP Hello John,
MP Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 1:17:18 PM, you wrote:
That being said, I must say that as far as the law is concerned,
you won't get far with this argument. Sorry.
JP Depends what country he is in.
MP Well, to
Hi Mark,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 2:53:52 PM, you wrote:
MP Hello M,
MP Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 1:18:01 PM, you wrote:
Mark Does it still uses loads of memory for doing practically nothing? :-)
MicCullen But if it's already your calendar because it syncs with yer Palm...
MP Must
Hello WilWilWil,
How Ritlabs can believe that somebody will pay more expensive for Pro
version 3 without any explanation of differences with Personal version
?
The is still honest people out there.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 @ 8:29:31 PM, Nick Dutton wrote:
[snips]
Nick I'd bet that this is where their real money comes from, not in keeping
Nick a (vocal) few of the faithful happy. They are a business after all.
But businesses should have ethics, should they not? And not keeping
Hi,
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 at 12:13:28 PM, Graham Dodd wrote:
Anyone got any other suggestions for mail clients ?
Becky!
--
Ludovic LE MOAL (Quimper - France)
URL:http://www.lemoal.org/ ICQ# 92250692
Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows 98 4.10
Hi,
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 at 2:50:13 PM, WilWilWil wrote:
I've lost my Job last year and bought TB for manage my Job research. I'm not so
happy to pay again for being up to date with TB when my order is just 3 months
old !
Same for me.
I thing that I've not to pay for a debugging
Hello Paul,
Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 8:14:04 PM, you wrote:
PC On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 23:59:29 +0200, Andre Wichartz wrote:
Hello Peter,
On 24 Aug 2004 at 16:58:43 -0400 GMT [22:58 CEST] you wrote:
PK Where can I find the latest version of BayesIt for download?
PK The site given in
Hello Clive,
You KNOW this do you?
No, I don't _know_.
After all, as the one beta tester who appears to have rushed in and
bought a new licence, Ritlabs would have thrown a welcome party for
you.
Of course, with loads of champagne and vodka... but I like beer an there
was none.
--
Best
Howdy,
Due to my desktop crashing completly (Motherboard, HD all fried, power
surge) I was not using The Bat to download my email and was instead
using web based for 2.5 months. In that period, I only used web based
and had ammassed around 4000 emails that I had not downloaded from
POP3.
Upon
1 - 100 of 270 matches
Mail list logo
