Re: ansify libarch/i386

> From: j...@wxcvbn.org (=?utf-8?Q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9mie_Courr=C3=A8ges-Anglas?=) > Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 20:10:25 +0100 > > ok? ok kettenis@ > Index: lib/libarch/i386/i386_get_ioperm.c > === > RCS file:

Re: ldapd: add -r option to specify datadir path

Hi Landry, On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 09:39:52AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > Hi, > > i'm tinkering with ldapd and writing regress tests for it, and to > allow running independent instances (with separate port/control > socket/etc) i needed to add the possibility to specify an alternative >

Re: ldapd: add -r option to specify datadir path

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 07:37:34PM +0100, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > j...@wxcvbn.org (Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas) writes: > > > Sebastien Marie writes: > > > >> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 09:39:52AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> i'm tinkering with

sunxi: fix sxipio func mask

Hi, in sxipio the mask is incorrect for get- and setcfg. If bit is 1, off is (1 & 7) << 2, which is 4. That means each cfg is 4 bits wide, so the mask is 0xf and not 0x7. I cross-checked it with NetBSD and Linux. As far as I know it does not fix any known issue for me, it's just something that

Re: can't run multiple instances of httpd, flags not visible in processes

On 2016/02/01 15:02, Joerg Jung wrote: > What about smtpd, should be similar, no? This would do the trick. It loses the getrlimit/setrlimit dance that config_process() normally does, but I'm not sure if that is really needed for the parent process anyway (mine only has 11 FDs so it's not in any

Re: can't run multiple instances of httpd, flags not visible in processes

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 07:24:39PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2016/02/01 15:02, Joerg Jung wrote: > > What about smtpd, should be similar, no? > > This would do the trick. It loses the getrlimit/setrlimit dance that > config_process() normally does, but I'm not sure if that is really >

Re: ldapd: add -r option to specify datadir path

Gleydson Soares writes: > Hi Landry, > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 09:39:52AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: >> Hi, >> >> i'm tinkering with ldapd and writing regress tests for it, and to >> allow running independent instances (with separate port/control >> socket/etc) i needed to

[Patch] (lack of) UTF-8 support in write(1)

Hello tech@, I've been working on this patch with schwarze@. It introduces UTF-8 support in write(1), or more precise lack thereof. The specifications say that write(1) should write characters to the console in conformance with the senders locale. Since the receiving tty might not be UTF-8

unused variable in init(8)

Not needed since rev. 1.55 and the introduction of crypt_checkpass(). ok? Index: init.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/init/init.c,v retrieving revision 1.57 diff -u -p -p -u -r1.57 init.c --- init.c 23 Dec 2015 02:41:12 -

multicast, ETOOMANYREFS and intro(2)

Hi, while glancing at the multicast code I noticed the use of ETOOMANYREFS: if (imo->imo_num_memberships == imo->imo_max_memberships) { struct in_multi **nmships, **omships; size_t newmax; /*

Re: sunxi: fix sxipio func mask

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:51:40PM +0200, Artturi Alm wrote: > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 09:06:35PM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > in sxipio the mask is incorrect for get- and setcfg. > > > > If bit is 1, off is (1 & 7) << 2, which is 4. That means each cfg is 4 > > bits wide, so the

[patch] vi enable -pedantic

Hello tech@, This patch enables -pedantic and does the appropriate cleanup that comes with it. It's mostly a CHAR_T->char conversion, which should be quite harmless, but edge-cases can be missed. I'd like to have multiple OKs for this one as well as testing on multiple architectures, just

Re: sunxi: fix sxipio func mask

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:14:38PM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote: > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:51:40PM +0200, Artturi Alm wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 09:06:35PM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > in sxipio the mask is incorrect for get- and setcfg. > > > > > > If bit is 1, off

Re: ldapd: add -r option to specify datadir path

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > Gleydson Soares writes: > >> Hi Landry, >> >> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 09:39:52AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> i'm tinkering with ldapd and writing regress tests for it, and to

Re: sunxi: fix sxipio func mask

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 12:24:02AM +0200, Artturi Alm wrote: > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:14:38PM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:51:40PM +0200, Artturi Alm wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 09:06:35PM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > in sxipio

Re: sunxi: fix sxipio func mask

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:01:45AM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 12:24:02AM +0200, Artturi Alm wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:14:38PM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:51:40PM +0200, Artturi Alm wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at

Re: sunxi: don't use sxitimer on the sun7i/A20

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 02:55:52AM +0200, Artturi Alm wrote: > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 10:45:42PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 10:12:05AM +0200, Artturi Alm wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 01:14:35AM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > one of

Re: I have a program I wish to submit for the base

1. You can pick a mirror relatively trivially, but since I've run the program, the fastest one isn't the one I chose manually. Also, it can choose multiple mirrors at once, so presumably if there is a failure, it will choose the next mirror(s) that it wrote down in pkg.conf 2. You are saying that

Re: Can I accelerate my magnet HDD using a SSD in any way?? E.g. softraid patch/ARC, dedicated hardware e.g. Intel RCS25ZB040LX="Nytro MegaRAID", anything

2016-01-31 9:16 GMT+01:00 Tinker : > This could be made in software with benefit, as a Softraid patch. > So the frequently accessed stuff ends up cached on the SSD for faster read > speed. > There is some hardware solution, e.g. Intel made the >

Re: ldapd: add -r option to specify datadir path

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 09:39:52AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > Hi, > > i'm tinkering with ldapd and writing regress tests for it, and to > allow running independent instances (with separate port/control > socket/etc) i needed to add the possibility to specify an alternative > datadir, which was

Re: Karel, some followup Q:s on your RAID1C patch

2016-01-31 9:24 GMT+01:00 Tinker : > Q1: > > My most important question to you is, the DATA that you CHECKSUM, do you > include the SECTOR NUMBER (or other disk location info) of that data into > your checksum function's inputs, so if the underlying storage's storage >

Re: Karel, some followup Q:s on your RAID1C patch

I did not oppose adding the sector number, just the "idea" that internal relocations would make this number change. If it did, then everything would break for all filesystems, so that is obviously not how it is done. 2016-02-01 11:11 GMT+01:00 Tinker : > On 2016-02-01

Re: Karel, some followup Q:s on your RAID1C patch

On 2016-02-01 16:29, Janne Johansson wrote: 2016-01-31 9:24 GMT+01:00 Tinker : Q1: My most important question to you is, the DATA that you CHECKSUM, do you include the SECTOR NUMBER (or other disk location info) of that data into your checksum function's inputs, so if

Re: can't run multiple instances of httpd, flags not visible in processes

moved from misc. On 2016-01-28, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: >> Well, we "tradionally" had setproctitle("[priv]") in the parent. I >> changed the tradition to setproctitle("parent"). >> >> I have no objections with changing this in the parent (but keeping the >> setproctitles

Re: fix armv7 long descriptor second level bits

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 06:55:57PM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote: > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 06:19:59PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > The AP bits are the same place as in the small descriptor second level > > format. > > > > Expanded version of a diff from Patrick. > > Looks good to me, works for

Re: can't run multiple instances of httpd, flags not visible in processes

> On 01 Feb 2016, at 14:53, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > moved from misc. > > On 2016-01-28, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: >>> Well, we "tradionally" had setproctitle("[priv]") in the parent. I >>> changed the tradition to setproctitle("parent"). >>>

Re: Some df(1) cleanup

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 05:41:25PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote: > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 05:17:03PM +0100, Michal Mazurek wrote: > > Meaningful error messages: > > > > mntbuf = calloc(argc, sizeof(struct statfs)); > > if (mntbuf == NULL) > > - err(1, NULL);

Re: Some df(1) cleanup

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 05:17:03PM +0100, Michal Mazurek wrote: > Meaningful error messages: > > mntbuf = calloc(argc, sizeof(struct statfs)); > if (mntbuf == NULL) > - err(1, NULL); > + err(1, "calloc"); I disagree with the

Re: Karel, some followup Q:s on your RAID1C patch

Since these are not emails with patches, let's not disturb tech@ but have this thread moved to misc@ , thanks. On 2016-02-01 18:40, Janne Johansson wrote: I did not oppose adding the sector number, just the "idea" that internal relocations would make this number change. If it did, then

Re: I have a program I wish to submit for the base

Jorge Castillo said: > Why not make it a port? Making port for figuring out PKGPATH doesn't sound right. See, there are four problems with the program: 1. It is not good enough in doing its job. Which is funny, because picking right mirror is trivially done without any program. 2. It

sync dhcrelay's packet processing with dhcpd's.

Not sure if I sent this before, but I found it sitting in a tree. dhcrelay missed out on some of the changes made to dhcpd/dhclient's packet.c. OK to sync them up? After this set of patches, the only difference from dhcpd's is the intentional ipsec-related one. OK? "Remove unused (a.k.a. always

Re: I have a program I wish to submit for the base

On 2016/02/01 08:43, Jorge Castillo wrote: > the only though that has come to me concerning mirrors, > while using OpenBSD all this years is "damn it sure would be nice to know > which mirrors there are without connecting to the internet first". Fixed in -current, see

Re: Some df(1) cleanup

Theo Buehler wrote: > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 05:17:03PM +0100, Michal Mazurek wrote: > > Meaningful error messages: > > > > mntbuf = calloc(argc, sizeof(struct statfs)); > > if (mntbuf == NULL) > > - err(1, NULL); > > + err(1, "calloc");

ansify libarch/i386

ok? Index: lib/libarch/i386/i386_get_ioperm.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libarch/i386/i386_get_ioperm.c,v retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -p -r1.7 i386_get_ioperm.c --- lib/libarch/i386/i386_get_ioperm.c 15 Nov 2014 02:23:28 -

ipmi(4) - Implement ipmitool-compatible IOCTL

These two patches implement ipmitool-compatible IOCTL in ipmi(4). IPMI BMCs are usually accessed via ethernet ports. This provides BMC access from within host for some situations where you can't use ethernet. The idea is to provide generic command interface for userland via IOCTL, while keeping

Re: unused variable in init(8)

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 08:05:42PM +0100, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > > Not needed since rev. 1.55 and the introduction of crypt_checkpass(). > > ok? I have the same in my tree. ok semarie@ > Index: init.c > === > RCS file:

Re: sunxi: don't use sxitimer on the sun7i/A20

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:55:57AM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 02:55:52AM +0200, Artturi Alm wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 10:45:42PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 10:12:05AM +0200, Artturi Alm wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at

Re: ldapd: add -r option to specify datadir path

j...@wxcvbn.org (Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas) writes: > Sebastien Marie writes: > >> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 09:39:52AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> i'm tinkering with ldapd and writing regress tests for it, and to >>> allow running independent instances (with

Re: can't run multiple instances of httpd, flags not visible in processes

On 2016/02/01 15:02, Joerg Jung wrote: > > > On 01 Feb 2016, at 14:53, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > moved from misc. > > > > On 2016-01-28, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > >>> Well, we "tradionally" had setproctitle("[priv]") in the parent. I > >>>

install(1) typo

There seems to be a "be" missing in install(1). The whole phrase seems odd to a non-native speaker like me: those options "should not be relied upon" because they are not portable, not "for portability". (But I might easily be wrong.) Jan --- install.1.orig Mon Feb 1 13:57:31

Re: I have a program I wish to submit for the base

I can't comment on code quality since I suck at programming but you yourself said your program does not follow style(9) as much as it could, I think this is not a good start. Why not make it a port? If this becomes useful to a lot of people then maybe it can be in base later, but not before it

Re: install(1) typo

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 04:27:06PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote: > There seems to be a "be" missing in install(1). > > The whole phrase seems odd to a non-native speaker like me: > those options "should not be relied upon" because they are not portable, > not "for portability". (But I might easily be

Re: ldapd: add -r option to specify datadir path

Sebastien Marie writes: > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 09:39:52AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: >> Hi, >> >> i'm tinkering with ldapd and writing regress tests for it, and to >> allow running independent instances (with separate port/control >> socket/etc) i needed to add the

df(1) - use return, not exit() in main()

Replace exit() with return. Index: df.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/df/df.c,v retrieving revision 1.54 diff -u -p -r1.54 df.c --- df.c9 Oct 2015 01:37:06 - 1.54 +++ df.c1 Feb 2016 17:58:59 - @@ -178,7