Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 5:00 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: > Just a theory. > Taking this to the private forum. -- Jeremy Austin (907) 895-2311 office (907) 803-5422 cell jhaus...@gmail.com Heritage NetWorks Whitestone Power & Communications Vertical Broadband, LLC

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Nathan Anderson wrote: > Have you tried shutting off only the SNMP polling for a few cycles, but > leaving the ICMP polling tests running? > > > This is why I said I've found the source, but not yet the cause. I'm going to see if I can isolate

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

@wispa.org Subject: Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:24 AM, Nathan Anderson <nath...@fsr.com<mailto:nath...@fsr.com>> wrote: Jeremy mentioned his periodic traffic dips to me recently off-list. I have found the source of the dips, if not the

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

; <mcarpen...@amarillowireless.net> To: "Telrad List" <telrad@wispa.org> Sent: 4/3/2017 11:24:22 AM Subject: Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again We are not using SNMP here just TR-069. We do ping the UE. Matt Carpenter On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Jeremy Austin <jhaus...@

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

t;> used for testing was the latest public release (116). >> >> >> >> -- Nathan >> >> >> >> *From:* telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] *On >> Behalf Of *Nathan Anderson >> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 15, 2017 1:47 AM &g

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 8:34 PM To: telrad@wispa.org; telrad@wispa.org Subject: Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again * UE getting stuck at MCS4apparently until an S1 reset. This may or may not be the same throughput issue that you guys were talking

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

[mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Skywerx Support Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 8:58 PM To: Adam Moffett; telrad@wispa.org Subject: Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again Um Boy! Here we go!!! First off please re read my previous posts. We now have 18 eNB's online with 2 centralized EPC's

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

Our average is low to Mid 20's on CINR and worst being between 10 and 12. We have 10 gig fiber uplinks where the EPC's are located with licensed 2+0 to each tower where eNB's are located. Latency between EPC and all eNB's is 1 ms or less. -- Justin Davis COO SkyWerx Industries, LLC > On Mar

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

t I think I'm waiting for 6.6M first. > > > > -- Original Message ------ > From: "Nathan Anderson" <nath...@fsr.com> > To: "telrad@wispa.org" <telrad@wispa.org> > Sent: 3/14/2017 5:43:50 PM > Subject: Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

avoidable. There was a recurring reset issue that was only resolved a few months ago. -- Original Message -- From: "Nathan Anderson" <nath...@fsr.com> To: "telrad@wispa.org" <telrad@wispa.org> Sent: 3/9/2017 5:46:25 PM Subject: Re: [Telrad] Uplink th

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

http://www.telrad.com/telrad-launches-new-lte-in-a-box/ -- Nathan From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Ian Fraser Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 4:12 PM To: telrad@wispa.org Subject: Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again I didn't see this - what product

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

I didn't see this - what product are you speaking of ? On 14/03/2017 7:04 PM, Nathan Anderson wrote: Telrad in correspondence with their WISPA event, it's clear that you guys aren't even using the same product that the rest of us are ___ Telrad

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

than From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Anderson Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 2:44 PM To: telrad@wispa.org Subject: Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again There really isn't much for me to add to Jeremy's excellent response. As far as what could be

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

ire a full system reboot to be applied? I mean, what year is this? -- Nathan From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy Austin Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 11:56 PM To: telrad@wispa.org Subject: Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again Justin, "W

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

Justin, "What's Different" is an excellent question; I can't speak for others on this list. What's different (in my case) is that we start from the assumption that our experience should be as positive as yours. Success stories are great. How a company handles success stories... they print a

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

The Telrad Wispa forum is starting to remind me of the Ubiquiti forum. The same exact people posting with the same exact issues. But only like three people!!! Issues like why can't I put 80 people on a Rocket M5, or how do I configure a Rocket M5?Why does service suck on my access points? Oh

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

On 3/9/2017 4:53 PM, Jeremy Austin wrote: > I have been fairly quiet on list about our outstanding issues, > thinking that they would be better solved by superior troubleshooting > and Telrad engineering than by social engineering. You are certainly not alone.

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Nathan Anderson wrote: > I personally have lost countless hours of sleep and built up a tremendous > sleep debt over maintaining this system, and have fallen behind on other > duties (as well as life in general) as a result. I am trying not to

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

1:53 PM To: telrad@wispa.org Subject: Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again On the other hand, the dips are back for us again. This is getting to be very wearing. To recap: 1) We are running the prerelease code 2) We have been having to reset S1/reboot ENBs periodically (multiple times a day

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

..@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] *On > Behalf Of *Hanson > *Sent:* Thursday, February 16, 2017 12:54 PM > > > *To:* telrad@wispa.org > *Subject:* Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again > > > > So then we need a read only root account. That would be very helpful. > &

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

I think you mean a non-privileged shell account. :) Pedantically yours, -- Nathan From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Hanson Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 12:54 PM To: telrad@wispa.org Subject: Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again So then we need

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

So then we need a read only root account. That would be very helpful. On 02/16/2017 11:58 AM, Jeremy Austin wrote: On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Adam Moffett > wrote: Is there a way to monitor CPU usage on the EPC?

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Anderson Sent: Monday, February 06, 2017 3:56 PM To: 'Adam Moffett'; telrad@wispa.org Subject: Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again Then maybe the problem is not that the properly-marked upload traffic isn't getting transmitted

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

ispa.org> Sent: 2/6/2017 4:30:43 PM Subject: Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Adam Moffett <ad...@clarityconnect.com<mailto:ad...@clarityconnect.com>> wrote: Can somebody tell me if they're getting expected uplink throughput? What ENB and EPC re

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

by default in the UE. -- Original Message -- From: "Jeremy Austin" <jhaus...@gmail.com> To: "Adam Moffett" <ad...@clarityconnect.com>; telrad@wispa.org Sent: 2/6/2017 4:30:43 PM Subject: Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again On Mon, Feb 6, 201

Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again

lrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy Austin Sent: Monday, February 06, 2017 1:31 PM To: Adam Moffett; telrad@wispa.org Subject: Re: [Telrad] Uplink throughput again On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Adam Moffett <ad...@clarityconnect.com<

[Telrad] Uplink throughput again

After a reboot of an eNB I ran iPerf on a dedicated bearer at QCI 1 from several UE at the same time. I specifically chose 8000 UE with high SINR. Since the reboot clears the show traffic counters, we can see that > 97% of UL traffic during this test runs at MCS 20. Given the channel size