[tw5] Re: template: where is the widget???

On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 6:15:35 PM UTC-5 jn.pierr...@gmail.com wrote: > Thank you to both of you for your explanation. The information on the > system tag was very helpful. > > @Soren: you write tgis in your textbook: > [...] > I think PMario covered everything you asked very well, let me

Re: [tw5] NoteTaking in Streams

Saq, The breadcrumbs in Stream are nice. As I understand it the breadcrumbs find the parents to the given node. In this case using parent and streams-list fields. I thought of the following because I expect streams includes 90% of the code to do as follows. Mario's TopP plugin Allows new

[tw5] Re: protected macros

Have a closer look at: https://tiddlywiki.com/#dumpvariables%20Macro:%5B%5Bdumpvariables%20Macro%5D%5D%20%5B%5Bdumpvariables%20Macro%20(Examples)%5D%5D and: https://tiddlywiki.com/#LogWidget:LogWidget%20ActionLogWidget They may help you to see what's going on. .. The later 2 can only be seen

[tw5] Re: protected macros

On Tuesday, June 29, 2021 at 1:43:23 AM UTC+2 jn.pierr...@gmail.com wrote: > In a tiddlers tagged as #:/tags/Macro there is a public macro. It requires > other macros to achieve its goals, but these macros have no business being > used elsewhere. > > If I declare these macros in the same

[tw5] Re: using negative values

Thank you tones it was indeed the space On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 3:43:56 PM UTC+2 TW Tones wrote: > Mohamed, > > Negative values may not always be valid but you example has a space > between the sigh + or - and the number. Make it part of the number with no > gap. -4 NOT - 4 > > Regards >

[tw5] Re: template: where is the widget???

On Tuesday, June 29, 2021 at 1:15:35 AM UTC+2 jn.pierr...@gmail.com wrote: Here are some things that *change the current tiddler*: > >- Transcluding another tiddler with the {{curly braces}} syntax. >- Using a $list widget to enumerate the outputs of a filter. >- Directly setting

[tw5] Re: Discussion: Tiddler titles for sources

On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 1:51:05 PM UTC-3 Si wrote: > > I have been thinking about this and two possible advantages occur to me: > >- Shorter titles are quicker to type when linking from other tiddlers. >- More importantly, perhaps they are easier to remember, or 'lock >onto'?

[tw5] protected macros

In a tiddlers tagged as #:/tags/Macro there is a public macro. It requires other macros to achieve its goals, but these macros have no business being used elsewhere. If I declare these macros in the same tiddler, they are exported. Bad :-( To mitigate that, I have their name beginning with an

Re: [tw5] NoteTaking in Streams

Thank you Stan and Steph. I'll post a link here and on reddit once the questionnaire is ready. On Tuesday, June 29, 2021 at 1:07:37 AM UTC+2 stan...@gmail.com wrote: > You can add me to the list for the questionaire. Streams is an excellent > addition to TW. > Stan > > On Monday, June 28,

[tw5] Re: template: where is the widget???

Thank you to both of you for your explanation. The information on the system tag was very helpful. @Soren: you write tgis in your textbook: Here are some things that *change the current tiddler*: - Transcluding another tiddler with the {{curly braces}} syntax. - Using a $list widget to

Re: [tw5] NoteTaking in Streams

You can add me to the list for the questionaire. Streams is an excellent addition to TW. Stan On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 1:44:26 PM UTC-4 saq.i...@gmail.com wrote: > @si > > >> I've also been considering asking for volunteers for a small group of >>> regular users of Streams for testing

Re: [tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

Ahh OK that shouldn't have confused me as much as it did... >>> The problem is, that I would need to add a generic way. It may work for your, but an other user would probably have fun to link to [[foot]] ;) ... IMO this isn't that much of a problem. If the filter was added by the user, they

Re: [tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 9:13:16 PM UTC+2 Si wrote: > >>> The problem is, that I would need to add a generic way. It may work > for your, but an other user would probably have fun to link to [[foot]] ;) > ... > > I'm not sure I understand what you are saying here! Is "[[foot]]" an >

[tw5] Re: Discussion: Tiddler titles for sources

Interesting discussion. Tiddler titles could be a problem, or not, depending on how you organise stuff. Take the case of William Empsom's SEVEN TYPES OF AMBIGUITY. There is the original 1930 edition, the 1947 2nd edition, the 1953 revised 2nd edition. There was also an American 1947 edition.

Re: [tw5] NoteTaking in Streams

Hi Saq, I'd also be happy to take part in the questionnaire. I use Streams daily and appreciate it very much. All best, Steph On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 1:44:26 PM UTC-4 saq.i...@gmail.com wrote: > @si > > >> I've also been considering asking for volunteers for a small group of >>> regular

[tw5] Re: Discussion: Tiddler titles for sources

Si, Field name usage for bibliographic data is also a "live" problem for me. I've recently gravitated toward approaching the title field with author-date brevity, as is used in interlinear citation: *Beauvoir 1962* (or *Beauvoir 1962b* in the rare case of multiple sources published from same

Re: [tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

>>> I did add a github issue: https://github.com/wikilabs/plugins/issues/101 .. so it's not forgotten. Cool, thanks! >>> The problem is, that I would need to add a generic way. It may work for your, but an other user would probably have fun to link to [[foot]] ;) ... I'm not sure I

Re: [tw5] Re: Artwork for v5.2.0

Jeremy, I think your diagnosis is spot on: we have a collective surplus of enthusiastic creative energy from folks who would like to contribute to making TiddlyWiki intuitive, visible, and attractive. Those of us who have a deeper toolkit/skillset for graphics than for coding are especially

[tw5] Re: butlast filter operator

Thanks! On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 10:45:52 AM UTC-7 saq.i...@gmail.com wrote: > This is essentially an oversight and will be fixed. Thank you for bringing > this up. > > https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/5833 > > On Sunday, June 27, 2021 at 8:28:50 PM UTC+2 History Buff wrote: >

[tw5] Re: A tour through my Zettelkasten

Probably did, but right now that one is more or less just <> -- there's no special functionality for selecting questions out of the tiddlers. That's something I'd like to improve in the future. On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 12:12:30 PM UTC-5 mark.cu...@gmail.com wrote: > Is there any chance your

[tw5] Re: butlast filter operator

This is essentially an oversight and will be fixed. Thank you for bringing this up. https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/5833 On Sunday, June 27, 2021 at 8:28:50 PM UTC+2 History Buff wrote: > All, > > I have a general question about the butlast filter operator. I had a > filter

Re: [tw5] NoteTaking in Streams

@si > I've also been considering asking for volunteers for a small group of >> regular users of Streams for testing new features.. > > > I'm happy to test stuff out as required. > I think I will start out with a questionnaire and also use that as an opportunity to ask for volunteers for

Re: [tw5] Artwork for v5.2.0

Hi Springer, Everything looks great! Thank you! Best wishes Mohammad On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 6:51 PM springer wrote: > Mohammad, > > Thanks! Let me know, of course, if you'd prefer any tweaks to color, > opacity, etc., or font choices within the icon part. > > -Springer > > > On Sunday,

[tw5] Re: A tour through my Zettelkasten

Is there any chance your filter missed the OpenQuestions tiddler as well? On Sunday, April 18, 2021 at 11:55:35 AM UTC-4 Soren Bjornstad wrote: > Looks like my filter missed the TODO tiddler, which should contain: > > \define todore() \[\[TODO\]\]: > \define splitre() [\.\?!] > > To add a TODO

[tw5] Discussion: Tiddler titles for sources

Hi all, I've been rethinking how I should name tiddlers that represent sources, and I'm interested in hearing the thoughts of other TiddlyWiki users. By sources I mean books, articles, movies etc. The crucial point here is that I am talking about things that have an 'official' name. Currently

Re: [tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

I did add a github issue: https://github.com/wikilabs/plugins/issues/101 .. so it's not forgotten. -m On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 6:37:35 PM UTC+2 PMario wrote: > On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 5:49:48 PM UTC+2 Si wrote: > > For example take [[books|??]]. By default this will work as it currently

Re: [tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 5:49:48 PM UTC+2 Si wrote: For example take [[books|??]]. By default this will work as it currently > does, but from a global config the user could add the filter > trim:suffix[s]. This would be applied to [[books]] and then the result > used as the search term. >

Re: [tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

Hi Mario, thanks for the response. There is a little work around, that looks a bit strange. eg: I found some > [[book|??]]s. So the link will only cover the book text. I know that's > not pretty but it creates valid sentences. Thanks, this is probably the best workaround. The question is

Re: [tw5] Re: Artwork for v5.2.0

Hi Springer One thing I find myself thinking when I look at the entries is that the new release banner is a frustratingly constrained canvas for the creativity that we see here. The purpose of the new release banner is just to brand each released version, so that visitors to tiddlywiki.com can

Re: [tw5] Re: Artwork for v5.2.0

Dear all, The gallery is now up to date including James' latest submission with emoji. Of course, multi-submission authors will need to winnow our offerings. I'd love to hear more feedback in the spirit of what Télumire offered over the weekend.

Re: [tw5] Re: butlast filter operator

Hey Tony, Yeah that’s what I eventually realized so I changed what happens when I reach zero. I was just wanting to understand the inner workings better. On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 7:34 AM TW Tones wrote: > Another way to look at it ; > Butlast purpose discard the last N input title(s) > > So

Re: [tw5] Re: butlast filter operator

Another way to look at it ; Butlast purpose discard the last N input title(s) So saying "discard the last 0 input titles" is non sensical If you actually want to discard 3, then 2 then 1 perhaps you filter needs find another way once it reaches 0 Tones On Monday, 28 June 2021 at 13:07:37

[tw5] Re: details tag and wiki interpretation

Eric, I noticed this today, and wonder if a behaviour has changed; Never the less we can add a style to the div like this; Quick Access * one of many * two of many ... Which helps save space Tones On Monday, 28 June 2021 at 22:02:21 UTC+10 Eric Shulman wrote: > On Monday, June 28, 2021

Re: [tw5] Artwork for v5.2.0

Mohammad, Thanks! Let me know, of course, if you'd prefer any tweaks to color, opacity, etc., or font choices within the icon part. -Springer On Sunday, June 27, 2021 at 11:27:52 PM UTC-4 Mohammad wrote: > Springer, > > Many thanks! Your mockup is now great! I appreciate all your efforts

[tw5] Re: template: where is the widget???

> > I've read in the doc that widgets are the fundamental part of tiddlywiki > and that all wiki syntax sugar is finally resolved as a number of widgets. > > Use of template is only described with transclusion as {{||template}} > (with tiddler or field or index before ||). > > the transclude

[tw5] Re: using negative values

Mohamed, Negative values may not always be valid but you example has a space between the sigh + or - and the number. Make it part of the number with no gap. -4 NOT - 4 Regards Tones On Monday, 28 June 2021 at 23:12:26 UTC+10 mohamed...@hotmail.com wrote: > > Hi , > > i have a field that has

[tw5] Re: template: where is the widget???

Jean-Pierre, The word template is over used in tiddlywiki, mostly because of the many ways to do templating. There are more possible than the common ones. - {{tiddlername}} is like incorporating content from a template containing text or code - {{||tiddlername}} says display tiddler

[tw5] using negative values

Hi , i have a field that has a number value referenced in a mathematical operation now I need to use a negative number , like say - 4 if i write the number like that ,the mathematical operation does not work and does not pick up on the number is there a specific format for using

[tw5] Re: details tag and wiki interpretation

Thank you Eric. And ... does work too. Nice trick! Le lundi 28 juin 2021 à 14:20:53 UTC+2, David Gifford a écrit : > A span works just as well. Blessings. > > On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 7:02:21 AM UTC-5 Eric Shulman wrote: > >> On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 4:49:46 AM UTC-7 jn.pierr...@gmail.com

[tw5] Re: details tag and wiki interpretation

A span works just as well. Blessings. On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 7:02:21 AM UTC-5 Eric Shulman wrote: > On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 4:49:46 AM UTC-7 jn.pierr...@gmail.com wrote: > >> I've got a perfectly all right tiddler content with something like an >> ordered list in wiki syntax. >> Then

[tw5] Re: details tag and wiki interpretation

On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 4:49:46 AM UTC-7 jn.pierr...@gmail.com wrote: > I've got a perfectly all right tiddler content with something like an > ordered list in wiki syntax. > Then I've decided to have that part within a html details markup. The > problem is, the wiki syntax is no more

[tw5] details tag and wiki interpretation

Hi! I've got a perfectly all right tiddler content with something like an ordered list in wiki syntax. Then I've decided to have that part within a html details markup. The problem is, the wiki syntax is no more producing a list. for instane my wiki code would be fubaring # foo # bar

[tw5] template: where is the widget???

Hi! I've read in the doc that widgets are the fundamental part of tiddlywiki and that all wiki syntax sugar is finally resolved as a number of widgets. Use of template is only described with transclusion as {{||template}} (with tiddler or field or index before ||). the transclude widget has

[tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

PMario wrote: > That's right, because languages haven't been designed to be expressed by > algorithms. They have been designed by the human brain. And it seems humans > do like "exceptions" from the norm, which tend to cause problems for > programs. > Ha! Great reply! The way I put it is

[tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

There is one thing, which is also interesting. Browsers have a lot of different built in functions already. The problem is, we don't have wikitext representations for them. This is a whole new field for

[tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 11:18:29 AM UTC+2 TiddlyTweeter wrote: While it is possible to emulate *natural language usage* (i.e. code for > variations of plurals; or passive v. active voice) I'm not sure it is ever > satisfying. > That's right, because languages haven't been designed to be

[tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

PMario wrote: > Si wrote: > ... > >> I only just noticed your Uni-link Search feature! Very handy - I have >> been frequently writing things like [[really good idea|Really Good Ideas]], >> so this will save me a lot of time. >> > > >> I'm wondering if there is a way to use Uni-link search,

Re: [tw5] Re: TW as static site generator in AWS lambda

This is really amazing. It shows me how easy Tiddlywiki can be used for processing data (especially when you have standard formats like JSON). I've also thought the Lambda flavour/instance of Tiddlywiki would be way more difficult to deploy. I guess I'll use the same approach to implement

[tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

On Sunday, June 27, 2021 at 10:58:41 PM UTC+2 Si wrote: ... > I only just noticed your Uni-link Search feature! Very handy - I have > been frequently writing things like [[really good idea|Really Good Ideas]], > so this will save me a lot of time. > There is a little work around, that looks a