Good discussion. I have been experimenting with dynamically generating
Indexes from individual Tiddlers in my Martial-Arts wiki.
https://silat.chronicles.wiki/#Glossary
I had to set that aside for my real-time multiplayer experiments, but hope
to get back to UI work soon.
Best,
Joshua Fontany
Ah, I believe that techniques like "extracting introductions" might even
have developed in tandem with a need I had, way back -- to have a list of
"quick definitions" that displayed only the title and first line of each
definition-tagged tiddler while dropping any further content of text field
Hi Springer!
The conditional summary needs a summary field! This is what Soren explained
and is a good approach!
I mean Extracting Introduction From Tiddlers:
https://tobibeer.github.io/tb5/#Extracting%20Introductions%20From%20Tiddlers
It lets you use the same standard searchbox!
Best wishes
Mohammad, By "Tobias Beer's method" do you mean the one here:
https://tobibeer.github.io/tb5/#Conditional%20Summary
?
That's quite similar to what I use. In fact, I like to create visually
distinctive ViewTemplate sections for various fields, iff the fields are
populated. Since I often use
Springer
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 4:01 AM springer wrote:
> Soren,
>
> In your "better indexes" essay you write:
> If we do have the full text included in each locus, we may want to write a
> summary anyway and store it along with the full text: this way, we’ll be
> able to create an outline
*Springer*, that's really cool, I don't think I've ever seen that
particular layout before! I do a similar thing to your “tldr” in my
Zettelkasten, extending the “description” field to non-system tiddlers and
displaying it at the top next to the gem icon if present:
[image:
Soren Bjornstad wrote:
> Some of you all might be interested in this new post on my blog:
>
>
> https://controlaltbackspace.org/notes/better-indexes-through-semantic-modeling/
It was well worth reading!
*THE GOOD*
Great example of logical working through to a satisfactory outcome.
I
Hi Soren
Thank you for sharing, as ever your writing is admirably clear and concise, and
it's a pleasure to follow your thought processes.
I tweeted your post as TiddlyWiki:
https://twitter.com/TiddlyWiki/status/1425837197844910080
Many thanks,
Jeremy
--
Jeremy Ruston
jer...@jermolene.com
On Thursday, August 12, 2021 at 1:31:00 AM UTC+2 springer wrote:
> Soren,
>
> In your "better indexes" essay you write:
> If we do have the full text included in each locus, we may want to write a
> summary anyway and store it along with the full text: this way, we’ll be
> able to create an
Soren,
I have read much of this and will continue to do so (and reread), I think
it is important for tiddlywiki itself that we explore knowledge and
information modeling/management. This is a sizable contribution to the
discussion. As I read I have seen a few alternate paths both converging
Soren,
In your "better indexes" essay you write:
If we do have the full text included in each locus, we may want to write a
summary anyway and store it along with the full text: this way, we’ll be
able to create an outline later and more easily see what parts of the
document we’re hopping
Hi Soren
You make me very eager for the semantic modeling plugin! And boy that looks
like a challenging list for your sabbatical! Enjoy it. Blessings to you.
On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 3:02:15 AM UTC-4 TiddlyTweeter wrote:
> Ciao Soren
>
> VERY interesting write-up of a common practical
Ciao Soren
VERY interesting write-up of a common practical puzzle with a well
conceived SOLUTION.
I'm gonna look at it more and comment in more detail later.
ONE thing worth mentioning *already* is that TiddlyWiki, I think, is very
good for being able to DEMONSTRATE STRATAGEMS on linkages.
13 matches
Mail list logo
