Marc Carter wrote:
> Too true. His paper was "The Fixation of Belief," not knowledge. I
> teach that paper as "ways of coming to believe," but many texts use
> "ways of coming to know."
>
> That's such a great paper. Those guys were *smart*.
Indeed, Charles Sanders Peirce (note the spelling)
Sorry, that message to Michael should have just been sent to him alone.
GPeterson
Gary's iPad
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here:
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=5879
or send a blank ema
Michael, is the app formatted to take advantage of ipad size and video quality?
Or is it just iphone app that then needs to be magnified on the ipad, usually
with loss of detail? Gary
GPeterson
Gary's iPad
On Oct 21, 2010, at 1:37 PM, Michael Britt wrote:
> Tipsters,
>
> Over the summer I
- Original Message -
From: Paul C Bernhardt
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 5:58 PM
Subject: [tips] Recommendations of Textbook for a Group Processes course
I hoping to get the shared wisdom of TIPS on textbook options
Assistant Professor of Psychology
Academic-year, tenure-track position to teach courses, including online
courses, to support the B.S. in Psychology and general education requirements,
as needed, in general psychology, psychology of everyday life, lifespan
development, personality theory and/or
I hoping to get the shared wisdom of TIPS on textbook options for a Group
Processes Course. I lean towards a social psychological approach, as opposed to
a counseling approach.
Share early, share often .
Thanks!
Paul
Paul C Bernhardt
Frostburg State University
Frostburg, MD, USA
pcbernhardt[
Tipsters,
Over the summer I mentioned I was working on an iphone/ipod/ipad app designed
to bring the latest news in psychology to these devices. I'm happy to say that
as of today the app is available in the iTunes app store. I hope you all don't
mind if I say a few words about the app - an ap
H Jim.
No, you're not mistaken, that was me. The last part of my last post
was that the discussion of knowledge was actually tangential to the
belief thing as a belief.
Of course it was certainly nice to have the discussion about knowledge
and the various points of view presented
I note your emp
> *From:* Marc Carter [marc.car...@bakeru.edu]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 21, 2010 9:22 AM
> *To:* Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
> *Subject:* RE: [tips] Why don't we hear more about such things?
>
>
> That's certainly how I learned it. "Knowledge" is justified, true
> belief.
ALLEN ESTERSON
Michael "omnicentric" Sylvester,PhD
Daytona Beach,Florida
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here:
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=5870
or send a blank email to
leave
Thought I read about this or something similar from Christopher Green.Didn't
the German philosophers like Nietsche (sp) and others had this idea of a master
race.
Btw,Leipzig was a hot bed of anti-semitism long before the rise of the
Nazism.The German intellectual circles excluded many jews fr
This was yet another delightful TED talk, this time by a former speechwriter
for Al Gore. Sharp, funny and thought-provoking. It would be especially
good for a motivation course or an I/O class.
http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/dan_pink_on_motivation.html
Beth Benoit
Granite State College
Plym
Too true. His paper was "The Fixation of Belief," not knowledge. I teach that
paper as "ways of coming to believe," but many texts use "ways of coming to
know."
That's such a great paper. Those guys were *smart*.
m
--
Marc Carter, PhD
Associate Professor and Chair
Department of Psychology
Those who are convinced (by, say, recent electoral campaign events) that
actually being persuasive is an important part of communication, and who
are further convinced that persuasion, especially in the political
sphere, often involves something rather more than a clear statement of
the facts a
Hi
James M. Clark
Professor of Psychology
204-786-9757
204-774-4134 Fax
j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca
>>> Michael Smith 21-Oct-10 8:07 AM >>>
Of course all of this discussion of knowledge has very little to do
with my original context which was that the "God saved them" statement
is a statement of beli
Here's one thing that I believe (as opposed to know) contributes to the
confusion: many research methods texts, when discussing C.S. Pierce's ways of
fixing beliefs (e.g., authority, tenacity, etc.), refer to them as ways of
knowing.
From: Marc Carter [marc.car..
The feeling is mostly frustration. Of course when you are frustrated for long
enough... The many strong friendships with other academics serves as something
of a buffer. The real effect is that I am more active politically that I might
be otherwise.
I do think that there are several opportu
That's certainly how I learned it. "Knowledge" is justified, true belief. One
can have true beliefs, but without justification they do not rise to the level
of knowledge. One cannot "know" something that is false.
So beliefs that are not amenable to empirical justification or sound deductive
Thanks for the link Jim.
I would disagree that my previous post implies that one must use
'knowledge' in a "quirky or loose way". As your link shows, there is a
recognized position of irrational knowledge (irrational, of course,
without any pejorative connotation).
Although I'm not implying that t
Diary, tonight, Wednesday, May 26, I'm diving deep, real deep,
spiritually and emotionally deep, so deep most people can't or won't dive there
with me. A few mornings ago I cut out a Buddhist saying from the "approved"
English language newspaper, China Daily, of all places. Buddhism i
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:53:26 -0700, Christopher D. Green wrote:
>Mike Palij wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:08:11 -0700, Christopher D. Green wrote:
>>> Mike Palij wrote:
>>> A quick search of the internet shows that there are several books that
>>> allege to be historical research and to provide
The "narcissism of small differences" is a term coined by Freud (he
sure knew how to invent memorable names for psychological concepts!) to
describe a propensity for people to feel considerable hostility towards
others whose attitudes or views differ only in minor ways from their
own.
The best
22 matches
Mail list logo
