Milan Kuchtiak wrote:
I am partly working on Tomcat integration into Forte4j IDE.
Could anybody tell me how the servlets are compiled into classes.
I supose that not JDK javac compiler is used.
In general, the JDK compiler is probably used by most people, although
any Java compiler should
We're pleased to announce the availabililty of milestone 4 of the Tomcat
4.0 servlet container and JSP engine. Compared to milestone 3, this
release reflects the following changes:
* Implementation of all the changes between "public draft" and "proposed
final draft"
of the Servlet 2.3 and JSP
I agree that it's definitely time to start doing this. However, to have
useful results, it is important that we execute the same test procedures --
otherwise, you cannot even reproduce the same results reliably on the same
platform.
Roy, would it be possible for you to write us a simple
Ethan Wallwork wrote:
Since the spec implies that exceptions should be thrown from a
RequestDispatcher call rather than handled, and there seems to be nothing in
the spec that forbids this behavior, I would like to see it implemented this
way. Does anyone know of any reasons it shouldn't be
Larry Isaacs wrote:
Thanks Craig,
To support this behavior, should the spec require that for a JSP that is
"included" or "forwarded", handlePageException() is required to propagate
the exception back to the caller? Currently, it just says that if there is
no error page, it should "perform
Michael Percy wrote:
Thanks, Costin.
You guys all make it sound like much less pain than I had previously
thought. Maybe Tomcat could use a developer community site akin to what
Mozilla has (www.mozillazine.org) -- people would probably be more willing
to contribute if they felt invited.
Hans Bergsten wrote:
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
[...]
Therefore, I'm going to spend the weekend integrating all the bug reports and
fixes I can find into 3.2 -- please check the CVS commit reports and remind me
of any that I miss. In particular, I would like people to
Mark,
I just checked in a slight generalization of this change (the read of the four-byte
header could fail in the same way. I forgot to give you credit in the CVS commit
:-(, but thaks for the bug report. Please test this (with your large servlet
requests) when you can.
Craig
Mark Pollard
I've updated the Tomcat documentation pages on the Jakarta web site to
pull the "tomcat_32" branch, so that we can see the docs that will be
included in a 3.2 release (and have the opportunity to fix them).
Please help this process by reviewing the only doc pages at:
While researching the isues related to BugRat Bug Report #213
("RequestDispatcher does not propogate errors"), I became aware that, in
the implementation of RequestDispatcher.forward() and
RequestDispatcher.include(),
(org.apache.tomcat.facade.RequestDispatcherImpl) the method
David Soroko wrote:
I am observing the following behavior which I do not understand (Tomcat 3.1
and 3.2b6)
The setup:
The appdev Hello sample servlet to which the method init (ServletConfig
config)
has been added. It just prints a line of text.
To the servlet's web.xml the
Hans Bergsten wrote:
Once upon a time this happened when an application was defined by a Context
element and stored in the default webapps directory. Tomcat created one context
for the Context declaration and one for the the WAR (or expanded WAR) it found
in the webapps directory.
Well,
Colin Evans wrote:
Hi, it appears that HttpServletResponse.encodeURL refuses to add a
JSESSIONID to relative URLs for Tomcat 3.1 and 3.2b6. I looked at the code,
and it appears that HttpServletResponseFacade.isEncodeable() always returns
false on URL strings that are not fully qualified,
Nacho wrote:
Excuse my ignorance, Why tomcat 3.x makes redirects (302) absolute ?
It leads to problems with NAT ( at router level ) redirects, and reverse
proxys, and it can commented without aparent harm
See servlet 2.2 specification, section 6.3, first complete paragraph.
Making the
Qian Weichun wrote:
The bug lies here:
I forward a request in my servlet.
After I commit the output, I perform the forwarding.
Tomcat doesn't act conforming to the servlet 2.2 specification,
which specifies that it should throw the IllegalStateException.
Luke,
I apologize for not giving you credit for this patch -- it was included (along
with other patches) by someone else. But thanks!!!
Craig McClanahan
"Kirby, Luke" wrote:
Hi!
It would seem that the Jakarta NT Service fails to properly shutdown Tomcat.
Examining the code shows that it
Nacho wrote:
Ohh unpleasure findings ( and i do need to read the damn RFC too :-)
Tomcat 3.2 seems to have another bug!!!
i've obtained this ( by means of telnet ) from different http servers,
after done a GET / in all of them, i obtained
This is from IIS 5.0
first finding: How
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have found a different session behavior between tomcat3.1 and
tomcat3.2
I have a code in a servlet that invalidates a session, if is present,
and creates a new session.
The servlet works without any problem with tomcat 3.1 but
with tomcat 3.2 beta6 there
It's actually quite a bit worse than just getting the /servlet prefix
wrong. Basically, the web.xml settings are not consulted at all when
generating tomcat-apache.conf.
I do not anticipate that this will be changed any time soon in 3.2. For
4.0, one of the main reasons that the web connector
Yes, this is a real bug in 3.2b6 (and probably earlier). I checked in a patch
for it earlier this week, which will be included in b7 and the eventual release.
What caused the problem was kind of interesting -- the session stuff was
abstracted out into a RequestInterceptor, which would add the
Nacho wrote:
Hola a todos:
After some more research in the issues related to NATs and tomcat
standalone, and more reading, i think i have found a real and common
problem in tomcat 3.X, that it's not present in Tomcat 4.0 ( this is
from a brief reading of the code ).
The problem, i think
It's been a week now, and I've committed 20 patches to the 3.2 tree,
ranging from simple tweaks to security problems to spec compliance
bugs. I believe that I've gotten all of the critical bug reports
submitted on the mailing lists or via BugRat. Does anyone know of any
I've missed (see below
Serge Knystautas wrote:
Ok, I submitted the bug report this afternoon (#362) about how jasper was
mishandling a custom tag of mine. You can read the report if you want, but
basically here's what happens... say your custom tag has an attribute to be
rtexprvalue and because of the flexibility
Marc Saegesser wrote:
Craig,
I posted the diffs to fix a log file problem in jk_nt_service.c a few days
ago. The changes are minor (but fix a really annoying problem) and have
been running at my site without problem for about a week.
I'm new to submitting code changes to the project so
Serge Knystautas wrote:
[snip]
The way I got this to work was to overload the setter method to take both a
String and an Object... this got it working through Jasper Servlet but not
jspc. I don't know if that's a violation of the spec or the way to handle
this issue.
Yep, it is, and again
Jon Stevens wrote:
During ./build.sh, facade22.jar is placed into the tomcat/lib directory
twice (once also in lib/servlet22). Is there a reason for that?
I couldn't tell you ... but it's worth mentioning that the main branch of
"jakarta-tomcat" (where you committed your change for
Arieh Markel wrote:
I am reading the (2.3) spec and am realizing that I am not able to
share a login page with multiple contexts.
That's true (also true for servlet 2.2).
In our (embedded) use of Tomcat, we have different contexts, but
we use a single login form/screen.
When
Paul and others,
See intermixed comments below.
Paul Frieden wrote:
I've attached 1 patch, 2 modified interceptors, and one new
interceptor. These all work with 3.2b6. Please consider these for
3.2b7. Here is what they do:
CookieTools.patch:
This patch fixes cookie deletion.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have posted bug fix to TC load balancing when using URL-only sessionID
(both mod_jk and mod_jserv).
I have received no answer.
The fix is for 3.2b6.
R u going to include this?
This fix bug #328, and let tomcat to serve applications that can't use
Nick Bauman wrote:
I have all kinds of problems using new versions of Tomcat (and someone
said that they are suprised at how few people try the milestone builds /
betas) and many of them come from problems with Ant. So I think Ant is
actually _preventing_ people from getting the most out of
Barry Dunne wrote:
Hi,
I need to trap the username and password entered by the user when accessing
a secured web page, this is so that I can use this information when
connecting to an external system in a servlet.
The method I used was to have form based authentication but with the action
Rob Shaw wrote:
I'm seeing a behaviour that suggests instantiation of servlets
due to an invocation via a "servlet-mapping" or via the
InvokerServlet (/servlet) are handled differently.
More specifically, given that I've set up a Context for
the path "/foo", and within that context, I've
Rob Shaw wrote:
Given that I have 2 "contexts" defined (which I'm assuming
each has thier own classloader).
That is correct.
After making a request to the same servlet within each
context, I'm witnessing the creation of seperate instances
of the servlet per context, which I would
+1
Craig
Larry Isaacs wrote:
In Tomcat 3.2b7 (and earlier), invoking
http://localhost:8080/test/jsp/Helloworld.jsp results in an NPE in
JspCompiler.isOutDated(). This occurs because getRealPath() returns
null since the 'w' should be uppercase, hence it is considered an
"unsafe" path.
and no-cookie
browsers (WAP).
Please
let me know whether you are going to include that in tomcat 3.2.
(this
fix bug #328)
TIA.
--Shai
-Original
Message-
From:
Shai Fultheim (BRM IL)
Sent:
Thursday, November 16, 2000 01:03
To:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc:
'Craig R. McClanahan'
Subject
Hi Jason,
See below.
Jason Brittain wrote:
Hi guys!
In reading through the org.apache.catalina.resources package code, I found
a small omission from the ResourcesBase.setCheckInterval() method:
public void setCheckInterval(int checkInterval) {
// Perform the property update
int
Jason Brittain wrote:
BTW: I really like the resources package! I can think of several useful
implementations that I'd like to use, like one for CVS, or one for JavaMail,
or ... lots more.
I like the Resources abstraction as well. Before we go whole hog at creating new
implementations,
Stefán F. Stefánsson wrote:
It can't be that... must be something on my side... but I keep getting
the following error when I try to run build (doesn't matter if I do
build or build dist).
C:\jakarta\jakarta-tomcatbuild
Buildfile: build.xml
BUILD FAILED
build.xml:33: Could not create
Thanks for all the bug reports on 3.2b7! We've been so successful at
identifying remaining bugs that I'd like to propose we do at least one more beta
cycle (3.2b8) before calling it good. We need to make sure that we didn't
introduce any regression errors with all the bug fixes -- and we need
Nacho wrote:
Hola a todos:
cycle (3.2b8) before calling it good. We need to make sure
that we didn't
introduce any regression errors with all the bug fixes -- and
we need to resolve
the JSP issues that Larry raised this morning.
+1 to 3.2b8
+1 to Larry fix of jasper.
I
Stefán F. Stefánsson wrote:
Here is a patch for bug report 404.
Stefán,
Thanks for the patch! I've committed this fix, basically along the lines of
what you proposed with a
couple of tweaks that seemed to be missing. Please try it out (the fix will be
included in beta-8 to
be created on
Hi Tim, see intermixed.
Tim Bond wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get a WAR file created with the J2EE reference
implementation deployment tool to deploy on Tomcat 4.0. The new
env-entry feature (as of 11/1) is working. Here's part of my web.xml
file:
servlet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
6.8 Container Managed Security Constraints
Due to the way that Tomcat 3.2 is implemented, container managed security
constraints are imposed both on the original request URI *and* on subrequests
initiated to handle RequestDispatcher.forward() or
Gomez Henri wrote:
I propose to do a 3.2b8 build on Monday afternoon (which
should give us time to
address the remaining b7 issues that I know about). What do
you think?
RPM will be release just after ;-)
Thank you for faithfully doing these, by the way :-).
Which are
Gary Albelli wrote:
I was reading this bug report and could not find where the jsp spec
indicates that the buffer should be flushed prior to processing the include.
You're right ... the servlet spec does not require this behavior (although JSP 1.1
pages that use jsp:include page="/x"
Hans Bergsten wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
craigmcc00/11/20 15:59:43
Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/facade Tag: tomcat_32
HttpServletResponseFacade.java
Log:
Intra-document references (i.e. relative urls starting with "#") never
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Hi,
While building my RPM I notice that in server.xml in the SSL session
the secure parameter is still missing :
Normal or te be commited ?
I did not know about this one. Go ahead and commit it, so we get it right in
the final release.
Craig
-
---
Dan Milstein wrote:
Does anyone know where can I find documentation on the ajp13 communication protocol?
I'm looking for documentation about how the packets are laid out, what messages the
server can send the servlet engine, etc. I am *not* looking for documentation on how
to write config
Warner Onstine wrote:
Hi all,
It's been a while since I looked at the SSL stuff and I just received a
request which I'm not sure how it would be handled in TC4. Would it be
possible to handle multiple certificates for SSL per servlet? If this needs
further clarification let me know.
I
Folks,
I plan to cut a "milestone 5" release of Tomcat 4.0 this coming Friday (or,
worst case, on Saturday). As a sneak preview of coming attractions, the
following cool stuff will be included:
* Initial version of the web connector for Apache
* Substantial performance optimizations on the
Pilho Kim wrote:
How can I test JSSE ?
I have installed Tomcat 3.2 beta 8 on Win98.
First, download JSSE (1.0.2) from the JavaSoft web site, and install it's JAR
files on your classpath (or in the system extensions directory,
$JAVA_HOME/jre/lib/ext on a Java2 platform).
Next, edit your
I would rather wait and include the connector stuff in the m5 milestone -- that
way it will get more attention (and bug fixes :-).
Also, I don't see any makefiles or other build scripts for the web connector, or
for the invocation stuff. I'd be happy to integrate whatever is necessary into
the
See intermixed below.
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I plan to cut a "milestone 5" release of Tomcat 4.0 this coming Friday (or,
worst case, on Saturday). As a sneak preview of coming attractions, the
following cool stuff will be included:
Nice...
* Initial version of the web connector for Apache
A few short comments intermixed below.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Many of the ajp13 bugs seems to be fixed (even the dreaded ajp13 +
RequestDispatcher).
That's great! Even if you don't get them fixed in time for 3.2 final, rolling out
a maintenance release with those fixes would be
I'm trying to build the new native code stuff on my Linux box, and am running
into the following SOLARIS-specific issues:
service/src/native/jsvc.h
- The header file sys/systeminfo.h is SOLARIS specific
service/src/native/jsvc_unix.c
- The sysinfo() system call, defined in sys/systeminfo.h
is
"Pier P. Fumagalli" wrote:
Ok, I don't know what's happening... I'm reading some of the messages to
this list "in advance" (since I moderate and NOT all of you kids post
with the same email address you are subscribed! GRRR!)...
But, strangely enough, I've seen some messages talking about
Louis Tribble wrote:
Presumably when 3.2 goes final, there will be a surge.
That seems somewhat likely to me :-)
Also, 4.0-m5 (this weekend or so) will be the first Tomcat 4.0
"milestone" (alpha) that has the connectors to run with Apache.
Hmm, we might want to see about adding some
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
(1) Build and release Tomcat 3.2 final on Wednesday 11/29/2000
+1 (known bugs to be fixed in 3.2.1 - Did you apply the patch from Clinton,
Doug [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Is that the fix for the RequestDispatcher.forward() problem? If so, then I have not
done so. Are you
"Roytman, Alex" wrote:
I am trying to tie Tomcat with JNDI to use J2EE pattern to obtain resources:
Context context = new InitialContext();
dataSource = (DataSource)context.lookup("java:comp/env/jdbc/myDataSource");
(I know Tomcat team is planning to have it for Tomcat 4 eventually)
Thanks to everyone for the bug reports (and patches)! You can now download
"beta 8" of the Tomcat 3.2 servlet container from:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/tomcat/release/v3.2-beta-8
Relative to "beta 7", a number of critical bugs have been fixed, and several
configuration options
Matthew L Daniel wrote:
If this is not the proper forum to be discussing Catalina related difficulties,
please advise me and I will take this elsewhere. As some other kind soul
reported, BugRat is exactly that. Even the usage page is broken.
I am using the CVS build of Catalina 4.0M5. It
Larry Isaacs wrote:
Craig,
I overlooked this earlier. I plan on leaving out the CVS "bin" directory
from the source zip. From what I can tell, all these binaries are
out of date.
Definitely. I totally forgot they were there.
I'm also going to remove them from CVS as well, so we don't
I'm getting ready to build the Java part of the 3.2 final build. It would be
useful to have the native code pieces built for as many platforms as possible so
that I can post them on the web site along with the distribution.
Could developers who have environments to do this please help me out
Jason Brittain wrote:
It sounds like a good idea. While I was working on this valve I was
thinking
that it would be great to queue up the log messages for another thread, but
I first wanted to quickly get these lighter optimization changes into the
codebase.
Sounds like a reasonable
Larry Isaacs wrote:
It doesn't contain any 3.3 features that I know of because I
don't/didn't
know anything about what 3.3 will have versus 3.2 =)
This is will help. However, there are some changes in the tomcat_32 "older" version
that would need to be ported to the MAIN version before
"Aiken, David" wrote:
That sounds workable.. i looked for an archive of this newsgroup but didn't
have any luck - do you know where the relevant section in the JSP/servlet
spec is?
Do you mean the restriction on serving things from WEB-INF directly to the
client?
Servlet 2.2 Spec, Section
Matthew L Daniel wrote:
To my knowledge, this is not a known issue. In fact, I've got tons of stuff
that
depends on request parameters working just fine in 4.0. I would be very
interested
in a simple test case that can reproduce what you're seeing.
I have included a jar (the
n assigned.
Doing this forces all requests to come through your controller servlet, because
none of the JSP pages would be directly accessible.
thanks!
david
Craig
-Original Message-----
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 12:43
The most anticipated release from the Jakarta project yet! We hereby announce
the availability of the final release of version 3.2 of the Tomcat servlet
container and JSP engine. Tomcat implements the Servlet 2.2 and JSP 1.1
specifications, and represents the most current release quality build
See below.
"Aiken, David" wrote:
hi all..
We're hitting a problem with the MVC approach in tomcat.
Our controller is designed to intercept all requests for URLs within our
web application so that it can handle internationalization and security
checks centrally.
The problem is
Larry Isaacs wrote:
Hi all,
We have a need for a global way to have Jasper compile the
JSP servlet source with debug information. I would propose
defining a system property such as:
jasper.compile.debug
which if set to "true" would turn on the inclusion of debug
info. Any
Nick Bauman wrote:
Could someone with edit rights on Jakarta change the link to me as the
Keeper of the Bugs from my yahoo email to this one?
I'm talking about the link on:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/bugs.html
Done.
Also, what's up with the Scarab schema: it's gone (the link is
Stefán F. Stefánsson wrote:
woops... this bug should not have that severity or priority... I didn't
notice any place where I should have set that now that I think of it...
hmmm... weird... maybe it's a bug in the bug-tracking system?
Yah, it is ...
In response to the issue raised however,
"Osmundsen, Helge" wrote:
We have been running tomcat 3.1 for a while, and just downloaded 3.2 final
to our test Unix server. We have our servlets defined in the home +
"/conf/web.xml" file. This has not changed. 3.1 still works fine. 3.2
does not load the servlets in the default
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would be interested in hearing from folks here whether they percieve
a need for Debian packaging, or whether they prefer to "roll their
own"?
I'd love to see up-to-date Debian packaging, but I think it would be a
challenge to keep it quite as up-to-date
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Costin, could you please move your upload directory for these nightly builds to
someplace else? The problem is that you're confusing the people who wonder why
the nightly builds have nothing to do with the current (3.2) code release.
I can move them to
This issue was the topic of quite a lot of discussion on the expert group for
the servlet 2.3 and JSP 1.2 specs. Tomcat 3.2 implements the result of what the
expert group decided was the intended behavior.
Craig McClanahan
Shahed Ali wrote:
I noticed that if I have an include directive
Rob Shaw wrote:
Tomcat 3.1 and 3.2. I haven't run the tests for 4.0.
You will see the same results in 4.0, for the same reasons, on your simple test
cases. However, there is a behavior difference in 4.0 related to the order in
which class loaders are searched for classes -- see my upcoming
Aron Kramlik wrote:
Rob,
This is great information. I wonder if you could explain
why it is that I need to put xml4j.jar file under the $CLASSPATH
(i.e. $TOMCAT_HOME/lib) that is loaded by an init() method of
a servlet?
Which version of Tomcat? There are different issues in each one of
"Heinemann, Andreas" wrote:
Hi,
i've got a question/problem concerning the doPost() method.
As far as I know, whenever there is a new request, tomcat creates
a new thread running through the doPost() method.
This is not precisely correct in all circumstances. In both Tomcat 3.2 and 4.0,
Arieh Markel wrote:
I want to close this (543) bug.
I believe that this is not a bug (as I explained in the attached
message on which I replied to the bug filing).
You're right ... it's not a bug.
I think I cannot close a bug on the bugrat database.
You have to have a BugRat
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Hi,
1) any date for TC 4.0 M5 ?
As soon as I can get the Apache connector to compile and run on my Linux system
(and understand it enough to explain to others how to configure it, which should
be really easy thanks to Pier's hard work :-), I will cut a M5 release --
Jon Stevens wrote:
on 12/9/2000 3:55 PM, "Hans Bergsten" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know the migration of Java Apache projects has been discussed, but
I have not seen a formal decision being made by PMC. So I like to
run it by the PMC anyway, but based on what you say it sounds like it
Jon Stevens wrote:
on 12/9/2000 7:07 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+(jspFile.toUpperCase().indexOf("/WEB-INF/") != 0) ||
+(jspFile.toUpperCase().indexOf("/META-INF/") != 0))
Seems like it would be better to define this as a constant
Over the last three days, a review of published and soon-to-be-published reports
of security vulnerabilities in Tomcat has uncovered a series of problems in the
3.1 final release, and a couple of less serious (but still significant) problems
in 3.2. Please vote (quickly) on the following two
Hans Bergsten wrote:
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
[...]
Proposal #1: Release a Tomcat 3.1.1 that fixes *only* the security problems
+0. Is removing TC 3.1 from the download pages an alternative? There shouldn't
be any reason for anyone to use TC 3.1 now when 3.2 is released.
Larry Isaacs wrote:
In addition to specifying these JSP options, I'm looking for a way to
alter the defaults that get used when these options aren't specified in
server.xml. My target is to be able run Tomcat in debugging and
non-debugging situations using the same server.xml and without
Kief Morris wrote:
Pilho Kim typed the following on 23:23 12/12/2000 +0900
I cannot download JMX (Java Management Extensions),
because I reside outside USA.
I was able to download it from here (UK) without any problem.
I had to register, but it worked.
The "README.txt" file in Tomcat 4.0
Danno Ferrin wrote:
I think that keeping the import list to what is required by the spec and
refrencing all of the other object we need to compile by the fully
qualified name will result in less un-intended colissions.
+1 for importing exactly, and only, the "default import list" defined
Aron Kramlik wrote:
Has there been a definitive list of these security problems with
TC 3.1 or TC 3.2?
The definitive lists of what vulnerabilities were fixed are in the release notes
document for each version (file "doc/readme" in the download).
Subscribers to TOMCAT-DEV also saw the CVS
Aaron Knauf wrote:
Is there any reason why we can't compile tomcat against JSSE and include the
jars in the tomcat lib directory as part of the standard binary distribution?
This would make it much easier for people to get HTTPS support from tomcat. I
believe that the Sun licence allows
Recent investigations and reports have revealed security vulnerabilities in both
Tomcat 3.1 and Tomcat 3.2 final releases. To deal with these problems, the
Tomcat team has developed maintenance releases, and recommended actions, for
each major version. (Tomcat 4.0 milestone 4 shares one of
You need to upgrade to at least jakarta-tomcat-4.0-m4 for this to work
-- earlier versions returned the JSSE internal object for a certificate,
rather than converting it to java.security.cert.X509Certificate as the
spec requires. This has been fixed.
Craig McClanahan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Schmitt, Christian" wrote:
Hi all,
I had Cocoon 2 and Tomcat 4 (CVS) working for a couple of days, but since
yesterday I'm getting a strange error (see subject), and frankly I don't
know what's causing it.
Anyway, here's the offending XSP page:
?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?
The latest milestone release of Tomcat 4.0, milestone 5, has just been made
available at:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0-m5/
This release includes two major new areas of functionality (the initial release
of a web connector for Apache, and a JNDI naming
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Warning
The following files are invalid :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0-m5/src/jaka
rta-servletapi-4.0-m5-src.tar
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0-m5/src/jaka
rta-servletapi-4.0-m5-src.tar.gz
The
Punky Tse wrote:
Hi,
Craig and Pier: Let's fix it! We have a beautiful build tool (Ant) ,
why can't we have a good build system?
Agreed.
One of the reasons Tomcat 4 is complex is actually Jon's fault :-). He wanted a
way to build just the servlet container portion (Catalina), which
See intermixed.
Jon Stevens wrote:
Hi All,
I spent a few hours last night mucking with the build process and found out
that the main problem primarily stems from the fact that the Ant build
scripts are not written to take advantage of Ant 1.2's new features with
regards to setting up the
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
* This release fixes ***only*** the identified security
vulnerabilities.
It does not address any of the other bugs, or feature
requests, related
to Tomcat 3.2 final. These issues will be dealt with in future
maintenance releases of Tomcat 3.2 as appropriate.
Gomez Henri wrote:
I've asked some days ago about the 'Attic ?'...
Sorry, I thought that got answered.
The "attic" is CVS's way of dealing with files that are on one branch of a
repository, but not another -- or cases where you deleted a file, but you might
want to go back to a previously
1 - 100 of 1121 matches
Mail list logo
