: Christopher Cain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 6:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Velocity and JSP speed testing...
Totally OT, bandwidth-wasting, irrelevant musings P.S. ...
Where did that Paulo Gaspar cat go? That guy was always
interesting in a flame
war
He is over on the Velocity lists being a pain in the ass still. :-)
I just love him.
I love you too Jon.
Our last flame war was about me wanting to get rid of the dynamic
logging in
Velocity and just make a dependency on Log4J. Eventually, I think he just
gave up. Now that Ceki has the
Quoting Paulo Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry man, I can't make a really good flame war when I agree
with Jon.
That's okay, buddy. You're back, and that's the important thing. We missed you
is all ;-)
- Christopher
Not exactly scientific, but I do trust Rickard to do things correctly...he
has an existing JSP page for testing and then converted it to
Velocity...here are the results...
JSP - 240-480ms
Velocity - 50-70ms
You make the decision.
:-)
-jon
-- Forwarded Message
From: Rickard Öberg
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
Not exactly scientific, but I do trust Rickard to do things correctly...he
has an existing JSP page for testing and then converted it to
Velocity...here are the results...
JSP - 240-480ms
Velocity - 50-70ms
Frankly, I'm astounded it took
Craig R. McClanahan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-jon
Craig (who is actually quite happy with Catalina at this point :-)
Never been a fan of JSPs myself, but seeing Velocity (lately I had to
install it for EyeBrowse on Nagoya, and it was painful) I'm not a big fan of
that thing either.
But
on 8/6/01 7:45 PM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never been a fan of JSPs myself, but seeing Velocity (lately I had to
install it for EyeBrowse on Nagoya, and it was painful) I'm not a big fan of
that thing either.
Installation != Use
Remember the old JServ 1.0 days when it
on 8/6/01 7:18 PM, Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
Not exactly scientific, but I do trust Rickard to do things correctly...he
has an existing JSP page for testing and then converted it to
Velocity...here are the results...
JSP
Craig R. McClanahan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-jon
Craig (who is actually quite happy with Catalina at this point :-)
Never been a fan of JSPs myself, but seeing Velocity (lately I had to
install it for EyeBrowse on Nagoya, and it was painful) I'm not a big fan
of
that thing
When I switched my projects from JSP to Velocity, I did it more for:
- simplicity of the language (VTL)
- taking away (from web designers) the power to write/execute Java
directly
but if it's fast as well, even better :-)
Bojan
PS. It does take longer to get the first page. Velocity has to
Totally OT, bandwidth-wasting, irrelevant musings P.S. ...
Where did that Paulo Gaspar cat go? That guy was always interesting in a flame
war, especially with Jon involved. Man ... dude did NOT like Jon, but he sure
loved Velocity. I wonder he went ... I really miss those days, back when we
on 8/6/01 9:24 PM, Christopher Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Totally OT, bandwidth-wasting, irrelevant musings P.S. ...
Where did that Paulo Gaspar cat go? That guy was always interesting in a flame
war, especially with Jon involved. Man ... dude did NOT like Jon, but he sure
loved
12 matches
Mail list logo
