Here's a good article:
http://raibledesigns.com/tomcat/
-Original Message-
From: Jobish P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 6:07 AM
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: mod_jk2 connection
Hi,
Could any one guide me to connect apache to tomcat through
It´s very interesting, but do you Know any good and simple manual for
windows?
David Owens wrote:
Here's a good article:
http://raibledesigns.com/tomcat/
-Original Message-
From: Jobish P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 6:07 AM
To:
windows box
very easily.
Hope this helps.
-Original Message-
From: Victor Daniel Diaz Suarez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 7:41 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 connection
It´s very interesting, but do you Know any good and simple manual for
windows
Hi ,
Thanks Owens. That was a nice article.
Howewer I encountered a problem while starting my apache server.
The error message was,
Syntax error on line 270 of /apache/conf/httpd.conf:
Invalid command 'JkWorkersFile', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a
module not included in the server
David Owens wrote:
Here's a good article:
http://raibledesigns.com/tomcat/
Actually it has one error:
# list the workers by name
worker.list=tomcat1, tomcat2, loadbalancer
It should be:
worker.list=loadbalancer
See the:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/config/workers.html
Users List
Subject: RE: mod_jk2 connection
Hi ,
Thanks Owens. That was a nice article.
Howewer I encountered a problem while starting my apache server.
The error message was,
Syntax error on line 270 of /apache/conf/httpd.conf:
Invalid command 'JkWorkersFile', perhaps mis-spelled or defined
-Original Message-
From: Richard Walters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 2:54 AM
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: mod_jk2
how/where does mod_jk2 know where to find java
mod_jk2 doesn't need to find java.
you have to have tomcat
Jk2 is deprecated, so you may want to look at mod_jk 1.2.8 which has all the
jk2 enhancements(but still uses the jk syntax).
If you still need to use jk2, the Location matching works fine with 2.0.49. I
have been using it for quite a while now with multiple vhosts.
Charlie
-Original
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read (by chance?) somewhere on the jakarta web site that mod_jk2 (aka
JK2) is officially unsupported since mid-November.
Well, it is actually not supported for a much longer time :).
At this point I'm not sure what to do: should I use JK? Should I stay with
mod_jk2
The recommended ways to go are JK or mod_proxy_ajp.
Ta
Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 December 2004 11:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mod_jk2 future?
Hi all,
I've a jsp-based application (interface to an oracle db) that will go
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 12:16:51PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Tomcat), Tomcat-5.0.28, configured with mod_jk2 because I read that md_jk2
: was the connector to use with apache 2.x.x
Where did you read this?
I ask because plain mod_jk (aka version 1) works just fine with Apache
2.x. A
Actually I don't remember.
When we decided to use Tomcat instead of Websphere a few months ago, I
read quite a lot of documentation/articles (I'm not a developer, but the
systems' administrator of our linux servers). I just remember reading the
following line because I saved it: jk2 is a
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 02:02:56PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: I will check with the developpers team whether switching from JK2 to JK
: could be a problem but is there any known issues in switching from one
: connector to the other (apart for the configuration files)
I can't say, as I've
Nevermind I figured it out.
Just needed to add this in the Host in conf/server.xml:
Context path= docBase= debug=1/
Doesn't make a lot of sense but it did the trick.
John
Hello Im running tomcat5 with mod_jk2, apache 2 and RH FC01
Im having trouble getting servlets to work under mod_jk2
Hello Edward,
You need to add this link in your httpd.conf file:
JkSet config.file /etc/httpd/conf/workers2.properties
John
my system:
Tomcat 5.0.27; Apache 2.0.51; mod_jk2/2.0.4; Gentoo Linux 2004.2/x86
my problem:
It doesn't work..
probable cause:
In catalina.out, this message
Thanks, John, but this isn't the problem - I already have that line, and
anyway, it's not Apache that can't find workers2.properties but Tomcat: the
message is reported during Tomcat startup, which takes place before Apache is
started.
Edward
On Monday 18 October 2004 15:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check your server.xml for the coyote connector. Was this modified in any
way? Try replacing the jk2.properties file with default on in tomcat/conf/
Strange, because tomcat default install works fine, so Im assuming you may
have made some mods somewhere.
Im sure you've already checked these...
00:27
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 Ready/Recommended For Production?
Boy am I confused now. If mod_jk2 is dead, so what is everyone using?
Still using just the first mod_jk? I had just gotten everythign working
with mod_jk2 - more or less- but configurationwise mod_jk2 is a pain since
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Peng Tuck Kwok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 Ready/Recommended For Production?
Do you really need to put apache in front of tomcat ? Standalone
tomcat
PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Peng Tuck Kwok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 Ready/Recommended For Production?
Do you really need to put apache in front of tomcat ? Standalone
tomcat
On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 05:56, Antony Paul wrote:
Do you mean Apache dont have any security holes. I dont know about
hacking a system. But in terms of security Tomcat is far better than
Apache since it dont have any security vulnerabilities.
But if you run tomcat standalone, you have to run
Dangerous.
You should run tomcat as a non-root user, no login, no shell. The reason
Apache is involved is because we want Apache to serve static pages.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Millson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 14, 2004 9:58 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re
, 2004 9:58 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 Ready/Recommended For Production?
On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 05:56, Antony Paul wrote:
Do you mean Apache dont have any security holes. I dont know about
hacking a system. But in terms of security Tomcat is far better than
Apache since
. It is working great for me on a rather busy
little cluster of servers.
--Angus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 7:27 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 Ready/Recommended For Production?
Boy am I
If you want access to some of apaches more advanced features, yup, you
need apache infront of tomcat.
--Angus
-Original Message-
From: Peng Tuck Kwok [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 11:59 PM
To: Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_jk2
Run it as a daemon then you can run it as a non root user with permissions on port 80
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 October 2004 15:20
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: mod_jk2 Ready/Recommended For Production?
Yes for static, but what
. It is working great for me on a rather busy
little cluster of servers.
--Angus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 7:27 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 Ready/Recommended For Production?
Boy am
mod_auth_mysql and JDBC
for centralized authentication (is this even possible?).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 2:27 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: mod_jk2 Ready/Recommended For Production?
I have been using mod_jk2
From the tomcat-devel list:
So is JK2 dead because of proxy_ajp? Why doesn't JK2 just replace JK?
JK2 is dead because (like mod_webapp before it :), it failed to attract a
community interested in maintaining it. You might as well ask 'why doesn't
mod_webapp just replace JK?'
For some reason the
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 13:42, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
From the tomcat-devel list:
So is JK2 dead because of proxy_ajp? Why doesn't JK2 just replace JK?
Ah, I see. This message from tomcat-devel shows the JK ToDo list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg63908.html
It is
Boy am I confused now. If mod_jk2 is dead, so what is everyone using?
Still using just the first mod_jk? I had just gotten everythign working
with mod_jk2 - more or less- but configurationwise mod_jk2 is a pain since
the syntax was completely changed and requires you to map every nook and
cranny.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 10:07:34PM -0400, Mike Millson wrote:
: The Tomcat FAQ page still says that mod_jk is great and should be used
: for production and mod_jk2 may not be production worthy for everyone.
: [snip]
: Is this still accurate, or is mod_jk2 now ready/recommended for
: production?
Do you really need to put apache in front of tomcat ? Standalone
tomcat (since ver 4.x)
has always been pretty good in terms of performance
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 22:07:34 -0400, Mike Millson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tomcat FAQ page still says that mod_jk is great and should be used
for
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 01:03:42PM -0400, Jacques Poulin wrote:
: Cannot load /etc/httpd/modules/mod_jk2.so into server:
: /etc/httpd/modules/mod_jk2.so: undefined symbol: apr_socket_send
: [snip]
: I was hoping someone could help me. I've seen a lot of messages in the
: archive about the
YOu have to use LocationMatch instead because * won't match a /. I had
this problem myself.
Webmaster wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to upgrade a setup I was using with mod_jk to mod_jk2.
This setup has 2 workers. Here it is:
With mod_jk:
JkMount /webapp1/*.jsp worker1
JkMount /webapp2/*.jsp worker2
Ernesto Echeverría
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Shraibman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jueves, 19 de Agosto de 2004 11:29 a.m.
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: [tomcat] Re: mod_jk2 and subdirectories
YOu have to use LocationMatch instead because * won't match a /. I had this
problem
Not that I know of. You could move your content up a level (move your
pipelines and associated stuff in computing/sitemap.xmap folder up to
the top sitemap.xmap and change the webapp's name to computing. Off the
top of my head, that's the best suggestion I can offer.
--David
Kirk Storer
If the naming of these files follows the usual conventions - mod_jk2.dll
is a library for Windows, mod_jk2.so is a library for unix/linux.
They're probably equivalents to eachother but will not be interchangable.
--
Stephen
Hirode, Kartheek V. wrote:
Hello all
We have the following config
Sergei, Ian, and Anybody else:
Hello, I am trying to do the same thing, which is to have Apcache 2.0.49 forward all
jsp and servlet request to Tomcat 5.0.25 on a windows box. Have you or anyone else
been able to get this to work successfully? What is debian/testing? And what is
Debian
, that was not the case.
ian.
-Original Message-
From: Tonte Pouncil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 13, 2004 9:55 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: mod_jk2, apache and index.jsp
Sergei, Ian, and Anybody else:
Hello, I am trying to do the same thing, which is to have
am at work now. Be looking to hear from
me tomorrow unless I can steel away some time to try this at work.
Thanks!
tp
-Original Message-
From: Ian Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 9:20 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk2, apache and index.jsp
Sorry to say but I have gone through the whole process 3 times now
(including re-installing Redhat itself) and I still get error 503 Service
Temporarily Unavailable. I reckon it must be a permissions problem but
where?
I have tried the following:
chmod 666 jk2.socket
I tried changing the path to
Tim Wills wrote:
Sorry to say but I have gone through the whole process 3 times now
(including re-installing Redhat itself) and I still get error 503 Service
Temporarily Unavailable. I reckon it must be a permissions problem but
where?
I have tried the following:
chmod 666 jk2.socket
I tried
At 06:41 AM 5/07/2004 +0100, you wrote:
I read your article before posting that question but I didn't realise it
applied to my situation. Were you getting that error message when you ran
./configure ??
I did for a while. Then I found out the one in my path was the
wrong version of
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: mod_jk2 ./configure problem/query
At 06:41 AM 5/07/2004 +0100, you wrote:
I read your article before posting that question but I didn't realise it
applied to my situation. Were you getting that error message when you ran
./configure ??
I did for a while
Tim Wills wrote:
Reading your article more thoroughly, I am a bit confused on a number of
matters.
1. Why am I seemingly editing Apache's Makefile (I assume from the directory
you have given) and not mod_jk2? Does the apxs command read that file?
2. I checked Apache's make file and it has no
At 03:35 AM 5/07/2004 +0100, you wrote:
I am having problems installing mod_jk2 and although I have not isolated
what it is, one thing is worrying me. I have installed Apache 2.0.49 and
Tomcat 5.0.25 (on Redhat 9) from source and they both run fine.
When I run the command:
./configure
I read your article before posting that question but I didn't realise it
applied to my situation. Were you getting that error message when you ran
./configure ??
Cheers
Tim
At 03:35 AM 5/07/2004 +0100, you wrote:
I am having problems installing mod_jk2 and although I have not isolated
what
Shared Memory File is a cool feature:)
(I haven't looked at mod_jk sources for details of its implementation,
but the idea should be the same).
Generally speaking, it's an ordinary file (with name, attributes, inode,
...),
but it isn't used with conventional read/writes. Instead of them,
First of all, check the requirements of mod_jk2. I'm not sure, but I thought
it requires Apache v2.0.43 min.
Then, get jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.x.src.
cd ./jk/native2
./configure --with-apache2=/usr/local/apache2 --with-apxs2=/usr/local/apache
2/bin/apxs
cd ./server/apache2
make
This
You can build mod_jk2 following these steps:
7.3.4. Build mod_jk2 from source
After you have downloaded the mod_jk2 source tarball, navigate to that
directory and expand it like so,
# *tar zxvf jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.2-src.tar.gz*
Next, navigate to the directory where you
PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 7:56 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 connector
Try commenting everything out in jk2.props, should get you connector
working even if the jni stuff takes more work afterwards.
Mark
On 5 Jun 2004, at 12:23, Ricky wrote:
Hi All,
I have
Try commenting everything out in jk2.props, should get you connector
working even if the jni stuff takes more work afterwards.
Mark
On 5 Jun 2004, at 12:23, Ricky wrote:
Hi All,
I have difficulty to make mod_jk2 connector to work. :-(
I try to use Unix Channel from this tutorial :
Did you compile apache2.0.49 with DSO enabled option? Hope you have done it.
Check spellings as well.
Compile apache2.0.49 and Mod_jk2 with same compile
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey A. Worman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 2:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
scripts for the release version that aren't in a developers
cvs checkout?
jw
- Original Message -
From: Kommuru, Bhaskar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, June 4, 2004 0:04 am
Subject: RE: mod_jk2.so load problem with apache2 (winxp)
Did you compile apache2.0.49 with DSO enabled option
I forgot to mention that I did not recompile the mod_jk stuff. I'm
still trying to use the binary that I downloaded for apache 2.0.49.
Will this be a problem?
jw
- Original Message -
From: Jeffrey A. Worman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, June 4, 2004 5:59 am
Subject: Re: RE: mod_jk2
Hi Jeffrey,
Where did u download the mod-jk2 binary for apache 2.0.49.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey A. Worman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 9:03 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: RE: mod_jk2.so load problem with apache2 (winxp)
I forgot
I downloaded the the file jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2.0.4-win32-
apache2.0.49.zip from one of the mirrors from jakarta.apache.org. I
think it was http://www.signal42.com/mirrors/apache/jakarta/tomcat-
connectors/jk2/binaries/win32/
jw
I found some previous discussions concerning problems with Jetty and Acrobat
Plug-in having difficulties displaying pdf(s). They were very helpful as
the symptoms were exactly like mine although having nothing to do with
mod_jk2, where I was incorrectly concentrating my efforts.
I tried a
www.jpackage.org
On Thursday 13 May 2004 14:01, wsedio wrote:
Hi all,
do you know where I can find an RPM or SRPM for the latest mod_jk2?
I am running RH Enterprise Linux 3 (Apache 2.0.46) and Tomcat 5.0.24.
Thanks!
-
Just one note. Because of the way that lb_factor works, having a factor as high as
yours is absurd and a bit self defeating. You also might want to look into the level
parameter instead of the lb_factor parameter. Check out the jk2 docs on the web page
for psuedo code explaining my comments.
Greetings.
I assume from the lack of response my post (below) that no one else has
encountered these problems? Should I report both as bugs on Bugzilla?
Regards,
Carl
-Original Message-
From: Carl Olivier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 May 2004 05:47 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
The actual content of your workers2.properties and jk2.properties file would
be helpful to us, don't you think?
-Original Message-
From: JimmiSeven Productions Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 1:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mod_JK2 not sure if correctly
, May 04, 2004 1:07 PM
Subject: RE: Mod_JK2 not sure if correctly setup!
The actual content of your workers2.properties and jk2.properties file
would
be helpful to us, don't you think?
-Original Message-
From: JimmiSeven Productions Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04
Hi,
Everything looks fine, do you have the AJP connector defined in the
server.xml file?
yang
-Original Message-
From: JimmiSeven Productions Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 1:46 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Mod_JK2 not sure if correctly setup!
Yes
--
Engine name=Tomcat-Apache-JK2 defaultHost=www.somesite.com
debug=0 jvmRoute=localhost:8009
- Original Message -
From: Yang Xiao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 4:20 PM
Subject: RE: Mod_JK2 not sure if correctly setup!
Hi
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 09:21:28AM +0200, Thomas Lange wrote:
: I'm implementing a chat application, which sends all the chatting
: output for each user in just one long query (servlet), which last
: for the entire chatting session.
:
: On leaving the chatroom, the client simply closes the
I found a workaround to this problem thanks to a user on another forum.
I was doing auth in the Directory / directive, which is reasonable
since I want my entire site password protected. Doing auth this way,
getRemoteUser() returns a null. If I add auth to a Location /webapp
directive (which
Frank Fischer wrote:
did you manage to solve you're problem with this gcc: cannot specify
-o with -c or -S and multiple compilations error?
I ran into the same problem on Fedora Core 1 with apache rpm.
No, I haven't solved the problem on any RHEL 3.0 machines. It seems to work or
not work
Chris,
Check the version of gcc on each machine.
Just a quick thought.
Doug
- Original Message -
From: Chris Egolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 12:24 PM
Subject: mod_jk2 2.0.4 compiler error on RHEL 3.0, Apache 2.0.46
All -
I've
ThanksI should have thought of that, but unfortunately they're both
gcc-3.2.3-24.
Parsons Technical Services wrote:
Chris,
Check the version of gcc on each machine.
Just a quick thought.
Doug
- Original Message -
From: Chris Egolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I've had those and several other problems with Red hat enterprise 3
package of apache, such that we reverted back to using the rpm that goes
with redhat 9
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 21:45, Bryan Field-Elliot wrote:
I'm running Apache 2.0.46 on RHEL (package name is httpd-2.0.46-32.ent).
I'm also
SImple :) don't follow the instructions.
Do a ./configure --help to get the options you need (--with-apxs2 --with-jni
--with-pcre and related java/tomcat options) then do a straight make and
manually copy the binary to your web server's module location.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas D.
I would try making the directory for it possibly.
I don't know why it does this, but it puts a usr/local/apache2/modules
directory under the build directory.
/bin/cp ../../../build/jk2/apache2//usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_jk2.so
./../../build/jk2/apache2/mod_jk2.so
/bin/cp: cannot stat
The directory already exists. The error seems to relate the fact that
mod_jk2.so doesn't exist in the source directory. But why? I don't see any
error that points to where the compile is failing.
--- Walter Truitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would try making the directory for it possibly.
Thanks for your help!!! The problem was the options for where the apache2
source was located:
--with-apache2=
--with-apache2-include=
--with-apache2-lib=
-Tom
--- Yiannis Mavroukakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SImple :) don't follow the instructions.
Do a ./configure --help to get the
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren
Wir haben Ihre Nachricht dankend erhalten und werden diese so schnell wie möglich
bearbeiten.
Mit internetten Grüssen
Ihr Shoppingcity.ch-Team
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_jk2 2.0.4 for Win32
-Original Message-
From: David Short [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 6:13 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: mod_jk2 2.0.4 for Win32
Does anyone have the binary
Thank you!!! I've been searching all over the place for the .dll. I loaded
the .so and things seem to be ok so far.
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 10:37 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_jk2 2.0.4
-Original Message-
From: David Short [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 6:13 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: mod_jk2 2.0.4 for Win32
Does anyone have the binary (.dll) for the new mod_jk2 2.0.4 for W2K?
They are at usual places (binaries/win32).
Just create extra worker declarations on workers2.properties on different
ports.
-Original Message-
From: Randy Harrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 March 2004 20:56
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: mod_jk2 with multiple tomcats
Hi all,
I'm currently using apache2 + mod_jk2 +
http://apr.apache.org/
-Original Message-
From: Vi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 March 2004 17:37
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 problems
Yes, probably some lib(s), which were not linked corectly with mod_jk2
while compiling it?
What's apr?
Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote
:37
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 problems
Yes, probably some lib(s), which were not linked corectly with mod_jk2
while compiling it?
What's apr?
Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
If memory serves me right, the apache httpd sources and the apr sources.
-Original Message-
From: Vi
It shouldn't, but if you are worried you install it in a directory out of
the way, and link jk2 against it.
-Original Message-
From: Vi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 March 2004 09:38
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 problems
Yes, I already found it, but should I install
If I am not mistaken that means that you are missing a particular
library or that mod_jk2 was linked against the wrong sort type of lib.
I've installed both mod_jk2 and tomcat 5.0 on RH9 without any problems
but I first removed httpd2, recompiled from source and installed.
-Original
Thanks for answer!
Yes, but I don't want to risk with the reinstallation! I have a very
important server running.
When I was compiling mod_jk2 I encountered that a lib was missing ( I
forgot the name ),
the link in /usr/lib was there but the file to which it was pointing
wasn't. What I did is,
PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 March 2004 14:23
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 problems
Thanks for answer!
Yes, but I don't want to risk with the reinstallation! I have a very
important server running.
When I was compiling mod_jk2 I encountered that a lib was missing ( I
forgot the name
I meant to say ./configure producing a makefile;)
-Original Message-
From: Yiannis Mavroukakis
Sent: 10 March 2004 14:43
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk2 problems
Well great, you took the httpd sources, got the library out of them but your
httpd is probably
running
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 March 2004 14:23
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 problems
Thanks for answer!
Yes, but I don't want to risk with the reinstallation! I have a very
important server running.
When I was compiling mod_jk2 I encountered that a lib was missing ( I
forgot
it compiled well, but can't load. Is there any util to see all symbols
of library?
Try ldd :
$ ldd mod_jk.so
libc.so.6 = /lib/i686/libc.so.6 (0x4200)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x8000)
Nothing obvious :).
François.
ldd, is good, but I ment something to show me all functions of a lib.
libc.so.6 = /lib/i686/libc.so.6 (0x4200)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x8000)
Obviously those two are not enough
Francois JEANMOUGIN wrote:
it compiled well, but can't load. Is there any util to
try
ldd -v -r /etc/httpd/modules/mod_jk2.so
If there are any missing objects or functions it will report them to you.
-Original Message-
From: Vi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 March 2004 15:24
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 problems
ldd, is good, but I ment
15:24
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 problems
ldd, is good, but I ment something to show me all functions of a lib.
libc.so.6 = /lib/i686/libc.so.6 (0x4200)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x8000)
Obviously those two are not enough
Francois JEANMOUGIN
If memory serves me right, the apache httpd sources and the apr sources.
-Original Message-
From: Vi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 March 2004 17:17
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 problems
Oh, yes! Thanks!
Here is what missing:
undefined symbol: ap_scoreboard_image
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 problems
Oh, yes! Thanks!
Here is what missing:
undefined symbol: ap_scoreboard_image (./mod_jk2.so)
undefined symbol: ap_server_root(./mod_jk2.so)
undefined symbol: apr_pool_cleanup_null (./mod_jk2.so)
undefined symbol: apr_socket_create
httpd sources and the apr sources.
-Original Message-
From: Vi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 March 2004 17:17
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 problems
Oh, yes! Thanks!
Here is what missing:
undefined symbol: ap_scoreboard_image (./mod_jk2.so)
undefined symbol
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 March 2004 17:17
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 problems
Oh, yes! Thanks!
Here is what missing:
undefined symbol: ap_scoreboard_image (./mod_jk2.so)
undefined symbol: ap_server_root(./mod_jk2.so)
undefined symbol: apr_pool_cleanup_null (./mod_jk2.so
PS - My preferred way of dealing with Solaris installs
has been to get gcc up and running, and then build
everything else from source. This can be a pain on a
slow box . . . building the latest version of gcc and
perl take a while. However, in the end I think the
effort is worth it.
Check to see
From: Nikola Milutinovic
Sent: 9. sijeanj 2004 7:31
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 JNI question for the brave :)
Mladen Turk wrote:
From: Yiannis Mavroukakis
Sent: 8. sijeanj 2004 16:34
Would it not be possible to bind JNI under a single worker and then
isolate
Mladen Turk wrote:
That was the thing that I considered, but again if you have
multiple
workers, what would be the benefit of having that much Tomcat
instances running.
What is the real benefit of running TC from within Apache via JNI?
It should be a faster, cause there is no socket channel
1 - 100 of 358 matches
Mail list logo
