19/03/12 03:50, [[w:en:User:Madman]] wrote:
Unfortunately, my OCD makes me apply absurdly arbitrary
and exacting standards to any code when it has my
name on it. This also makes it difficult for me to use source control
(though I *do*, as it's absolutely essential to development) as I
don't
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:50 PM, [[w:en:User:Madman]]
madman.enw...@gmail.com wrote:
Haha, no worries. As it happens, I've made enough progress that I
anticipate releasing documentation and examples by the end of tomorrow
(today?) and the base code by the end of the next day.
Documentation is
On 03/15/2012 09:50 PM, [[w:en:User:Madman]] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Tim Landscheidt t...@tim-landscheidt.de
wrote:
It depends on what you mean by requirement. Something
like a library *must* provide a function normalizeLink()
with these semantics would probably deter
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Sumana Harihareswara
suma...@wikimedia.org wrote:
You know what I'm about to say. :-) Come on, come on, just show us the
code, as unbearable as you may find that. Release early, release often,
let us get our paws on it and help you. :-)
If for whatever
On 03/18/2012 10:50 PM, [[w:en:User:Madman]] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Sumana Harihareswara
suma...@wikimedia.org wrote:
You know what I'm about to say. :-) Come on, come on, just show us the
code, as unbearable as you may find that. Release early, release often,
let us get
Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
I think it really makes sense to define the names of a set of available
functions. That would really make much simpler the development of
portable tools, or working on different languages, without having to
relearn the framework used.
That said,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Tim Landscheidt t...@tim-landscheidt.de
wrote:
It depends on what you mean by requirement. Something
like a library *must* provide a function normalizeLink()
with these semantics would probably deter developers from
trying to implement it. If on the other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13.03.2012 17:05, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
Even if only for PHP there would be a critical mass, it'd be still
useful to Perl, Python and other developers. For example, I think
it is a common problem to normalize links - e. g., are
MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
[...]
I'm a bit concerned about the diversity of the tools made by each of us.
Almost every user utilises its own library of files for providing a
skin, db access... Which make integrating them into something coherent
quite hard.
These multiple frameworks
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:49, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
It's true, most of the tools were overtaken by another user, can you
tell us which tools are still broken? I myself would prefer to move
all these tools to wikimedia labs, as soon as it's possible, which
would allow us to
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Merlijn van Deen valhall...@arctus.nl wrote:
On 12 March 2012 15:49, Hydriz Wikipedia ad...@alphacorp.tk wrote:
Tparis has the full source code of those tools, and looks like he has
already brought them up on his own account. See
On 12/03/12 17:05, Paul Selitskas wrote:
That's a good point not to do this ever more. But then we are about to
return to the stable toolserver approach, aren't we? :) By the way
there is a sort of bugs in Soxred's tools concerning language code -
project subdomain conversion which I would
Hello,
At Monday 12 March 2012 17:24:15 DaB. wrote:
Maybe there should be a path for converting an inactive user into a MMP,
a MMP is not for collecting all stuff from a user, but for 1 project (side-
projects may be included). So a MMP Soxred93-old-stuff is not possible, but a
MMP gradient
If you are pushing for an MMP, it would be best not to use my code. It's
shoddy, poorly written, broken, and inefficient. Frankly, I'm amazed it lasted
as long as it did.
-X!
On Mar 12, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Paul Selitskas p.selits...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Merlijn
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Merlijn van Deen valhall...@arctus.nlwrote:
On 12 March 2012 15:49, Hydriz Wikipedia ad...@alphacorp.tk wrote:
Tparis has the full source code of those tools, and looks like he has
already brought them up on his own account. See
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Soxred93 soxre...@gmail.com wrote:
If you are pushing for an MMP, it would be best not to use my code. It's
shoddy, poorly written, broken, and inefficient. Frankly, I'm amazed it
lasted as long as it did.
-X!
Well, it's been working so far.
I'd recommend
On 12/03/12 19:36, Krinkle wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Soxred93 wrote:
If you are pushing for an MMP, it would be best not to use my code.
It's shoddy, poorly written, broken, and inefficient. Frankly, I'm
amazed it lasted as long as it did.
-X!
Well, it's
Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
I'm a bit concerned about the diversity of the tools made by each of us.
Almost every user utilises its own library of files for providing a
skin, db access... Which make integrating them into something coherent
quite hard.
These multiple
Tim Landscheidt wrote:
Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
I'm a bit concerned about the diversity of the tools made by each of us.
Almost every user utilises its own library of files for providing a
skin, db access... Which make integrating them into something coherent
quite hard.
19 matches
Mail list logo
