ahh the typecast!
___
kind regards
*Rob Atkinson*
Lead Ontologist, Knowledge Architect at SURROUND Australia Pty Ltd
Address Level 9, Nishi Building, 2 Phillip Law Street; New Acton Canberra
Australia 2601
Phone + <http://++61+466+491+
ant.com/doc/7.2/scripting/introduction.html#shape-scripts
>
> Holger
>
>
> On 2022-05-11 11:09 am, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
> ahh - its dash:shapeScript - but requires a different syntax - maybe thats
> what it is hiding as an error when run as a resource script...
>
>
> On
ahh - its dash:shapeScript - but requires a different syntax - maybe thats
what it is hiding as an error when run as a resource script...
On Wednesday, May 11, 2022 at 11:05:35 AM UTC+10 Rob Atkinson wrote:
> oops - obviously dash:ShapeScript is a type not a predicate - i've got
>
oops - obviously dash:ShapeScript is a type not a predicate - i've got
myself mixed up here... how do you attach to the nodeshape? The predicate
isnt in the docs AFAICT
On Wednesday, May 11, 2022 at 10:39:53 AM UTC+10 Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
> Am not using the focus node - as its an
Knublauch wrote:
>
> On 2022-05-11 9:56 am, Rob Atkinson wrote:
> > HI I have a script that behaves as expected in the script editor but
> > when run as a resource action behaves differently.
> >
> > two things
> >
> > - a script that extracts some
HI I have a script that behaves as expected in the script editor but when
run as a resource action behaves differently.
two things
- a script that extracts some data from an asset collection and then
inserts it into a different asset collection works from the script editor,
but when run as
1 graph.withDataGraph *probably* worked somehow, but that would
> be a hack and wouldn't properly support transactions etc.
>
> Holger
>
>
> On 2022-05-09 4:57 pm, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> trying to find examples to understand options for inserting into a named
Hi
trying to find examples to understand options for inserting into a named
graph..
I have a situation where I need to process a graph and send data to
multiple related graphs
ADS offers me the "withDataGraph" that calls a function with no
parameters...
seems like it might be relevant to
sometimes
to work out what form things are in sometimes and the hidden assumptions
about import closures.
___
kind regards
*Rob Atkinson*
Lead Ontologist, Knowledge Architect at SURROUND Australia Pty Ltd
Address Level 9, Nishi Building, 2 Phillip Law
eate
> a clone which you later tbs.deleteAssetCollection().
>
> On 2022-05-02 3:22 pm, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
>
> hi
>
> havent been able to find in the docs or examples, but suspect I may be
> missing something.
>
> I have a DataGraph I want to publish to two different explorer instan
hi
havent been able to find in the docs or examples, but suspect I may be
missing something.
I have a DataGraph I want to publish to two different explorer instances -
but with different data in each. Some other things may happen - custom
review steps - so its going to be in ADS.
So I need
FWIW this is an area of research I am embarking on in my role with the Open
Geospatial Consortium - specifically looking at support for modularised
data models via OGC APIs - currently defined around JSON schema, but I am
hoping to find workable patterns and tooling to support an uplift to
specific metadata annotation in mind so that we can clarify
> this, i.e. what license would you suggest for such things?
>
> Note this rule does NOT apply to all ontologies bundled with TopBraid.
>
> Holger
>
>
> On 2022-04-04 3:07 pm, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> c
Hi
can anyone in TQ shed any light on the copyright status of the owl2shacl
rules - there is no metadata in the file and this is posted on a public
access forum, so is there any impediment to utilising it in an open source
project?
cheers
On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 at 12:05, Holger Knublauch
wrote:
A related perspective
following a test-driven design philosophy, ontology development requires
instance data for testing, and best practices for documentation require
illustrative examples.
Thus while editing example instances in a separate graph we want to be able
to attach these to the
ahh - so I was mainly looking for way to set this as a global default?
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 10:50, Holger Knublauch
wrote:
> Ah sorry I wasn't clear, but those settings are in drop down of the upper
> right corner of the Problems & Suggestions panel.
>
> HTH
> Holger
>
>
> On 2021-11-25 7:36
True - but
a) his business problem appears to be metadata about observations and how
to group these without ugly naming conventions
b) I postulated a possible equivalence between the SOSA model and
reification
I was wondering if subproperty declarations would allow EDG to absorb
observations data
OK - ta. Thought I'd check before doing anything else.
On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 at 09:07, Holger Knublauch
wrote:
> I am not aware of such an upload widget. It would need to be somehow
> configured to know where to send the images to, and then produce a URL
> (e.g. xsd:anyURI literal). Viewing such
;http://www.tno.nl/>
> <http://www.tno.nl/>
>
> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you
> are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you
> are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no
>
I have had the same requirement - I added a new property "explanatory
image" - and also "canonicalExample" for RDF instances matching the model
and "implementationExample" for implementations of the model in other forms
(such as XML)
We are using asciidocs and pyLode to generate documentation
te server response is.
>
> Holger
>
>
> On 2021-07-16 11:55 am, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
> That makes sense - but didnt work when I tried it :-(
> Double checked it.
>
> We can access the SPARQL endpoint from other locations via scripts, so
> shouldnt be a more systemic
That makes sense - but didnt work when I tried it :-(
Double checked it.
We can access the SPARQL endpoint from other locations via scripts, so
shouldnt be a more systemic access problem.
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 09:17, Holger Knublauch
wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> sorry for the delay as I had to ask a
The JS code is for Tag panel - its not customised...
On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 12:52, Holger Knublauch
wrote:
>
> On 2021-05-27 12:38 pm, robatki...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> The JS for the tag display pane calls the endpoint - the latest error isnt
> call the function anymore on v7 - but is still the
thanks
>
> > 1) centering on a selected element only works if the element is
> > already visible and you click on it in the map
> No this should always work. I just tried with the Geography Taxonomy,
> e.g. clicking on Armenia from the default view in Europe. It "went
> there". Are you not
solved - it didnt like mix of class=NodeShape and sh:targetShape but once
I forced the parent shape onto the class things worked as expected.
(is there a place in the doco where this is explained? - havent found one
yet)
On Wed, 5 May 2021 at 14:36, Rob Atkinson wrote:
> Thanks Irene - I
Thanks Irene - I'll review with that info and see if I can resolve things
On Wed, 5 May 2021 at 13:41, Irene Polikoff wrote:
> I don’t quite understand your model, but may be the following will help:
>
> 1. If you have a NodeShape that is not a class, but targets a class, it is
> considered an
OK - thanks for the warning. You might want to consider the issue of
deploying a project with resources that you dont want to introspect over
automatically then :-)
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 16:48, Holger Knublauch
wrote:
> You cannot rely on Eclipse for this moving forward. EDG (server-side)
is this an eclipse thing?
is there perhaps some blacklist strategy possible like .gitignore
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 15:56, Holger Knublauch
wrote:
> I cannot think of a solution for that. There is no way to deactivate
> certain file types.
>
> Holger
>
>
> On 2021-03-18 2:44 pm,
sorry gmail seems to have killed that screenshot .. grrr
On Wednesday, July 15, 2020 at 1:18:04 PM UTC+10 Rob Atkinson wrote:
> spoke too soon - here is an example showing the shape, the existence of
> labels, and the failure to show the label in the Tag search form.
> in additio
; wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Holger
> >>>
> >>> A simple use case of viewing corpus topics is if the tagset is
> imported into a datagraph. How are the values of the content and
> corresponding tag shown on a form.
> >>>
> >
ent1. How can the above corpus:topic triples be used to generate an
>> inference in a form to list all existing tags for Concent1 (e.g. content A
>> and B) ?
>>
>> The only way I've been able to do this is to construct new instances of a
>> class with new propertie
Knublauch wrote:
> Is topic an object property shape or a literal-valued one? (Can you show
> the shape declarations).
>
> Holger
>
>
> On 2/07/2020 5:32 pm, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
>
> {
> clauseSections(where: {
> topic:
e='ID4'}}]}}]}}]}}]}' contains a field not in
'ClauseSection_where_topic': 'exists'",
"locations": [
{
"line": 2,
"column": 18
}
]
}
]
}
On Thursday, July 2, 2020 at 5:24:02 PM UTC+10 Holger Knublauch wrote:
>
>
After some fiddling I can return data from a content tag set
with a query like this
{
clauseSections(where: {rdfs_label: {pattern: "def"}
} ) {
rdfs_label
topic {
label
}
uri
}
}
This successfully returns details from the linked topic.
But I cant get a query to
site at
> https://github.com/qudt/qudt-public-repo
>
> Steve Ray
> qudt.org
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 1:10 AM Rob Atkinson <
> rob.at...@surroundaustralia.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> yep fixing the namespaces in the original data files
To add to and refocus this issue:
1) We can extract tag triples from reified and qualified tagging data - but
its not obvious whats the best way to make the annotations on reified
statements visible in EDG - brute force via a DataGraph or custom SWP are
possible, but maybe there is some
yep fixing the namespaces in the original data files fixes it - but you
have to perform quite a few gymnastics before everything is lined up :-)
On Tuesday, June 30, 2020 at 5:52:08 PM UTC+10 Rob Atkinson wrote:
> hmm units uses:
> a <http://qudt.org/schema/qudt#ElectricCu
t 5:31:23 PM UTC+10 Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
> not sure what ttl to send - the file is
> TopBraid/LinkedModels/unit-v1.0.ttl and ?I just want to know how to expose
> that via GraphQL - or confirm that it cannot be done for some reasone
>
> If I create an ontology, then exe
find out why...
On Tuesday, June 30, 2020 at 5:08:10 PM UTC+10 Holger Knublauch wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> is the Unit class also instance of sh:NodeShape?
>
> Feel free to send me what you have as a TTL file and I can take a look.
>
> Holger
>
>
> On 30/06/2020 17:03, Rob
I have tried to make the QUDT units ontology (pre-loaded) accessible via
GraphQL and failed...
If I include it into a empty data graph I can traverse and inspect all the
contents...
I can set the search root to be, for example Unit
I then add statements like this to the graph root object..
I'm not sure about whether it will work or not, but a warning that AFAIK if
you leave an xml file in an open project in a workspace it is parsed on TBC
startup - and this can take a long time too. It may only apply to XSD
files, life is too short to check this
On Friday, 19 June 2020
+1 for an option to pre-process JSON.
In particular it would be good to be able to attach JSON-LD context files
to control the mapping of element to RDF nodes.
On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 04:45:19 UTC+10, Tim Smith wrote:
>
> One thought - can you pre-process the JSON as text? I noticed you are
?
On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 19:22, Holger Knublauch
wrote:
> See \server.topbraidlive.org\system-applications\tbladmin\tbladmin.ui.ttlx:
> tbladmin:TextIndicesPage:
>
>
>
> There is no way to only rebuild individual graphs.
>
> Holger
>
>
> On 26/05/2020 18:34, Rob
17:31, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
>
> So I still need to work out why in some cases we can search included
> content, and other we cant.
>
> On the same machine, same initialisation script, same version of EDG we
> have workspaces where it works and where it doesnt - an we
of content in the included graph for local search. It seems reasonable we
might need to trigger something on data setup, but cant see what it is.
On Tuesday, 26 May 2020 15:32:09 UTC+10, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>
>
> On 26 May 2020, at 04:43, Rob Atkinson >
> wrote:
>
> OK - solve
:28:58 UTC+10, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, 22 May 2020 05:29:20 UTC+10, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 21 May 2020, at 07:00, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>> >
>> > tested this on a colleagues machine using the exact same ve
tial additional data
separate (segmented A-box union graphs) whilst retaining search capability.
On Tuesday, 26 May 2020 10:50:06 UTC+10, Irene Polikoff wrote:
>
> Please see below
>
> On May 25, 2020, at 8:00 PM, Rob Atkinson > wrote:
>
>
>> Yes, it runs on local host.
>
>
> Yes, it runs on local host.
>
> I can’t reproduce your issues.
>
> One possibility is that you have no data in the asset collections you set
> to be indexed. From Rob’s e-mails, I know that he uses files and asset
> collections in EDG are simply “wrappers” for these files. If you are
>
On Friday, 22 May 2020 05:29:20 UTC+10, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 21 May 2020, at 07:00, Rob Atkinson > wrote:
> >
> > tested this on a colleagues machine using the exact same version and
> build of TBC, and the search works fine out of the box. I
s84_pos>
>> -
>> this is where you provide the URIs of the underlying graphs that you are
>> “wrapping” and want to generate shapes from
>>
>
> You do not need to include the OWL2SHAL rules in the EDG ontology. This
> service already knows what to do.
>
>
install of TBC
On Thursday, 21 May 2020 16:00:43 UTC+10, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
> An update..
>
> tested this on a colleagues machine using the exact same version and build
> of TBC, and the search works fine out of the box. I created a fresh repo
> and reran the same configuration s
a
series of icons in the tab. (both using chrome).
Will try on some other machines and compare.
Wondering if it some cached stuff as i have used all previous versions.
On Thursday, 21 May 2020 12:12:05 UTC+10, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
> oops - forgot to update item #6 - thats doesnt work if a
:
>
>
>
> On May 20, 2020, at 10:40 PM, Rob Atkinson > wrote:
>
>
>> OK - this is based on exporting TTL and inspecting it - its picked up
>> stuff from imports - if I open the Repository and look at triples without
>> the imports these node shapes are
>
>
> OK - this is based on exporting TTL and inspecting it - its picked up
> stuff from imports - if I open the Repository and look at triples without
> the imports these node shapes arent there. I didnt expect the TTL export to
> include both an owl:imports statement and all the imported
oops - forgot to update item #6 - thats doesnt work if a filter is included
if data is included - but does work if data is copied into graph
On Thursday, 21 May 2020 12:09:04 UTC+10, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
> Ok - a few layers of challenges here - gradually unpicking it:
>
> Query in
ote:
>
>
> On 20 May 2020, at 09:25, Rob Atkinson >
> wrote:
>
> OK search is _nearly_ working using the shapes once I save them and force
> them to be imported.
>
> I had to set the graphql:publicClass and force-refresh the editor to pick
> up changes.
>
>
that
is suggested by the EDG design of binding UI capabilities to asset types.
functions are not the only reusable elements either:
ui:Elements like have different side effects.
On Thursday, 21 May 2020 11:15:51 UTC+10, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>
>
> On 20/05/2020 11:40, Rob Atkin
that as default? and/or one that forces it
(disables option)
On Wednesday, 20 May 2020 12:38:21 UTC+10, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
>
> Use Case:
>
> I have a large data graph I wish to navigate and allow users to annotate
> so I expose in an EDG editor. Its not really "re
>
>
> > Can you share your ontology, or better yet, reduce it to a minimal
> example that triggers the problem, so that we can investigate, fix any bugs
> for the next release, and perhaps advice on what specifically triggers the
> bug in the current release?
> >
will do via email. This is
A number of questions about the process of enabling EDG functions that rely
on shapes
A general question is what EDG functions and editor components need shapes
to work properly - GraphQL for sure, Search (?) - Classes and instances
dont seem to need to to display, but editing needs property
inline
On Wednesday, 20 May 2020 13:18:52 UTC+10, Irene Polikoff wrote:
>
> Please see below
>
> On May 19, 2020, at 10:38 PM, Rob Atkinson > wrote:
>
>
> Use Case:
>
> I have a large data graph I wish to navigate and allow users to annotate
> so I expose in
Use Case:
I have a large data graph I wish to navigate and allow users to annotate so
I expose in an EDG editor. Its not really "reference data" - but its
generated by scripting so the body should only be changed by external
processes - and the idea of annotation is to provide feedback on
This is a general challenge with EDG - and in the Semantic Web as a whole
AFAICT
We have open world semantics, but in reality all operations are done over
some graph closure. Systems make private, hidden, decisions about how to
bound such graph closures. You absolutely need to understand the
A corollary of this issue is the GraphQL public schema
We need to make a statement about the ontology in order to enable things in
a data graph based on that ontology. We are interested in this for the
data graph. Is it logical to push graphql:publicShape my:lovelyClass
statements into
Looks great...
“I seem to see ahead, in a kind of way. I know we are going to take a very
long road, into darkness; but I know I can't turn back.”
Can we also have the template for achieving this programmatically in SWP
script. ( I can beta test it at a script level before the UI is
owl:imports closure, and there is no harm in keeping
> owl:Restriction triples or RDFS domain/range statements in the original
> files either.
>
> I'll record this idea as a ticket, but wanted to put this out here in case
> anyone has further feedback. It doesn't sound like huge dev
ut this out here in case
> anyone has further feedback. It doesn't sound like huge development effort.
>
> Holger
>
>
> On 24/04/2020 10:34, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> I too find it awkward when I am working with immutable OWL resources from
>> standards but EDG
ing
> filtering/transformations in the UI is to put the logic into the UI code
> itself, even if this makes it less "clean" from a model-driven POV.
>
> Holger
>
>
> On 24/04/2020 12:33, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
> I think the hidden field for classes in the tree i
s I am interested in,
> then make it a root of the classes tree. I like it more than the hiding
> option.
>
> On Apr 23, 2020, at 10:33 PM, Rob Atkinson > wrote:
>
> I think the hidden field for classes in the tree is the minimal starting
> point - without that we cant really
I think the hidden field for classes in the tree is the minimal starting
point - without that we cant really do very much. Its still messy having to
build a complete suite of hide-me statements.
A more general solution would be pluggability of the selection for what to
display. I can see a
> I too find it awkward when I am working with immutable OWL resources from
> standards but EDG requires the shapes - so end up doing complex automated
> loading where I generate a wrapper ontology to contain created shapes and
> then update imports in instance data to include these shapes
tracking this with interest :-)
I too find it awkward when I am working with immutable OWL resources from
standards but EDG requires the shapes - so end up doing complex automated
loading where I generate a wrapper ontology to contain created shapes and
then update imports in instance data to
?
On Tuesday, 24 March 2020 20:02:36 UTC+11, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>
>
> On 24/03/2020 17:20, Rob Atkinson wrote:
> > Poking around in code and docs I can see the SWP based ui:instanceView
> > (though I dont see this in the SWP uispin.org documentation)
> ht
Poking around in code and docs I can see the SWP based ui:instanceView
(though I dont see this in the SWP uispin.org documentation)
What I want to do is control the rendering of specific properties (in
general I want to be able to link between objects in different asset
collections effectively
e percentage of
> customers need today.
>
> Further, what are your thoughts about how SHACL paths would be addressed?
> They are quite common - for inverses, for example. .
>
> On Mar 2, 2020, at 11:56 PM, Rob Atkinson > wrote:
>
>
> An example of an API that moved f
ose clients really
> have a full RDF-based API, and would they be able to make sense of the
> partial graphs that would be returned by the server? If yes, isn't a SPARQL
> CONSTRUCT a more natural way to produce graphs, instead of relying on
> another set of intermediate st
to fully "support" JSON-LD it would be required to support it in the main
query interface - i.e. the GraphQL JSON response should be decorated with a
JSON-LD context statement that binds the available URI identifiers to the
graphql schema elements - after all the graphql schema is generated
> same information for working with SHACL.
>
> On Monday, January 27, 2020 at 7:41:56 PM UTC-5, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>>
>> that very useful sounding link:
>>
>>
>>> http://wiki.topquadrant.com/display/master/Ontology+View+or+Edit#OntologyVieworEdit-SHACLrequirem
that very useful sounding link:
http://wiki.topquadrant.com/display/master/Ontology+View+or+Edit#OntologyVieworEdit-SHACLrequirementsforworkingwithReferenceDatasetsandDataGraphs
> .
>
resolves to this less useful contents page
tab or resize the window,
cheers
Rob
On Sunday, 19 January 2020 05:23:38 UTC+11, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 15/01/2020 17:49, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
> Love the new 6.3 editor :-)
>
> I've tried looking into code but not getting terribly far tr
Love the new 6.3 editor :-)
I've tried looking into code but not getting terribly far trying to work
out what are the possible values teamwork:defaultLayout
The only value i've found that works so far is "TabularEditor"
When i make this default, the "available layouts" gives me a bunch of
OK - I had set it to true to force it to use the new editor in 6.2 I think.
BTW "server start-up" - i did a reset system registries in TBC and it
worked - for a deployed WAR will this need a hard restart?
On Wednesday, 1 January 2020 10:56:14 UTC+11, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
The new UI extensively uses isShapesGraph() - but its not easy to find how
this is determined...
For a custom data asset type, what is needed for it to be treated as a data
graph, not a shapes graph?
I tried subclassing datagraph:Datagraph but it didnt seem to work.
--
You received this
Blue one on the left..
On Friday, 13 December 2019 06:44:43 UTC+11, Irene Polikoff wrote:
>
> Which one are you talking about:
>
> Blue navigator on the left showing types of asset collections
>
> Or
>
> Asset types navigator in the editors
>
>
>
> On De
Looking good!
Can we component documentation for making widgets to plug into editor,
override options and a recipe to create a new tab using the React.js
approach.
The asset main menu tab is still not scalable or customisable to handle
more asset types - is anybody interested (or willing to
Thanks Irene
will aim to submit a requirement once I've had more experience with the
grahpqL stuff in 6.3 :-)
On Wednesday, 9 October 2019 02:31:08 UTC+11, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) wrote:
>
>
>
> In:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/skos-and-owl/master.html
>
>
>
> its is said:
>
> “
>
Accepting this isnt the right forum, there are some interesting and
important architectural issues here - so what is the right forum (where TQ
architects can be engaged to either explain best practices or consider
roadmap)
I'll take the opportunity to point to some W3C work I've been
One option would be to have a SHACL engine that captures provenance of
shape validation - it means lots of extra triples of course, but you could
then run such a query without doing something to force revaluation of al
SHACL rules. Maybe an extension to SHACL to nominate an optional provenance
t; the Settings tab.
>
> From memory: I believe a property will be eligible as tag property if it
> is applicable to the selected content root class, and has a range of
> skos:Concept. Don't quote me on this!
>
> Richard
>
>
>
> On 10 Sep 2019, at 08:26, Rob Atkinson >
>
st to verify the particular rule actually fires?
>
> Holger
>
>
> On 11/09/2019 18:02, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> trying to execute a SHACL rule that preserves all the triples during a
> replace _except_ the ontology object and its properties
>
> This gives me the e
Hi
trying to execute a SHACL rule that preserves all the triples during a
replace _except_ the ontology object and its properties
This gives me the expected results when executed against the target graph..
CONSTRUCT {
?s ?p ?o
}
WHERE { ?this a owl:Ontology .
?s ?p ?o FILTER ( ?s !=
I cant reconcile the documentation and actual behaviour for setting up the
tagger
The docs say
The first few steps of setting up an AutoClassifier session are the same as
the setup of a manual tagging session:
1. create a content tag set,
2. specify the content graph, tag property
> this right after ontology creation - if you only generate and add shapes,
> without removing any other definitions that are there.
>
> On Aug 15, 2019, at 1:36 AM, Rob Atkinson > wrote:
>
>
> I have tried reading this a few times and am still a little lost...
>
logies defined only using SHACL. Or you could do
> this right after ontology creation - if you only generate and add shapes,
> without removing any other definitions that are there.
>
> On Aug 15, 2019, at 1:36 AM, Rob Atkinson > wrote:
>
>
> I have tried reading this
namespaces. Use the resulting file as input to the
> sml:ConvertXMLToRDF step.
>
> Holger
>
>
> On 15/08/2019 10:07, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
> Checking I'm not missing something here.. can i import XML and have the
> model (classes and properties) in a different namespace than the
ost-processing to strip model triples into a
separate graph, and update all the namespaces .. but if there was already a
way to control different namespaces for model and instances it would be
much better...
Rob Atkinson
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro
+1 to this.
also, AFAICT there seem no reason we couldnt also add a JSON-schema.
Both of these could be derived from shapes for a graph - and i think each
exported graph would need some mix of the following:
1) a context derived from the graphQL schema used in the case of a graphQL
export
+1 - (stupid to have missed that - i can never quite keep track of which
bits of documentation i have looked in.. cant you exploit existing
capability in EDG to have a corpus set up which automatically imports all
the documentation sources and makes them searchable in one place?) - we
could
+1 to that question.
what I'd really like is something like a superclass of workflow actions
with a default that allows us to register functions to call on success or
error (and defining a basic API in terms of what is available to those
functions - as arguments and/or the context graph those
Can any point me to docs on how to install a java code function into a TBC
environment plz?
Ta
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
1 - 100 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
