I think you run into the FAQ about SPARQLMotion, which is how to pass variables
from one module to the next, if the name of the output is different from the
input. The string pattern matching {?text} sometimes works, but is ugly.
Instead, you should leave the input variable field blank at the
Matt,
please try to rename sml:MsSQL to sml:SQLServer. Judging from the Jena (2.6.2)
source code, SQLServer is the correct match string. Not sure why it was working
for you earlier :)
Regards,
Holger
On Jan 29, 2010, at 5:56 PM, Matt wrote:
This is from the error log:
Paul,
I have read somewhere that Mulgara has a Sesame interface. If that's true then
you could access it as remote Sesame graph.
Alternatively it may publish a SPARQL end point which you can query using the
SPARQL SERVICE keyword.
It would also be straight-forward to add a TopBraid back-end
Hi Brad,
I guess it could be the confusion between spin:Function and spin:Function*s*.
To create a user-defined SPIN function, you need to subclass spin:Functions
(under spin:Module), which will create you an instance of the metaclass
spin:Function. Then you should see the spin:body property.
Hi Peter,
our code is currently using the BulkUpdateHandler associated with the
AllegroGraph Jena interface, and specifically the .add(Model) method. Whatever
this does is what you see. We need to check whether the method that takes an
Iterator behaves differently. If it does not have a
.
Thanks.
On Jan 14, 2:28 pm, Holger Knublauch hol...@topquadrant.com wrote:
Hi Bradley,
I had a similar problem a few days ago. I ended up converting theDTDto XSD
using
http://www.thaiopensource.com/relaxng/trang.html
and then I could import the XSD to TBC
Hi Paul,
many thanks for pointing this out - fixed for 3.3 and your test case is now in
our library.
Holger
On Feb 15, 2010, at 6:02 AM, PaulZH wrote:
SELECT ?label ?htm
WHERE {
LET (?fn := 'http://www.test.org/Scott_(writer)') .
LET (?li := (smf:lastIndexOf(?fn, /) + 1)) .
LET
Thanks, Tim. I have changed this for 3.3 so that sub-properties of
spin:constructor will be always recognized as well.
Holger
On Feb 15, 2010, at 8:15 AM, Tim Darr wrote:
Attached is a simple test case. The MyClass class has a property that is a
sub-property of spin:constructor that sets
Hi Hassene,
please have a look at JenaBean
http://code.google.com/p/jenabean/
Holger
On Feb 17, 2010, at 7:45 AM, Hassene Ben Amara wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to generate JAVA classes from a given ontology and generate
SPARQL queries like the Object Relational Mapping tools
Hi Andrej,
no sorry. TBE does not have any dependencies on Eclipse (UI) specific features
such as GEF, and we have no plans to change that. It would also be very
difficult to create a Flex-based interface to server-side GEF...
Holger
On Feb 23, 2010, at 6:22 AM, Andriy Sokolov wrote:
Ideally, what I'd like to do is define a template for a report/chart
that is associated with a class in my ontology and when the user
selects an
instance of this class, the chart/report is available to them in one
of the UI forms in TB Live.
Yes this is exactly what we have been working on
Hi Brad,
we are working on exactly this as we speak. We have added a new SPARQLMotion
module that makes it possible to load arbitrary XMI/EMF file and then run SPIN
mapping rules over them. This will be available for TBC 3.3 in a month. The
missing piece is the set of SPIN rules, but we may
Hi Gerrick,
the easiest way to understand this mechanism to look at how TopBraid Composer
opens an existing .xls file. Right click on it in the Navigator and Open with
TopBraid. You will see that each page of Excel file becomes one class. Each row
becomes one instance of that class. Those
)
at org.topbraidcomposer.core.io.TBCIO.loadModel(TBCIO.java:226)
at org.topbraidcomposer.core.io.TBCIO.loadModel(TBCIO.java:257)
at org.topbraidcomposer.core.io.TBCIO$1$1.run(TBCIO.java:298)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Holger Knublauch hol...@topquadrant.com
The ones with charts are not handled correctly by the Excel API. The following
three seem to be fine:
BHPCalcs, PVT, WellHistory.
Holger
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
TopBraid Composer Users group.
To post to this group, send email to
or just leave it as is?
Gerrick
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Holger Knublauch hol...@topquadrant.com
wrote:
The ones with charts are not handled correctly by the Excel API. The
following three seem to be fine:
BHPCalcs, PVT, WellHistory.
Holger
--
You received this message
Tim,
in SPARQLMotion, the module sml:CheckConstraints will create
spin:ConstraintViolation instances for any kind of constraint, including ASK
ones.
Since this topic came up before, I have just added an option to TBC so that the
same behavior will also be available via the Problems view. In
Hi Arthur,
this would certainly be possible, but it would help me understand your use case.
1) What data structure would you like to operate on? Result sets of SELECT
queries are basically tables, or would you like the JSON objects?
2) What kind of operations would you like to perform over
On Mar 11, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Arthur Keen wrote:
Did not realize you could use recursion in this way. I like recursion a lot.
It makes perfect sense now that we have experienced first hand why the above
spin rule was not a good idea. We anticipate on the order of 10,000
measurements,
You can do this, but you need to do an extra step. The default importer
(Semantic XML) will turn XML text nodes into RDF instances of the Semantic
XML ontology. Those instances can then be post-processed using SPARQL rules
(SPIN) into whatever target ontology you want. There is no option to do
Hi Gerrick,
this works for me. Please see the attached example. Using
sml:ImportRDFFromWorkspace, just specify the file name of the .csv file and
leave the base URI blank.
Regards,
Holger
On Mar 26, 2010, at 9:29 AM, Gerrick Bivins wrote:
Scott can you be more specific here?
What module
Yeah, this is a recurring problem that nearly every advanced user (i.e. with
large data sets and many merged graphs) runs into sooner or later. It's a
matter of re-architecting the Jena graphs to exploit optimizations. You
wouldn't expect good performance if you had an application that merged
There is a maintenance release of the SPIN API available from
http://topbraid.org/spin/api
This is primarily to catch up with various ARQ features for SPARQL 1.1, and to
produce a version that is fully compatible with the upcoming 3.3 release of
TopBraid.
Cheers
Holger
--
You
For users upgrading to 3.3 please note:
For legal reasons, TopBraid no longer bundles MySQL and jTDS drivers. Please
see the following Help file to download and install these database drivers:
Help TopBraid Composer Import and Export Import external information
Importing Relational
On Apr 6, 2010, at 8:58 AM, Arthur Keen wrote:
Scott,
thanks for the tip, I did not know about spin:reifiedRule and being able to
set the the maxIterationCount to 1 - this solves an issue that I was having
with another set of rules. We had planned to implement the provenance within
Andriy,
you can extract the javadocs by unzipping the plugins/org.topbraidcomposer.help
jar file. I assume that you can then tell your development environment
(Eclipse?) to point to those JavaDocs.
Holger
On Apr 6, 2010, at 7:24 AM, Andriy Sokolov wrote:
Thanks, Holger!
However I mean
Hi Tim,
On Apr 21, 2010, at 2:02 AM, Tim Darr wrote:
Two questions:
1 - there seems to be a default HTML view definition for classes
(basically a reproduction of the TBC form view). How is this
overridden or changed?
the default renderings depend on which files you are importing. The
On Apr 20, 2010, at 11:15 PM, Gerrick Bivins wrote:
If you are taking votes I vote yes on changing the export option!
Ok, changed for a future maintenance release.
Regards,
Holger
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Group TopBraid Suite Users, the topics of
alredy?
On Apr 21, 2:27 pm, Holger Knublauch hol...@topquadrant.com wrote:
Aziza,
this seems to work for me. Make sure you have TBC 3.3. Then I used the add
import button in the Imports View and pasted the URL below. As expected,
the class FinancialInstrument shows up.
Maybe you have
John,
the documents hosted at spinrdf.org are the official specs aimed at
implementors and advanced users. This approach is comparable to the RDF and OWL
specifications on the W3C pages - these kinds of specs are not meant to be
introductory.
If you haven't read them already, you may find the
Does this only work for perform update or are there other modules where
you can bind to a value to a variable that is named the same as a property on
a downstream module?
This works everywhere in SPARQLMotion.
Holger
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
.
-- Scott
On Apr 21, 6:05 pm, Arthur Keen arthur.a.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Holger,
Thanks very much for clarifying this.
Arthur
On Apr 21, 2010, at 5:59 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
I would not recommend going down this route. Theoretically it might be
enough to insert the missing
Hi Peter,
first, please note that the following does not work:
a href=#{= ui:label(?section) }
The problem is that attributes (here: href) can only contain {...} expressions
if those expressions cover the whole length of the string. So the following
would work:
a href='{=
={= fn:concat(%22#%22, ui:encodeNode(?
layer))Business Services/A
So, maybe this has turned into a different silly question?
Also, can I suppress the inclusion of the link to the tui.css
stylesheet?
Peter
On May 6, 10:43 am, Holger Knublauch hol...@topquadrant.com wrote:
Hi Peter,
first
Hi Gerrick,
I have turned this warning off for 3.3.2 onwards. If you are desperate to get
this change immediately, then you would need to write a small TBC plugin that
does the following call against the Jena API:
// Suppress datatype format exception
On May 7, 2010, at 4:57 PM, peter wrote:
Also, can I suppress the inclusion of the link to the tui.css
stylesheet?
Yes, you can suppress this by deleting the tui.css file from your workspace.
The system will always include .css files when they have the same name (and the
same workspace
I see two main options:
1) Get all instances of a metaclass :
SELECT ?class
WHERE {
?metaClass rdfs:subClassOf* rdfs:Class .
?class a ?metaClass .
}
2) Get all subclasses of the root class
SELECT ?class
WHERE {
?class rdfs:subClassOf* rdfs:Resource .
}
Regards,
Holger
On May
Arthur,
one way of doing this is:
1) Create a subclass of rdfs:Resource, e.g. SSNType
2) Change the rdf:type of that to rdfs:Datatype
3) On the owl:equivalentClass field, type in:
xsd:string[pattern d{3}-d{2}-d{4}]
Or enter this as rdfs:subClassOf.
Cheers,
Holger
On May 20,
Please try adding an additional dependency (required plugins):
org.topbraid.lib.spin
We will double-check the documentation, but where exactly does the compile
error occur?
Thanks,
Holger
On May 26, 2010, at 10:36 AM, Gerrick Bivins wrote:
I'm trying to build the SM plugin from the
Jeff,
we currently do not support multiple named graphs with TDB, if that's what you
mean.
In general I guess a good strategy is to create what you want manually with
TBC, and then mimic the same file structure and connection file in your
application. Sorry if these responses are not super
.
Thanks for the quick response. I'll give this a try.
Gerrick
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Holger Knublauch hol...@topquadrant.com
wrote:
Please try adding an additional dependency (required plugins):
org.topbraid.lib.spin
We will double-check the documentation, but where
Hi John,
there is indeed a small bug in the Classes View. It erases the root class if
someone edits a triple rdfs:subClassOf owl:sameAs rdfs:subClassOf. This triple
happens to be generated by TopSPIN when OWL RL is used.
Fortunately this inference is very redundant and inefficient anyway, so I
architecture. Any plans to
support this in the future like it is for SDB?
Thanks,
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:topbraid-
us...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Holger Knublauch
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 6:40 PM
To: topbraid-users
Arthur,
it could well be that the SPIN template wizard does not handle enumerations
well yet. I will look into this on Monday. In the worst case, you can edit
those things on a lower level, using nested sub-forms or in the source code.
Regards
Holger
On May 29, 2010, at 8:24 AM, Arthur Keen
On May 30, 2010, at 1:01 AM, Christian Fuerber wrote:
Scott and Holger,
thank you so much for the hints!
I could dramatically accelerate my queries (e.g. one that used to run
13h finishes now within 20 minutes).
I think it would be cool to have a check box or so that enforces the
how the example in my screenshot differs from your set up?
Also, please clarify what TBC version you are using. I am on 3.4 alpha :)
Thanks
Holger
On May 29, 2010, at 9:06 AM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
Arthur,
it could well be that the SPIN template wizard does not handle enumerations
well
Hi Rita,
On Jun 4, 2010, at 2:24 AM, Rita Marnau wrote:
The second argument of M. Connor was, that SPARQL has no sound semantics [2].
What's worse, SPARQL does not even have formally sound semantics
in terms of RDF. [..] there
are no guarantees about the soundness of results returned by
Hi Guil,
yes this is a known problem with an (old) version of OWL RL and TopBraid. It
has been fixed in the meantime. You can read my original response here:
http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users/browse_thread/thread/56bd5f97a0094e8d/3785ef3818d7e516?lnk=gstq=topSPIN#3785ef3818d7e516
Hi Joe,
having variables there is not supported (yet?) by the SPARQL syntax, so we had
to add a hack to allow this common requirement. The trick is that you need to
pre-bind a variable (such as ?myGraph) to the URI resource of the named graph
in a previous SM step. Then, you can call this
Hi Brice,
I am not aware of a completely built-in solution to your task, but TopBraid has
several technologies that might be of help.
First, you can generate arbitrary text documents (including XMLs) using our JSP
support (sml:CreateTextFromJSP). Depending on the topography of your XML file
).
What I was concerned mostly about was:
1) the length of my encoded string being too long
2) the string getting mangled since it's being simply passed as a string
rather than wrapped in xml or something.
Otherwise would something like this work?
biv
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Holger
On Jun 22, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Gerrick Bivins wrote:
Holger,
What I mean is, if I call a SM service like this:
http://localhost:8083/tbl/actions?action=sparqlmotionid=EmbedEncodedStringarg1=mybase64EncodedString
where mybase64EncodedString is the string representing the image encoded,
do
. Perhaps I'm missing something.
Gerrick
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Holger Knublauch hol...@topquadrant.com
wrote:
On Jun 22, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Gerrick Bivins wrote:
Holger,
What I mean is, if I call a SM service like this:
http://localhost:8083/tbl/actions?action=sparqlmotionid
Ah, and I completely forgot that you could even use SPARQLMotion itself
(sml:PostRequest) :)
Holger
On Jun 22, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
I don't know which tools and environments you are familiar with, but I
believe you will need either HTML forms or a programming language
pm, Holger Knublauch hol...@topquadrant.com wrote:
Hi Joe,
having variables there is not supported (yet?) by the SPARQL syntax, so we
had to add a hack to allow this common requirement. The trick is that you
need to pre-bind a variable (such as ?myGraph) to the URI resource of the
named
On Jun 29, 2010, at 7:16 PM, Brice Sommacal wrote:
Thanks Holger for your prompt response.
Yesterday, as you adviced me, I made a SpinResultSet and then apply a
construct on my results.
The aggregator took in parameter was simply defined by a spr:stepFunction
fn:concat.
But nothing
Hi Paul,
On Jun 29, 2010, at 3:40 PM, PaulZH wrote:
a) When creating a new instance of class rdfs:Datatype, I expected to
get when using add existing ... on property owl:onDatatype the list
of xsd datatypes, but I see none. Is this influenced by a setting?
Seems to work for me, see
;
owl:unionOf (xsd:date xsd:dateTime)
] .
lead to 4 datatypes in my instances overview.
Paul
-- Scott
On Jun 29, 7:07 am, PaulZH p...@proxml.be wrote:
Hi Holger,
On Jun 29, 12:44 pm, Holger Knublauch hol...@topquadrant.com wrote:
Hi Paul,
On Jun 29, 2010, at 3:40 PM
Any version 3.3.0 or above should be fine.
Holger
On Jul 8, 2010, at 10:12 AM, Gerrick Bivins wrote:
Cool!
Is that in 3.3.1 or do I need to use the beta (3.3.2)
Gerrick
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Holger Knublauch hol...@topquadrant.com
wrote:
Add SPARQL Expression
--
You
Hi Gerrick,
cool video :) In your PostRequest, you need to specify the sm:outputVariable
as a normal string only, i.e. Add empty row and enter PDFResult. The consumer
of this variable (your Return module) should then use the SPARQL expression
?PDFResult as you have specified it.
Holger
On
John,
I have no idea, so let's try to inspect this together. You need to look into
the definitions of spl:Argument. Look at its form. Does it declare the same
argument twice? If you mouse over the icon the left of the argument node you
should see a tool tip that tells you where the blank node
Hi Peter,
yes, the content negotiation scenario you describe, to create either machine or
human-readable representations of RDF data, has been exactly one of the
motivations for having UISPIN. UISPIN 1.0 will be included in TBL 3.4 end of
September. I need to check how to do the redirects and
the submodels in one large graph?
regards
Arthur
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Holger Knublauch hol...@topquadrant.com
wrote:
Yeah, this is a recurring problem that nearly every advanced user (i.e. with
large data sets and many merged graphs) runs into sooner or later. It's a
matter of re
Yes, through the SERVICE keyword in SPARQL
http://jena.sourceforge.net/ARQ/service.html
Regards,
Holger
On Sep 4, 2010, at 8:46 AM, Tim Harsch wrote:
Does TBC provide funcitonality to query SPARQL end points directly?
Thanks,
Tim
--
You received this message because you are
Hi David,
the Free Edition only includes a single inference engine, for SPARQL Rules [1].
The default inference engine of Maestro is SwiftOWLIM, which is a rule-based
OWL engine. If you want to get similar results as the OWLIM engine, you need to
select a SPARQL Rule base containing the OWL RL
Hi Olaf,
many thanks for this detailed bug report. You are 100% right, and I have added
the following line to the clone method
cl.initialBindings = initialBindings;
I believe you have the latest source code so that you can (for now) add this
line yourself, but I am overdue to
Hi Peter,
just following up on this old thread, I have meanwhile added a new servlet
/tbl/describe that will do content negotiation in the spirit of the cool URIs
linked data movement. Basically, this looks at the incoming request and either
returns RDF triples or an HTML rendering, depending
Hi Olaf,
I have been trying to reproduce this, but so far without success. Judging from
the source code, the variable blank node would have to have an rdf:type while
your example below does not have this. You can also try that this works in
general if you just enter this with TBC (FE) on some
11:21:45 Holger Knublauch wrote:
Hi Olaf,
I have been trying to reproduce this, but so far without success. Judging
from the source code, the variable blank node would have to have an
rdf:type while your example below does not have this. You can also try
that this works in general if you just
There is a new maintenance release of the TopBraid SPIN API available from
http://topbraid.org/spin/api/
In addition to several bug fixes, this includes a more complete coverage of the
SPARQL 1.1 spec.
Regards
Holger
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Hi Paul,
I have been trying this (admittedly with 3.4) and it seems to work in
principle, after I went to the create index item from the SPARQL view's context
menu. Could you elaborate on which version you have and which steps you made?
It should create a folder with filename.larq in your
Fixed for 3.4.0
Thanks for the bug report
Holger
On Sep 24, 2010, at 2:08 AM, Scott Henninger wrote:
Jody, yes it is the case that sml:ConvertStringToSPINRDF doesn't
handle SPARQL 1.1 features yet. We're working on this while keeping
an eye on SPARQL 1.1 progress and should have this ready
Hi Arthur,
I believe you should try to upgrade from 3.2.2 to something more recent. I have
tried it with the 3.4 beta and it appears to work fine, so I assume 3.3 has the
same behavior. I have added a triple to make qudt:Unit rdfs:subClassOf
rdfs:Datatype. Then I could set the range of a
Hi Paul,
as you will probably know, incremental inferencing is a non-trivial problem in
semantic web languages. It is easier to just add triples than to retract
previous triples and redo inferences. The TopSPIN engine has some very basic
support for this only - it will re-evaluate all rules
Hi Rodolfo,
thanks a lot for this bug report. It was indeed a (simple) recursive loop.
Since this was a small but rather critical bug, I have just updated the SPIN
API that is on the web with a fix. The file has still the same version number
etc, but the infinite loop should be gone now. I
Hi Paul,
our build will automatically pick up the latest versions of the external
ontologies such as dcterms, meaning that 3.4.0 will include that update.
However we do use a local copy of the core DC vocabulary (that is now slowly
becoming out of fashion). I checked whether the latest DC
Hi Arthur,
many thanks for sending along your example files (off-list). We had a good look
into your scenario and found that the performance loss is entirely caused by
the user interface. The TopSPIN inferencing always takes less than a second.
But then opening the Inferences view takes a few
Hi Dean,
I assume this is because by selecting each resource, the system needs to ask
many many small queries (with ?this pre-bound), and there is some overhead in
creating the query executions etc. I will run this through a profiler to see if
we can optimize that. If you run all constraints,
On Oct 22, 2010, at 11:13 PM, Schmitz, Jeffrey A wrote:
Hello,
Just a couple of nits I finally have gotten around to aksing about. First,
was wondering if there is an underlying reason a DELETE query can’t be
attached in the range of the spin:query property? E.g. the following query
I’ve figured out how to do. Are you saying this is possible using the API
toString and print functions? If so, I’ll have to take a closer look.
Thanks,
Jeff
From: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
[mailto:topbraid-us...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Holger Knublauch
Sent: Tuesday
Hi Joe,
no sorry, there is no such option in TBC. You may either need to change the
ranges of those properties, or post-process them, e.g. with a SPARQL construct.
May I ask why this distinction is relevant? In my understanding, rdfs:Literal
is just meant to be the superclass of all datatypes,
On Nov 19, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Tim Darr wrote:
If this is the wrong mailing list for SPIN questions, please let me
know where to redirect.
That's fine here.
It appears that SPIN update templates cannot be assigned to rules. If
this is the case, how are they executed?
SPIN rules must
Yes, our friends at Franz are working and publishing a separate plugin for AG 4
support.
See their web page http://franz.com/agraph/tbc/
Holger
On Nov 30, 2010, at 9:35 AM, Matt wrote:
Is support for AG4 coming in TBC 3.4? It seems like TBC3.3 supports
only AG3.5.
--
You received
Hi Andriy,
I am not sure if I understand you correctly, but if multi-threading of changes
is a problem, you could use the variant of the execute method that takes a
Runnable as second argument (changeEngine.execute(change, andThen)). The
andThen Runnable is executed after the change has been
Hi Pim,
the prefix for afn is wrong. In TBC you don't need to specify it at all, and
from Jena use
PREFIX afn: http://jena.hpl.hp.com/ARQ/function#
SELECT ?x ?now
WHERE {
LET (?x := test).
LET (?now := afn:now()).
}
Note the ARQ in the prefix :)
Holger
On Dec 2, 2010, at 6:05 PM,
Hi Michel,
this is already supported in frameworks such as Jena. In Jena, you can execute
SPARQL queries on any Graph. A Graph is a bunch of triples. The Graph Java
interface has multiple implementations, and some of those implementations
automatically do RDFS or OWL inferencing on the fly.
Hi Daniel,
you have found a bug in Jena, which will be fixed in the next ARQ release and
folded into TopBraid when available:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/jena-dev/message/46124
Meanwhile, you could use the function smf:cast(?literal, xsd:time).
Cheers
Holger
On Dec 3, 2010,
?
Andriy
On 1 Dez., 04:10, Holger Knublauch hol...@topquadrant.com wrote:
Hi Andriy,
I am not sure if I understand you correctly, but if multi-threading of
changes is a problem, you could use the variant of the execute method that
takes a Runnable as second argument (changeEngine.execute
Hi Michel,
I believe Jena really only supports Turtle. I also believe Turtle is a sub-set
of N3, i.e. every Turtle file is also an N3 file, but not necessarily vice
versa. In TBC you can use either .ttl (recommended) or .n3 for those files, and
since Jena will never use any features that are
Hi Christian,
we have changed the policy so that all files in the (default) TopBraid project
will be marked as read-only at start-up. The preferred procedure for customer
projects is to create your own Eclipse project(s), and place your files there.
Please leave the TopBraid project unchanged
I am speculating a bit here, but maybe Dean's use case is that he wants to
access a TBE user session, so that http://tb-session (aka urn:x-tb:session)
becomes meaningful. This is not supported in stand-alone web service calls. You
need to figure out the URI (graph name) of the target graph
Hi Kevin,
I believe this question should rather go to the jena mailing list, as it's
about programmatic access to TDB.
TopBraid's .tdb files are *not* Jena assembler files, but SPARQLMotion files -
they look similar though.
Regards,
Holger
On Dec 28, 2010, at 1:06 PM, kptyson wrote:
On Dec 28, 2010, at 5:02 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
My original problem is that TB reads the model, and immediately
complains that I am lacking imports for no apparent reason, and then
doesn't show me the actual ontology (unless I pull on 'show local
resources' first). It's not a very big
Hi Daniel,
yes both are unimplemented at this stage, but you have reminded me to push it
up in the feature requests list.
Thanks,
Holger
On Jan 5, 2011, at 3:09 AM, Daniel Mekonnen wrote:
Greetings,
I've been unable to get default values working for spl:Arguments when
used in spin
Hi Tim,
the system arguments of the SWP/UISPIN servlet have changed from 3.4 on, and
now start with an underscore. For example, resource is now _resource. This
makes it easier to distinguish those system arguments from other, page-specific
arguments.
You can see those URLs if you go to
Hi Jeff,
no, the SPIN RDF model does not store the prefixes used in the SPARQL query.
Simply use those from the associated Jena Model instead.
Regards,
Holger
On Jan 15, 2011, at 1:46 PM, Schmitz, Jeffrey A wrote:
Hello,
I’m using org.topbraid.spin.model.SPINFactory to retrieve a stored
TBC also has an export wizard to create such a Java file from any currently
open ontology.
Holger
On Jan 22, 2011, at 7:13 AM, Smith, Tim wrote:
Hi Gokhan,
I think that's the problem - I have not defined my own SM properties in a
java class - only in the rdf model.
Is there an
Hi Frank,
no, we do not support Racer out of the box.
If you want to tell us what you are trying to achieve, we may be able to assist
with TBC-compliant alternatives.
Regards,
Holger
On Jan 23, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Frank Sonne wrote:
Hi,
Does TopBraind Composer supports the reasoner
Hi Tim,
you are close to the solution. There are various implementations of IVarValue,
and one of them is RDFNodeVarValue. So try casting it into that class to get
the actual RDFNode: RDFNode rdfNode = ((RDFNodeVarValue)varValue).getRDFNode();
Holger
On Jan 26, 2011, at 7:51 AM, Smith, Tim
Hi,
On Jan 26, 2011, at 4:25 AM, Erwachen Hz wrote:
Hi,
I have some doubts and hope someone explain me :)
If we assume i'm adding SPIN rules and constraints to my ontologies and then
storing them into a triple store as triples or store the ontology in as an
ontology storage system
301 - 400 of 2310 matches
Mail list logo
