- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 3:14
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
I don't ask either of these questions Bill
Lance wrote:
There is but one on TT, Judy, whose wisdom is
the wisdom of Aristotle. That one would be DM.
Philsophy is to DM what the church fathers are
to some others.
Surely you know that I object to this characterization of me, Lance. My
philosophy is more like Plato than Aristotle, but
: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God (Judy)
Lance wrote:
There is but one on TT, Judy, whose wisdom is
the wisdom of Aristotle. That one would be DM.
Philsophy is to DM what the church fathers are
to some others.
Surely you know that I object to this characterization of me, Lance. My
JD wrote:
Have I gone over your head with the use
of this phrase? Look up ad hom and you
will find begging the question in there
somewhere. You have no idea just how
ridiculous this makes you sound.
Please stop attacking Judy! PLEASE!
You are plain wrong about this idea you have that ad
: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 11:51
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
myth (a typically
emptyesoteric equation--actually, an 'adherent' of the church fathers is
a ridiculous idea--a student of their residualimpactcould
conclude, likeCalvin did
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 3:46
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
Oophs! Possibly I should have said "God
the Word" - When IYO did H
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 05:55:02 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Judy Taylor
I don't ask either of these questions Bill but
this is beside the point
I'm thinking you do not realize how you "sound" to others,
Judy.
No Bill I don't think itpossible to know
to the
Scriptures' approach.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 11, 2006 07:57
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God (Judy)
JD wrote:
Have I gone over your head with the use
of this phrase? Look up ad
Are you saying that God decreed the fall of man
Bill?
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:27:19 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Judy Taylor
Oophs!
Possibly I should have said "God the Word" - When IYO did He actually become
Jesus?
And you are saying that you
of like the king with no clothes.
judyt
- Original Message - From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent:
January 11, 2006 07:57Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God
(Judy)
JD wrote: Have I gone over your head with
Lance wrote:
Having so identified yourself, David, (more like
Plato than Aristotle) you ought to object to DM,
not to me. You are, IMO, a philosophical rationalist.
Hi Lance. You paint me with too broad of a brush. I may be more agreeable
with Plato than Aristotle, but as I said in my
I'm content to express myself within the framework of those who do a better
job than I, David.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 11, 2006 09:21
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God (Judy)
Lance wrote
Original question by Judy:
Do you believe the Word of God
was/is full of the Holy Spirit?
Judy wrote:
Had to have been before his baptism; his birth
was precipitated by the Holy Spirit and there
was spiritual recognition between he and John
while both were in utero when Mary visited her
Lance wrote:
I'm content to express myself within the framework
of those who do a better job than I, David.
Then you had better invest heavily in them, or you will be like the coward
who buried his talent in the ground and returned it to his master when he
returned. If you are going to leave
Do women regularly tell you that you're a really funny guy? BTW, David, my
'investment' is in Him, NOT in them.
--- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 11, 2006 09:49
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God (Judy
Lance wrote:
... my 'investment' is in Him, NOT in them.
If your investment is in Him, NOT them, then think for yourself and speak
from the Spirit of God. Don't leave the framework for your speech to those
you consider able to do a better job. Be who you are called to be in
Christ. Don't
my comment on
God giving you light in a higher way as a joke?
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/10/2006 11:00:54 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
..or is it,
Bro?
On T
..'the fathers hold
no authority whatsoever' is correct, Bro--e.g., the referenced fathers are the fathers
bec they recognize to a man, uncontested,that 'Jesus Christ', partic in
the writing of the Ap John is 'the Father's son'--the one Father whose
only son himself, in and through the
often allude.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 11, 2006 10:02
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God (Judy)
Lance wrote:
... my 'investment' is in Him, NOT in them.
If your investment is in Him, NOT them
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:27:19 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Judy Taylor
Oophs! Possibly I should have said
"God the Word" - When IYO did He actually become Jesus?
And you are saying that you asked me this question earlier
-- hm.
Judy wrote:
We know that He was full of the Holy Spirit because
it is written that God giveth not the Spirit by measure
unto him (John 3:34)
This passage says that God GIVETH not the Spirit by measure, indicating that
it was a present thing, something that was happening at the time it was
cd: Bro I just don't know what I maybe should know that you know-if indeed you truly know it.
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/11/2006 10:30:05 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God (Judy)
words are in context, Bro--many times
cd; Good point Judy.
- Original Message -
From: Judy Taylor
To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/11/2006 2:14:01 PM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God (Judy)
From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Judy wrote: We know that He was full of the Holy Spirit because it is
No.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 6:37
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
Are you saying that God decreed the fall
as
always the Second Person of the Trinity, and as such was alwaysfully God.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 6:21
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTa
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:47:20 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
.
. . and since I am already branded the heretic by
you .. Oh well!!
It is I who called you a heretic, Judy: that is
correct.
I know and JD who sits in your
"amen" corner seconded it, of course
Bill wrote:
If you do like the label, then please cease with
the ad hominem arguments, attaching me to
the fathers and dismissing my comments on
the basis of that association; for when you do
that, you are employing a fallacious form of
argumentation.
Attaching you to the fathers is not an
It is, however, a fallacious form of argumentation.
It's called "bagging the questions" and , as such, it is ad hom. Whether you agree with accepted definition or not, the simple fact that you admit such statements to be "fallacious form[s] of argumentation" should be enough to cause one tobe
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:44:14 -0500 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bill
wrote: Judy, I am asking you to please address the
content of my statements. Rebut them if you wish -- with Scripture
or whatever other source you would like to use ...
Yes, Judy, please oblige Bill in
It is, however, a fallacious form of argumentation.
It's called "bagging the questions" and , as such, it is ad
hom.
What on earth are you talking about JD, I never bagged
any of
his questions. I answered one and the other is on
hold until
he responds to mine.
Whether you agree with
Text should read "begging" the question. It is your M.O.
jd
-- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is, however, a fallacious form of argumentation.
It's called "bagging the questions" and , as such, it is ad hom.
What on earth are you
Do you, DM, understand the 'spirit' of freemasonry and the 'spirit' of
mormonism to be one and the same 'spirit'?
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 10, 2006 06:44
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
As I have already stated FYI JD; at the start there
was NO QUESTION
You are off on another flight of fancy. A child
of the King never has to beg
for anything Yours is the wisdom of
Aristotle. When will you fellows learn
Have I gone over your head with the use of this phrase? Look up ad hom and you will find "begging the question" in there somewhere. You have no idea just how ridiculous this makes you sound.
jd
-- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As I have already
you candefine
humor, Bro--what is it?
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 00:51:24 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
God bless you and give you his light in a higher way.:-)
..interestingly,
humor doesn't appear to be confined to the KJV
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:01:27 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
you
candefine humor, Bro--what is it?
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 00:51:24 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
God bless you and give you his
..or is it,
Bro?
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:30:14 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..interestingly,
humor doesn't appear to be confined to the KJV
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:01:27 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
you
candefine humor, Bro--what is it?
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006
of
Christ.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 08, 2006 16:25
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
If that answer does not satisfy you Bill
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 21:36:39 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe he has equal status in the
Godhead with the other two members. God is ONE -
remember?
That is good, Judy. And yes I do remember that. Why then do
you make such an issue out of Jesus' statement
I suspect not but, more importantly, is it
reflective of your 'inspired' interpretations?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 08, 2006 22:19
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
Modalism -- One God, three
manifestations which is different from three
persons. That's how I remember the above -- correct?
jd
--
Original message -- F
No, it reflects the fact that sometimes I am
tired in the evening and should wait until the
next day to respond -
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 06:17:59 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I suspect not but, more importantly, is it
reflective of your 'inspired' interpretations?
y.org
Sent: January 09, 2006 06:12
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 21:36:39 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe he has equal status in the
Godhead with the other two members. God is ONE
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
You fellows are great with the sixty million dollar
theological words and they are all 'isms - just like the cults.
I don't study all that. I study the Word of God
and this is what I see there. If you want to go with those you
k@mail.innglory.org
; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 9:13
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
Modalism -- One God, three
manifestations which is different from three
Exactly what it says
Lance,
I did not change it to the plural did
I?
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 06:40:53 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
QUESTION:"the PromiseALL Truth' As it does
not say 'truth(s)' might your interpretation of this word
be mistaken? What do you believe
Sent: January 09, 2006 06:48
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
Exactly what it says
Lance,
I did not change it to the plural did
I?
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 06:40:53 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
QUESTION:"the Promi
: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 09, 2006 06:44
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
A little patronizing Lance
...
So tell me why are DM and myself accused of
modalism and sabellianism? Is it becauseyour
mentors have convinced you that -
"
d conclude,
therefore,that it is not meaningful or important at all.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 4:12
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/8/2006 10:12:46 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
I believe in the same thing Dean only I
call it the Godhead rath
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:45:55 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Because He said it and since you hold
Him in such high esteem yourself, I would think that you would find
this an important pointalso.
Things can be said, Judy, and have more than one possible
@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 09, 2006 08:07
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:45:55 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Because He said it and since you
hold Him in
I have never ever said anything about "interpreting or
unpacking" scripture
The scriptures are spiritually discerned Lance... and
God the Holy Spirit is the one appointed to
lead us through them. Not one of you so far has
refuted anything I have written byscripture
except Gary who was on the
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/8/2006 4:14:48 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God (Judy)
And I believe that you can't answer a simple question.
- Original Message -
From: Judy Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday
stherefore redundant.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 6:07
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:45:55 -
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/8/2006 7:30:44 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God (Judy)
myth (mother Mary matters, M'am)
cd; Be so kind as to explain this statement -in term I can relate to Gary. Thanks.
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16
If this is your choice then I respect that
JD
However, I stillthink it a shame that you
do not consider any of my objections seriously enough to check them out even
though they are grounded in the
truth of God's Word like the one in Col 1:19 and 2 Cor
5:19
This may seen like a small point
: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 09, 2006 08:24
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
I have never ever said anything about "interpreting
or unpacking" scripture
The scriptures are spiritually discerned Lance... and
God the Holy Spirit is the one
ail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 6:07
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:45:55 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Because He said it
of it.Please enlighten
me.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 6:27
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
cd: But what an answer she gave Bill-Glory be to God asI
BILL, SHE DOES NOT ADDRESS IT!!
- Original Message -
From:
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 09, 2006 08:58
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
Great the accolades, Dean, and glory to God! I
too see the Great King
Refutations abound, I agree but only as opinions.
I want to see where I am wrong IN GOD'S WORD
rather thanby men's opinions or some theology
which distorts other parts of God's Word which are
what abounds around here. I am not blind to them,
they just hold no weight. I see them as
cisterns
ight as He was!Thank you Judy for this answer.
- Original Message -
From:
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/8/2006 4:14:48 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
And I believ
on this matter differs from the one The Spirit has shown
THEM..
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 09, 2006 08:51
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
Refutations
I don't really trust your statistics Lance, you are
generalizing by using what your memory tells you
The Mormon boys use a lot of scripturesto refute
what they think comes against their teachings
Scriptures wrested out of context don't count, nor do
scriptures used solely for the purpose of
Gabriel to.. a town in Galilee, to a virgin .."You will be with
child and give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus.
.The Holy Spirit will come upon you..the power of the Most High ..the
holy one to be born will be called the Son of God. .. nothing is impossible
with God."
So what are you saying Gary, that mary gave birth by
the power of the Holy Spirit to a baby boy
called Jesus the Son of God? Is Luke or are you
saying something other??
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 08:11:11 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gabriel to.. a town in Galilee, to a virgin .."You will be
ask an
apostle
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:19:42 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So what are you saying Gary..
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 08:11:11 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gabriel to.. a town in Galilee, to a virgin .."You will be
with child and give birth to a son,
- Original Message -
From: Judy Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/9/2006 7:52:13 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God (Judy)
Yes. Hi Dean, sorry I missed this.
I disagreed with John about Col 1:19; in his zeal to prove a doctrinal pointhe wrote:
2
Judy wrote:
The conflict is in where your faith is rooted Bill;
the patristic fathers and the scriptures do not agree.
This is not entirely accurate, Judy. Sometimes the church fathers and the
Scriptures DO agree.
I don't see Bill as having his faith rooted in the church fathers. Rather,
Lance wrote to Judy:
Your SCRIPTURAL INTERPRETATION on this matter
differs from the one The Spirit has shown THEM..
In regards to me, I do not see too much doctrinal difference between Judy
and me. Our difference is primarily one of emphasis. Our biggest
difference concerns the humanity of
Well 1161 and 225 back at ya !! These dern computers.
jd
-- Original message -- From: "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Judy Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/9/2006 7:52:13 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTa
classic/tt hall of
fame quote:
To me these other versions only add
confusion..the KJV is enough for me -- cd
||
..Iused the NASV and Amp because they were
the closest to the computer at the time.
They
say the same as the KJV because this verse (V.20) speaks of the Father rather
. .
. and since I am already branded the heretic by you
.. Oh well!!
It is I who called you a heretic, Judy: that is
correct. But you branded yourself with your continued linking of me to the
"Church Fathers."The truth is you had ample opportunity to recognize the
validity of my
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/9/2006 5:31:32 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God (Judy)
Well 1161 and 225 back at ya !! These dern computers.
jd
cd: :-) lol-very funny.
-- Original
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 1/9/2006 10:34:32 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God (Judy)
classic/tt hall of fame quote:
cd; Why? In language I can understand please Gary? With all due respect-I am almost
this is
veryfunny Bro, esp coming from a KJV-only dude like
yourself--but i'll honestlytry to quit laughing about it, just for
you
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 00:14:04 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
To me these other versions only add
confusion..the KJV is enough for me --
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/10/2006 12:23:58 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God (Judy)
this is veryfunny Bro, esp coming from a KJV-only dude like yourself--but i'll honestlytry to quit laughing about it, just for you
cd
@mail.innglory.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 1/9/2006 10:34:32 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God (Judy)
classic/tt hall of fame quote:
To me these other versions only add confusion..the KJV is enough for me -- cd
||
..Iused the NASV and Amp because they were the closest
-- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 18:17:18 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The word tranlated "pleased" in the gk text is the word in question. "Father" or "God" is atached to that word. That attachment is a
do you believe in teh Father, Son and Sprit (Matthew 28:19) or not.
jd
-- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't use the word "trinity" since I prefer Godhead but have never believed any differently. Where
have you been?
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 08:22:39 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The word tranlated "pleased" in the gk text is the word in
question. "Father" or "God" is atached to that word.
That attachment is a personification and does not actually , literally , exist
in the text. There are good
I do but obviously not in the exact same way
that you do. jt
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 08:27:13 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
do you believe in teh Father, Son and Sprit (Matthew 28:19)
or not.
jd
From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Idon't use the word "trinity" since I
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/7/2006 7:22:23 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God (Judy)
Three in one? You have admitted to the idea of the Trinity, whether you intended to or not.
jd
cd: I may
I believe in the same thing Dean only I call it
the Godhead rather than "trinity" because Godhead
is what it is named in scripture. I don't deny
there is a Father, Word/Son, and Holy Spirit. judyt
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 09:59:26 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Three in one?
the divine
Christbefore that time?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 2:54
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 08:22:39 + [EMAIL PROTECTED
myth
[examing
existential evidence,e.g.,]
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 04:54:05 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
I am not into adding or subtracting from the
Word of God..
||
for
ref:
1.
James 1:21(King
- Original Message -
From: Judy Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/8/2006 10:12:46 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God (Judy)
I believe in the same thing Dean only I call it the Godhead rather than "trinity&quo
@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/8/2006 3:22:40 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God (Judy)
-- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 18:17:18 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The word tranlated "pleased" in the gk text i
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
cd: I once read an explanation of the Trinity as God pouring
himself through Jesus Christ and out the other side came the Holy Ghost-John's
analogy of the cup of water reminded me of this
explanation
Why would you ask such a
question?
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 08:39:06 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you now saying that Christ was never
God? Do you now deny His deity altogether?
It was God in Christ -- that makes Him deity,
in this case.
Yes God the Holy Spirit
: Sunday, January 08, 2006 1:18
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy)
Why would you ask such a
question?
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 08:39:06 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you now saying that Christ was never
God? Do you now deny
I believe He is King of Kings and Lord of
Lords
Head of the Church which is His
body
Our Prophet, Priest, and King who sits at the
RH of the Father in Heaven.
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:42:55 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Because I'm trying to understand what you believe concerning
And I believe that you can't answer a simple
question.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 2:09
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ -
incarnate God (Judy
If that answer does not satisfy you Bill then
it was not a "simple" question.
You seem to have some axe to grind and come
across as a very angry man.
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:24:48 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And I believe that you can't answer a simple
question.
From:
If that answer does not satisfy you Bill then
it was not a "simple" question.
Fair enough, then answer a tough question: When
did Jesus receive the Holy Spirit, and was he the divine Christbefore that
time?
I believe He is King of Kings and Lord of
Lords Head of the
myth (mother
Mary matters, M'am)
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:09:41 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe He is King of Kings and Lord of
Lords
Head of the Church which is His
body
Our Prophet, Priest, and King who sits at the
RH of the Father in Heaven.
||
..God
..yo, Christine,
keep in mind that greater revelationcan be reductionistic as well as
expansive
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:29:06 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
myth (mother
Mary matters, M'am)
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:09:41 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I believe He
..evidence suggests
that jt re-writes Luke reductionistically, in green, below
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:53:45 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..yo, Christine,
keep in mind that greater revelationcan be reductionistic as well as
expansive
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:29:06 -0700 [EMAIL
.. that she
simultaneouslyre-writes Acts 9, expansively,e.g., thereis
nodonkey in Acts--she took the liberty to add that
notion
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:00:32 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..evidence
suggests that jt re-writes Luke reductionistically, in green,
below
On Sun, 8
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
