In a message dated 10/17/2002 8:23:33 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You have obviously never heard me preach. You are imagining what you think
I must be preaching. Don't you understand that I have worked with sinners
of all kinds, from the homosexual with aids, to
Blainer) DaveH's explanation below is about how I would have explained
it. I would only add that if the angel was previously a mortal and is
doing the work of the Lord in post-mortal life, he (she) may be a spirit,
as yet unresurrected, or may be a resurrected being--either. Most likely
the
David Miller wrote:
The ones who ignore personal responsibility for
sin, in my opinion, are those who cop-out and
say that we will always sin and there is nothing
that we can do about it until Jesus comes back.
Glenn wrote:
This very statement is why I think people are blinded
to this
Blainer) to Glenn--You sent me this blank sheet, so I assumed you
wanted me it fill it in with something worthwhile. Well, I had to have
SOMETHING on tt worth reading!!! (:)
***The point is that when some hear the word 'kabbalah', they
automatically assume it means evil when it is not.
Blainer) The Big Picture seems to be what is missing here. Maybe this
will help. We have learned from JS--whom we believe to have had many
experiences with angels--that all angels who minister to the peoples of
this earth are either former or future inhabitants of this earth, with
the one
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 21:31:19 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 10/17/2002 6:10:34 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Laura, remember there are not 130 divisions in Mormonism. Nope.
Christianity is not divided and Mormonism is not divided. Nope.
Gary wrote:
interestingly, Isaiah doesn't preach this passage
the way you do, David--he isn't clutching apriori
to perfectionism for himself alone; he actually
includes himself as a sinner among sinners in the
audience
Of course, and so did Peter during the first few years of his
In a message dated 10/17/2002 6:10:34 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Laura, remember there are not 130 divisions in Mormonism. Nope. Christianity is not divided and Mormonism is not divided. Nope.
Blainer) That's the female in you talking. (:)
I am upset that Joe boy
Glenn wrote:
I have not met anyone like you describe above. What is
the difference in your perfect doctrine and the Lordship
doctrine. I understand the Lordship doctrine teaches you
much not only make Jesus your Savior but also be totally
committed to Him as your Lord, or you won't go to
Michael Douglas wrote:
> As for your second question...Jesus
had an elevated status over
>Lucifer in the pre-mortal existence as I understand. That's
interesting. What gives you this idea though?
DAVEH: Jesus (as Blaine pointed
out in a parallel post today) was the firstborn of our Father.
In a message dated 10/17/2002 7:51:38 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Blainer) The Big Picture seems to be what is missing here. Maybe this
will help. We have learned from JS--whom we believe to have had many
experiences with angels--that all angels who minister to the
Laura wrote:
What happens when one of these hard sinners is
saved. Is he immediately perfect? Perfect in the
sense that he never sins again.
I've met both types. Some immediately clean up an start a new life. Others
appear that way for awhile, but stumble and have to get back up again.
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 21:19:54 -0400 "David
Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:You have obviously never heard me preach. You are
imagining...
..well, what does this sound
like(?):
Isaiah 64:6..is a major part of my
preaching to sinners, especially to religious, self-righteous
hypocrites.
In a message dated 10/18/2002 12:22:41 AM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
First of all, I find it difficult to carry on a mutually
respectful conversation with you when you refer to a man I greatly
respect as "Joe Boy."
I didn't mean to be disrespectful and maybe I did
Larua, Of course it is difficult to carry on a conservation when Blainer lies about 130 Mormon divisions. Until he admits this foundational truth he has no credibility in ANYTHING he says. To deny the 130 division facts is to bring disdain upon Joe Smith and Mormonism. This is why I no longer
Laura wrote:
I know many women who are stronger in the
faith than their husbands.
Blainer wrote:
Yes, so do I, but that was not the case
with Joseph and Emma.
First, how do you know that this was not the case, and how confident are you
in this statement?
It seems to me that in your
Gary wrote:
being 'in Christ' and being Christ are two different
realities: when you *are* Christ you will never sin
The Bible says,
We know that whosoever is born of God sinneth not; but he that is begotten
of God keepeth himself, and that wicked one toucheth him not. (1Jo 5:18)
I realize
ftr, 1 Jn 5, in either KJV or NIV (but in the
NIV, as follows), teaches that the only perfect one is JC
himself--among us humans there is no one perfect but God
Evidence:
1Jn.5:16ff.: If any man see his
brother sin a sin which is not unto death, he shall ask [God], and[God]
shall give him
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:52:17 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ftr, 1 Jn 5, in either KJV or NIV (but in the
*[KJV]*, as follows), teaches that the
only perfect one is JC himself--among us humans there is no one
perfect but God
Evidence:
1Jn.5:16ff.: If any man see
his
Geneva Study Bible
16:2 All the ways of a man [are] b clean in his own eyes; but the LORD weigheth the spirits.
(b) He shows by it that man flatters himself in his doings, calling that virtue, which God terms vice.
A person who claims to be perfect flatters himself and is calling it
Verse 48
Ye therefore shall be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect.
No one can say that Christ did not set a high standard for man to follow! To be perfect as God is perfect, what a challenge this is! At the outset, every candid student of the Holy Scriptures should admit and understand
1Co 4:5 - [In Context|Read Chapter|Original Greek]Therefore do not go on passing judgment before the time, {but wait} until the Lord comes who will both bring to light the things hidden in the darkness and disclose the motives of {men's} hearts; and then each man's praise will come to him from
Glenn wrote:
This is where the NIV clears up the KJV.
Actually, this is where the NIV CORRUPTS the text by adding words that do
not exist in any of the manuscripts. The NIV gives heavier weight to
corrupted Egyptian manuscripts that lack many of the verses contained in the
majority of
Gary wrote:
1Jn.5:16ff.: If any man see his brother sin a sin which
is not unto death, he shall ask [God], and [God] shall
give him life..We know that whosoever is born of God
sinneth not; but he that is begotten of God keepeth
himself, and that wicked one toucheth him not.
the Ap. John is
Coffman, unfortunately, is filled with unbelief when he reads this passage.
Here's what John Wesley says about the passage.
Mat 5:48 - Therefore ye shall be perfect; as your Father who is in heaven is
perfect - So the original runs, referring to all that holiness which is
described in the
Right, this is proof texting. I have had my fill of proof texting with the C/C. YOU CAN TAKE ANY ONE VERSE AND MAKE IT MEAN ANYTHING YOU WANT IT TO MEAN!
If you stand by 1 John 1:8, you had better read it in context. I stand by 1
John 1:8 too, because it is foundational for my teaching on
26 matches
Mail list logo
