>From: Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>DAVEH: Hi Michael.......I But.....I do feel obligated not to totally ignore you and the
>other TTers who've taken time to ask questions, so I'll respond as I
>have time.
Michael D: O.K. I'll look foward to your replies, then.
> Regarding your below question......I simply don't know how to answer
>it. I am not the smartest student of LDS theology. I am not aware of
>any distinction between 'arch angels', anointed cherubs and others.
>When I get a chance, I'll do a small amount of research into the topic
>to see what other LDS folks have said about them. I'll let you know if
>I find anything of importance. In the mean time, perhaps Blaine has
>some thoughts about it.
>
> As for your second question.......Jesus had an elevated status over
>Lucifer in the pre-mortal existence as I understand.
That's interesting. What gives you this idea though? And certainly, when Lucifer rebelled he lost what heavenly status he previously had as he was ejected from heaven.
For sure .
>
> . .
Blainer:.
> > > But he was denied the privilege of tabernacling in the flesh,
> > because
> > >he made war in heaven, and actually overcame one-third of the hosts
> > of heaven. The other two-thirds are you and I and all others who were
> > >allowed to take on mortal bodies.
Blainer represents this as though the other two thirds have already taken on flesh. Does this mean that the only angels now are the ones who have died? (based on what Dave H. said) 
