interesting eh, DavidM?
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 23:38:31 -0800 Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||Judy Taylor wrote:
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:20:45 -0800..
I don't make up things that paint God into any
corner..I go to a higher authority
No. Thanks for the information.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 18, 2006 21:06
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] torrance.
Lance have you attended these meetings?
http://politicsofthecross.blogspot.com/
The
Sectarians indeed, John! You've identified the real
question.Yes, He is (the creator)! I thinkthat the sectarians marginalize
themselves.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 18, 2006
Sectarianism! Amen! Have you (of course you have)
taken note of those who so identify others as sectarians while their group
(sect) is thus reflective of a repristinated gospel. They seem themselves as
'recovering' the truth.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm wondering what would motivate someone to send a msg
like this to a public list
Can you help me with it DavidM?
It is not conversation that's for sure
It is not communication either
Is this written to helpencourage or
instruct?
What is the point in taking one line out of it's
setting to
Agreed! I to hate all the isms and all the
ologies.
In fact I don't see why we can not lay them aside so
that we may recognize the faith
once delivered to the saints and "walk in Truth" or
reality. Jesus was not referring to any
"Unity in diversity" in John 17.He prayed they
would be One as
David:On warning (wo)men re:'transgressing the commandments of God'.
Everyone (including you along with all of those within your sect, David)
'transgresses the commandments of God', David. You then, David, ought to be
and, likely are, warning those non-protestants within your sect concerning
David:Or, the Holy Spirit is not a rationalist.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 18, 2006 23:00
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Is the day in Genesis literal or figurative?
JD wrote:
And virtually all of my
As everyone here already knows, I believe God is a Trinity that is exactly why I was wondering how you would answer. Is this that difficult to answer?Who do you, believe to be God? Father Son Holy Ghost Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DAVEH: For a guy who knows so much about LDS
David Miller wrote:
Do you ever warn people about
the FIRE of hell?
DAVEH wrote:
No, I don't do much preaching, and when
I doI prefer to be more positive in my
approach.
I guess the LDS organization has not restored the church then, eh? You are
not doing what the early church did.
I don't know what you mean,Gary. Judy is just speaking the
basics of a spiritual man. I like what Judy said.
I'm still waiting for you to answer my questions about the relationship
between Jesus and truth. Could you comment after each of the falling
statements with the word "agree" or
As DH has acknowledged and, 'everyone here already
knows', you know the teachings of his sect as well or better than he does. Are
you attempting to teach or embarrass him?
ONCE AGAIN, I'd recommend the book 'Joseph Smith -
Rough Stone Rolling' Richard Lyman Bushman
- Original Message
Judy, I'm scratching my head on this one. I think maybe you might
understand the response better than me.
David Miller
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 5:41
You, David, may be DOING what the early church DID without MEANING what the
early church MEANT. On this one DH may be closer to the truth than DM.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 19, 2006 07:21
Subject: Re:
JT I don't make up things that paint God into any corner DAVEH: Here's the problem as I see it Could the disagreement between JT DH bebecause Judy believes God CREATED all things while Dave believes in the ORGANIZATION by PHYSICAL LAWS of preexisting matter?In contrast to the
Do you agree with Lance DH? Do I know LDS theology as well as you do? Or is Lance putting words in your mouth? I seem to remember you saying quite the opposite!Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As DH has acknowledged and, 'everyone here already knows', you know the teachings of his
Lance wrote:
David:On warning (wo)men re:'transgressing
the commandments of God'. Everyone
(including you along with all of those within
your sect, David) 'transgresses the commandments
of God', David.
You appear to be using the word sect here rather loosely. I'm
anti-sectarian, remember?
The vaunted Larry King once said that he asked no
question of those being interviewed to which he already knew their answer. Based
on your thoroughgoing knowledge of LDS theology and, to a lesser extent, Kevin
himself, I'd say that this is not a practice to which you subscribe.
Hm?
Lance wrote:
David:Or, the Holy Spirit is not a rationalist.
If you define rationalist in the more esoteric sense of the idea that
reason is the source of truth, then I do not believe the Holy Spirit is a
rationalist. By this definition, I am not a rationalist either. However, I
do believe
I have read all of these passages numerous times. Yes, I do read the Bible.
Like it or not David, you are co-leader of a sectarian group.
You posted a family anecdote on TT in the last week or so. What that
reflected concerning 'your God' spoke volumes. If anyone should be fearful,
David, I'd
We've been here before have we not? IFF you believe that the laws of logic
to which you subscribe are those out of which God operates then, David. you
deceived. What you are practicing is anthropological theology as against
theological anthropology.
- Original Message -
From: David
Your suggestion is a possibility if my speaking was a matter of trying to
imitate the early Christians. However, I speak from my heart, from a source
of love that dwells in my heart. Therefore, if my speech happens to
coincide with the early believers, I know that I am walking in the same
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 23:38:31 -0800 Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't make up things that paint God into any
corner;DAVEH: Here's the problem as I see it,
Judy. You seem to think God can do anything,
yet he seems to do things the hard way from our
perspective.
jt:
Well, perhaps I should have kept that to myself, or shared privately with a
few others, but then, wouldn't that have tended toward sectarianism? At
least my daughter is healed, Lance. You should be rejoicing with me, not
fearing dangerous sect or cult. The difference between us on this
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 08:00:09 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes: Like it or not David, you are co-leader of a sectarian
group.
Can you justify this announcement Lance by giving us a
list of
the various sects that comprise this group?
Mormon is obvious,
what are the others.
You are not doing what the early church didDM brings up a great point. Since the LDS are a RESTORATION of the Early Church, why are you are not doing what the early church did?I checked the word CONFOUND and it seems to be the Spirit of God come upon the characters in the BoM etc. Yet it
No, Lance. You are misapplying things you have read. Based on my reading
of Torrance, I'm with him on this one. I believe God operates with logic,
not against it, yet logic alone cannot lead us into all truth. I don't
expect you to be able to understand at this point, but you should know
David could 'justify' this truth better than I,
Judy.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 19, 2006 08:07
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hell BoM
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 08:00:09
This stuff looks like it is right down your alley and in your nieghborhood! Are you a 21st Century Friend? Do you also believe in the Emergant Church? Are these guys nothing more than there "Politically" active RC Fathers? Are they trying to bring in the Kingdom and establish their own brand
I DID discuss it with you off the list but, you did not respond, David. What
we (most believers) have here is a failure to communicate with you (your
sect). You cite Heb 11 as if it amounted to 'case closed'. When I wrote you
privately David, I mentioned Hobart Freeman. Please look at his
What truth do you refer toLance?
Are you calling him co-leader of a sectarian group
because he encourages his daughter
to believe God to speed healing of herwrist and
relieve the pain? or
Because there are many religious sects on this TT
list?
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 08:13:20 -0500 "Lance Muir"
Of course! I'm hoping to be appointed
King.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 19, 2006 08:15
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] torrance.
This stuff looks like it is right down your alley and in your
nieghborhood!
Kevin, we are not supposed to be talking about anything
to do with "torrance" Lance has made him off-limits
But your list below does include what Lance and friends
seem to hold dear
Community, relationship, a dancing trinity - all
that... I don't understand his reticence re the relational or
Demonstrate that you and Torrance are 'as one' on this point, David. My
goodness but you esteem yourself highly (I don't expect you to be able to
understand this point', 'you are not hearing me on this last post') IFF you,
David, were who you think yourself to be then, Bill, Caroline, Debbie,
No!
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 19, 2006 08:19
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hell BoM
What truth do you refer toLance?
Are you calling him co-leader of a sectarian group
David and Lance, why would you have the most
interesting discussions
off the list? Do you think the rest of us are too
immature or not up to your level?
I'm aware of E.W. Kenyon and Hobart Freeman, New
Thought and on and on
These are not sects per se even if these men did get
off into
As to the former, I agree. As to the latter, that's
what I'm suggesting to David but, he seems not to want engagement at that
level.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 19, 2006 08:31
Subject: [TruthTalk] Hell BoM
What is so difficult about a simple question? Are you attempting to imply that his religion is secretive?What do you mean EMARASS him are you Embarassed by your understanding of his theology?Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As DH has acknowledged and, 'everyone here already
Sorry Kevin - I guess it is only myself who is not
permitted to speak about torrance;
seems to beOK for Lance and those he
approves/respects ... you may not be on
the "forbidden" list?From: "Lance Muir"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Demonstrate that you and Torrance are 'as one' on this point, David.
Nuff said.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 19, 2006 08:47
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Who is
God?
What is so difficult about a simple question?
Are you attempting to imply that his religion is secretive?
Speak of him all you wish, Judy. What you were
doing was akin to Kevin stating that DH believes in the same Trinitarian God
that he (Kevin) does. Thus 'embarrassment'!
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 19, 2006
Why would you be embarrassed about torrance being
identified with Reformed
theology and John Calvin when you
personallyinform the list as follows and torrance
quotes these doctrines in his own
writings?
Judy: Why indeed! Because he knew the works of Knox
thoroughly. He also knew the works
George Burns used to close his act with his wife
Gracie Allen by saying 'Say goodnight Gracie!, to which Gracie Allen would
reply, 'Goodnight Gracie'
As to your homework on various topics along with
your conviction and sincerity Judy, you get better and better. Many meanings
elude you but,
Only we are not talking about me Lance
The subject is you and your mentor. If you know
something that eludes me - then lay it out.
Also you need to tell DavidM and I what nonexistent
promise we lay claim to.
The above is your duty as a professing believer who
sees a brother/sister in a fault
I did not believe the former to have been the case, David. As to the latter,
not unlike Judy, I've always thought you spoke from the heart. I also
believe that you both believe that you 'know'. However..I
needn't remind you, by name, of the host of persons over the centuries who
Repetition, thy name is ...well Judywell David!
Even David, your 'knowing' colleague in all of his lucidity could not make known
to you some things. That was my point, Judy.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc:
And who is the 'knowing' colleague Lance? George
Burns and Gracie Allen?
Please speak with lucidity and give up the
riddles. What is the nonexistent promise?
You can at least tell us that much
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 09:38:02 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Repetition, thy name
Since when has truth been evaluated by how many have in
the past gotten of the
track and fallen? As sad as that may be every one
will stand or fall before his own
Master.
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 09:34:49 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes: I did not believe the former to have been
It hasn't Judy but, untruth has.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 19, 2006 09:41
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hell BoM
Since when has truth been evaluated by how many
The 'knowing colleague' to whom I made reference
was David Miller. You and he seem to believe that the two of you apprehend the
Scriptures in a way that I, along with others over the years on TT, simply don't
believe. IMO, you and he believe that you've been promised that such,
So let's just throw it all out since noone can know
what is true and what is not anyway?
I can see where you get this idea since your mentor
writes:
Justification means that at every point in our theological inquiry we have to
let our knowledge, our theology, our formulations, our
You are wrong then; I have been misguided in the past
and I have testified of it
openly on TT. We are warned all over the
scriptures about false prophets and false teachers
However, when he rose Christ gave gifts to the Church.
We also have His Word so there is no
excuse for staying in the
myth (as alluded
to,somethoughtful readersmaywanna explore the
relationship betw jt's notions:'truth is JC' is 'Jesus wasting
[her] time'in pursuitof truth--how about you,
Bro?)
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 07:26:35 -0500 "David
Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
1. Jesus said, "I am
i know
so which of the three utterances do you
like most, 1., 2. or 3.?
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 07:26:35 -0500 "David
Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like what Judy
said.
---
for ref:
- Original Message -
From:
Judy Taylor
To:
..or is it #4?
(take all the time in the world,
Bro,esp if youreally most likeher notion thatJC
himselfwasted his)
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 23:38:31 -0800 Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||Judy Taylor wrote:
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:20:45
-0800..
I don't make up
All out of context, just a mumbo, jumbo of words but I
guess it makes
no difference when one is way out
there
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 08:09:06 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i know
so which of the three utterances do
you like most, 1., 2. or 3.?
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 07:26:35
..actually, on #4, DaveH may lean a
little toward it himself
..but what do you
think,like, couldhe jt be onto somethingbetter than
wastingtime with JC?
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 08:29:11 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..or is it #4?
(take all the time in the world,
Bro,esp if
I was wondering how you would answer.
DAVEH: Thank you for your below succinct answer, Kevin. I will
reciprocate.
Contrasted to the man-made doctrine of the Trinity, I believe in
the Biblical version of the Godhead where each person (Father, Son and
Holy Ghost) of the Godhead is referred
jt: It was necessaryif mankind were to
be redeemed eternally because without the
shedding of blood there is no remission of
sin.
DAVEH: ??? Jesus could not forgive sin without shedding of blood? Is that what you
believe?
if we were privy to the Jewish
sacrificial system we would understand
The tables have been turned! The SP's call the LDS shudder!
DAVEH: Perhaps you are right, Kevin. I know I don't have much fight
in me at the moment. Perhaps the modern LDS people just aren't
conditioned to be contentious, which would explain why some would
rather avoid the SPers rather than
One smiles! Hokey Smokey, Dave! You'd be so bold as
to contrast man-made vs Biblical when, granted IFF your first 'prophet' wasn't a
prophet then, your whole system/foundation/restored version is
man-made.
PS:Do YOU know of anyone who has read that new
biography on Joseph Smith? 'Joseph
A 'posture' from which a 'blithering idiot' like
myself might learn.
- Original Message -
From:
Dave
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 19, 2006 12:44
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hell BoM -
confounded LDS
The tables have been turned! The SP's call the LDS
Lance, I don't know what you are talking about. We do have a failure to
communicate here.
1. Heb. 11 isn't meant to be case closed, just helpful.
2. I don't know who Hobart Freeman is, or his legacy.
3. I am familiar a little with E.W. Kenyon. No, I am not one of his
offspring.
4.
What this reminds me of is when the Pharisees complained about Jesus
healing on the Sabbath. My daughter is healed now, and she is happy, I'm
happy, my wife is happy, everybody is happy except for these 3 people who came
together and talked about how disturbing my post to TT was about it.
Judy quotes a mentor of Lance:
Out of sheer respect for the majesty of
the Truth as it is revealed in the Holy
Scriptures, we have to do our utmost
to speak correctly and exactly about it
-that is the meaning of orthodoxy and
the way of humility-but when we have
done all this, we have still
I see no conflict.
-- Original message -- From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Judy quotes a mentor of Lance: Out of sheer respect for the majesty of the Truth as it is revealed in the Holy Scriptures, we have to do our utmost to speak correctly and exactly
Dean is anti- charismatic. He would challenge most of your theology as relates to faith and healing. No surprise.
jd
-- Original message -- From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What this reminds me of is when the Pharisees complained about Jesus healing on the
There is no thing as a NON SECTARIAN unless you meana Unitarian who has no beliefsDavid Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lance wrote: David:On warning (wo)men re:'transgressing the commandments of God'. Everyone (including you along with all of those within your sect, David) 'transgresses the
Sorry position is filled.As far as that crowd Reformed (RC) to the core. They are right all other clods have it wrong.Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course! I'm hoping to be appointed King.- Original Message - From: Kevin Deegan To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Nice theory but just a fable as Kevin never has stated any such thing! Maybe you do not understand all you think you do. The mind can be a funny thing. Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Speak of him all you wish, Judy. What you were doing was akin to Kevin stating that DH believes in
So if TFT only held to say 75% of calvinism that makes him non REFORMED? Lets just call him the continuosly reformed reformer OK? Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why would you be embarrassed about torrance being identified with Reformed theology and John Calvin when you
Thanks DH Since Jesus is called the FULLNESS of the Godhead Bodily how does that fit into your theology?I read your reply. I am not trying to mock here but...You say the Trinity is confusing? You left the question unanswered in my mind. Is there one God or Three?Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But Jesus did not have a command as in DC 71 COMMANDING him to confound. Why all the verses on confounding when to all observers it would seem that it is in reality the LDS who are confounded? Seems the LDS god has called and none have answered. Men women or children. On paper in 1Nep 17 LDS
Do I know LDS theology as well as you do?
DAVEH: You certainly seem to know a lot about it, Kevin. However, it
is obvious that you don't understand it.
Kevin Deegan wrote:
Do you agree with Lance DH?
Do I know LDS theology as well as you do?
Or is Lance putting words in your mouth?
I'd recommend the book 'Joseph Smith -
Rough Stone Rolling
DAVEH: Have you read it, Lance?
Lance Muir wrote:
As DH has acknowledged and,
'everyone here already knows', you know the teachings of his sect as
well or better than he does. Are you attempting to teach or embarrass
him?
Where are the valiant ones like in Helaman? LDS don't have even one that believes thier gods words inDC 71?No one believes the promise of DC 71? there is no weapon that is formed against you shall prosper; 10And if any man lift his voice against you he shall be confoundedI lift my voice
Riddle me this one Batman!Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A 'posture' from which a 'blithering idiot' like myself might learn.- Original Message - From: Dave To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: March 19, 2006 12:44 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hell BoM - confounded
You are right about that! I do have a hard time understanding how you have THREE gods but you tell me you really have one. Take that back you have an INFINITE nuber of gods but you say you have one.That is hard to understand and hard to comprehend too. Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do I know
I understand your reluctance todefend the mormon faith!Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:You are right about that! I do have a hard time understanding how you have THREE gods but you tell me you really have one. Take that back you have an INFINITE nuber of gods but you say you have
Unitarians, of course, have beliefs.
Here is a definition of sectarian that allows many to escape the curse of "Sectarian !!"
Sectarianism refers (usually pejoratively) to a rigid adherence to a particular sect or party or denomination. It often implies discrimination, denunciation, or
OH like Paul For we have found this man a pestilent fellow, and a mover of sedition among all the Jews throughout the world, and a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Unitarians, of course, have beliefs.Here is a definition of sectarian that allows many to
Did I miss your response Lance?Do you think that you could change the mind of one who might fit the description of Acts 15:26? Men that have hazarded their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.Would you say that men that put their own lives in hazard are not somewhat DOGMATIC?
Actually, when sectarians become angry, which is most of the time, they call others "sectarian" just to complicate things. One cannot read Romans 14 and come away believing that Pual was "secatarian." Further, his role in revealing the mystery of the gospel, that Jews were not the only ones in
Then there are a lot more sectarians out there they even they(sectarians) know themselves.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Actually, when sectarians become angry, which is most of the time, they call others "sectarian" just to complicate things. One cannot read Romans 14 and come away believing that
George Bush, the man. David Warren. The Ottawa Citizen Sunday, September 11, 2005There's plenty wrong with America, since you asked. I'm tempted to say that the only difference from Canada is that they have a few things right. That would be unfair, of course -- I am often pleased to discover
No, Lance. You are misapplying things you have read. Based on my reading of Torrance, I'm with him on this one. I believe God operates with logic,--- dm
Demonstrate that you and Torrance are 'as one' on this point, David. My goodness but you esteem yourself highly ("I don't expect you
A discussion between DM and apracticing scientist would be most interesting !!
jd
-- Original message -- From: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As to the former, I agree. As to the latter, that's what I'm suggesting to David but, he seems not to want engagement at
You might plead lack of intelligence or that the Holy Spirit is not a rationalist or any number of things, but it is quite simple and true that if you do not keep the commandments, you are not in Christ. Here is the reason that you and I cannot understand one another concerning the
David , in other posts of the day, I find you saying that yoou and Torrance are in agreement concerninglogic. I may ahve misunderstood your wording, but that was what you said according to my perspective.
Below you say this:
If you define "rationalist" in the more esoteric sense of the idea
http://www.islam-online.net/English/News/2006-03/17/article03.shtml Pope Calls on Religious Leaders to Come Together "Judaism, Christianity and Islam believe in the one God, creator of heaven and earth.
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.
Yahoo! Mail
A noun is a noun irrespective of the race, creed or culture of the interpreter!Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The 'knowing colleague' to whom I made reference was David Miller. You and he seem to believe that the two of you apprehend the Scriptures in a way that I, along with others
Rationalist : Human reason experience is the Origin of Truth instead of the God of the Bible. Unwittingly making man the judge of God instead of God the judge of man.Thus the difference between Deductive vs Inductive"reasoning" as a method for Theology. Christian Thelogy comes from "Above"
Funny all you focus on is the (in your
imagination) money, while in fact money has nothing to do with anything. iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006
11:52 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;
No, he prefers to put up with your insults
this week. iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006
11:43 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] torrance
Just wondering; does anyone know if this
John Knox is the same one who in the early 1700s apparently won
Alexander Hamilton to Christ when he was a teenager in the West
Indies? izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Deegan
Sent: Saturday,
What is the positive message about hell?
iz
Do you ever warn people about the FIRE of hell?
DAVEH: No, I don't do much preaching, and when I doI prefer to
be more positive in my approach.
Random acts of insanity. iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 4:41
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Physics,
Astronomy and Genesis chapters 1-11
Lance and cohorts, please stop referring to David Miller's sect. Can you
identify or name any such sect? Why do you insist on such arrogant insults?
David please close this snakepit. izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent:
The problem with you, Lance, is that you live an insular life; thinking that
others who don't agree with you don't get out enough. My husband is a
medical doctor and research scientist who believes exactly as DM does, and
he knows many others who believe as he does. Stop being so narrow minded
So do I. iz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 7:28 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Is the day in Genesis literal or figurative?
Demonstrate that you and
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
