When I run it on vs express the cosole opens, the text **Sample
ObjectCreation is printed on the cosole and then an error
message appears:
Unhandled exception at 0x7c812a5b in sdo_misc.exe: Microsoft C++ exception:
std::bad_alloc at memory location 0x0012f3b0..
Adriano
On 20/03/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/20/07, Geoffrey Winn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've downloaded the SDO src distribution on XP and it builds and runs as
advertised.
+1 from me.
Geoff.
On 20/03/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
...ant
On
On 21/03/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/03/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/20/07, Geoffrey Winn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've downloaded the SDO src distribution on XP and it builds and runs as
advertised.
+1 from me.
Geoff.
On 20/03/07, ant elder
On 21/03/07, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I run it on vs express the cosole opens, the text **Sample
ObjectCreation is printed on the cosole and then an error
message appears:
Unhandled exception at 0x7c812a5b in sdo_misc.exe: Microsoft C++ exception:
My TUSCANY_SDOCPP is pointing to
C:\tuscany_sdo_cpp-1.0-incubator-M3-binthat's the latest version, I
suppose.
Adriano Crestani
On 3/21/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21/03/07, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I run it on vs express the cosole opens, the text
Yes. Which version of VC are you building with? The bin version of SDO
is built with VSExpress (VC 8).
You could try downloading the src release and building it on your machine.
Cheers,
On 21/03/07, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My TUSCANY_SDOCPP is pointing to
Adriano, did you check whay is on your PATH?
On 21/03/07, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My TUSCANY_SDOCPP is pointing to
C:\tuscany_sdo_cpp-1.0-incubator-M3-binthat's the latest version, I
suppose.
Adriano Crestani
On 3/21/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21/03/07,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1006:
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Mx)
Java-SDO-M3
Remove workarounds after switching to EMF 2.3
-
Key: TUSCANY-1189
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1189
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Java SDO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1164.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Mx)
Yang,
I've been battling with Maven trying to remove the junit jar from the
archive. As far as I can see it seems to be a (spurious?) transitive
dependency coming in from the plugin project's dependency on
On 3/21/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21/03/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/03/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/20/07, Geoffrey Winn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've downloaded the SDO src distribution on XP and it builds and
runs as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12482698
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1164:
-
Applied workaround (see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12482700
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1171:
-
Rem: the most effective way to debug transitive dependencies
On 3/21/07, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/21/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21/03/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/03/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/20/07, Geoffrey Winn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've downloaded the SDO src
we decided to abandon...was there a VOTE? Please refresh my memory.
thanks,
dims
On 3/21/07, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 20, 2007, at 10:45 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
Hi Sebastien
My understanding is that these are separate modules that are not
going to
destabelize the
Similarly I don't understand the inclusion of asm since its scope is
provided
dependency
groupIdasm/groupId
artifactIdasm/artifactId
version2.2/version
scopeprovided/scope
optionaltrue/optional
/dependency
On 21/03/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's an example in
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml?view=markup
Hope that helps,
Kelvin.
On 21/03/07, muhwas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to run hello world web service sample. I
am following instructions given with the sample.
According to
On 21/03/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/21/07, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/21/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21/03/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/03/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/20/07, Geoffrey Winn [EMAIL
I think this was the final email, in the thread of discussion we had on
different ways of doing the model.
Ta
Meeraj
-Original Message-
From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 10:54 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Working in trunk,
On 3/21/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's an example in
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml?view=markup
Hope that helps,
Kelvin.
On 21/03/07, muhwas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to run hello world web service sample. I
am
Got it! thanks.
-- dims
On 3/21/07, Meeraj Kunnumpurath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this was the final email, in the thread of discussion we had on
different ways of doing the model.
Ta
Meeraj
-Original Message-
From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
Folks,
I don't really like what's going on. Too much conflicts between
people. Whatever be the issue of the day, I see 2 sets of people in
constant confrontation. The constant branching/merging is not healthy
or productive. Is there any effort or hope of reconciliation or should
we start looking
On Mar 21, 2007, at 3:53 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
we decided to abandon...was there a VOTE? Please refresh my memory.
Yes, that was when we voted to move Chianti to trunk.
Jim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David T. Adcox closed TUSCANY-1186.
---
Resolution: Invalid
The schema being used for this test case seems to be invalid. I've
On Mar 20, 2007, at 1:11 PM, Frank Budinsky wrote:
I've confirmed that IBM, the copyright holder, gives permission to
Apache
to reuse the two EMF files in question.
Thanks for confirming this.
I've opened TUSCANY-1185 to contribute the two base classes,
provided in
an attachment.
Hi,
I am glad you brought this point up.
You mentioned about constant confrontation between two sets of people. I
would say, unfortunately, this has been caused by a lack of diversity in
the community.
I hope most of these confrontations are based on technical differences.
For the first
Jeremy, I don't understand your last comment:
I can't ack this for the ASF - that has to be done by an Officer as
described in the IP Clearance process. They would probably want
something official from IBM (Software Grant).
By attaching the two files to the JIRA, and selecting the Grant
Hi Meeraj,
There is an error while building demo, therefore I cannot get the
server.start.jar generated. This is the output of maven:
Missing:
--
1)
org.apache.tuscany.sca.core-samples.common:calculator:jar:2.0-alpha2-inc
ubating-SNAPSHOT
Try downloading the file manually
On Mar 21, 2007, at 10:27 AM, Frank Budinsky wrote:
Jeremy, I don't understand your last comment:
I can't ack this for the ASF - that has to be done by an Officer as
described in the IP Clearance process. They would probably want
something official from IBM (Software Grant).
By attaching
Just wanted quickly to report that I've updated my local copy of the PHP
extension for SDO to Tuscany revision level 520962, and I am seeing two
regressions in previously working testcases. I don't have enough evidence
yet to say if these are Tuscany issues or errors introduced in the PHP side,
On Mar 20, 2007, at 4:09 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
Interestingly I just hit the same issue independent of your work. I
got two instances of the ComponentManager and the one contributed
from the system.scdl shadows the primordial one.
Which actually the correct behaviour, just not the
Hi everybody,
I am new tu tuscany. I am trying to run
helloworldwsclient sample. when i am running
java -jar ../../../bin/launcher.jar
target/samplehelloworldwsclient.jar
I am getting following exception. I have
axis2-1.0-incubator-M2.jar and
databinding-sdo-1.0-incubator-M2.jar in my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Brian Murray updated TUSCANY-826:
-
Attachment: 826.patch
826.zip
Attaching 826.zip (the test case with needed
On 21/03/07, Caroline Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wanted quickly to report that I've updated my local copy of the PHP
extension for SDO to Tuscany revision level 520962, and I am seeing two
regressions in previously working testcases. I don't have enough evidence
yet to say if these
IAE in static case when using DataObject.setList() to assign multiple Objects
to a many-valued Property.
Key: TUSCANY-1190
URL:
I believe this issue is resolved. I spent a good part of the last two days
chasing this down with the Lawyers to alleviate Jeremy's concern.
Does anyone other than Jeremy believe that this issue is not already
resolved? If so, can you please explain exactly what else I need to do?
Thanks,
I'd recommend asking a question on [EMAIL PROTECTED] They would give you all
necessary guidance needed.
On 3/21/07, Frank Budinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe this issue is resolved. I spent a good part of the last two days
chasing this down with the Lawyers to alleviate Jeremy's
I think it may not be completely clear to everyone yet why this code does
not have to follow the IP clearance process as described at:
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
From that link it doesn't seem completely clear when you need to follow the
IP clearance process or when a code
Sorry, I missed one.
You need to build /java/sca/core-samples/common as well.
HTH
Meeraj
-Original Message-
From: Antollini, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 5:30 PM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Demo Build error
Hi Meeraj,
There is an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12482875
]
Frank Budinsky commented on TUSCANY-1190:
-
My first observation is that the type is mixed. In light of the
Also did you build /java/sca/runtime? That is where server.start,
standalone-host etc are located. Since our last communication I have
also added /java/distribution/demo.app, which needs to be built as well.
Ta
Meeraj
-Original Message-
From: Antollini, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ant, perhaps that is the question. I certainly don't think this is a
substantial contribution, but who can confirm that?
Frank.
ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/21/2007 02:53:10 PM:
I think it may not be completely clear to everyone yet why this code
does
not have to follow the IP
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12482908
]
Brian Murray commented on TUSCANY-1190:
---
The problem is indeed only true with mixed=true. (Thank you for
On 3/21/07, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 20, 2007, at 1:11 PM, Frank Budinsky wrote:
I've confirmed that IBM, the copyright holder, gives permission to
Apache
to reuse the two EMF files in question.
Thanks for confirming this.
I've opened TUSCANY-1185 to contribute the
FYI for the ones that might be interested. Some technical discussion around
LDAP DAS on the Apache Directory dev list.
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40directory.apache.org/msg11354.html
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Frank Budinsky resolved TUSCANY-1190.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in revision 521017.
I found 7 places in the generator
Hi,
We just finished the ServerSide demo and I figured I send a mail to
the list outlining how it went...
We had the slot following the opening keynote and were up against Rod
(Spring) and Patrick (OpenJPA) as the other two talks. I was
surprised to find that the ballroom was pretty
Maybe we all know this already..
but Ant's change Split Axis2 tools into two in r501879 leaves all the W2J
parts in the J2W folder and vice versa.
Did you mean to only copy the J2W parts into the new J2W, etc.?
In other words, did we intend to have parts in directory:
Hi, Jim.
Congratulations on the success!
The update is very useful for us to get the first-hand information.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 3:17 PM
Subject: ServerSide
SDO codegen tool xsd2java seems to be mangling Java reserved words now, by
attaching an underscore (_) to the word. So, 'static' is changed to
'static_' or 'abstract' is changed to 'abstract_'. This has produced an
unexpected side-effect of changing, in at least one case, an SDO API entry
My VC version is the 2005 express.
Maybe this problem has something to do with my libxml, iconv or zlib
version. What is the minimum required version of these libraries to run the
misc sample?
Answering Pete's question: PATH =
C:\Adriano\Faculdade\Tuscany\Tuscany\CPP\libxml2-2.6.13.win32\bin;
The libxml dependency has not changed so if you have run SDO
previously, which you have, then you should be fine.
I really can't think why you are seeing this problem. It works fine
for everyone else so it must be something in your environment. If that
is your complete PATH then you do not have
53 matches
Mail list logo
