+1 from me
Jim
On Aug 7, 2006, at 7:50 AM, Pete Robbins wrote:
I would like to nominate Andy Borley to become a committer.
He has provided excellent functional patches for C++ such as the
Axis2C
EntryPoint Binding. He has also provided much needed documentation
patches
and has been a grea
Unfortunately I'm out for the next two days traveling and in meetings
at my employer. I'll be available through the email lists to help
out so if people post there I'll try and help.
Jim
On Aug 6, 2006, at 3:19 AM, ant elder wrote:
If there are no objects or other pressing things to discus
Also, as some more background, checkstyle and PMD enforce our coding
guidelines which were agreed upon and written up a while back, almost
at the start of the project. It would be nice at some point to get
those back on the web site with more explanations on coding practices...
Jim
...ant
/?t=11507459634&r=1&w=2
[2]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200604.mbox/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/6/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If there are no objections, I'm going to look into TeamCity (probably
not right away but soon)
If there are no objections, I'm going to look into TeamCity (probably
not right away but soon) for continuous integration. Details are at:
http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/.
The OpenJPA project is using TeamCity and Patrick Linksey gave it a
good review when I talked to him about their exp
O.K. JDKWireCallbackService was a service that was removed and I
didn't see it was referenced in the launcher system scdl. I'll remove
it and check it in.
Jim
On Aug 5, 2006, at 3:04 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Hi,
I get the following error running the supply chain example from the
c
At the risk of throwing stones in a glass house (since I forget to
set svn ignore), *please* remember to run mvn -Psourcecheck prior to
checkins for Java SCA. The Checkstyle audit raises a significant
number of formatting errors that are trivial to avoid by setting
templates in an IDE.
Mo
A while back, we decided to express operations using
java.lang.Method. People have raised this as an issue when dealing
with implementation types that may not use Java interfaces to
represent services. This has also been problematic in dealing with
Java metadata, as it forces knowledge of p
Hi Rick,
Is there a reason we want to add a dependency on Axis2 for the
Tuscany standalone distribution? I was thinking the standalone
version would come with very limited dependencies and based on
configuration would resolve extensions. For example, what do we do
for people that want to
Ignacio came up with a nice design and implementation (including a
presentation posted on the wiki) for callback support. I've applied
the patch as well as did a bit of refactoring that I will describe
below. There's still a lot of refactoring to be done and some things
that we will probabl
rs take a deployment
context that has a scope container. I think it would be easier to
just parse the XML as Jeremy mentioned previously and avoid the
unnecessary runtime infrastructure . Am I misunderstanding what you
are trying to do?
Yang.
On 8/4/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Aug 4, 2006, at 1:27 PM, Yang Lei wrote:
Thanks Jeremy,
Basically, what I need is something like WSDL4J , maybe a "SCDL4J",
which
contains the WSDL object model and a reader/writer. Tuscany already
has the
SCDL object model, also the loaders, I was able to manually
register loaders
(s
Result of the vote for Raymond Feng as committer on Apache Tuscany:
9 +1s with Dan voting twice ;-): Jim Marino,Kevin Williams, Pete
Robbins, Dan Kulp, Ken Tam, Jeremy Boynes, Ant Elder, Sebastien
Delfino, Rick Rineholt
No -1s
Raymond, welcome aboard! We'll start the process of ge
Greg,
We don't have this finished yet but it would be a nice project for
someone to work on, particularly since it would involve figuring out
how we are going to support SCA policy. If you or someone else is
interested in tackling this (or part of it) let me know and I'll help
out.
Jim
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-595?page=comments#action_12425824
]
Jim Marino commented on TUSCANY-595:
I'll take a look. The stacktrace formatting is screwed up so here's another
attempt:
CompositeCom
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-595?page=all ]
Jim Marino reassigned TUSCANY-595:
--
Assignee: Jim Marino
> NPE on service binding registering autowire.
>
>
> Key:
+1 from me!
On Aug 3, 2006, at 12:44 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I would like to nominate Meeraj to become a committer on Tuscany -
he has been active in the project for quite a while now,
contributing the original Groovy container implementation, a work
manager implementation for use by asyn
I think it sounds reasonable. A couple of things I would add:
1. We may want to look at making this into a generic deploy harness
(in addition to some type of "native" deployment on host platforms,
e.g. a J2EE server or OSGi container)
2. I think we also need to clearly establish best pract
+1 from me - Welcome Kelvin.
Jim
On Aug 2, 2006, at 1:53 PM, Frank Budinsky wrote:
I'd like to propose that we make Kelvin a committer. Kelvin has
made many
contributions to the SDO project:
- helped design -noEMF generator patterns and contributed tests for
those
patterns
- provided SDO
Graham Barber pointed be to the OSOA wiki section where press
coverage is being tracked for SCA/SDO:
http://www.osoa.org/x/8wM
There's also a bunch of whitepapers people may be interested in as well.
Jim
-
To unsubscrib
Forgot to add that the component ref should be nulled at the end of 2...
Jim
On Aug 2, 2006, at 8:48 AM, Jim Marino wrote:
o.k. Actually it looks like it is a problem with both. The issue
is the launcher is not shutting down the system composite (it does
shut down the runtime though
AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
From the launcher.
-Original Message-----
From: Jim Marino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 August 2006 16:10
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Problem with suplly chain
Quick question: Are you running this from the launcher or SCATestCase?
Jim
On Aug 2,
Quick question: Are you running this from the launcher or SCATestCase?
Jim
On Aug 2, 2006, at 7:28 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Ta
-Original Message-
From: Jim Marino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 August 2006 15:24
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Cc: Jeremy Boynes
Subject: Re
On Aug 2, 2006, at 1:30 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Jeremy,
Ok, this is my suggestion ...
1. Have an annotated destroy method on the ThreadPoolWorkManager that
will shutdown the executor. I tried this, however, for some reason the
destroy method is not getting called. Is there anything els
How about moral support - I'm swamped ;-) Seriously, you may want to
sync with Jervis since he mentioned reusing some pieces across Axis2
and Celtix.
Jim
On Aug 1, 2006, at 6:23 PM, Ken Tam wrote:
I'm about to start working on a binding for the Sun JAX-WS RI, akin to
the Celtix & Axis2 bi
On Aug 1, 2006, at 6:07 PM, Ken Tam wrote:
Proposal 1: Support independent build and distributions at the top
level
Rationale: Users interested in different technologies such as SCA and
SDO do not want to have to build all of them together. This also
gives a false impression that there are st
Yea for some reason it's not picking it up on my machine. Have any
idea what may be happening since you have the same box as me?
Jim
On Aug 1, 2006, at 6:47 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Aug 1, 2006, at 5:44 PM, Ken Tam wrote:
done, thanks for the reminder
Thanks - now we can both remind
On Aug 1, 2006, at 5:29 PM, Ken Tam wrote:
I was seeing a ScopeNotFoundException rather than an NPE I think, but
yeah, it happened when a component defaulted to STATELESS scope (in
the absence of an @Scope("MODULE")). I talked with Jim and we came to
this fix together.
Just so's I understand
service's interfaces and semantics?
It depends. If it is a client using SCA, then it resorts to whatever
the "interface language" is - e.g. Java interfaces. Under the covers,
it is up to the binding extension to sort things out.
Jim
Thanks
- Venkat
On 8/1/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL
Yea this is definitely simpler than a side file. I came across this
but never tried it out a few years back:
http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/anoras/archive/2004/08/09/21502.aspx
Apparently it provides a way to "introspect" the script to retrieve
Javadoc style annotations but the way you hav
On Aug 1, 2006, at 7:27 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Aug 1, 2006, at 12:43 AM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Jim :-)))..
Please help me understand the scope of "not required". If
something is not
required then why have it in the first place? Are these things no
longer
relevant to the current
+1 from me.
Jim
On Jul 31, 2006, at 8:57 PM, Kevin Williams wrote:
I would like to recommend Brent for committership. Brent has made
invaluable contributions to the DAS and has been a consistent
provider of quality patches since the inception of this project.
Here is my +1 for Brent.
On Jul 31, 2006, at 10:16 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi Jeremy / Jim / Rick / Ant and others
What is the decision about the sca-tools that existed in M1? Do we
plan to
make it a part of the current Tuscany-Java as well?
I think tooling in general is a good thing to have (as long as it's
On Jul 31, 2006, at 1:56 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jul 30, 2006, at 6:33 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
On Jul 30, 2006, at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jul 30, 2006, at 2:55 PM, ant elder wrote:
What about the dependencies of the extension? It looks like
right now all
the dependency jars
I'd like to propose we make Raymond a committer. Normally, I would
list some of the things a candidate has done for the community but
with Raymond he has done so much I wouldn't know where to begin. So,
here's my +1 form making Raymond a committer.
Jim
JavaMappedService is already created. So, since
Ignacio is out this week, I'm going to work on that and some other
refactors as I apply the patch.
Jim
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: July 28, 2006 7:47:10 PM PDT
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject
On Jul 30, 2006, at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jul 30, 2006, at 2:55 PM, ant elder wrote:
What about the dependencies of the extension? It looks like right
now all
the dependency jars still have to go in the boot directory and
only the
extension in the extension directory. Is that w
On Jul 29, 2006, at 9:19 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
It would be good to have them. Not only are they useful in their
own right, they also validate that the runtime can handle data
types and formats that are not XML based.
I also think they are useful to have, particularly to validate the
e
There's a practical short-term and longer term reason. The immediate
issue I have is that the unit tests take 10 seconds on my machine to
complete because Jetty appears to take a while dealing with thread
cleanup. I think this is too long for four unit tests to run as part
of a checkin. M
r patch submission"
page on the wiki that covers Tuscany specific expectations?
Brent
On 7/28/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When doing a check-in or submitting a patch, please remember to run
> mvn with -Psourcecheck to ensure checkstyle and PMD pass. I've
&
Hi Raymond,
Thanks. I'll take a look starting Monday as I'm a little backlogged
on some other things. I had planned to refactor some of the property
injection which may fit well with this. More comments inline...
On Jul 29, 2006, at 12:06 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I posted a patch and
nnectivity, I'm even going to unsubscribe so I don't have to plow
through my mailbox when I get back), hopefully we'll be able to
figure it out before then. In any case, at least the patch is out
there so that it does not get stale by the time I'm back.
----- Original Message
O.K. thanks. I need to step out for a bit but I'll look into it tonight.
Jim
On Jul 28, 2006, at 2:25 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Ok, done. Forgot to add them to version control, apologies.
- Original Message - From: "Jim Marino"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Hi Ignacio,
I think the patch is missing the following classes:
JavaMappedCallback and IllegalCallbackException
Can you just attach the classes to the JIRA issue (no need to patch)?
Jim
On Jul 28, 2006, at 1:39 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/brows
Hi Ignacio,
Can you create a JIRA and attach the code so I can take a look?
Jim
On Jul 28, 2006, at 12:35 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
In the process of adding support for callbacks, I am adding a
CallbackProcessor to pick up a callback name and member when
visiting a field or a method. I
atch submission"
page on the wiki that covers Tuscany specific expectations?
Brent
On 7/28/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When doing a check-in or submitting a patch, please remember to run
mvn with -Psourcecheck to ensure checkstyle and PMD pass. I've
forgotten myse
For those interested, the OSOA collaboration held a series of analyst
briefings this week and here is some of the press coverage:
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&ie=UTF-8&ncl=http://
www.crmbuyer.com/story/T6hlnqIJw5R2TT/IT-Leaders-Unite-for-SOA-
Standards.xhtml&filter=0
Jim
--
On Jul 27, 2006, at 9:53 AM, ant elder wrote:
One of the reasons I started this thread was to try to get a common
understanding about what everyone expects is required to become a
Tuscany
committer. Its hard to publicly say you think someone isn't ready
yet, even
on the private list, so a c
When doing a check-in or submitting a patch, please remember to run
mvn with -Psourcecheck to ensure checkstyle and PMD pass. I've
forgotten myself a couple of times but I have noticed the build has
failed several times recently due to PMD errors.
Thanks,
Jim
-
I've committed Jervis' patch (thanks Jervis!) in 426629. I made some
formatting changes to pass checkstyle and pmd and have the following
comments:
- Axis2Reference and Axis2Service take WebServiceBinding - can we not
have it do that? We should decouple the model from the runtime
artifact
On Jul 27, 2006, at 12:24 AM, Ken Tam wrote:
I'm also interested in getting tomcat working with the new
architecture, but I think it's important that the integration take
place in modular fashion so that the basic tomcat integration is as
thin as possible, and the majority of functional testing
Hi Jervis,
I just got back from a trip so I'll take a look tomorrow am my time
PST. Sorry for the delay.
Jim
On Jul 26, 2006, at 9:07 PM, Jervis Liu (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-575?page=all ]
Jervis Liu updated TUSCANY-575:
---
Rick,
This is a major improvement over what we currently have and I really
like how things have been cleaned up and streamlined. I'm sure I will
have some suggestions in the furture but I agree this should be
published ASAP assuming others agree.
Some minor comments that we may want to co
On Jul 25, 2006, at 10:50 AM, Scott Kurz wrote:
I have a couple thoughts on the subject of Host APIs:
First, I think it would be valuable for the host environment to be
able to
access any CompositeContext via some sort of namespace of Composites
registered with a given runtime instance... o
Hi Jervis,
It's at:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/tuscany/branches/java-M1/java/
Jim
On Jul 24, 2006, at 8:13 PM, Liu, Jervis wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know where the previous m1 code moved to (as the
sandbox chianti replaced the main trunk)? I thought it was moved to
branch, but
On Jul 24, 2006, at 7:31 PM, Ken Tam wrote:
r425257 creates a "web distribution" which can be extracted directly
into Tomcat's "shared" dir or any webapp's WEB-INF. From the commit
mail:
---
Example usage of the web distribution w/ Tomcat:
Extract web-1.0-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip into Tomcat's "shar
I've found it helpful for exactly too and you can get a free open
source license. At times it is too strict (e.g. flagging getter/
setters) but overall it is great for seeing untested portions of code
and is simple to setup.
Jim
On Jul 24, 2006, at 7:26 PM, Brent Daniel wrote:
Kevin,
Yea this has come up and it's probably a good time to consider some
refactoring to pull this out. One thing that comes to mind is
management, and eventing (things like firing session start
notifications). Do you have some specific things you are thinking about?
Jim
On Jul 24, 2006, at 2:
ould be to call workAccepted in the
decorated work just before workStarted in the same thread.
I am checking out the latest source. I will have a closer look and
submit a patch by tonight or tomorrow morning.
Ta
Meeraj
-Original Message-----
From: Jim Marino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24
Maven with the -e switch
[INFO]
--
--
[INFO] Total time: 39 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Mon Jul 24 11:32:59 EDT 2006
[INFO] Final Memory: 35M/254M
[INFO]
----------
--
Jim Marino wrote:
O.K. the easiest th
.run(Thread.java:595)
- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Marino"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: Java core test case failures?
Yea it is. I just checked in a fix. Please let me know if it works
on your machine, Rick.
Jim
On Jul
Yea it is. I just checked in a fix. Please let me know if it works on
your machine, Rick.
Jim
On Jul 24, 2006, at 7:48 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jul 24, 2006, at 7:30 AM, Rick wrote:
testSchedule
(org.apache.tuscany.core.services.work.jsr237.workmanager.ThreadPoolW
orkManagerTestCase) T
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-527?page=all ]
Jim Marino resolved TUSCANY-527.
Resolution: Fixed
> First cut of the work scheduler implementation
> --
>
> Key:
You can also run it from an IDE with the following param, assuming
the SCDL configuration is set:
-Dtuscany.installDir=/tmp
Jim
On Jul 23, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
There were some directions in the mail here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200607.mbox/
You may need to zip the attachments since it looks as if the list
stripped them.
Jim
On Jul 21, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
We current specify manifests for some of the jars that enable them
to be used as OSGi bundles. These (IIRC) are based on some sent in
near the start of th
We should be using Meeraj's WorkScheduler which abstracts the work
manager type (which he also supplied as an implementation). So, we
should delete the Geronimo impl, which I believe will require some
changes to test cases.
Jim
On Jul 21, 2006, at 12:00 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Which work
Thanks Simon, I think this would be useful. Perhaps we should also
link to SCA whitepapers on osoa.org once they are published?
One thing I would like to make sure we do is maintain the technical
scenarios with easy navigation to them without having to click
through "business scenarios". I
Hi Ignacio,
The test case failure is due to the assertion problem that was
outlined in another threead (just change MAVEN_OPTS to have -ea).
I'll submit the patch as soon as I clear out another checkin I have
on my machine and will take a look at the monitor problem as well.
Thanks,
Jim
I've made a few additional changes to constructor-based injection
that people may be interested in:
1. Annotation processing can now heuristically determine the
constructor based on the presence of @Property, @Reference, or
@Autowire annotations and does not require @Constructor:
public F
On Jul 20, 2006, at 5:14 PM, Ken Tam wrote:
On 7/20/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 20, 2006, at 11:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +/**
> + * Default application SCDL path used if no
> "applicationScdlPath" param is specified
> + *
> + * REVIEW: this doe
These test cases were my bone-headed mistake...What they should be
doing is testing that prepare() executes properly so I'll fix them
once I get a couple of other checkins cleared out.
That said, we really ought to run mvn was assertions on as we need to
verify that assertion checking is do
Hi Ignacio,
The test case issue is due to assertions getting
On Jul 20, 2006, at 9:06 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
I have an initial pass at a replacement for one-way async support
using a target invoker rather than an interceptor. I have been able
to test it in chianti and ported it to the
Yea I've seen other projects use this. What would be nice is if we
could write using a word processor instead of an xml editor and have
it converted to DocBook. I'll have to check into this but if someone
has experience doing this sort of thing, it would be good to know.
Jim
On Jul 20, 2
On Jul 19, 2006, at 10:48 PM, rakesh dash wrote:
Jim,
Thanks a lot for your response.
1. In the slide 4, it states to reduce the number of concepts of
SCA. How
does composite attains it?
For example- services are equivalent to entry point,
references are
similar to external servic
Krishnan wrote:
Hi... How do you get a membership at http://www.osoa.org.
- Venkat
On 7/19/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Right now Jeremy and I have been doing this as we are members of the
spec group as well. However, there is no reason others can't do this
as well. Ther
That seems like a good idea to me. Perhaps we could also introduce a
mechanism whereby people can choose the binding implementation
without messing with the classpath as in M1 as well?
Jim
On Jul 13, 2006, at 8:24 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
The Axis2 and Celtix bindings both support the
de
On Jul 19, 2006, at 6:36 PM, Ken Tam wrote:
I'm about to check-in some code to support embedding Tuscany in any
servlet container -- mostly a servlet listener that launches the
runtime. It's not a lot of code (if it were, I'd be worried :), but I
could still see moving it out into a separate
Just a few minor comments inline...
On Jul 19, 2006, at 6:33 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Comments inline ...
On Jul 19, 2006, at 5:20 PM, scabooz wrote:
Jeremy (and others of course),
There have been a few recent threads that have touched on the
various aspects of how Tuscany might be imbedded
Cool - thanks!
On Jul 19, 2006, at 12:35 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
oh, ok.
Lets try this agian zipped.
-David Wheeler
On 7/19/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:I found out
yesterday the list strips PDFs but if you zip them it
goes through.
Jim
On Jul 19, 2006, at 12:22 PM,
I found out yesterday the list strips PDFs but if you zip them it
goes through.
Jim
On Jul 19, 2006, at 12:22 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
Sure thing Jim.
Should be attached
On 7/19/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi David,
Is there any chance you can pdf it?
Jim
On Jul 19
Hi David,
Is there any chance you can pdf it?
Jim
On Jul 19, 2006, at 11:56 AM, David Wheeler wrote:
The original format is an Omnigraffle document, but I have attached
a zip that contains the graffle as well as copies in svg and visio.
I modefied it to better reflect the seperation of the
On Jul 19, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
One thing we ran into with chianti was problems in the build due to
the availability of dependencies that are only used in a few
places. For example, there were repeated problems building the JAXB
databinding due to downtime at java.net. T
These look nice. A couple of comments:
1. For extensions, can we include Spring as that has a lot of
widespread appeal and is something we are actively working on?
2. Is there a way to make the ancillary technologies such as DAS, SDO
and Tooling fit outside the core runtime, as they are not e
Right now Jeremy and I have been doing this as we are members of the
spec group as well. However, there is no reason others can't do this
as well. There will be a new OSOA website (mentioned by Raymond)
where issues can be raised directly so this may facilitate that process.
Jim
On Jul 19
There are a number of ways to do this:
- If you are employed by one of the collaborators, you already have
access
- You can become a participant in the collaboration
- The spec group is in the process of constructing a web site with
access to the documents, which will be available very short
On Jul 19, 2006, at 9:19 AM, Simon Nash wrote:
Comments inline below.
Simon
Jim Marino wrote:
On Jul 19, 2006, at 2:07 AM, Simon Nash wrote:
I wasn't asking for an "official" policy statement on this, and
I wasn't suggesting that we stop all innovation and move i
On Jul 19, 2006, at 8:41 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Jim Marino wrote:
On Jul 19, 2006, at 2:07 AM, Simon Nash wrote:
I wasn't asking for an "official" policy statement on this, and
I wasn't suggesting that we stop all innovation and move into a
phase where we only work on thin
On Jul 19, 2006, at 2:07 AM, Simon Nash wrote:
I wasn't asking for an "official" policy statement on this, and
I wasn't suggesting that we stop all innovation and move into a
phase where we only work on things that were part of M1.
By releasing M1, we moved from a phase of focusing purely on
t
stab at separating packages into what
should go into an SPI and what should go into core?
Jim
Then DOM Node --> SDO DataObject can be applied.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Marino"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 2:12 PM
I would like to get started on support for for XPath in SCDL as it is
part of the recent SCA spec changes. This will likely require
changes to the loader infrastructure and in particular
StringParserPropertyFactory. Instead of having a PropertyFactory
create an ObjectFactory responsible fo
Looks like the mailing list strips attachments. Is there a way to
send this and not have it removed?
Jim
On Jul 18, 2006, at 11:36 AM, Kevin Williams wrote:
Hi Jim,
I don't see the attached report.
--Kevin
Jim Marino wrote:
I've been using Clover as a test coverage tool and
On Jul 18, 2006, at 1:32 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
In chianti we had started to play with jMock as a mock object test
framework but after living with it for a while I started to get
frustrated with it. I saw that Raymond's databinding framework was
using EasyMock and tried converting over o
They have a free license for open source projects. I just got mine.
Jim
On Jul 18, 2006, at 11:59 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I tried Clover with Tuscany M1 before and the report is nice. I
thought it requires a license.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message - From: "Jim M
I've been using Clover as a test coverage tool and have found it
quite useful (http://www.cenqua.com/clover/) Licensing is free for
open source projects and it has plugins for popular IDEs so it can be
run as part of a standard code-test cycle (it can be toggled on and
off).
Although it i
It may be easier just to replace it but if people prefer to have
license clarification, let me know and I will get it fixed. The
intent with the jar was not to have a proprietary license and was
probably an oversight in the Codehaus distro.
Jim
On Jul 18, 2006, at 10:46 AM, Jeremy Boynes w
remove the synchronized keyword from the ThreadPoolWorkManager
callback methods. The underlying collection I use for keeping track of
the listeners is thread-safe.
Ta
Meeraj
-Original Message-----
From: Jim Marino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 July 2006 21:56
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
S
I've added the WorkScheduler as a system service and have it
autowired to ComponentBuilderExtension. Extensions may now access the
scheduler through the protected field workScheduler.
Next up is to apply Meeraj's patch to the scheduler...
Jim
onight (or today for you), could you
pls remove the synchronized keyword from the ThreadPoolWorkManager
callback methods. The underlying collection I use for keeping track of
the listeners is thread-safe.
Ta
Meeraj
-Original Message-----
From: Jim Marino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 July 200
Hi comments inline
On Jul 16, 2006, at 10:17 PM, rakesh dash wrote:
Hello,
I am starting to understand the basics of certain M2 related
concepts and am trying to navigate the src tree of the run time.
It would be great if someone may clarify few of my basic queries on
it. My
apologies
nager provided by the environment.
Ta
Meeraj
-Original Message-
From: Jim Marino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 July 2006 21:38
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: WorkManager in JavaComponentBuilder
Forgot to mention (you may already know this):
You can use Meeraj's work manager, Thr
901 - 1000 of 1522 matches
Mail list logo
