Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/9] arm: imx6ul: Add Engicam Is.IoT MX6UL Starter Kit initial support

Hi On 28 Jan 2017 1:25 p.m., "Stefano Babic" wrote: Hi Jagan, Tom, On 27/01/2017 16:55, Jagan Teki wrote: > n Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Stefano Babic wrote: >> Hi Jagan, >> >> On 27/01/2017 09:54, Jagan Teki wrote: >>> From: Jagan Teki

Re: [U-Boot] i2c_set_bus_num freeze

Hi On 27 Jan 2017 3:13 p.m., "Ran Shalit" wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Ran Shalit wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: > >> Hello Ran, >> >> Am 26.01.2017 um 18:42 schrieb Ran Shalit: >> >>>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] splash: fix splash source flags check

Hi On 14 Jan 2017 3:54 a.m., "Anatolij Gustschin" wrote: From: "tomas.me...@vaisala.com" SPLASH_STORAGE_RAW is defined as 0, so a check against & will never be true. These flags are never combined so do a check against == instead. Signed-off-by:

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot PATCH V2 1/8] usb: ums: split macro and data struct in f_mass_storage.c

char *vendor_name;/* 8 characters or less */ > + const char *product_name; /* 16 characters or less */ > + > + charcan_stall; > +}; > + > +struct fsg_dev { > + struct usb_function function; > + struct

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot PATCH V2 0/8] introduce Rockchip rockusb

ers/usb/gadget/storage_common.c > > -- > 2.10.2 > > ___________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot -- | Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV | | COO - F

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] spi: mxc: Fix compilation problem of DM_SPI class driver

) > return -ENODEV; > > -- > 2.7.4 > -- | Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV | | COO - Founder Cruquiuskade 47 | | +31(0)851119172

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] video: mxsfb: Support data-enable and pixclock polarity

w it will be only set if requested by new flag in mode sync. This > is going to break current users, I'm afraid. Who is going to request > this for all driver users? Will it be supplied via environment mode > variable "video=ctfb..." ? This should be

Re: [U-Boot] persistent logo on LCD on imx6ull

Hi Peng Ok I have fixed it :) Michael On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: > Hi Peng > > I'm working to make persistent the uboot logo on imx6ull platform but > I have some problem with the framebuffer. Now this is the main idea > > I use t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] spi: mxc_spi: Fix spi mode communication where clock is inverted

mxc_spi_claim_bus_internal(struct >> mxc_spi_slave *mxcs, int cs) >> } >> reg_write(>period, MXC_CSPIPERIOD_32KHZ); >> reg_write(>intr, 0); >> + udelay(50); >> >> return 0; >> } >> -- >> 2.7.4 > -- |

[U-Boot] persistent logo on LCD on imx6ull

n gpios so they get down and up again (nshut and nreset) even I don't touch them 2) Even clock tree is ok pixelclock seems that stops to go out Do you have any suggestion? Michael -- | Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV | | CO

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot, cache speculation side channel attacks and ARM

Hi On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com> wrote: > On Sat, 20 Jan 2018 11:45:08 +0100 > Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi <mich...@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > >> Hi Marc >> >> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 11:42 AM, Marc Zyngier <ma

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dm: spi: prevent setting a speed of 0 Hz

and delete this message including its attachments. The > unauthorized dissemination, copying and change of this e-mail are strictly > forbidden. The addresser shall not be liable for the content of such changed > e-mails. > __

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dm: spi: prevent setting a speed of 0 Hz

Hi On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:27 AM, Simon Goldschmidt <sgoldschm...@de.pepperl-fuchs.com> wrote: > On 18.01.2018 09:23, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Simon Goldschmidt >> <sgoldschm...@de.pepperl-fuch

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: mx25: Remove SION bit in all pin-mux

Hi On 25 Jan. 2018 12:07 am, "Fabio Estevam" <feste...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Michael, On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 3:46 PM, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi <mich...@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > This is exactly my initial propose. Can we give a try and manage on board level? T

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3] imx: mx25: Remove SION bit in all pin-mux that are safe

k fine and clock stretching detection is > automatic and would always need the input state), the need for these > advanced I²C features can be considered board-specific, so SION would > still not be required in iomux-mx25.h. > > In the end, for this p

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: mx25: Remove SION bit in all pin-mux

Hi On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Benoît Thébaudeau <ben...@wsystem.com> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On 25/01/2018 at 06:47, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: >> On 25 Jan. 2018 12:07 am, "Fabio Estevam" <feste...@gmail.com >> <mailto:feste

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: mx25: Remove SION bit in all pin-mux

Hi On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 6:05 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau <ben...@wsystem.com> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On 24/01/2018 at 17:46, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 5:38 PM, Fabio Estevam <feste...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi Michael, >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: mx25: Remove SION bit in all pin-mux

Hi Fabio On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi <mich...@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > Hi Fabio > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:14 PM, Fabio Estevam <feste...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> Can you check where SION bit is mandatory for

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: mx25: Remove SION bit in all pin-mux

Hi Fabio On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 5:38 PM, Fabio Estevam <feste...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > [Removed usb list as this is off-topic for them] > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi > <mich...@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: mx25: Remove SION bit in all pin-mux

Hi On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 6:29 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau <ben...@wsystem.com> wrote: > Hi Fabio, > > On 24/01/2018 at 18:21, Fabio Estevam wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 3:12 PM, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi >> <mich...@amarulasolutions.com> wrote:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: mx25: Remove SION bit in all pin-mux

t; flag) for FEC MDIO and SD CMD/CLK/DATAn. > > Which I think it is fine as it is set on a per board basis. > > Maybe we could do the same in U-Boot. > This is exactly my initial propose. Can we give a try and manage on board level? Michael > Thanks -- | Michael Nazzareno Trim

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3] imx: mx25: Remove SION bit in all pin-mux that are safe

nly for eSDHC1, so Linux's >> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx25-pinfunc.h should be fixed). Therefore, SION is >> mandatory for all the eSDHC CMD functions in >> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx25/iomux-mx25.h, but it can be removed for >> everything else (I still have to carry out one

Re: [U-Boot] On writing .ext4 image to MMC

gt; U-Boot@lists.denx.de > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot -- | Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV | | COO - Founder Cruquiuskade 47 | | +31(0)851119172 Amsterdam 1018 AM NL | |

Re: [U-Boot] On writing .ext4 image to MMC

em on first boot create a first instance of something like ssd for keys. I think that just use resize FS should do the trick. Why is should be done in bootloader? Michael Adam On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:18 AM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi < mich...@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > Hi &

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx6sabresd: Add fastboot support

are partition already defined? in sabre config. It's not used to know the u-boot version ;) Can you just update the commit message in how you perform the update? Michael ___ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > https://lists.denx.de/listin

Re: [U-Boot] FEC Clock

Hi On 1 Feb. 2018 6:06 pm, "Fabio Estevam" wrote: [Please do not top post in mailing lists] On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 6:40 AM, Mehmet Ali İPİN wrote: > Dear Estevam, > > I used GPIO 16 to generate the 25MHZ clock, using

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot,v2,4/5] clk: implement clk_set_defaults()

Hi On 28 Jan. 2018 5:50 pm, "Philipp Tomsich" < philipp.toms...@theobroma-systems.com> wrote: > Linux uses the properties 'assigned-clocks', 'assigned-clock-parents' > and 'assigned-clock-rates' to configure the clock subsystem for use > with various peripheral nodes. > > This implements

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot,v2,4/5] clk: implement clk_set_defaults()

Hi On 28 Jan. 2018 6:15 pm, "Dr. Philipp Tomsich" < philipp.toms...@theobroma-systems.com> wrote: Michael, On 28 Jan 2018, at 17:54, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi < mich...@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: Hi On 28 Jan. 2018 5:50 pm, "Philipp Tomsich" <phi

[U-Boot] help: how get last command result using scripting

Hi all Trying to understand how to get the last result. For example: sspi 1:0.3 24 72; sspi 1:1.3 24 73 Now I need to have the last output of the last command to compare in one script. Any idea? Michael ___ U-Boot mailing list

Re: [U-Boot] help: how get last command result using scripting

Any idea? >> >> Michael >> ___ >> U-Boot mailing list >> U-Boot@lists.denx.de >> https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot > > > > > Best regards, > > Lukasz Majewski > > -- > > DENX Software Enginee

Re: [U-Boot] help: how get last command result using scripting

t;> >> U-Boot mailing list >> >> U-Boot@lists.denx.de >> >> https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Best regards, >> > >> > Lukasz Majewski >> > >> > -- >

Re: [U-Boot] Problem booting uImage with u-boot

_______ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot -- | Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV | | COO - Founder Cruquiuskade 47 | | +31(0)8511

Re: [U-Boot] Problem booting uImage with u-boot

's better. What is your its file for generate fit-image? Michael > Regards > Saeed > > On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, 11:25 p.m. Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi, > wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 8:47 PM, Saeed Abdoli wrote: >> > Hello >> &

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot,V3,1/2] spl: Fix redundant image of uboot

Hi On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:11 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:09:00PM +0200, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: >> Hi Tom >> >> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 9:54 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >> > On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 05:09:22PM +0200, Michael Trima

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot,V3,1/2] spl: Fix redundant image of uboot

ot feature and this was the address problem on the specific case. We can call ->verify image every ->load, anyway can you explain better why you need a configurable behavior? Michael > -- > Tom -- | Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV | | COO - F

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] eth: dm: fec: Add gpio phy reset binding

ce *dev) >>>> return -EINVAL; >>>> } >>>> >>>> - /* TODO >>>> -* Need to get the reset-gpio and related properties from DT >>>> -* and implem

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/16] pico-imx7d: Convert to distro config

gt; - "else run netboot; " \ > - "fi; " \ > - "else run netboot; fi" > + "fdt_addr_r=0x8300\0" \ > + "kernel_addr_r=" __stringify(CONFIG_LOADADDR) "\0" \ > + "pxefile_addr_r=&

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/13] pico-imx6ul: Convert to SPL

Hi On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:56 PM Fabio Estevam wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 9:53 AM, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi > wrote: > > > Ok, if you resend with the change discussed I'm fine with it. The reason > > that > > I'm trying to make muc

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/13] pico-imx6ul: Convert to SPL

Hi Fabio On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:50 PM Fabio Estevam wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi > wrote: > > > Well, yes and no. Not all the bits can be writable according to the > > documentation if I remember and if the value you > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 06/13] pico-imx7d: Update the README file

; - > $ sudo dfu-util -D u-boot.img -a u-boot > > Remove power from the pico board. > -- > 2.18.0 > > ___ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot -- | Michael Nazz

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/13] pico-imx6ul: Convert to SPL

Hi On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:33 PM Fabio Estevam wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi > wrote: > > >> >> +static void ccgr_init(void) > >> >> +{ > >> >> +

Re: [U-Boot] persistent logo on LCD on imx6ull

Hi otavio On Wed., 4 Jul. 2018, 7:03 pm Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi, < mich...@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > Hi > > > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 6:45 PM, Otavio Salvador > wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 6:20 AM, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi > > wrote: > &

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 1/2] spl: Fix redundant image of uboot

header_t *)spl_image->load_addr)) { > + debug("Header checksum failed\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + /* > +* Verify the crc of the data > +*/ > + if (!image_check_dcrc((const image_header_t *)spl_image->load_addr)) { > +

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] spl: Fix compilation issue when you want to use SPL from enviroment

ORT=y > CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT=y > CONFIG_SPL_LIBGENERIC_SUPPORT=y > +CONFIG_SPL_ENV_SUPPORT=y > CONFIG_TARGET_MX6ULL_ISIOT=y > CONFIG_SPL_SERIAL_SUPPORT=y > CONFIG_SPL=y > -- > 2.7.4 > Michael -- | Michael Nazzareno Trim

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] spl: Fix redundant image of uboot

Hi On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 5:10 PM, Lothar Waßmann wrote: > Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Lothar Waßmann >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 15:53:36 +0200 Michael Trimarch

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] spl: Fix redundant image of uboot

hcrc(...) { >> + debug("Header checksum failed\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + err = image_check_dcrc((const image_header_t *)spl_image->load_addr); >> + if (!err) { >> > dto. Just because I want to be

Re: [U-Boot] persistent logo on LCD on imx6ull

Hi On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 6:45 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 6:20 AM, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi > wrote: >> Ok I have fixed it :) > > Mind to share how? commit 9c066153a6876b1ae57117d99ad228a07873eb75 Author: Michael Trimarchi Date: Wed Jul 4 1

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot, cache speculation side channel attacks and ARM

quot; Regarding IBE set, is this can be set later on boot stage after MLO? Michael > https://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel=151566145121435=2 > > A15: ACTLR > https://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel=151562519425981=2 > > Am I misunderstanding the list we need to do in u-boot? > > --

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot, cache speculation side channel attacks and ARM

hose patches on kernel 3.4. Is those enough? Michael > > Thanks, > > M. > > [1] > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/log/?h=kpti > -- > Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. > __

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: mx25: Remove SION bit in all pin-mux

= IOMUX_PAD(0x000, 0x008, >> 0x05, 0, 0, NO_PAD_CTRL), >> + MX25_PAD_A10__A10 = IOMUX_PAD(0x000, 0x008, 0, >> 0, 0, NO_PAD_CTRL), >> + MX25_PAD_A10__GPIO_4_0 = IOMUX_PAD(0x000, 0x008, 5, >> 0, 0, NO_PAD_CTRL)

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: mx25: Remove SION bit in all pin-mux

Hi On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:39 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau <ben...@wsystem.com> wrote: > On 24/01/2018 at 16:34, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote: >> On 24/01/2018 at 16:26, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:14 PM, Fabio Estevam <feste...@gmail.com&

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: mx25: Remove SION bit in all pin-mux

Hi On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 5:03 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau <ben...@wsystem.com> wrote: > On 24/01/2018 at 16:43, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:39 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau <ben...@wsystem.com> >> wrote: >>> On 24/01/2018 at 16:34, Be

Re: [U-Boot] imx6: USB SDP failed for u-boot-dtb.img

t process >>>> the same, any help? >>> >>> Is this a regression? If so, are you able to run a 'git bisect'? >> >> I don't think it's regression, I'm guessing this is first test with >> u-boot-dtb.img or did you tested the similar image type? >> > &

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: improve throughput in the sunxi_mmc driver

Hi On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:10 PM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@bootlin.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:37:11PM +0200, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: >> Hi >> >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 9:55 PM, Maxime Ripard >> <maxime.rip...@bootlin.com> wr

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: improve throughput in the sunxi_mmc driver

ng? > Just curios but what is the result if %s/udelay(1000)/udelay(1)/g in the driver Michael > Maxime > > -- > Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com > > ___ >

Re: [U-Boot] Moving MX25 to SPL

Hi Stefano On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 12:59 PM Stefano Babic wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > On 16/10/2018 12:32, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: > > Hi all > > > > I'm trying to figure out how move the mx25 to two stage boot using > > SPL. Anyone know why was

[U-Boot] Moving MX25 to SPL

Hi all I'm trying to figure out how move the mx25 to two stage boot using SPL. Anyone know why was done it before? More technical question is if I can convert imximage.cfg value and let it write to an spl.c file that make the same. I don't have a lot of background on imx25 bootrom and what it's

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: Fix memory 2-rank initialization for a33 cpu

dth = 16, > .page_size = 2048, > -- > 2.17.1 > -- | Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV | | COO - Founder Cruquiuskade 47 | | +31(0)851119172

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: Fix memory 2-rank initialization for a33 cpu

Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi > > Acked-by: Maxime Ripard > Can you test on a consumer board with A33? I have tested over oscilloscope on my device Michael > Maxime > > -- > Maxime Ripard, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com -

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] net: dm: fec: Fix time unit error in phy-reset-duration

dm_gpio_set_value(>phy_reset_gpio, 0); > } Reviewed-by: Michael Trimarchi > } > -- > 1.9.1 > -- | Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV | | COO - Founder Cruquiuskade 4

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/13] pico-imx6ul: Convert to SPL

; >> + writel(0x, >CCGR7); are you sure that arrive to 7? > > > > These can be know values. > > I am sorry, but I did not understand your comments. > I think that it's not a good strategy to enable all the gate in general here. Michael > Please clar

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fw_setenv: avoid writing environment when nothing has changed

Hi On Mon., 24 Sep. 2018, 8:19 am Rasmus Villemoes, wrote: > On 2018-09-05 21:22, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > In the case where one deletes an already-non-existing variable, or sets > > a variable to the value it already has, there is no point in writing the > > environment back, thus

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] common: add board specific hook for os preboot config

Hi On Mon., 24 Sep. 2018, 5:15 pm Stefan Agner, wrote: > On 24.09.2018 16:56, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: > > Hi > > > > On Mon., 24 Sep. 2018, 4:51 pm Stefan Agner, wrote: > > > >> On 24.09.2018 16:43, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: > >>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] common: add board specific hook for os preboot config

Hi On Thu., 16 Aug. 2018, 3:09 pm Stefan Agner, wrote: > On 13.08.2018 09:30, Gerard Salvatella wrote: > > Some boards require specific configuration prior to booting the kernel. > > For instance, our boards require shutting down the display to avoid > > fading transitions before the drivers

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] common: add board specific hook for os preboot config

Hi On Mon., 24 Sep. 2018, 4:51 pm Stefan Agner, wrote: > On 24.09.2018 16:43, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: > > Hi > > > > On Thu., 16 Aug. 2018, 3:09 pm Stefan Agner, wrote: > > > >> On 13.08.2018 09:30, Gerard Salvatella wrote: > >>>

Re: [U-Boot] SPL variant of sunxi nand module

Nikolai > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > Regards, > > Nikolai > > ___ > > U-Boot mailing list > > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot > > ___

Re: [U-Boot] BPI-M2 Magic: DRAM:Timeout initialising DRAM

> > Jagan. > > -- > Jagan Teki > Senior Linux Kernel Engineer | Amarula Solutions > U-Boot, Linux | Upstream Maintainer > Hyderabad, India. > ___ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > https://lists.denx.de

Re: [U-Boot] Issue with compiling uboot for SoC-eds arria 10

nd a link to it Michael > > ____ > From: Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi > To: Sujay Suresh > Cc: "u-boot@lists.denx.de" > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 5:54 PM > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Issue with compiling uboot for SoC-eds arria 10 > >

Re: [U-Boot] Issue with compiling uboot for SoC-eds arria 10

of the build log. If you are running ubuntu in a virtual machine configure add on to do copy and paste Michael > Please Provide your support. > Best. > ___ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-b

Re: [U-Boot] [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] Revert "sunxi: board: Print error after power initialization fails"

Karl P_______ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot -- | Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV | | COO - Founder Cruqu

Re: [U-Boot] [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] Revert "sunxi: board: Print error after power initialization fails"

bit pointless. Just reverting > this and meanwhile checking the DRAM init code seems the easier solution. > Definitely have the same impression. Please send the same revert but adjust the commit message Michael > Cheers, > Andre > _

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] pico-imx7: Disable video support

> } > #endif > > Then I can load U-Boot via USB without problem. > > However, in order to turn on the LCD we need to turn on GPIO1_6. > > If I do this from the U-Boot prompt: > > => gpio set 6 > > Then the board hangs. > > Not sure why setting GPIO1_6 i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] pico-imx7: Disable video support

Hi On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 4:25 PM Fabio Estevam wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 7:19 PM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi > wrote: > > > Are you sure about memory calibration? > > I couldn't spot an issue with regards to memory initializat

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] pico-imx7: Disable video support

Hi On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:48 PM Fabio Estevam wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 1:38 PM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi > wrote: > > > + /* Perform DDR DRAM calibration */ > > + udelay(100); > > + mmdc

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] pico-imx7: Disable video support

Hi On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:56 PM Fabio Estevam wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 1:51 PM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi > wrote: > > > Let me summarize ;). Do you have any reset from the tool? does it > > sends everything > > using usb? Does S

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] pico-imx7: Disable video support

Hi On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:37 PM Fabio Estevam wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 1:29 PM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi > wrote: > > > Can you use ddr calibration instead of fixed value? Does this happen before > > migration to DT > > Yes,

Re: [U-Boot] [V3 1/3] sunxi: Fix A33 memory initialization

;= ~(0xff << 0); > reg_val |= (0x33 << 8); > - reg_val |= (0x8 << 0); > + reg_val |= (0x10 << 0); > writel(reg_val, _ctl->dramtmg8); > /* Set phy interface time */ > reg_val = (0x2 << 24) | (t_rdata

Re: [U-Boot] [V6 PATCH 3/3] sunxi: Use clrsetbits_le32 instead of multiple instruction

gned-off-by: Shyam Saini > > --- > > Is this patch on master? couldn't apply at all? I think you should apply 1 and 2 Michael > ___ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot -- | M

Re: [U-Boot] arm: sunxi: Bananapi_M2_Ultra not working with DM_MMC

Hi On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 4:48 PM Tom Rini wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 07:47:13PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 7:31 PM Paul Kocialkowski > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Le lundi 08 avril 2019 à 19:21 +0530, Jagan Teki a écrit : > > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] pico-imx7: Disable video support

Hi On Sat., 23 Mar. 2019, 11:16 pm Joris OFFOUGA, wrote: > Le sam. 23 mars 2019 à 14:53, Fabio Estevam a écrit : > > > Since commit 9e3c0174da842 ("pico-imx7d: Add LCD support") loading U-Boot > > via USB download mode causes the following hang: > > > > SDP: initialize... > > SDP: handle

Re: [U-Boot] IMX6 NAND boot regression

Hi On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 6:20 PM Tim Harvey wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 9:00 AM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi > wrote: > > > > Hi Tim > > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 5:54 PM Tim Harvey wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019

Re: [U-Boot] IMX6 NAND boot regression

Hi Tim On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 5:54 PM Tim Harvey wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 8:41 AM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi > wrote: > > > > HI all > > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 7:14 PM Tim Harvey wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 5:30

Re: [U-Boot] IMX6 NAND boot regression

take note > to avoid anything between v2018.07 and the next release v2019.03 for > IMX NAND SPL. > > It kind of sucks that patches that affected IMX NAND SPL were accepted > with no testing on a NAND SPL board or cc's sent to maintainers of > boar

Re: [U-Boot] IMX6 NAND boot regression

Hi Tim On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 5:59 PM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: > > Hi Tim > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 5:54 PM Tim Harvey wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 8:41 AM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi > > wrote: > > > > > > HI all > > &g

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] Revert "pico-imx7d: Add LCD support"

Hi On Wed., 13 Mar. 2019, 12:39 pm Fabio Estevam, wrote: > Hi Joris, > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:35 AM jorisoffouga > wrote: > > > You were right in increasing the size of that fixed bug, the old size > was 0x400 > > > > Hi Fabio, > > > > I send patch with this correctif ? > > Excellent,

Re: [U-Boot] [V4 3/3] sunxi: Use clrsetbits_le32 instead of multiple instruction

its_le32(_ctl->dramtmg8, (0x33 << 8) | (0x10 << 0)); > > That should just be one call to clrsetbits_le32(). > > > writel(reg_val, _ctl->dramtmg8); > > And you need to remove this line, of course, otherwise you write the va

[U-Boot] Secure Boot nand on IMX6DL

Hi all I'm trying to enable secure boot on nand but seems that SPL does not start at all. Any help? I'm using latest uboot Michael -- | Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV | | COO - Founder Cruquiuskade 47 | | +31(0

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] Revert "pico-imx7d: Add LCD support"

_ENV \ > "fdt_addr=0x8300\0" \ > "fdt_addr_r=0x8300\0" \ > @@ -133,16 +131,6 @@ > #define CONFIG_POWER_PFUZE3000 > #define CONFIG_POWER_PFUZE3000_I2C_ADDR0x08 > > -#ifdef CONFIG_VIDEO > -#define CONFIG_VIDEO_MXS > -#define CONF

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: Fix nand boot of imx6q and imx6qdl boards

would require some malloc() > pool before relocation in order to load U-Boot proper properly. > > So, enable SPL malloc() pool of 0x2000 size similarly like what we have used > for > icore mmc defconfigs. > > Once this is added, > > Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki I will upl

Re: [U-Boot] [BUG] booting on the Tinker Board (tinker-rk3288_defconfig) is broken

Hi [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] rockchip: rk3288-vyasa: increase heap space after relocation Can you check it if you have the same problem? Michael On Sun., 17 Feb. 2019, 1:11 pm Heinrich Schuchardt On 2/17/19 9:19 AM, David Wu wrote: > > Hi Henrich, > > > > 在 2019/2/16 下午5:53, Heinrich Schuchardt

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 3/3] sunxi: Fix A33 memory initialization

Michael > > Maxime > > -- > Maxime Ripard, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com -- | Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV | | COO - Founder Cruquiuskade 47 | | +31(0)85111

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/3] sunxi: Don't change the rank in dram size detection in A33

Hi Maxime On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 9:49 AM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: > > Hi Maxime > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 9:44 AM Maxime Ripard > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 05:57:07PM +0100, Michael Trimarchi wrote: > > > Change the size create a

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/3] sunxi: Don't change the rank in dram size detection in A33

gt; Maxime Ripard, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com -- | Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV | | COO - Founder Cruquiuskade 47 | | +31(0)851119172

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 3/3] sunxi: Fix A33 memory initialization

LPDDR3 so make no sense to try to let them work as LPDDR3. I will update the commit message Michael > > > /* Set phy interface time */ > > reg_val = (0x2 << 24) | (t_rdata_en << 16) | (0x1 << 8) > > | (wr_latency << 0); > > -- > &

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 3/3] sunxi: Fix A33 memory initialization

o have but It's not my case. The best for me is update the commit message and give more info there. Add the memory components and the layout of my setup, ask to test other boards before get included Michael > > > All I have is a multimeter and no A33 ;-) > > > You are aw

Re: [U-Boot] Nand boot on imx6q board is broken

Hi On Thu., 31 Jan. 2019, 6:26 pm Adam Ford On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 7:58 AM Shyam Saini > wrote: > > > > Hi Adam, > > > > Thanks a lot for replying. > > > > > > > > I spent some time trying to make the imx6q_logic board boot from SPL > > > from NAND, but I needed to patch a few things. Some

Re: [U-Boot] arm: sunxi: Bananapi_M2_Ultra not working with DM_MMC

Hi jagan On Mon., 8 Apr. 2019, 8:26 pm Tom Rini, wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 06:23:29PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 6:00 PM Paul Kocialkowski > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 05:51 -0300, Pablo Sebastián Greco wrote: >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mtd: mxs_nand_spl: fix nand_command protocol violation

Hi Stefano On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 4:52 PM Stefano Babic wrote: > > On 14/05/19 22:56, Andrea Scian - DAVE Embedded Systems wrote: > > > > Hi Michael, > > On 14/05/19 20:44, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: > >> Hi all > >> > >> On Tu

Re: [U-Boot] Possible bug in imx6ul nand

y else face this problem? > > I did try to erase nand with "flash_erase" from linux and it worked > with throwing any error. In and all it seems like a uboot issue. > > Thanks a lot, > Shyam -- | Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV | | COO -

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mtd: mxs_nand_spl: fix nand_command protocol violation

) { > chip->cmd_ctrl(mtd, page_addr, NAND_ALE); > -- > 2.19.2 > > ___ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot -- | Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >