Similarly, you can do a SELECT file SAVING field1 field2
Then read that select list either by subroutine or directly.
The only catch is you need to make sure there is an 'A' in attribute 4 of the
select verb.
Kate Stanton k...@walstan.com wrote in message
For me the key is in how many is a number of records?
On Mon, 3 Dec 2012 14:48:45 -, Symeon Breen wrote:
Hi - I have been using uniobjects.net for many years now, however I
usually use it to call a basic subroutine on the u2 server. I now
have a
little project where I need to get a
Ahh yes - upto about 200 ish
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of
mhilb...@ppcsoftware.com
Sent: 03 December 2012 14:47
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] uniobjects.net
For me the key
:
Ahh yes - upto about 200 ish
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of
mhilb...@ppcsoftware.com
Sent: 03 December 2012 14:47
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] uniobjects.net
For me the key
If the records are a small number that UniXML straight into a dataset is
very easy to use
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen
Sent: 03 December 2012 14:49
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of
mhilb...@ppcsoftware.com
Sent: 03 December 2012 15:07
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] uniobjects.net
If the supposed access time for these records is rather quick, 200 records
is a relatively small
-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of
mhilb...@ppcsoftware.com
Sent: 03 December 2012 15:07
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] uniobjects.net
If the supposed access time for these records is rather quick, 200 records
is a relatively small
Of Brian Leach
Sent: 03 December 2012 16:15
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re: [U2] uniobjects.net
Simeon
There isn't a single standard, it depends on a) how easy it is to generate
the data in the first place and b) what you want to do with it after..
Going UniXML gives you the option to generate
Why not call a subroutine to do REFORMAT to a file, then read the file and
return the output. That will give you your I-type data (if I am reading
what you are after correctly).
On 4 December 2012 03:48, Symeon Breen syme...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi - I have been using uniobjects.net for many years
AM
Subject: Re: [U2] UniObjects.Net error message
Is the subroutine actually running successfully and you are just getting
an error message or is it failing? I have had this message show up
occasionally on subroutines that worked when I used END instead of
RETURN at the end of the subroutine
Is this a new program/process? Do it is just stop working?
Does it rely upon label common variables, file hands/variables, etc which
perhaps aren't defined when calling it via your call?
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Hona, David
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 1:39 AM
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re: [U2] UniObjects.Net error message
Is this a new program/process? Do it is just stop working?
Does it rely upon label common variables
...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Schasny
Sent: 17 May 2011 16:18
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Uniobjects.Net Compact Framework and Visual Basic -
Mystery Solved!
My VAR and IBM have responded to this issue and it seems that in the
compact framework DLL an additional argument is required
May 2011 15:48
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Uniobjects.Net Compact Framework and Visual Basic
OK, so here is the entire message:
System.Resources.MissingManifestResourceException:
MissingManifestResourceException
at System.Resources.ResourceManager.InternalGetResourceSet
...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Schasny
Sent: 10 May 2011 15:12
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Uniobjects.Net Compact Framework and Visual Basic
I'm not using either of those. Good thought though. Here's some more info:
No matter which combination
OK, so here is the entire message:
System.Resources.MissingManifestResourceException:
MissingManifestResourceException
at System.Resources.ResourceManager.InternalGetResourceSet()
at System.Resources.ResourceManager.InternalGetResourceSet()
at
Or A namespace is incorrect
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 2:35 PM
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re: [U2] Uniobjects.Net Compact Framework and Visual Basic
Are you using a secure connection or connection pooling? I don't think
either are supported yet with UniObjects on the compact framework.
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Schasny
Sent: Tuesday,
C# to vb.net conversion is quite simple, if it works in one it should work
in the other. - have you some example code that you need help with ?
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Schasny
Sent: 10
I'm not using either of those. Good thought though. Here's some more info:
No matter which combination of Windows platform (Mobile 5, Mobile 6, CE)
and .NET Framework (2.0 or 3.5) I attempt to use in creating the app it
builds and deploys just fine but when the programs is run either in the
While a direct connection from UO sounds elegant, I would advise
that such connectivity should be carefully considered. If you're
coming into U2 from the outside world via UO, then you may have a
direct and insecure connection to your DBMS exposed to the world.
I recommend instead using a web
...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Schasny
Sent: 10 May 2011 15:12
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Uniobjects.Net Compact Framework and Visual Basic
I'm not using either of those. Good thought though. Here's some more info:
No matter which combination of Windows platform (Mobile 5, Mobile 6, CE)
and .NET
] On Behalf Of Jeff Schasny
Sent: 10 May 2011 15:12
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Uniobjects.Net Compact Framework and Visual Basic
I'm not using either of those. Good thought though. Here's some more info:
No matter which combination of Windows platform (Mobile 5, Mobile 6, CE)
and .NET
I have a working VB application which I literally cut and pasted the
code from into a new project on the Windows mobile platform rather that
straight windows. The only difference is the use of the uniobjects for
compact framework .dll in the windows mobile application.
This is an internal non
Hi Jeff
I suspect that you may not have included all the components to be carried
across to the device. They are on your workstation, hence why it runs, but
fails on the device. I believe there is a description of the items that need
to be included in the sdk in the ibm or rocket directory.
Oh, delete the line with 'ListBox1.DataSource = DS' in it, I forgot to!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hona, David S
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 2:32 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UniObjects.NET: populating
:58 PM, Hona, David S wrote:
Oh, delete the line with 'ListBox1.DataSource = DS' in it, I
forgot to!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hona, David S
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 2:32 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2
Clif,
Visual Basic 2005 from O'Reily has been very helpful to me.
Eric Armstrong
Lobel Financial
714-816-1207
-Original Message-
From: Clifton Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 1:05 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] UniObjects.NET
read it, it's feeling kinda
ad-ish. If so, apologies!)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clifton Oliver
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 4:05 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] UniObjects.NET: populating ListBox from XML
I
Clif,
Try something like this...
Cmd = uvSession.CreateUniXML
Cmd.GenerateXML(SORT CUSTOMER COMPANY ID.SUP)
DS = Cmd.GetDataSet
ListBox1.DataSource = DS
With ListBox1
.DataSource = DS.Tables(0)
.DisplayMember =
Thanks, David. I'll check those references and post a summary
findings back to the list.
I really appreciate the help!
Regards,
Clif
On May 6, 2008, at 8:31 PM, Hona, David S wrote:
Clif,
I vaguely recall that the UniXML functionality isn't officially
supported until UV 10.2.x (on the
references in 'newfeatures.pdf' to the use of UniXML functionality.
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clifton Oliver
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 5:28 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] UniObjects.NET
It's confirmed. As soon I globally cataloged that routine,
DataGridView is working. We haven't gotten a list box to work, but
that will be another subject line for archive purposes.
Thank you!
Regards,
Clif
On May 6, 2008, at 3:12 PM, Clifton Oliver wrote:
Sure enough, that subroutine
Hi Clif
I would check to see whether the GETXMLSUB subroutine has been globally
cataloged in the uv account. The code is in BP, it needs to be cataloged as
*GETXMLSUB.
Brian
Greetings, List Citizens (Litizens?)
A client of mine and I are having problems with using UniObjects.NET
and the
Sure enough, that subroutine was not cataloged on the AIX system.
I've cataloged it, but got my PC access expired before I could test
it. (What are the odds?) I'll report back to the list (for the
archives) with a verification when I get my access renewed.
Thank you!
Regards,
Clif
On
Windows or *nix, makes no nevermind. You pay for UV per session licence.
However, some versions of UV allow device licencing - meaning clients
(such as UODotNet) can have 10 sessions from one ip and consume a single
licence.
I believe that a pooling licence is an optional extra. UODotNet can take
Hi
It depends.
UniObjects is not an additional paid product like RedBack.
However the latest version with UV 10.2 supports (optional) inbuilt
connection pooling.
If you want to take advantage of that you will need the new pooled
connection licence.
Brian
-Original Message-
From:
, November 29, 2004 1:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] Uniobjects.NET speed/performance
I've had the same experience, using a select loop in a list runs very
slowly, and was planning to try this same approach. I tried to use ReadList
method of the Slist object as documented in the UniObjects
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] Uniobjects.NET speed/performance
Sorry so late, it's been very busy here and I've turned off u2 list
access at work in order to cope... Here's a snippet of code form the
very project that is currently taking up all my time. The array logic
was stolen right out of the .net
Suppose I should have mentioned that my example was in c# using UniObjects
.Net. I have been able to see that using the readlist method allows the
program to run much faster, simply putting the select list into a loop and
reading one record at a time runs noticeably slower. I didn't have this
of a failed connection
opensession does not return an instance of the object. Unless I'm missing
something obvious ?
Ian
-Original Message-
From: Ron White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 November 2004 19:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] UniObjects.Net specifying port
Look
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Tabor
Sent: 05 November 2004 19:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] UniObjects.NET speed/performance - PERFORMANCE SURVEY
*** Now you've got me wondering... ***
We're considering moving from UO to UO.NET due to a considerable
Look in the UniObjects .Net Help under UniSession Properties.
One of the properties is public int HostPort {get; set;}.
Ron White
- Original Message -
From: Ian Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 8:35 AM
Subject: [U2] UniObjects.Net specifying
Of Kate Stanton
Sent: 05 November 2004 00:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] Uniobjects.NET speed/performance
Yes! We found it so slow we immediately reverted to the VB3 version, while
seeing if we can find a way around it. We have put very little time into it
since - rather discouraged
01:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] Uniobjects.NET speed/performance
I've found that altering the hostname parameter in
UniObjects.OpenSession from an IP address to a name (eg : sun_prodserver
) can *sometimes* dramatically increase session connect speeds.
This seems completely counter
, 2004 04:24 am
Subject: RE: [U2] Uniobjects.NET speed/performance
I find .net to be slow and cludgy in virtually all situations - even with
a
fast processor and 512MB RAM. I've been completely unimpressed with it
since
it was released. The classes never seem to expose what I need, and you
don't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lol
you don't actually consider 512Mb a lot of ram now do you ?
Actually, I certainly do ...
My mobo at home is maxed out for ram. It has 768Mb. I've just upgraded my daughter's
ram. Her pc has two slots and I've maxed out one ... with 512Mb.
And a lot of office
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 November 2004 11:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] Uniobjects.NET speed/performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lol
you don't actually consider 512Mb a lot of ram now do you ?
Actually, I certainly do ...
My
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Leach
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 4:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] Uniobjects.NET speed/performance
I find .net to be slow and cludgy in virtually all situations - even with
a
fast processor and 512MB RAM. I've been completely unimpressed
On my test system the connection is slow but after that I feel it is
just fine.
grs
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Tabor
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 1:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] UniObjects.NET speed/performance
Slow as the proverbial in my case; went back to VB6.
Majority of our stuff is in Java so it was no great problem to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Tabor
Sent: 05 November 2004 19:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] UniObjects.NET speed/performance - PERFORMANCE SURVEY
*** Now you've got me wondering... ***
We're considering moving from UO to UO.NET due to a considerable amount
of our non-MV programming is in VB.NET anyway. I'm getting the feeling
that UO.NET is generally
I found that using a select list within a loop was cause for a long nap... I fixed
that by reading the entire list into an array and then looping through the array.
I've read on this list that there is an updated uniobjects.dll available, but my VAR
was not able to locate it?!?
I really
Chris,
I noticed that the initial session connection took a long time. It is so
noticeable.
grs
Is anyone else experiencing speed problems with Uniobjects.net?
I've just upgraded our core application from Uniobjects to UONET
(a non-trivial exercise as I'm sure you're aware) but the response
David,
The history of ODBC and OleDB on U2 shows what a bad idea that is.
Frankly, accessing U2 using relational methods is pretty much a waste of
time - certainly a huge waste of resources as it tries to map between two
totally different data access models. UniObjects is fast, lean and performs
Brian, I think you're missing one of the main features of ADO.NET, which is
to make the source of your data independent of how your application works
with it. I don't necessarily want to access my MV environment via SQL, but
I do want to be able to pull the data into a dataset so that it's
Maybe I'm missing your point , but UniOleDB has always worked just fine with
ADO.NET via the OleDb namespace.
- Original Message -
From: David Cason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 06:08 pm
Subject: [U2] UniObjects.Net
I'm not gettin it. I've
Program like a MAN, fill the dataset yourself. It's a bit of work, but in the end
you get a Dataset that is setup exactly like you want/need it. I've been doing this
for sometime with the UniObjects for Java imported via the J# tools. Since all of the
user interface widgets take datasets,
Tony,
I'm not suggesting that IBM shouldn't have a route into ADO.NET. RedBack
would seem an obvious candidate here, due to the disconnected/lockless
nature of the recordsets. But I'm glad UO.net wasn't mangled into an ADO.NET
provider of some kind. That wouldn't be appropriate, since if I do
59 matches
Mail list logo
