It all sounds very interesting. The connection pooling works well with uo
because otherwise each request has to open a new socket connection to
unirpcd which then has to spawn a new udcs process which in turn has to
spawn a udt process to do the work. That's a big overhead when you have
several
Did you do any actual testing on that to confirm it? I created a WCF
web service that manages a set of shared connections for all of my .net
apps that access UniVerse. I found that starting the session took much
longer then processing most of my requests if the session was already
open.
Similarly here - I have two web services that my apps connect to - one is
pooled, the other not. Typical time for a transaction using the pooled one
is between 300 and 600 ms, whereas the non pooled for the same transaction
is between 1 and 2.
I have 2 because my apps connect to the pooled web
Symeon:
Your pooling connection is set up for a single dbms account, correct?
You'd need a separate pooling license for each dbms account to access,
correct?
That is some dance you need to go through to do what, basically, the
computer is supposed to do!
Bill
I thought I would chime in here a little... as I've been using Kevin's idea
to create some web applications
(none of which are live, except for a few management reports- not because
I've had problems, but, mainly because priorities keep changing - if you
know how that goes)
At any rate. I have a
The amount of ram used by uv or udt is configurable - There are a whole heap
of parameters and it is a subject in its own right.
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of John Thompson
Sent: 01 December 2011
We been using UOJ for 7 years now. We do not have any connection issues at
all. We run 10k of transactions per day without even a hiccup with most
sites averaging around 5k per day. Our average transaction speed
according to firebug is about 200ms. Those transaction figures do not
include the
So how does the php script connect into unidata ? Is it using intercall ?
if so it is exactly the same mechanism as uniobjects (via unirpcd) so what
would the benefit be ?
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On
That always seemed just /*wrong*/ to me! I could never figure out why
a connection pool license would work this way. Sure puts a crimp on a
number of potentialities. :-)
Bill
- Original Message -
*From:*
Kevin's idea of using Apache as the connector and php as the scripting
language...
Works like so...
And Kevin can chime in if I get something wrong, because I certainly did
not architect this.
Imagine this scenario.
-A Linux Web Server running Apache
-A U2 server (with some form of nix) also
So, no... it does not use intercall.
I guess the benefits would be:
-No Windows Server (if you consider this a benefit)
-Simple
-No UniObjects (if you consider this a benefit)
-Cross Platform
-You could still use Windows server if you wanted (Apache runs on Windows
Server too)
(Maybe that might
TBH I think there is a problem with our version of unirpcd. Uoj and uo.net I
think both work pretty much the same way.
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Doug Averch
Sent: 01 December 2011 19:57
To: U2
Esp as sql server express (yes the free one) comes with 100 connection pools
out of the box.
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett
Sent: 01 December 2011 20:26
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re:
Our test harness works in such a manner - shelling out to start a udt
process is not very scaleable IMO and does sound rather inefficient. Also
from a licencing point of view each shelled out process will take a udt
license. These are limited so the number of apache requests would also have
to be
Has anyone used Uniobjects for Java with Domino 8? If so, have you had
luck with it. Any best practice suggestions?
Charles Shaffer
Senior Analyst
NTN-Bower Corporation
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
It probably does this to keep it simple. If the pooled connection had to
keep logging to different accounts for each of its connection it would have
to keep track of where it was and which connection used which account. This
would likely slow it down and open an attach vector that could be
Hi,
I'm also interested in any advice / best practices for UO for Java on
Domino. It would certainly be nice to find a small user group to ask
questions and bounce around best practices.
I haven't tried using UniObjects for Java with Domino yet, but I have used
the original OLE/COM version
Jim Stoner Said
It would certainly be nice to find a small user group to ask
questions and bounce around best practices.
I would definitely be interested in that.
I haven't tried using UniObjects for Java with Domino yet, but I have
used
the original OLE/COM version of UniObjects in
Dear U2 Users
We are running Universe 10.2.9 on Solaris 10 Sparc 64 bit
and experience performance issues.
System is taking way too many system calls .
We have SUN m5000 and SUn6180 for storage.
does any body have any suggestions for uvconfig
and systems file on solaris 10.
Please help
Keep in mind, the session only stays open for 1 second and then logs off.
So you would just need enough licenses for the amount of traffic you had.
Which brings us back to the stupid per user license fees that I hate that
software companies do, but,
thats a whole other can of worms.
Nothings
What do you mean by way too many system calls? Are you comparing
this to previous performance numbers?
rex
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
We've been using UOJ with WebSphere App Server since around 2003. Not
quite the same as Domino, I realize, but at least under the same IBM
Java middleware umbrella. I can't offer a lot the way of best
practices, but I can say that the combination is robust and
trouble-free. This is more OS
Dear U2 users
We have been having this issue since we moved to Solaris 10
and universe 10.2.9
We are having big storage - Sun 6180 with raid 1+ 0 config.
Also the connection between the storage is 8gb Fiber .
If the machine has a load of 23 , system slows down . users experience a big
lag
Hi John, everyone,
So you asked my opinion, I think - and I will give it!
This is what I think about buying something: everything is negotiable.
This is what I think about the cloud and risk: it has to balance out. Are
you gaining enough benefit by moving the data to the cloud to risk losing
it?
From: Symeon Breen
A pooling connection goes into 1 single account yes
We have a special shared account for the pools with
voc pointers to the real customer accounts. Part of
the message passed to the backend is the customer so
it opens the correct files etc.
Rather than having a
From: John Thompson
The company I work for is looking at a product that
stores a bunch of our sales data in the cloud
Our internal legal person had a look at the contract
that the company is proposing and apparently it has a
little clause in their that they are not liable if the
data
Out of curiosity... and I don't know much about this... but I've read a
little bit about it...
Are you using ZFS as the underlying Solaris filesystem?
If so, I think it has a lot of tweaking options, as well as other options
that might play havoc if untested with UV.
Things like compression,
I follow John's policy in all web integration. All external
access comes through a single entry point which identifies the
purpose of the connection and transfers to an appropriate
subroutine. I also include logging abilities in most code, just
in case. Code below is made up for this example
John's description of the two Apache method was spot on as was his
description of my rationale for coming up with it:
I think Kevin's goals in this scenario above, were to keep it simple, and
make it cross platform, while still getting good performance.
Having waited YEARS for a PHP connector
29 matches
Mail list logo
