Check your UV terminfo files ... (and possibly your unix/linux ones
too).
There's almost certainly a setup string in their you need to tweak.
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Steve Richmond
Sent: 16 February 2004 20:29
To: u2
Did you run HS.UPDATE.FILEINFO?
Have you put the correct SQL type definitions in fields 8?
Did HS.UPDATE.FILEINFO actually work correctly! THAT'S A BIGGIE!
I've shoved a little article on pickwiki you might want to look at -
multivaluedatabasesuniverseodbcaccess
Cheers,
Wol
-Original
I want to log all errors in a record of COMO without displaying them
on screen?
How should I intiallize como and how can I pass this error message to
that record,
E.g.
WRITEU D.FILE TO F.FILE,K.ID
LOCKED PRINT ERROR::K.ID: record locked by user
:STATUS():,
Thanks to Farrel for responding to my plea and for the contact
details of other users.
I don't think this is a good move...MS-Office is bloatware, and as MS
patents it's XML formats (the Patent Office is so stoopid!
Tomorrow, I will patent Air, and start charging everyone on Earth
usage
If you type
HELP COMO
at TCL, it'll tell you ...
Or I'll tell you :-) From within your program (or wherever) do an
EXECUTE COMO ON PROGOUTPUT HUSH
This will create a PROGOUTPUT record in the COMO file that you can
then access with the editor or whatever you want.
To turn off the como, just
Actually, it was added in during release 7.x of uniVerse to support the SQL
optimizer. The optimizer used the count to make a determination on how
long it would take to perform certain SQL operations such as outer-joins,
etc, and spit out a warning message something like It will take 4307
I am running:
UniVerse 10.0.17
Windows 2000 SP 4
Veritas Backup Exec: Media Server Admin. Console: Ver 9.00 Rev 4454
My Application Event Log has been showing an unusually high number of
UniVerse errors. Since I am an end user I can't go directly to IBM and
must go through my VAR. I placed a
I am attempting to install and activate NLS on a UniVerse system,
10.0.19 on an HP-UX 11.0 box. We just recent upgraded from 9.6.1.14 to
10 by recommendation from IBM. They said 10.x was a better ground to
work from for NLS.
My problems is activating NLS - changing NLSMODE in 'uvconfig'
Barry,
Sounds like the NMEMOFF value is not correct. What are yourDMEMOFF,
PMEMOFF, CMEMOFF and NMEMOFF values?
At 09:34 AM 02/17/2004, you wrote:
I am attempting to install and activate NLS on a UniVerse system,
10.0.19 on an HP-UX 11.0 box. We just recent upgraded from 9.6.1.14 to
10
I am at a loss to find these parameters to give you an answer.
I have scoured uvconfig and the HP kernel for these setting and
come up empty. Could you clue me where to find these settings.
Barry Rogen
Senior Programmer
PNY Technologies
(973) 515 - 9700 ext 5327
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh RIGHT!! DUH!!! I am very sorry that I made this error. I had forgotten
that those values are hardbaked at compile time into universe and can't be
changed onsite.
In any case, the problem appears to be that the shmget system op is failing
for some reason or other.
Also, check that no
we runing UniVerse 9.5.2 r11 OS Tru64 5.1a for a merge off two database,
we
must input more than 31888 records par day, the problem is the journal
have
a limitation to 15000 ~ records, It is possible to grow this limitation
I'm not clear as to the exact problem. Are you saying there's
Gang,
I'm managing two MV Community calendars (user group meetings,
conferences, etc.). One is at www.keyally.com/mvcalendar.html and the
other will be on the U2UG.org site in the near future. I need help.
Please send me info, especially on Vendor-based events for anyone that
has MV
Amit,
You want error messages in the COMO but not on the screen, right?
Use DIVERT.OUT TTY.OFF/TTY.ON
DIVERT.OUT is the more general command. In fast, the COMO verb is
actually a basic program that executes DIVERT.OUT (source in
$UVHOME/uv/BP/COMO_VERB).
Example:
CT CDS.BP BHUTANI
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ray Wurlod
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 12:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: UV write fatal error
Permissions? All the preceding steps (Open, BSCAN) can be done without
write permission. Write,
Hi,
Although I'm an old hand at Unidata and UniBasic, I'm a newbie to ODBC.
I am trying to set up an ODBC link to my Unidata 6.0 database, using the Unidata ODBC
driver that came with 6.0, to use in a VB.net application I'm writing. All seems to
be set properly, but if I try to do a test
Dear Gwen Buck et al
I am running UV 9.6.2.8 on a WinNT 4.0 SP 6.0a box using Veritas Backup
Exec. I do not know which release of Veritas that I am using.
I haven't had any problems. I'd press your VAR for more detail. One
possible solution would be to run a uvbackup and allow Veritas to
Does the data value actually get inserted into the type 25 file if you
check after the write fails? Also, is the data pre-existing within the
type 25 file and this is an update to that record? Sounds almost like a
memory allocation or rotating file pool problem.
The on error branch (actually
Well -- the key is indexed...and so is the date field so the caveat does not apply in
this case -- more likely the elusive version 8 is the answer
--
Debster
--
From Lee Bacall:
A bit of a caveat in making selects against indexed keys may be helpful...
If one is
What version of the driver do you have? I had similar issues with an old
driver, I now have 3.01.04.7036 which seems to be working OK, I think it is
from the 6.0B Client CD. Although at one time it would work from Access but
not Excel?!?! I'm not sure what's changed (perhaps some MS updates).
The
Someone came to me with the following code sample, and asked why this would happen,
while I have some thoughts, I would like a more definitive answer (note no matter what
the answer, I believe the solution is dont do that)
Thanks,
Mike
On Universe 9.5:
04 ED BP P1 P2
SELECTed record
Ok. So there WAS a bscan done on the T25 file prior to attempting the
write. Since this is done from within BASIC, my guess is that the active
scan is causing some type of error. Try this; after the scan has verified
that the data item does NOT exist, close and reopen the data file, THEN
Not only did I get flooded with with McAfee content filter bounce
messages, but I am getting reports from posters to the list that they
received profanity and sex rejections from the offending (offended?)
domain. Some of these are for posts that went out days ago. I suspect
some postmaster
Within BASIC, try
array(x)=BITXOR(array(x),array(y));
array(y)=BITXOR(array(y),array(x));
array(x)=BITXOR(array(x),array(y));
It only works with integers. Other real numbers and strings won't work.
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
I'm on UV 10 and got the same results.
George
-Original Message-
From: Mike Rajkowski [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 12:17 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: Need/Want/Would like to know
Someone came to me with the
It was that XOR post. Guess it really was nasty!
George
-Original Message-
From: Moderator [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 1:46 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: [ADMIN] Net Nanny filter
Not only did I get flooded
The shared segment key is 0xaceea000 for version 10.x for any x.
The xMEMOFF parameters are tuneable in DataStage, but not in UniVerse.
You may have to ask IBM support to escalate this to ATS (advanced technical support)
where someone like Leroy (sometime participant here) will be able to look
It works fine on UDT 6 on AIX - I know that UDT passes by reference if that
helps
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of George Gallen
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 1:36 PM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Need/Want/Would like to know
It's because the underlaying function first free's off the memory of X(100)
before storing the value of A into it. Problem is, the contents for A
actually reside in the just free'd up memory location for X(100),
hence you are trying to store something that was previously defined in that
Thanks to all - I will pass this along to Ibm support.
Hopefully this will bring some light to the day.
Barry Rogen
Senior Programmer
PNY Technologies
(973) 515 - 9700 ext 5327
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
The quality of a person's life is in direct
proportion to
Hello, Mike.
I added a print X(100) following the Call in P1 and that fails too.
I suppose that the X(100) element is being cleared before the assignment
of A. However, as A is a pointer to X(100), both become cleared.
Perhaps the move_matrix op-code should test if the r-value (e.g. A)
resolves
Anthony Youngman wrote:
Did you run HS.UPDATE.FILEINFO?
Have you put the correct SQL type definitions in fields 8?
Did HS.UPDATE.FILEINFO actually work correctly! THAT'S A BIGGIE!
I've shoved a little article on pickwiki you might want to look at -
multivaluedatabasesuniverseodbcaccess
Cheers,
If you have trouble getting an upgrade CD from your vendor you can download
the Client CD from the IBM website under the Personal Edition.
https://www-927.ibm.com/software/data/u2/support/u2techconnect/udt6pe.asp
I don't think there is any difference on the client side...
hth
--
Colin Alfke
Just as another data point, I have problems with both XP Pro and XP Home
with a process locking up the CPU at 99% and freezing the system, and
I do not have UV installed on either of these machines.
So you might be looking at a Windows XP issue.
--
Regards,
Clif
Also, check that no existing 0xACEE segment exists (i'm sure this has
been done).
I have frequently found that I have needed to stop UniVerse two or three
times before doing a uvregen inorder for it to work.
Also try nls.stamp just before the uvregen and see if that makes a
difference.
Susan,
Curious, I find the reverse to be true. Since I usually read in
threads, I find that having to scroll through the last part to get
to the current part mildly annoying.
The information flow problem is that messages, especially email,
don't always arrive and sort threaded. This is
While I have seen the aversion to MS products on this list, I do like the way Outlook
allows me to sort by subject then by received date/time. It is smart enough to
handle the replies as part of a subject flow.
Usually most of the threads are in blocks in the intray. I don't know if other
Jef Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
While I have seen the aversion to MS products on this list, I do like
the way Outlook allows me to sort by subject then by received
date/time. It is smart enough to handle the replies as part of a
subject flow.
That doesn't
THANKS
We have decided to stop the journal during the migration
carlos
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Snyder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: mardi, 17. février 2004 16:43
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: Re: How you grow journal entry limitation
we runing UniVerse 9.5.2
39 matches
Mail list logo
