Doug,
How does my company save money if they have to buy and pay an annual
license fee for an editor?
They might as well ban going to the toilet or making and drinking coffee
during working hours.
I probably could be even more productive if the company would pay ME
more and not you.
I can und
Hi Doug,
A few questions:
How do you know how much disk space there is on my workstation?
How do you know what my CPU is doing?
Since when does my workstation cost nothing?
When did VIM, EMACS and Notepad+ become line editors?
When you are replying to a post, would you at least quote the salien
I got my HyperEdit to work. All happy now.
Thanks for all the responses, it was a real eye-opener.
Wyatt Buffington
AMPS Support
Manitoba Hydro
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Noah
Sent: T
> Let alone one, whose sole purpose for us (U2) is to highlight code.
Well a good program editor - like mvDeveloper (grin) or Doug's U2 Editor -
does a lot more than just highlight.
It's about ease of navigation and assisting developers to work faster and
more efficiently. Doug and I have taken
I like Brian that you have a Windows installer for your software, which it did
seemlessly, it was beautiful -- it made me cry.
And I like that it's only 5 Meg. But my host is a remote system, not local.
The first thing your software does is complain that it can't find Uniobjects.
Should it
Hi Will,
You should be able to connect to a UV machine anywhere on planet earth
using mvDeveloper.
It sounds to me like you are missing the UODOTNET library, which needs
to be on your local machine in order to expedite the connection to the
server.
One way to get this on your machine is to
Hi Mecki:
Let us say, for example, that you can produce 60 lines of debugged code per
hour. You cost the company $60.00 per hour including benefits. So the cost
of each line of code is $1.00. You will produce in theory (160/hrs*60) 9600
lines of code per month for a cost of $9600.00.
This amaz
Oops, I should have used a calculator 9670 should have been 11,200
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Doug Averch wrote:
> Hi Mecki:
>
> Let us say, for example, that you can produce 60 lines of debugged code per
> hour. You cost the company $60.00 per hour including benefits. So the cost
> of ea
Oops, should have used that darn calculator: 11,200 lines of code saving the
company $1600.00.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Doug Averch wrote:
> Hi Mecki:
>
> Let us say, for example, that you can produce 60 lines of debugged code per
> hour. You cost the company $60.00 per hour including be
Doug,
The notion of lines of code being a measure of productivity makes me
uneasy.
It is possible for someone to write 500 lines of efficient code using ED
which solve the problem at hand, in half the time than another developer
who writes 1000 lines of badly structured code to solve the sa
Glenn just upgrading from parchment to paper will save the lives of many goats
and you won't need to spend all those hours scraping the skins to the right
thinness, before you can use it.
I find also that quills have a nasty tendency to drip "Is that line of code X =
45? or does it say "No sex
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Wjhonson wrote:
>
> Glenn just upgrading from parchment to paper will save the lives of many
> goats and you won't need to spend all those hours scraping the skins to the
> right thinness, before you can use it.
>
> I find also that quills have a nasty tendency to
On 01/09/11 21:52, Glenn Sallis wrote:
> Doug,
>
> The notion of lines of code being a measure of productivity makes me
> uneasy.
>
> It is possible for someone to write 500 lines of efficient code using ED
> which solve the problem at hand, in half the time than another developer
> who writes 1
I'm looking to migrate from AIX 5.3 to RHEL. Basically because IBM is
putting the hatchet to "regular" support on AIX 5.3 in May 2012.
Has anyone had any experiences/challenges running Universe 11.1.4 on Red Hat
Enterprise 6 - 64bit?
I'm guessing I may get crickets on this one, since accroding t
I can't speak to 11.1 but we are running 10.2.7 just fine on RHEL 64bit.
Perry
- Original Message -
From: John Thompson [mailto:jthompson...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 06:02 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: [U2] Red Hat Enterprise Linux 64 bit and Universe 11.1.4 -
E
Hi John,
I think you will find it to be a positive move, both technically and
financially!
Recently I have done a fair bit of testing for a customer who are going
to be migrating to 64 Bit Red Hat from a non-AIX variant of Unix and I
cannot say I stumbled across any big issues. I was using p
I work with both RHEL & AIX, and I'm not sure that you save a whole bunch of
money by going Linux anymore. I won't p0ut [AD/} in here, because I'm not a
vendor, nor do I have a business relationship with one (anymore). But I was
recently investigating making this same move, and my IBM vendor pr
17 matches
Mail list logo
