Is this radio DFS channel ready now? I know it has been discussed, but
with all the new PowerBeam radio's I am confused.
Phil
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Ehh they'll say soon
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Nov 2, 2014 6:32 PM, Larry A. Weidig lwei...@excel.net wrote:
Funny, I just posed this question to Ubiquiti support today as well.
Seems ridiculous Cambium gets the entire
So are you saying the Nanobeams and PTP-AC's we have already bought will
not certify because of hardware problems?
Are they going to trade out what we bought expecting certification for
hardware that will certify?
What a pile of !!
I guess we need to stop buying until the promised
That's just speculation!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Paul pmcn...@cameron.net wrote:
So are you saying the Nanobeams and PTP-AC's we have already bought will
not certify because of hardware
On 11/2/14, 4:20 PM, Paul wrote:
So are you saying the Nanobeams and PTP-AC's we have already bought will
not certify because of hardware problems?
No, he said they have a history of not certifying everything and thus a
risk of such a situation. The PowerBridge M5 for example.
~Seth
It's not hysteria when they extract money from us for future promises and we
had to pay a premium to get the equipment early without the needed features.
On 11/2/2014 8:01 PM, Larry A. Weidig wrote:
Not so sure it is hysteria as annoyance. The lack of any real answers from
Ubiquiti about
With the Rocket GPS, I agree. The should have publicly offered to buy every
single unit back. I'm still sitting with 1/2 roll of the crappy melt in the
sun cable that I have to RMA. With this situation though, part of it was
Ubiquiti's fault, part of it was the FCC process and the
That's the closest TDWR. An Apache or whatever could fly by right now.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Phil Curnutt pcurn...@gmail.com
To: Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, November 2,
I'm replacing 5.8 links with 3.65 links to make room in the 5.8 band.
We don't get a lot a Apache's around here, mostly NMNG Blackhawk's with
Inferred SLR looking for pot farms.
Phil
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net wrote:
For what it's worth, I've moved all
But I assumed, and was wrong that UNII-1 would be a simple permissive
form filing
which later turned into a full DFS certification required for ubnt for
some reason.
DFS, I understand but most other companies had the permissive change made
in June when allowed.
On 11/2/2014 8:44 PM, Chris
I assume that due to the sensitive nature of the DFS certifications, they're
not changing anything on those products until the DFS is complete.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Paul pmcn...@cameron.net
To: ubnt
I just explained what happened.
Rory
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 7:55 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] NanoBeam M5 400
I assume that due to the sensitive nature
NO they should have been concentrating on the core equipment instead of
making half ass attempts into video, home automation, core switches,
wireless toliet lid openers and
what ever else distracted them from getting the job done like the other
manufacturers.
On 11/2/2014 8:47 PM, Mike
Hate to say it, but I agree with this.
I know it's not popular and all the guys who sell cameras and phone and
whatever else kick and scream.. but whatever..
I think UBNT should be WAY further down the road than they are now. So
either these extra products distracted them..
Or they really are more
/unrelated
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Paul pmcn...@cameron.net
To: ubnt users ubnt_users@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:54:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] NanoBeam M5 400
NO they should
I saw that, but I can't take it for gold until it comes from UBNT.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net
To: Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, November 2,
YES we are all having to assume. We get very little good info from them that
we can take to the bank.
I don't little being treated like a mushroom!
Right now Mikrotik looks good for 2 years for non-DFS until ubnt can get
their sh** together
on their core products.
On 11/2/2014 8:54 PM, Mike
Nothing personal. Even if Gino told me, I wouldn't treat it as gold. :-p
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net
To: Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, November
When someone brings up switching to Mikrotik wireless, I stop taking them
seriously. This is Mikrotik to the FCC: http://bit.ly/1wX04zi
UBNT probably don't know either or if they do, I certainly wouldn't make
announcements about the DFS process other than in progress. Letting too much
out to
We have this same thread nearly every week, so yes.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Chris Fabien ch...@lakenetmi.com
To: Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 9:17:24 PM
I apologize everyone, I didn't realize searching the list archives for any
related or similar discussion that Mr. Hammett had participated in was
required before replying to a message that caught my attention.
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net
wrote:
We
Hi Chris -
We can't give exacts, but I would expect prior to end of year for Powerbeam
(I know this is pretty open) and for AC early in Q1/2015. There will be
additional announcements related to AC in the next week or two (related to
PTMP, etc...). I know this was also asked on this list as
22 matches
Mail list logo
