I've scanned probably 10+ times. :/
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Dec 1, 2014 12:27 AM, Josh Reynolds j...@spitwspots.com wrote:
5.5.10 (and maybe 5.5.8?) for some reason shows like a cache of the
results. We always have to
Airview need to be manually changed.
- Original Message -
From: Kees H
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Weird site survey activity
Are youtalking about site survey or airview?
- Original Message -
Site Survey.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Kees H wi...@calbroadband.com wrote:
Are youtalking about site survey or airview?
- Original Message -
*From:* Josh Luthman
It has an odd cache issue sometimes.
Matt Hoppes
Director of Information Technology
Indigo Wireless
+1 (570) 723-7312
On 12/1/14, 11:22 AM, Kees H wrote:
Are youtalking about site survey or airview?
- Original Message -
*From:* Josh Luthman
Would an AF5 be able to supply 150/150 (true throughput) @ 13mi?
We have a customer requesting a 100/100 connection who is 5 miles from one
of our tower sites. Our site is currently 3 hops from any of our fiber fed
tower sites. With some redesign work and a mile or two of fiber I can
shorten
http://www.balticnetworks.com/wireless-calculators
http://dl.ubnt.com/datasheets/airfiber/airFiber_DS.pdf
Guessing 20 dB of Tx power, you should be able to maintain that if you have low
noise. AF5 won't work in 5150. DFS won't reach that far, so you have to use
5.8.
For areas over -88 noise
Great idea!
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 11:44:43 AM
Subject: [Ubnt_users] Scrap the
What is everyone using as surge arresters for your airFiber installs?
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
I don't have any AFs, but I'm not sure why you'd go anywhere other than BeeHive
for your surge arrestors.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.com
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
From their website:
Applications
Installed at large colocation sites such as a NOC
Prevent damage to the AP and the other NOC equipment
Fail
I lost more than I would have had I not had them in-line. Have never
had a surge arrester perform the way theirs did, and I've never been
Let me guess, it was a ToughSwitch...and you're blaming WB? We use 100
WB surge suppressors without problems but if one ToughSwitch blows up you
blame WB =P
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Matt
I remember that thread. I think the conclusion was the UBNT built the switch
wrong.
I've never heard of Chuck (or Forest for his associated products) ever not
making it right with a customer, even if it meant a design change (for the
better).
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing
As long as it has good line of site and 5.8ghz is clean enough, it should work
fine. According to the built in link calculator, it should be able to do
149.76Mbps using 20mhz channels at 13 miles... if you need more than that, you
can use wider channels, but that's going to be using pretty much
Well, unfortunately, I wasn't able to get ahold of anyone at WBH... left
e-mails, voicemails, etc. I would love to talk with someone there and
get a straight answer as I love the form factor and the fact I can
easily and quickly rack mount something like 24 SA but until I can
get a straight
That is a fabulous idea.
Steven Barnes
GM
PCSWIN.com
Howard LLC.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 12:45 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: [Ubnt_users] Scrap the Unifi Phones - I want a signal
On 12/1/14, 10:04, Matt Hoppes wrote:
I'm the last person in the world to recommend a TS to anyone
That said... have you ever had a WBH SA take a hit? If so, what, if
anything did it also do to your switch ports?
Shorting the switch port when the SA takes a hit doesn't seem like a
wise
On 12/1/14, 10:47, Josh Luthman wrote:
Why? You should always use HV.
On the non-GigE WB models like the 444 some people prefer a low clamping
voltage on the data pairs not carrying POE voltage vs. the POE pairs
which have a higher clamping voltage.
I use the GigE HV because it's one part
Can you configure or do anything with it at all? Or is it a dumb device
where you pair it and you're options are done with.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Jason Pond p...@grizzlyinternet.com wrote:
We have one at 12.5 miles and it reports Rx Capacity at 213 Mbps, but I
don't know what that translate to reality. That is a 50 MHz channel width
at 5800 MHz with signal levels around -65 and a noise level of about -92.
We are having difficulty maintaining that 213, it wants to switch back and
This is a good idea! I can't see any reason why it shouldn't work... it's just
a matter of getting somebody to make an app.
It looks like there actually is a web browser that runs on the watches, so it
might even be possible already, although I'm guessing that wouldn't be very
usable.
Any chance you can find two smaller channels and use it in full duplex? the
nice thing about running the AF5 in full duplex is that the channels only need
to be clean at the receive end... and if you don't need as much capacity one
direction, you can use a smaller channel.
That is what I’m thinking Mike, I’ve already shot an E-mail off to Pete @ SAF
to start looking at some licensed gear.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 1:12 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
There's a plethora of WISPA vendor members that make (or sell) licensed links.
Few people have anything bad to say about any of them.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Robert Haas rob-li...@bpsnetworks.com
To:
Sorry late to the discussion, but Pebble watches should be able to display JSON
information easily.
So you should be able to pull status.cgi and get the info.
Sincerely,
Eric Tykwinski
TrueNet, Inc.
P: 610-429-8300
F: 610-429-3222
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
Contrary to popular belief, you do not need a surge suppressor to clamp so
close to the 'normal' voltage on the line.
Most well-designed products actually contain basic integral surge
suppression. One of the most common questions I get is whether or not some
of my products contain surge
Is the watch doing the IP stuff or is the Pebble app doing all the hard
work and pushing it out via Bluetooth? I think we're going to need
something that can log in to the Ubnt radio or do SNMP and that should be
easier if it's the latter.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
Been there!
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com wrote:
Green wire…. 4 repairs last week and 1 already today.
See the attached picture
*Steven Barnes*
GM
PCSWIN.com
Howard LLC.
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ya, I had one the other day :(
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com wrote:
Green wire 4 repairs last week and 1 already today.
See the attached picture
*Steven Barnes*
GM
PCSWIN.com
Howard LLC.
___
That's good to know. What about unlicensed since we know those vary
greatly!
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:
Waste of time in the licensed world. They all perform as they advertise.
Modulation * channel size = megabits per second. Price varies,
On 12/1/14, 12:34, Josh Luthman wrote:
Waste of time in the licensed world. They all perform as they
advertise. Modulation * channel size = megabits per second. Price
varies, GUI varies, support varies. Go SAF!
It was my understanding that there would be no math.
~Seth
Is there a trick to getting iperf to work on AirFiber?
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net
wrote:
I usually just SSH to the client radio/far side, run iperf -s then go to
one of my servers in the data center and run iperf -c (client IP) -P5
works better
iPerf is not included with airFiber as it isn't needed. What it tells you the
channel capacity is is what the channel capacity is.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
To: Ubiquiti Users
The graph at the bottom tells you the actual throughput. Might even say
better than iperf.
It sends null/zero bits to verify it can carry that much traffic. So when
you get to throwing customer traffic through the link instead of zeros, you
already know your limit.
Josh Luthman
Office:
100 megabit switch between laptop and Airfiber? Is it linked at gig? Is
your laptop's CPU maxed out?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:00 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
It might be the capacity but
ToughSwitches on both ends on gigabit ports. I thought maybe laptop was
maxed out until I ran IPerf from TS8 to TS8.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:
100 megabit switch between laptop and Airfiber? Is it linked at gig? Is
your laptop's CPU maxed
You gave GOT to be shitting me!
-Ty
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net
wrote:
Wha? Are you serious?
On Dec 1, 2014 3:09 PM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote:
It's called airCRM. It does billing and control. It's only hosted in the
A 100 meg limit sounds like a 100 BaseT problem to me, but who knows!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:11 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed. Just wanted to confirm. Will have to chase the problem
Us: We want a working AirControl for our Ubnt gear!!!
Ubnt: Here is a solution to a problem you didn't have.
Me: *facepalm*
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Adair Winter
Completely. It's on their forum now. There have only been one or two people on
the forum that have supported that decision (or at least not gone against it).
Everyone else I've talked to grabs the flame thrower.
Now in order to use this flaming cloud of shit we must move a network to
Is this the new fools day? DECEMBER FOOLS!
I see nothing on the ubnt site... buuut maybe mike knows something we don't?
I just don't see how this can be true... Most people can't make a VPN work
as it is how the hell am I supposed to depend on this to work if it's not
INSIDE my network?
On Mon,
https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome-psyapi2ion=1espv=2es_th=1ie=UTF-8q=ubiquiti%20aircrm
http://community.ubnt.com/t5/Ubiquiti-Announcements-and-News/Announcing-airCRM-The-Ultimate-ISP-Management-Platform/bc-p/1118042
https://aircrm.ubnt.com/#/
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct:
On 12/1/14, 13:20, Adair Winter wrote:
I just don't see how this can be true... Most people can't make a VPN
work as it is how the hell am I supposed to depend on this to work if
it's not INSIDE my network?
Why aren't all of your radios open to the internet? You're obviously
doing it wrong.
I know but I actually get a touch above 100 - like 104-106...
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:
A 100 meg limit sounds like a 100 BaseT problem to me, but who knows!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite
Toughswitches are fundamentally broken and we have been pulling them off
our network. If you need more info, there's like a 25 page thread on the
Ubiquiti forum.
Also, you can't use them to generate much traffic as everything will be
done by the management cpu/interface, which is 100Mb.
Are TS software or hardware switched?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:29 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
I know but I actually get a touch above 100 - like 104-106...
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:14
Weare as well
josh reynolds :: chief information officer
spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com
On 12/01/2014 12:35 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 12/1/14, 13:16, Josh Luthman wrote:
Us: We want a working AirControl for our Ubnt gear!!!
Ubnt: Here is a solution to a problem you didn't have.
I'm
Confirmed. I just ran IPerf from one TS8 to another TS8 and just get around
100MBps! I'm going to move them to a tower with less traffic then. Now what
do I use for a higher capacity switch? I hate to put a high dollar switch
in a rough environment.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Josh Reynolds
Not sure Josh but I'd love to know!
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:
Are TS software or hardware switched?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:29 PM,
No, IPerf directly on the TS8. That was after running speedtests from
laptop. I could go back to the tower and run IPerf on the laptop to a
server at my NOC?
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote:
Are you doing MT BW Tests? Might be maxing out the CPU on the
Ubnt is about raising attention and getting their stock price up. I mean
how hard can it be to combine 5.5.10 plus SNMP that's in 5.6 beta. You
literally have to choose between 5.1 band or SNMP right now. I'm no
software developer but this can't be that difficult!
Josh Luthman
Office:
I never deployed it :)
But I see it when I take over my competitor's customers!
-Mike
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com wrote:
Green wire…. 4 repairs last week and 1 already today.
See the attached picture
*Steven Barnes*
GM
PCSWIN.com
Howard LLC.
Ya, they handle it very well.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:
You have a rough environment and put in a Ubnt TS8...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at
I think you're misunderstanding a bit, you don't want the switch to
generate traffic, that's not the problem.You want to test on devices on
the other ends (connected to) the switch that pass through the link,
something like an x86 pc or ccr or even edgerouter/pro that can generate
lots of
don't do that. run a test THROUGH the switch.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:43 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
No, IPerf directly on the TS8. That was after running speedtests from
laptop. I could go back to the tower and run IPerf on the laptop to a
server at my NOC?
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014
I'm excited. these are kick ass switches.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Josh Reynolds j...@spitwspots.com wrote:
Chris will be making 8 and 12 port versions, also DC SWITCHES :)
josh reynolds :: chief information officer
spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com
On 12/01/2014 12:46 PM, RickG
So, running IPerf on the switches at each end of the AirFiber is a bad
idea? I figured its the closed devices to the AF.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Josh Reynolds j...@spitwspots.com wrote:
I think you're misunderstanding a bit, you don't want the switch to
generate traffic, that's not
There are no G2's with an internal antenna. You either use 18, 24, 36,
48 or bigger antennas depending on the required reliability and distance.
I have a 13 mile 11Ghz link that drops is heavy rain. like 2+ hour rain.
but it's only happened once and it was along the ENTIRE path.
If you want to
Can I use them outside of Washington?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Josh Reynolds j...@spitwspots.com
To: ubnt users ubnt_users@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 3:48:43 PM
Subject: Re:
That's the other thing, how do you decide which frequency? Also, how
difficult was it to obtain the license?
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net
wrote:
There are no G2's with an internal antenna. You either use 18, 24, 36,
48 or bigger antennas depending on
iPerf is iPerf, but the CPU in a laptop is magnificently more powerful than the
CPU in a network appliance. It just doesn't have the nuts to do that much data.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: RickG
We have a long haul microwave network built with SAF Luminas and using 6
foot Andrew's dishes.
Each site is about 35-45km away from each other, all connected at around
-40 or so.
I've seen it drop down to about -60 once during a really heavy rain.
This is 11GHz.
On 12/1/2014 4:55 PM, Adair
It doesn't matter, the CPU can't generate that much traffic.
josh reynolds :: chief information officer
spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com
On 12/01/2014 12:58 PM, RickG wrote:
To be clear, I am not using the TS8 management interface.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Mathew Howard
Engineering decides the frequency.
Lower frequencies go further than higher ones.
Different bands have different channel sizes.
Seriously, just go to a set of vendors and say, X distance, Y speed, Z
reliability. They'll ask for you exact coordinates and heights... then give
you the quote.
Also, take a look at Cambium's LinkPlanner for some playing around to learn a
bit about how things work.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
We already use SAF Lumina’s which I’ve had good luck with. A plus would be if
we can use the same band radio to minimize on the shelf spares.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 2:02 PM
To:
If you're using SAF, then keep using them unless you have a reason to change
for the exact reasons you specify.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Robert Haas rob-li...@bpsnetworks.com
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
5.6 beta 5 actually does support the 5.1 band.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Josh Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.com]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 3:42 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New
If there is a web browser that runs on watches that is all you need. I already
check the signals for an install on my smart phone.
- Original Message -
From: Mathew Howard
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Scrap the
I'd like to free that hand if possible
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Dec 1, 2014 6:44 PM, Kees H wi...@calbroadband.com wrote:
If there is a web browser that runs on watches that is all you need. I
already check the signals
It surprises me that they did not ask wispa. They are on this group. Who
better to tell them what wisps are looking for.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
I hear ya.
- Original Message -
From: Josh Luthman
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 3:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Scrap the Unifi Phones - I want a signal readout on
my watch
I'd like to free that hand if possible
Josh Luthman
Office:
That doesn't surprise me at all :/
josh reynolds :: chief information officer
spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com
On 12/01/2014 03:14 PM, Kees H wrote:
It surprises me that they did not ask wispa. They are on this group.
Who better to tell them what wisps are looking for.
- Original
They have my e-mail address. They have the e-mail addresses for all of us at
The Brothers WISP. It's not like we're idiots. We'll gladly tell them what we
want and what they should\shouldn't do. They haven't taken us up on that offer.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
On 12/1/14, 16:44, Kees H wrote:
Why would I waste public ips on my radios, so ubnt can have control of my
radios? Don't they know ARIN is running out of IPv4 addresses?
But it's CLOUD.
~Seth
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
Oh and their cloud solution does not need to be hacked. What about a
disgruntled ubnt employee changing all the ssid's, logins and passwords of
all the connected cloud solution radios. Do I hear Taps playing?
Most ISPs in general like our management network to stay... private.
These are
Yup.. That is what those actresses said. My pictures are safe in the cloud
after all it is the CLOUD.
On 12/1/14, 16:44, Kees H wrote:
Why would I waste public ips on my radios, so ubnt can have control of my
radios? Don't they know ARIN is running out of IPv4 addresses?
But it's
There is a browser for Android Wear... which seems to be what most of the
watches are running.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.appfour.wearbrowserhl=en
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Josh Luthman
But,
UBNT said the their cloud is safe and no one can hack the cloud... They also
said DFS is coming to NBeams soon Why won't you believe ???
Bryan Robinson
-Original Message-
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
Sent:
*shrug*
Because they did
josh reynolds :: chief information officer
spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com
On 12/01/2014 12:36 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
That looks like it would be a great solution for a wisp with, oh say,
50 customers and no intention of growing...
That looks really terrible. Why
On 12/1/14, 13:35, Mike Hammett wrote:
I don't know how anyone could read their target market this badly.
But are we really their target market?
~Seth
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
There were several of us in the Alpha that told em it's a bad idea. They
wouldn't even acknowledge the fact we didn't want it. Al requests for a
local versions were ignored and not responded too.
My theory is Data Mining for investor relations.
-Original Message-
From:
Because they listened to the people on their forum
That looks like it would be a great solution for a wisp with, oh say, 50
customers and no intention of growing...
That looks really terrible. Why would they think that was a good idea?
elaborate please.
But are we really their target market?
~Seth
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
No one in the SU group or the pre-SU group did either.
josh reynolds :: chief information officer
spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com
On 12/01/2014 04:18 PM, Chris Ruschmann wrote:
Noone on the forum asked for this.
*From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
Heck they just have to hack it. Who needs to ask politely anymore these days?
- Original Message -
From: Josh Reynolds
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
I wonder if it's possible for the FCC to come
On 12/1/14, 6:14 PM, Tom Fadgen wrote:
I am sure glad that I own my business; and that said, as a business
owner I look to make choices from those available; not cry over what is not!
One thing is going to solve this problem, the one with UBNT not listing
to their customers and providing a lot
Well said Tom!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Dec 1, 2014 9:15 PM, Tom Fadgen tfad...@coastinet.com wrote:
I am sure glad that I own my business; and that said, as a business
owner I look to make choices from those available;
Excellent write-up.
I feel UBNT has kind of lost their way in certain areas. I don't
understand mFi at all. UBNT-Vision (aircam stuff) is kind of a
messstill. ToughSwitch debacle, green cable (tough lesson for us/them to
learn), etc.
AF24 is great. AF5 is... can be great in the right
Any reason, I can't seem to hard code 5300DFS in a RM5 v.5.5.10? (Actually
several of the upper channel DFS)
It goes to another frequency set in the frequency list. If I disable the
frequency list, it still goes to another frequency.
Now the RM5 in question is a backup AP ptp link and is not
The cloud doesn't contact the devices, the devices initiate connection
to the cloud.
(to be fair)
josh reynolds :: chief information officer
spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com
On 12/01/2014 06:08 PM, Robert Andrews wrote:
Kinda hard to point to a bunch of wavy hand WISPs about the size of your
Were you sure DFS was enabled on that radio prior to the upgrade? Downgrade to
5.5.8 and see if there is a enable uni-2 checkbox on the system tab. If thats
not checked prior to upgrade,it won't do lower frequencies.
On Monday, December 1, 2014 9:57 PM, Kees H wi...@calbroadband.com
Ok, but when the device contacts the cloud why can't the cloud at that
point start the update? I'm not really familiar with the product but
what is the frequency of the cloud to ground discharge ( or the other
way around )...
On 12/1/14 7:10 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
The cloud doesn't
Enable logging and see if it's taking DFS hits. if so the radio will jump
to a non-dfs freq no matter what.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Kees H wi...@calbroadband.com wrote:
Any reason, I can't seem to hard code 5300DFS in a RM5 v.5.5.10?
(Actually several of the upper channel DFS)
It
It is a dumb device.
You should be able to write an app that you start onsite and then it sends
information to the watch Every second.
Sincerely,
Jason Pond
Grizzly Internet, Inc.
On Monday, December 1, 2014, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:
Can you configure or do anything
what are your channel size?
I saw this with 40 meg channels
It would not let a DFS and non-DFS overlap
From: Josh Luthman
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 7:38 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] RM5 V5.5.10
Do a site survey. See if 5.3 frequencies are listed. If not, and
It's a command and control network, similar to bot networks. The CPE's will
do whatever the cloud tells them to do upon check in. If they want to
create a reverse tunnel back to them, they will, and at that point, they
might as well be owned.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Chuck Breitkreutz
96 matches
Mail list logo
