You need to ensure the internet permission is on for android. We probably
should make that automagicial with the test button..
Sent from my iPhone
> On 24 Feb 2017, at 4:44 pm, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> I jumped all over this right away. I set a breakpoint in a test stack,
Apart from all the other changes, Its great to see Android getting some
updates and attention.
A big well done to the team!
-
Andy Piddock
My software never has bugs. It just develops random features.
TinyIDE a Free alternative minimalist IDE Plugin for LiveCode
TinyIDE
Script edito
The dialog asking if you want to start a remote debug session should occur
as soon as you launch the app, so if that isn't happening then something is
not working with the socket, I would imagine. Perhaps try with the phone
actually connected by USB to the Mac and see if that works?
On Fri, Feb 24
I think everybody is overplaying this.
It will only matter if the amount of money or other advantages is worth at
least $110,000.
The algorithm executed in Amazons cloud at the cheapest rate would cost
that much in processing to get 1 key.
The only people that will waste YOUR money to do this
Richmond,
In general that is the case, yes. When for example 8.1.3 GM has been
released, we merge the branches all the way up so that the develop branch
(from which DPs are released) contains everything from that branch. In some
cases there may be things that are in earlier releases but not in a DP
thanks for sharing your thoughts on this Lagi, you make some good points.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Lagi Pittas via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> I think everybody is overplaying this.
>
> It will only matter if the amount of money or other advantages is worth at
It may cost $110,000 today but the computational cost of executing this
exploit will decrease year on year until it is trivial to perform. I would
think it much better to address this issue immediately so that applications
being made now are future proofed.
There is also the PR element to consider
I like the way these tracks are going. This is a very sensible and logical
way to progress. The cool new dangerous toys go into the newest version,
and the sensible stuff goes into both.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:07 AM, Ali Lloyd via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> Richmo
Hi
I didn't say they shouldn't do it I said I won't lose any sleep over it.
I don't think it needs to be built in either - just a library will do and
everybody can tweak it a little bit so that NOBODY knows which one it is -
that'll piss TPTB off.
Lagi
On 24 February 2017 at 13:58, Dan Brown via
Some more instruction on this might be helpful - if there is a socket
connection, what port has to be clear? Is the development machine supposed
to be listening for the mobile? I have additional security on our network,
and on each endpoint, so that may need to be dealt with.
On Fri, Feb 24, 201
Other reasons to think about an external editor:
1) Code folding
2) Visual markers for structures (vertical lines that connect the beginning
and end of a control structure, making it easy to see)
3) Larger community, therefore more people to work on it, make suggestions,
etc.
3a) Maybe, eventually,
And if for #5, if I just want to keep using the LC built-in editor because
I am comfortable using it, then I would hope it still exists. I guess like
metacard, it would branch into it's own open-source thing, maintained by
those who want it.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Mike Kerner via use-l
Obviously I can't speak for LC, but since the source is already there and
available, I can't imagine that it would go away, but it is definitely
behind most of the run-of-the-mill text editors.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
P
That is interesting because I am still struggling with a bug
http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=19322 where compiling to more than
one OS from a splash stack and with stack files seems to "corrupt" (I use the
term loosely) the mainstack where the libraries have been added to the list of
I did notice that somehow the compile was managing to open a modal stack which
was a substack of the mainstack, and until I shift-ctrl-cmd-right clicked the
window to get the contextual menu and set the mode of the stack to TopLevel,
the compiler halted in it's tracks. Might you be experiencing
Hi,
did someone already tested the new mime library, especially the command
mimeEncodeAsMIMEEmail.
I tried it already and i am having problems to use the command with an
attachment. My problem is, the attachment is not encoded and not added to the
encoded message in the IT variable.
This is my
Yes, but Peter has a single behavior for all his cards, but unique script local
variables for each card. He wants those script local variables to be visible to
his behavior.
In a related note, I want to say again that properties can act as scoped
variables using the method I described. So prop
Exclude the mailto: in each email address.
Bob S
> On Feb 24, 2017, at 07:54 , Matthias Rebbe via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> did someone already tested the new mime library, especially the command
> mimeEncodeAsMIMEEmail.
>
> I tried it already and i am having problems to use the comm
Outside the angle brackes is the display name of the email. Inside is the
actual email address. Unless the mailbox really is called "mailto:email1";, the
server will reject this as an invalid email address. In fact I do not believe
colons are legal characters in a mailbox.
Bob S
> On Feb 24,
Thanks, but the script does not include that. It seems Apple Mail.app added
that to the script.
But my original script definitely just contains the email address.
> Am 24.02.2017 um 17:05 schrieb Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
> mailto:use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>>:
>
> Exclude the mailto: i
As much as I enjoy chatting with other users, a while back I had hoped
to make this more actionable by submitting an enhancement request for
sha256:
http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=14223
The challenge with satisfying that request is two fold:
- sha2 is not a single algo, but a fam
Mike Kerner wrote:
> 4) Why is having an integrated editor important, if your edits made
> via an external editor take effect immediately? If we didn't need
> the L server hack to get live edits, we could use any editor.
What is "the L server hack", and what is the threshold of acceptable
imme
I think you are correct, Richmond.
Blagodarya vi mnogo (transliteration from vague memory, so apologies if
mangled).
Best wishes,
David Glasgow
> On 22 Feb 2017, at 2:04 pm, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Frankly I would just take a look at the Unicode convention's guff:
>
Hi all.
The Short Version:
Is there a way to get the hilited text for a control without focus?
The Long Version:
I use a method for forms (by which I mean LC cards with fields and buttons on
them) where I set the traversalOn to false on all the fields when I am simply
viewing the data, so t
Thanks for that reminder. I had forgotten about mactoISO(). Field population
isn’t from a custom property, but I have had oddities in another project which
are probably exactly that. At least I can fix that!
Cheers,
David G
> On 23 Feb 2017, at 12:31 am, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
>
That would be it, although I do not use any behaviors, except for data grids.
Bob S
> On Feb 24, 2017, at 08:13 , panagiotis merakos via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Bob you are probably affected by this bug:
>
> http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=19248
>
> This will be fixed in 8.1.
Interesting, although the Apple checkmark (option-v) returns empty. I
really like that checkmark!
Bob S
> On Feb 24, 2017, at 08:47 , David V Glasgow via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Thanks for that reminder. I had forgotten about mactoISO(). Field
> population isn’t from a custom propert
Bob you are probably affected by this bug:
http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=19248
This will be fixed in 8.1.4 RC-1 (thanks to Trevor who identified the cause
and submitted a pull request)
Best,
Panos
--
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode <
use-livecode@list
If you want, you can apply those changes locally:
https://github.com/livecode/livecode/pull/5180/files
and see if the problem is fixed.
1. Type in the msg box "edit the script of stack revsaveasstandalone"
2. Make those changes
3. Make sure you click on the "Apply" button
4. Try to create a stan
Its good to hear its being looked at by the core team. I trust the most
obvious correct decision will be made eventually.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> As much as I enjoy chatting with other users, a while back I had ho
of field "fieldname" is an optional argument youcan use.
get the selectedtext of field "myfield"
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> The Short Version:
>
> Is there a way to get the hilited text for a control without
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:00 AM, panagiotis merakos via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> If you want, you can apply those changes locally:
>
> https://github.com/livecode/livecode/pull/5180/files
>
> and see if the problem is fixed.
>
I have a stack that will install the st
Why does it need to be a part of the language and not a widget or a library
stack which we can all fiddle with for our projects , which would make it
more difficult for the bad boys to decrypt?
Lagi
On 24 February 2017 at 17:15, Tom Glod via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
Nevermind, it doesn't work, and I think it should. Enhancement request?
Bug?
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Mike Bonner wrote:
> of field "fieldname" is an optional argument youcan use.
>
> get the selectedtext of field "myfield"
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Bob Sneidar via use-livec
Trevor, I've said it before and I'll say it again. You are da bomb! :-)
Bob S
> On Feb 24, 2017, at 09:18 , Trevor DeVore via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:00 AM, panagiotis merakos via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
>> If you want, you can ap
I'll submit one.
Bob S
> On Feb 24, 2017, at 09:21 , Mike Bonner via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Nevermind, it doesn't work, and I think it should. Enhancement request?
> Bug?
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Mike Bonner wrote:
>
>> of field "fieldname" is an optional argument youcan
panagiotis merakos wrote:
> http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=19248
Unfortunate to see complication after complication pile up from the
IDE's insistence that stacks with the same name should not be in memory
at the same time.
As we've discussed earlier, the engine does not appear t
On 24/02/2017 17:18, Lagi Pittas via use-livecode wrote:
Why does it need to be a part of the language and not a widget or a library
stack which we can all fiddle with for our projects , which would make it
more difficult for the bad boys to decrypt?
Cryptographic hash implementations have a
One last thing. On windows, with traversalon and locktext to true, text is
selectable, but as expected there is no insertion point. The only way I
can make a selection with traversalon = false is to double click a word.
This is the opposite of just setting the locktext to true, one can drag and
s
*sigh* my mistake again. Even when selecting a word with script it
doesn't work. (I still had locktext on, combined with traversal being off,
and THAT worked. As soon as I turned the locktext back off it failed to
work)
Shutting up now, till I get some sleep. :D
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:36 A
Enhancement Request 19323 submitted.
As to your post, yes the selectedText 'of the field' will work. But a menu
command like "Copy" would not know which field was selected. I suppose I could
loop through all the fields and get the one which was not empty. I'll play with
that a bit.
Bob S
>
Thanks for the reply; although, as I am not Bulgarian (as my Bulgarian
wife of 25 years never stops
reminding me: "If you were Bulgarian I never would have married you.
This, of course, is a highly
ambiguous statement which may be interpreted in a number of ways . . .)
you don't need to stretch
Lagi Pittas wrote:
> Why does it need to be a part of the language and not a widget
> or a library stack which we can all fiddle with for our projects,
> which would make it more difficult for the bad boys to decrypt?
Peter covered why it should be done in C, but if you really need sha256
today
If by "as expected" you mean the selectedText of the field can be obtained,
then this is likely because you set it with the button. Selecting it with a
cursor does not behave the same way. How odd. I may have to dig into the IDE
and find where this is happening.
Bob S
> On Feb 24, 2017, at 0
I dl'd and also sent him some money.
Bob S
> On Feb 24, 2017, at 09:56 , Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Peter covered why it should be done in C, but if you really need sha256 today
> Mark Smith's libSHA includes a scripted version:
>
> http://marksmith.on-rev.com/revstuff/
>
Bob Sneidar wrote:
> Enhancement Request 19323 submitted.
>
> As to your post, yes the selectedText 'of the field' will work.
> But a menu command like "Copy" would not know which field was
> selected. I suppose I could loop through all the fields and get
> the one which was not empty. I'll play
Yes I did. It returns empty. I have a menu which intercepts the Copy menu
selection. I hilite the text in a field whose traversalOn is false, then select
Copy from the menu. In the menu handler I have "put the selectedText". I also
tried "hilitedText". Neither work. I also tried the hilitedText
Hi,
few days ago I read about PHP incorporating a modern crypto lib now:
> https://dev.to/paragonie/php-72-the-first-programming-language-to-add-modern-cryptography-to-its-standard-library
Not a specialist regarding this, but wouldn't it be possible to interface
such?
> https://github.com/jedisct
Very nice! I think I'll start using it as my primary docs UI and see if
there's anything I wish it had in addition. I love the simplicity of it.
Phil Davis
On 2/22/17 6:14 PM, Mike Kerner via use-livecode wrote:
Everyone,
Have a look at what Bernd has done. Again, the thread is
http://forums
Hi,
just found out what the problem was. I examined the mime.livecodescript file.
The array which holds the attachment information has to be a multidimensional
array
e.g. pAttachment[1][name] for the first attachment
pAttachment[2][name] for the second attachment
and so on.
Of course
My longest running in house production app is an audio transcriber. Very
successful little gadget, running in xTalk since 2001
We have over 1,000 XML files from an audio archive of transcripts.
Now I'm digging in and getting the data out.
I'm not facile with xml routines but did my best with th
On 2/24/17 2:36 AM, Monte Goulding via use-livecode wrote:
You need to ensure the internet permission is on for android. We
probably should make that automagicial with the test button..
Oh duh. Of course. I had overlooked the Android permission. Just in
case, I also added internet and TSNet to
But if you wanted to continue developing an alternative way of remote
debugging, the open-source LC users would love you. :)
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:48 PM, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> On 2/24/17 2:36 AM, Monte Goulding via use-livecode wrote:
>
>>
Today I spent most of the day using a proximal debugger: a nit comb,
for the simple reason that as the weather has warmed up several of the
children
picked up head-lice from "somewhere".
When I saw postings about a "remote debugger" it cheered me up no end
after an awful day.
Thanks; what a
Thanks for the positive feedback. It was an interesting project but *hard* to
debug when something went wrong.
> On 25 Feb 2017, at 6:48 am, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> I'd suggest that documentation make it clear what permissions and inclusions
> need to be set up. I'm not s
Bob Sneidar wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2017, at 10:06 , Richard Gaskin wrote:
>>
>> That should not be needed.
>>
>> LiveCode allows only one active field selection in non-list fields.
>
> Yes I did. It returns empty. I have a menu which intercepts the
> Copy menu selection. I hilite the text in a field
oh baby i just read the blog on the profiler. I am going to have fun with
this, too.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> panagiotis merakos wrote:
>
> > http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=19248
>
> Unfortunate to se
The difference is, turning traversal off, rather than setting the locktext
to true doesn't work. Even if one manages to hilite text in the
non-traversable field, it isn't really selected. (Which is why if it were
me I'd not do it that way)
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-l
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> --- serious programmers; tune out NOW!
Richmond, my world is enriched with your "crusty but benign" narratives and
your asking the questions that the rest of us are to afraid to as
Hi Richard. You are "locking" fields. I am setting the traversalOn to false.
The reason I use this is because a locked field will still show the focus
border, which I do not want. I suppose I can lock the field and lock the field.
I will play around with it.
Bob S
> On Feb 24, 2017, at 12:35
On 2/24/17 3:33 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
Hi Richard. You are "locking" fields. I am setting the traversalOn to
false. The reason I use this is because a locked field will still
show the focus border, which I do not want. I suppose I can lock the
field and lock the field. I will pla
Hi all.
I was given to understand that there can only be one default button. I see I am
mistaken. I thought that setting the defaultButton of a card unset the default
of the button that was the defaultButton prior to that. It seems to me that
this is how this ought to work, because if not, the
Bob Sneidar wrote:
Hi Richard. You are "locking" fields. I am setting the traversalOn
to false. The reason I use this is because a locked field will still
show the focus border, which I do not want.
The focus border should be governed independently, using the
showFocusBorder property.
If you
On 02/24/2017 03:13 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
Hi all.
I was given to understand that there can only be one default button. I see I am
mistaken. I thought that setting the defaultButton of a card unset the default
of the button that was the defaultButton prior to that. It seems to
Interesting. I think what I will do then is spend time setting all the buttons
default to false, then managing which buttons have the default on. The only
reason it helps me (I don't ever use standard buttons, but always attach a
graphic for an icon) is that I have 3 modes each data form can hav
Ok I've played with locked, traversalOn, and disabled and the only thing that
alows me to enable/disable editing of the contents of a field is traversalOn.
No combination of the other settings allow me to select text (in any manner
that a user would expect) and yet prevent the editing of the tex
Don't ignore the autoHilite of a field. Dictionary says:
Specifies whether a button highlights when it's pressed,
or whether selected text in a field is highlighted.
Phil Davis
On 2/24/17 6:18 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
Ok I've played with locked, traversalOn, and disabled and t
Trevor, in his (L)evure framework (which is what brought the original topic
up that inspired this thread) developed a way to get the LC IDE to act as a
server/listener and ST to broadcast every time a .livecodescript file is
edited. LC then unloads and reloads the .lcs file (whether it is a front
On 2/24/17 8:18 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
Ok I've played with locked, traversalOn, and disabled and the only
thing that alows me to enable/disable editing of the contents of a
field is traversalOn. No combination of the other settings allow me
to select text (in any manner that a us
Mike Kerner wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>
>> Mike Kerner wrote:
>>
>> > 4) Why is having an integrated editor important, if your edits made
>> > via an external editor take effect immediately? If we didn't need
>> > the L server hack to get live edits, we cou
For a scriptless solution that's purely property-driven, what Jacque
said covers normal click-and-drag selection at the small cost of
multi-click selection.
And if you need multi-click selection and don't mind a small bit of
scripting, putting this in a normal editable field seems to make it
71 matches
Mail list logo