Re: The selectedText for controls without focus

2017-02-24 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
For a scriptless solution that's purely property-driven, what Jacque said covers normal click-and-drag selection at the small cost of multi-click selection. And if you need multi-click selection and don't mind a small bit of scripting, putting this in a normal editable field seems to make it

Re: Script Editor fixable? (was: Configuring a Sublime Text project to notify LiveCode IDE about updates to script only stacks)

2017-02-24 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
Mike Kerner wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > >> Mike Kerner wrote: >> >> > 4) Why is having an integrated editor important, if your edits made >> > via an external editor take effect immediately? If we didn't need >> > the L server hack to get live edits, we

Re: The selectedText for controls without focus

2017-02-24 Thread J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
On 2/24/17 8:18 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote: Ok I've played with locked, traversalOn, and disabled and the only thing that alows me to enable/disable editing of the contents of a field is traversalOn. No combination of the other settings allow me to select text (in any manner that a

Re: Script Editor fixable? (was: Configuring a Sublime Text project to notify LiveCode IDE about updates to script only stacks)

2017-02-24 Thread Mike Kerner via use-livecode
Trevor, in his (L)evure framework (which is what brought the original topic up that inspired this thread) developed a way to get the LC IDE to act as a server/listener and ST to broadcast every time a .livecodescript file is edited. LC then unloads and reloads the .lcs file (whether it is a front

Re: The selectedText for controls without focus

2017-02-24 Thread Phil Davis via use-livecode
Don't ignore the autoHilite of a field. Dictionary says: Specifies whether a button highlights when it's pressed, or whether selected text in a field is highlighted. Phil Davis On 2/24/17 6:18 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote: Ok I've played with locked, traversalOn, and disabled and

Re: The selectedText for controls without focus

2017-02-24 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
Ok I've played with locked, traversalOn, and disabled and the only thing that alows me to enable/disable editing of the contents of a field is traversalOn. No combination of the other settings allow me to select text (in any manner that a user would expect) and yet prevent the editing of the

Re: The default button

2017-02-24 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
Interesting. I think what I will do then is spend time setting all the buttons default to false, then managing which buttons have the default on. The only reason it helps me (I don't ever use standard buttons, but always attach a graphic for an icon) is that I have 3 modes each data form can

Re: The default button

2017-02-24 Thread Mark Wieder via use-livecode
On 02/24/2017 03:13 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote: Hi all. I was given to understand that there can only be one default button. I see I am mistaken. I thought that setting the defaultButton of a card unset the default of the button that was the defaultButton prior to that. It seems

Re: The selectedText for controls without focus

2017-02-24 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
Bob Sneidar wrote: Hi Richard. You are "locking" fields. I am setting the traversalOn to false. The reason I use this is because a locked field will still show the focus border, which I do not want. The focus border should be governed independently, using the showFocusBorder property. If

The default button

2017-02-24 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
Hi all. I was given to understand that there can only be one default button. I see I am mistaken. I thought that setting the defaultButton of a card unset the default of the button that was the defaultButton prior to that. It seems to me that this is how this ought to work, because if not,

Re: The selectedText for controls without focus

2017-02-24 Thread J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
On 2/24/17 3:33 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote: Hi Richard. You are "locking" fields. I am setting the traversalOn to false. The reason I use this is because a locked field will still show the focus border, which I do not want. I suppose I can lock the field and lock the field. I will

Re: The selectedText for controls without focus

2017-02-24 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
Hi Richard. You are "locking" fields. I am setting the traversalOn to false. The reason I use this is because a locked field will still show the focus border, which I do not want. I suppose I can lock the field and lock the field. I will play around with it. Bob S > On Feb 24, 2017, at

Re: Null symbol cross platform

2017-02-24 Thread Stephen Barncard via use-livecode
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > --- serious programmers; tune out NOW! Richmond, my world is enriched with your "crusty but benign" narratives and your asking the questions that the rest of us are to afraid to

Re: The selectedText for controls without focus

2017-02-24 Thread Mike Bonner via use-livecode
The difference is, turning traversal off, rather than setting the locktext to true doesn't work. Even if one manages to hilite text in the non-traversable field, it isn't really selected. (Which is why if it were me I'd not do it that way) On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Richard Gaskin via

Re: [ANN] Release 9.0.0 DP-5

2017-02-24 Thread Mike Kerner via use-livecode
oh baby i just read the blog on the profiler. I am going to have fun with this, too. On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > panagiotis merakos wrote: > > > http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=19248 > > Unfortunate to

Re: The selectedText for controls without focus

2017-02-24 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
Bob Sneidar wrote: > On Feb 24, 2017, at 10:06 , Richard Gaskin wrote: >> >> That should not be needed. >> >> LiveCode allows only one active field selection in non-list fields. > > Yes I did. It returns empty. I have a menu which intercepts the > Copy menu selection. I hilite the text in a field

Re: Remote debugger

2017-02-24 Thread Monte Goulding via use-livecode
Thanks for the positive feedback. It was an interesting project but *hard* to debug when something went wrong. > On 25 Feb 2017, at 6:48 am, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode > wrote: > > I'd suggest that documentation make it clear what permissions and inclusions

Re: Remote debugger

2017-02-24 Thread Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode
Today I spent most of the day using a proximal debugger: a nit comb, for the simple reason that as the weather has warmed up several of the children picked up head-lice from "somewhere". When I saw postings about a "remote debugger" it cheered me up no end after an awful day. Thanks; what a

Re: Remote debugger

2017-02-24 Thread Roger Eller via use-livecode
But if you wanted to continue developing an alternative way of remote debugging, the open-source LC users would love you. :) On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:48 PM, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > On 2/24/17 2:36 AM, Monte Goulding via use-livecode wrote: >

Re: Remote debugger

2017-02-24 Thread J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
On 2/24/17 2:36 AM, Monte Goulding via use-livecode wrote: You need to ensure the internet permission is on for android. We probably should make that automagicial with the test button.. Oh duh. Of course. I had overlooked the Android permission. Just in case, I also added internet and TSNet

Parsing XML Nodes w/Same Tag

2017-02-24 Thread Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via use-livecode
My longest running in house production app is an audio transcriber. Very successful little gadget, running in xTalk since 2001 We have over 1,000 XML files from an audio archive of transcripts. Now I'm digging in and getting the data out. I'm not facile with xml routines but did my best with

Re: LC9 DP5 - mimeEncodeAsMIMEEmail and attachments

2017-02-24 Thread Matthias Rebbe via use-livecode
Hi, just found out what the problem was. I examined the mime.livecodescript file. The array which holds the attachment information has to be a multidimensional array e.g. pAttachment[1][name] for the first attachment pAttachment[2][name] for the second attachment and so on. Of course

Re: Community Dictionary (was Re: Delete element from array)

2017-02-24 Thread Phil Davis via use-livecode
Very nice! I think I'll start using it as my primary docs UI and see if there's anything I wish it had in addition. I love the simplicity of it. Phil Davis On 2/22/17 6:14 PM, Mike Kerner via use-livecode wrote: Everyone, Have a look at what Bernd has done. Again, the thread is

Re: SHA1 cracked .... What are the chances this will be addressed in LC?

2017-02-24 Thread axwald via use-livecode
Hi, few days ago I read about PHP incorporating a modern crypto lib now: > https://dev.to/paragonie/php-72-the-first-programming-language-to-add-modern-cryptography-to-its-standard-library Not a specialist regarding this, but wouldn't it be possible to interface such? >

Re: The selectedText for controls without focus

2017-02-24 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
Yes I did. It returns empty. I have a menu which intercepts the Copy menu selection. I hilite the text in a field whose traversalOn is false, then select Copy from the menu. In the menu handler I have "put the selectedText". I also tried "hilitedText". Neither work. I also tried the hilitedText

Re: The selectedText for controls without focus

2017-02-24 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
Bob Sneidar wrote: > Enhancement Request 19323 submitted. > > As to your post, yes the selectedText 'of the field' will work. > But a menu command like "Copy" would not know which field was > selected. I suppose I could loop through all the fields and get > the one which was not empty. I'll play

Re: SHA1 cracked .... What are the chances this will be addressed in LC?

2017-02-24 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
I dl'd and also sent him some money. Bob S > On Feb 24, 2017, at 09:56 , Richard Gaskin via use-livecode > wrote: > > Peter covered why it should be done in C, but if you really need sha256 today > Mark Smith's libSHA includes a scripted version: > >

Re: The selectedText for controls without focus

2017-02-24 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
If by "as expected" you mean the selectedText of the field can be obtained, then this is likely because you set it with the button. Selecting it with a cursor does not behave the same way. How odd. I may have to dig into the IDE and find where this is happening. Bob S > On Feb 24, 2017, at

Re: SHA1 cracked .... What are the chances this will be addressed in LC?

2017-02-24 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
Lagi Pittas wrote: > Why does it need to be a part of the language and not a widget > or a library stack which we can all fiddle with for our projects, > which would make it more difficult for the bad boys to decrypt? Peter covered why it should be done in C, but if you really need sha256

Re: Null symbol cross platform

2017-02-24 Thread Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode
Thanks for the reply; although, as I am not Bulgarian (as my Bulgarian wife of 25 years never stops reminding me: "If you were Bulgarian I never would have married you. This, of course, is a highly ambiguous statement which may be interpreted in a number of ways . . .) you don't need to stretch

Re: The selectedText for controls without focus

2017-02-24 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
Enhancement Request 19323 submitted. As to your post, yes the selectedText 'of the field' will work. But a menu command like "Copy" would not know which field was selected. I suppose I could loop through all the fields and get the one which was not empty. I'll play with that a bit. Bob S

Re: The selectedText for controls without focus

2017-02-24 Thread Mike Bonner via use-livecode
*sigh* my mistake again. Even when selecting a word with script it doesn't work. (I still had locktext on, combined with traversal being off, and THAT worked. As soon as I turned the locktext back off it failed to work) Shutting up now, till I get some sleep. :D On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:36

Re: The selectedText for controls without focus

2017-02-24 Thread Mike Bonner via use-livecode
One last thing. On windows, with traversalon and locktext to true, text is selectable, but as expected there is no insertion point. The only way I can make a selection with traversalon = false is to double click a word. This is the opposite of just setting the locktext to true, one can drag and

Re: SHA1 cracked .... What are the chances this will be addressed in LC?

2017-02-24 Thread Peter TB Brett via use-livecode
On 24/02/2017 17:18, Lagi Pittas via use-livecode wrote: Why does it need to be a part of the language and not a widget or a library stack which we can all fiddle with for our projects , which would make it more difficult for the bad boys to decrypt? Cryptographic hash implementations have a

Re: [ANN] Release 9.0.0 DP-5

2017-02-24 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
panagiotis merakos wrote: > http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=19248 Unfortunate to see complication after complication pile up from the IDE's insistence that stacks with the same name should not be in memory at the same time. As we've discussed earlier, the engine does not appear

Re: The selectedText for controls without focus

2017-02-24 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
I'll submit one. Bob S > On Feb 24, 2017, at 09:21 , Mike Bonner via use-livecode > wrote: > > Nevermind, it doesn't work, and I think it should. Enhancement request? > Bug? > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Mike Bonner wrote: > >>

Re: [ANN] Release 9.0.0 DP-5

2017-02-24 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
Trevor, I've said it before and I'll say it again. You are da bomb! :-) Bob S > On Feb 24, 2017, at 09:18 , Trevor DeVore via use-livecode > wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:00 AM, panagiotis merakos via use-livecode < > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>

Re: The selectedText for controls without focus

2017-02-24 Thread Mike Bonner via use-livecode
Nevermind, it doesn't work, and I think it should. Enhancement request? Bug? On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Mike Bonner wrote: > of field "fieldname" is an optional argument youcan use. > > get the selectedtext of field "myfield" > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Bob

Re: SHA1 cracked .... What are the chances this will be addressed in LC?

2017-02-24 Thread Lagi Pittas via use-livecode
Why does it need to be a part of the language and not a widget or a library stack which we can all fiddle with for our projects , which would make it more difficult for the bad boys to decrypt? Lagi On 24 February 2017 at 17:15, Tom Glod via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

Re: [ANN] Release 9.0.0 DP-5

2017-02-24 Thread Trevor DeVore via use-livecode
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:00 AM, panagiotis merakos via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > If you want, you can apply those changes locally: > > https://github.com/livecode/livecode/pull/5180/files > > and see if the problem is fixed. > I have a stack that will install the

Re: The selectedText for controls without focus

2017-02-24 Thread Mike Bonner via use-livecode
of field "fieldname" is an optional argument youcan use. get the selectedtext of field "myfield" On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Hi all. > > The Short Version: > > Is there a way to get the hilited text for a control

Re: SHA1 cracked .... What are the chances this will be addressed in LC?

2017-02-24 Thread Tom Glod via use-livecode
Its good to hear its being looked at by the core team. I trust the most obvious correct decision will be made eventually. On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > As much as I enjoy chatting with other users, a while back I had

Re: [ANN] Release 9.0.0 DP-5

2017-02-24 Thread panagiotis merakos via use-livecode
If you want, you can apply those changes locally: https://github.com/livecode/livecode/pull/5180/files and see if the problem is fixed. 1. Type in the msg box "edit the script of stack revsaveasstandalone" 2. Make those changes 3. Make sure you click on the "Apply" button 4. Try to create a

Re: [ANN] Release 9.0.0 DP-5

2017-02-24 Thread panagiotis merakos via use-livecode
Bob you are probably affected by this bug: http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=19248 This will be fixed in 8.1.4 RC-1 (thanks to Trevor who identified the cause and submitted a pull request) Best, Panos -- On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode <

Re: Null symbol cross platform

2017-02-24 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
Interesting, although the Apple checkmark (option-v) returns empty. I really like that checkmark! Bob S > On Feb 24, 2017, at 08:47 , David V Glasgow via use-livecode > wrote: > > Thanks for that reminder. I had forgotten about mactoISO(). Field >

Re: [ANN] Release 9.0.0 DP-5

2017-02-24 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
That would be it, although I do not use any behaviors, except for data grids. Bob S > On Feb 24, 2017, at 08:13 , panagiotis merakos via use-livecode > wrote: > > Bob you are probably affected by this bug: > > http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=19248

Re: Null symbol cross platform

2017-02-24 Thread David V Glasgow via use-livecode
Thanks for that reminder. I had forgotten about mactoISO(). Field population isn’t from a custom property, but I have had oddities in another project which are probably exactly that. At least I can fix that! Cheers, David G > On 23 Feb 2017, at 12:31 am, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode

The selectedText for controls without focus

2017-02-24 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
Hi all. The Short Version: Is there a way to get the hilited text for a control without focus? The Long Version: I use a method for forms (by which I mean LC cards with fields and buttons on them) where I set the traversalOn to false on all the fields when I am simply viewing the data, so

Re: Null symbol cross platform

2017-02-24 Thread David V Glasgow via use-livecode
I think you are correct, Richmond. Blagodarya vi mnogo (transliteration from vague memory, so apologies if mangled). Best wishes, David Glasgow > On 22 Feb 2017, at 2:04 pm, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode > wrote: > > Frankly I would just take a look at

Re: Script Editor fixable? (was: Configuring a Sublime Text project to notify LiveCode IDE about updates to script only stacks)

2017-02-24 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
Mike Kerner wrote: > 4) Why is having an integrated editor important, if your edits made > via an external editor take effect immediately? If we didn't need > the L server hack to get live edits, we could use any editor. What is "the L server hack", and what is the threshold of acceptable

Re: SHA1 cracked .... What are the chances this will be addressed in LC?

2017-02-24 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
As much as I enjoy chatting with other users, a while back I had hoped to make this more actionable by submitting an enhancement request for sha256: http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=14223 The challenge with satisfying that request is two fold: - sha2 is not a single algo, but a

Re: LC9 DP5 - mimeEncodeAsMIMEEmail and attachments

2017-02-24 Thread Matthias Rebbe via use-livecode
Thanks, but the script does not include that. It seems Apple Mail.app added that to the script. But my original script definitely just contains the email address. > Am 24.02.2017 um 17:05 schrieb Bob Sneidar via use-livecode >

Re: LC9 DP5 - mimeEncodeAsMIMEEmail and attachments

2017-02-24 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
Outside the angle brackes is the display name of the email. Inside is the actual email address. Unless the mailbox really is called "mailto:email1;, the server will reject this as an invalid email address. In fact I do not believe colons are legal characters in a mailbox. Bob S > On Feb 24,

Re: LC9 DP5 - mimeEncodeAsMIMEEmail and attachments

2017-02-24 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
Exclude the mailto: in each email address. Bob S > On Feb 24, 2017, at 07:54 , Matthias Rebbe via use-livecode > wrote: > > Hi, > did someone already tested the new mime library, especially the command > mimeEncodeAsMIMEEmail. > > I tried it already and i am

Re: Call a function on another card

2017-02-24 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
Yes, but Peter has a single behavior for all his cards, but unique script local variables for each card. He wants those script local variables to be visible to his behavior. In a related note, I want to say again that properties can act as scoped variables using the method I described. So

LC9 DP5 - mimeEncodeAsMIMEEmail and attachments

2017-02-24 Thread Matthias Rebbe via use-livecode
Hi, did someone already tested the new mime library, especially the command mimeEncodeAsMIMEEmail. I tried it already and i am having problems to use the command with an attachment. My problem is, the attachment is not encoded and not added to the encoded message in the IT variable. This is

Re: back to slow compile with 8.1.3?

2017-02-24 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
I did notice that somehow the compile was managing to open a modal stack which was a substack of the mainstack, and until I shift-ctrl-cmd-right clicked the window to get the contextual menu and set the mode of the stack to TopLevel, the compiler halted in it's tracks. Might you be experiencing

Re: [ANN] Release 9.0.0 DP-5

2017-02-24 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
That is interesting because I am still struggling with a bug http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=19322 where compiling to more than one OS from a splash stack and with stack files seems to "corrupt" (I use the term loosely) the mainstack where the libraries have been added to the list

Re: Script Editor fixable? (was: Configuring a Sublime Text project to notify LiveCode IDE about updates to script only stacks)

2017-02-24 Thread Mike Kerner via use-livecode
Obviously I can't speak for LC, but since the source is already there and available, I can't imagine that it would go away, but it is definitely behind most of the run-of-the-mill text editors. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com

Re: Script Editor fixable? (was: Configuring a Sublime Text project to notify LiveCode IDE about updates to script only stacks)

2017-02-24 Thread Roger Eller via use-livecode
And if for #5, if I just want to keep using the LC built-in editor because I am comfortable using it, then I would hope it still exists. I guess like metacard, it would branch into it's own open-source thing, maintained by those who want it. On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Mike Kerner via

Re: Script Editor fixable? (was: Configuring a Sublime Text project to notify LiveCode IDE about updates to script only stacks)

2017-02-24 Thread Mike Kerner via use-livecode
Other reasons to think about an external editor: 1) Code folding 2) Visual markers for structures (vertical lines that connect the beginning and end of a control structure, making it easy to see) 3) Larger community, therefore more people to work on it, make suggestions, etc. 3a) Maybe,

Re: Remote debugger

2017-02-24 Thread Mike Kerner via use-livecode
Some more instruction on this might be helpful - if there is a socket connection, what port has to be clear? Is the development machine supposed to be listening for the mobile? I have additional security on our network, and on each endpoint, so that may need to be dealt with. On Fri, Feb 24,

Re: SHA1 cracked .... What are the chances this will be addressed in LC?

2017-02-24 Thread Lagi Pittas via use-livecode
Hi I didn't say they shouldn't do it I said I won't lose any sleep over it. I don't think it needs to be built in either - just a library will do and everybody can tweak it a little bit so that NOBODY knows which one it is - that'll piss TPTB off. Lagi On 24 February 2017 at 13:58, Dan Brown

Re: [ANN] Release 9.0.0 DP-5

2017-02-24 Thread Mike Kerner via use-livecode
I like the way these tracks are going. This is a very sensible and logical way to progress. The cool new dangerous toys go into the newest version, and the sensible stuff goes into both. On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:07 AM, Ali Lloyd via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: >

Re: SHA1 cracked .... What are the chances this will be addressed in LC?

2017-02-24 Thread Dan Brown via use-livecode
It may cost $110,000 today but the computational cost of executing this exploit will decrease year on year until it is trivial to perform. I would think it much better to address this issue immediately so that applications being made now are future proofed. There is also the PR element to

Re: SHA1 cracked .... What are the chances this will be addressed in LC?

2017-02-24 Thread Tom Glod via use-livecode
thanks for sharing your thoughts on this Lagi, you make some good points. On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Lagi Pittas via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > I think everybody is overplaying this. > > It will only matter if the amount of money or other advantages is worth at

Re: [ANN] Release 9.0.0 DP-5

2017-02-24 Thread Ali Lloyd via use-livecode
Richmond, In general that is the case, yes. When for example 8.1.3 GM has been released, we merge the branches all the way up so that the develop branch (from which DPs are released) contains everything from that branch. In some cases there may be things that are in earlier releases but not in a

Re: SHA1 cracked .... What are the chances this will be addressed in LC?

2017-02-24 Thread Lagi Pittas via use-livecode
I think everybody is overplaying this. It will only matter if the amount of money or other advantages is worth at least $110,000. The algorithm executed in Amazons cloud at the cheapest rate would cost that much in processing to get 1 key. The only people that will waste YOUR money to do this

Re: Remote debugger

2017-02-24 Thread Ali Lloyd via use-livecode
The dialog asking if you want to start a remote debug session should occur as soon as you launch the app, so if that isn't happening then something is not working with the socket, I would imagine. Perhaps try with the phone actually connected by USB to the Mac and see if that works? On Fri, Feb

Re: [ANN] Release 9.0.0 DP-5

2017-02-24 Thread AndyP via use-livecode
Apart from all the other changes, Its great to see Android getting some updates and attention. A big well done to the team! - Andy Piddock My software never has bugs. It just develops random features. TinyIDE a Free alternative minimalist IDE Plugin for LiveCode TinyIDE Script

Re: Remote debugger

2017-02-24 Thread Monte Goulding via use-livecode
You need to ensure the internet permission is on for android. We probably should make that automagicial with the test button.. Sent from my iPhone > On 24 Feb 2017, at 4:44 pm, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode > wrote: > > I jumped all over this right away. I