Hi,
I have tried settings you have mentioned for WAL, it improves
performance in case of WAL write. But when check pointing process
starts(default - after 3 mins), caching process slows down(almost stops). Is
there any way by which we can write checkpoint to disk in background, so
that
Hi,
I am using onHeap along with the default offHeap memory in my Ignite 2.0
server nodes. I am getting out of memory error even though there is enough
memory available offHeap.
My understanding (based on my earlier posts) is that onHeap is just a cache
for offHeap. If that's how it works then
Hi Luqman,
I meant the service deployment. Most likely, you will do this in init()
method - just call Class.forName() and create the instance of the class.
Makes sense?
-Val
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Platform-updates-tp15998p16069.html
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:17 PM, iostream wrote:
> Suppose I have 10 Person entries in the disk, out of which only 5 are
> in-memory. Now if I run a SQL query which is expected to count the number
> of
> entries in Person cache, will the query run only on the disk or RAM
java 1.7.0_67 definitely has this issue with ignite 1.9, 2.0 and 2.1. We do
not see this issue with java 8
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Evgenii Zhuravlev
wrote:
> I tried your code with java 1.7.0_80-b15 and everything works fine.
>
> Also, check that you use right
Jessie,
What do you mean by "stuck"? Did you check thread dumps? Is it possible you
have memory/GC issues?
-Val
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Streaming-test-tp14039p16066.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at
IgniteContext does not create any executors, Spark does. And frankly I don't
know why you have so many, I was not able to reproduce it myself.
As for large number of tasks, only assumption I can make is that your cache
doesn't actually have any data, which forces Spark to scan ALL partitions to
Thanks, Turik, very interesting!
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 8:58 PM, techbysample wrote:
> Igniters,
>
> Check out the new GA Grid(Beta) project here:
>
> https://github.com/techbysample/gagrid
>
> GA Grid (Beta) is a distributive in memory Genetic Algorithm (GA) component
> for
Val, I replace atomicSequence with atomicLong and used the method below.
I need to specify an initial value, start, according to requirement.
return ignite.atomicLong(
"id", // name.
start, // Initial value
true // Create if it does not exist.
);
But the
When you add persistence, latency of each individual updates gets bigger,
because you update disk as well. In case you test on the same amount of
parallel threads, throughput will obviously go down. However, if you
increase the load, i.e. execute more operations in parallel, throughput will
go
Thanks for your reply Val.
We tried that, now it stopped spinning up several servers, all of those
became clients now (I still dont know the difference). But still just for a
single row rdd it takes several minutes to retrieve it.
It still spins up 100s of executor even though i specify 1
Hello,
Please properly subscribe to the mailing list so that the community can
receive email notifications for your messages. To subscribe, send an empty
email to user-subscr...@ignite.apache.org and follow simple instructions in
the reply.
Ignite can cope with such cases but it's highly
I tried your code with java 1.7.0_80-b15 and everything works fine.
Also, check that you use right config file - you provided a file with name
ignite-config.xml.xml, but in the code, you use ignite-config-login.xml.
Evgenii
2017-08-08 16:44 GMT+03:00 Evgenii Zhuravlev
Even disabling TLS/SSL doesn't have any effect. Moving to Java 1.8 is not an
option as we have other dependencies which are incompatible with 1.8.
Any other suggestion?
Regards,
Ankit Singhai
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
You could try tuning persistence store update reliability vs. performance
trade-opff by setting walMode to:
DEFAULT: every update is flushed to disk (sync). Least performant but survives
power loss.
LOG_ONLY: OS-managed buffered output (write). Survives process crash but not OS
crash.
I would suggest updating to the last version of java and check if it will
work. I can't reproduce same behavior with your code, but I use java
1.8.0_121-b13.
Please share results after updating.
Evgenii
2017-08-08 15:28 GMT+03:00 Ankit Singhai :
> PFA log. No luck even by
Hello,
The reason whyr mxbean is false that Apache Ignite "exports" its own beans
as DynamicBean.
I've tried logstash 5.5.1 with logstash-input-jmx 3.0.2 plugin
I've used the following jmx configuration that is gathering simple
statistics about MyTestCache, DiscoverySpi and CommunicationSpi:
{
Hi,
I tried to run your code on Linux, but everything works fine for me. One
thing - I don't see SSL configuration in your config files, while your log
contains information that SSL was enabled. Is the same behavior reproducible
without SSL?
Also, I see that you use both ipv4 and ipv6, possibly
Hi Alexey
Thanks, we found the issue. We were not giving port in config xml through
which we were connecting ignitevisor
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/ignite-visor-not-workin-in-case-ignite-is-started-from-a-tomcat-tp16043p16045.html
Hi!
Can you prepare a simple project to reproduce the issue?
Also please specify versions of Ignite and Tomcat.
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 1:18 PM, neerajbhatt
wrote:
> Hi All
>
> We have a web application deployed in tomcat, from which we are starting
> ignite server
>
Hi All
We have a web application deployed in tomcat, from which we are starting
ignite server
It seems in this scenario ignite visor is not able to detect ignite
instance.
In case we start ignite from a java class(not through tomcat), ignite visor
is able to connect to ignite and give cache
mxbean in MBeaninfo of a particluar cache is coming as false, because of
which logstash jmx plugin is not able to get data.
I am also facing the same problem
we have used
cacheCfg.setStatisticsEnabled(true);
cacheCfg.setManagementEnabled(true);
Attributes values are coming in jconsole but
22 matches
Mail list logo