Re: Problems with KVM HA & STONITH

2018-04-04 Thread victor
Hello Rohit, Is the Host HA provider start working with Ceph. The reason I am asking is because, I am not able to create a VM with Ceph storage in a kvm host with HA enabled and I am getting the following error while creating VM. .cloud.exception.StorageUnavailableException:

Re: Committee to Sort through CCC Presentation Submissions

2018-04-04 Thread Rafael Weingärtner
I think everybody that “raised their hands here” already signed up to review. Mike, what about if we only gathered the reviews from Apache main review system, and then we use that to decide which presentations will get in CloudStack tracks? Then, we reduce the work on our side (we also remove

RE: systemvm

2018-04-04 Thread Paul Angus
Hi Swastik, Have you tried running: sh /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh on the ssvm? It's (almost) impossible for the script not to be there. Can you paste the contents of /var/log/cloud.log to pastebin or something. paul.an...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place,

RE: systemvm

2018-04-04 Thread Swastik Mittal
@Paul Yes, I explicitly created it like normal nfs share, and gave the path of the exported directory in cloudstack. I ain't getting any ssvm-check file in my ssvm. I did try changing the system vm template from 4.11 to 4.6 but the result was the same. I was successfully able to launch a vm

RE: systemvm

2018-04-04 Thread Paul Angus
Did you explicitly create it or just let cloudstack sort itself out? FYI, ssvm-check is at: /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh In the ssvm itself paul.an...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue -Original Message-

RE: systemvm

2018-04-04 Thread Swastik Mittal
Hey Paul Yes, I have my management working as the storage as well. Regards Swastik On 4 Apr 2018 10:39 p.m., "Paul Angus" wrote: > Have you configured a storage network on the same subnet as the management > network? You have two interfaces on the same subnet. > >

RE: systemvm

2018-04-04 Thread Paul Angus
Have you configured a storage network on the same subnet as the management network? You have two interfaces on the same subnet. paul.an...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Swastik Mittal

Re: Upgrade CloudStack from 4.9.2.0 to 4.11.0

2018-04-04 Thread Dag Sonstebo
Hi Stephan, Thanks for the summary – can you log these as new issues in the new issues tracker https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues please (note not Jira). Regards, Dag Sonstebo Cloud Architect ShapeBlue On 04/04/2018, 10:39, "Stephan Seitz" wrote:

RE: ACS 4.11 creates isolated Net only with IP Range 10.1.1.0/24

2018-04-04 Thread Paul Angus
Hi Melanie, Yes looks like a UI bug. I tried through the UI with the browser in developer mode to see what was sent. The guest netmask is missing.

ACS 4.11 creates isolated Net only with IP Range 10.1.1.0/24

2018-04-04 Thread Melanie Desaive
Hi all, after upgrading to 4.11 we have the issue, that isolated nets created with the web-UI are always created for the IP range 10.1.1.0/24 - no matter what values are filled in the fields "Guest Gateway" and "Guest Netmask". Creating an isolated network with CloudMonkey works perfectly using

Re: systemvm

2018-04-04 Thread Swastik Mittal
@Stephen "host" in global settings is set to 10.1.0.15 which is the ip address of the management server. Yes, I'll work on getting ssvm-check file. Thanks Swastik On 4/4/18, Swastik Mittal wrote: > @Stephen > > Request to internal server mentioned in the global

Re: systemvm

2018-04-04 Thread Swastik Mittal
@Stephen Request to internal server mentioned in the global sec.storage.. after registering the iso successfully, get's stuck on HEAD request. As you mentioned there is an issue in route path from SSVM. Not able to figure out how do I find it. regards Swastik On 4/4/18, Swastik Mittal

Re: systemvm

2018-04-04 Thread Dag Sonstebo
Swastik, What is your “host” global setting set to? Also – the check script should be in /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh – if this is missing you have other issues – possibly with the systemvm.iso. Regards, Dag Sonstebo Cloud Architect ShapeBlue On 04/04/2018, 11:07, "Swastik Mittal"

Re: systemvm

2018-04-04 Thread Swastik Mittal
Hey @Stephen I am able to ping my management from ssvm. Also wget to internal server works fine, it took some time to establish connection initially. I don't have any ssvm-check.sh file. I forgot to mention it on this thread. Outputs: root@s-1-VM:~# ip a s 1: lo: mtu

Re: Upgrade CloudStack from 4.9.2.0 to 4.11.0

2018-04-04 Thread Stephan Seitz
Hi! We're currently using XenServer instead of VMware, so I just don't know if you really need to build your own packages. Afaik shapeblue's public repository has been built with noredist. Here's short list (sorry, we didn't report everything to the bugtracker by now) of caveats: * There's a

Re: systemvm

2018-04-04 Thread Stephan Seitz
Hu! I'ld recommend to log in to your ssvm and check if everything is able to connect. I second dag's suggestion to double check your network setup. Inside your ssvm I'ld run /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh also ip a s ip r s As an educated guess: did you setup your storage-network

Upgrade CloudStack from 4.9.2.0 to 4.11.0

2018-04-04 Thread Marc Poll Garcia
Hello, My current infrastructure is Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2 with VMware hosts and the management server on CentOS. I'm planning to perform an upgrade from the actual 4.9.2 versión to the latest one. I found this tutorial from Cloudstack website:

Re: systemvm

2018-04-04 Thread Swastik Mittal
@Dag By legacy I meant one way ssl. I have set ca strictness for client as false. I am using 1 nic common for all the network, that is one bridge serving both public and private network. I am setting up a basic zone so I set my management within ip range of 10 and guest within a range of 100,

Re: systemvm

2018-04-04 Thread Dag Sonstebo
Swastik, Your issue is most likely with your network configuration rather than anything to do with firewalls or system VM templates. First of all – what do you mean by legacy mode? Are you referring to advanced or basic zone? Secondly – can you tell us how you have configured your

Re: systemvm

2018-04-04 Thread Swastik Mittal
@jagdish Yes I was using the same link. On 4 Apr 2018 1:07 p.m., "Jagdish Patil" wrote: > Hey Swastik, > > download.cloudstack.org link doesn't look like an issue, but which version > and which hypervisor are you using? > > For KVM, download this: >

Re: systemvm

2018-04-04 Thread Jagdish Patil
Hey Swastik, download.cloudstack.org link doesn't look like an issue, but which version and which hypervisor are you using? For KVM, download this: http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/systemvmtemplate-4.11.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2 Regards, Jagdish Patil On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:00 PM Swastik

Re: systemvm

2018-04-04 Thread Swastik Mittal
Hey @jagdish I was using download.cloudstack.org to download systemVM. Is there any bug within the template uploaded here? @Soundar I did disable firewall services but din't work. I'll check it again though. On 4/4/18, soundar rajan wrote: > disabled firewalld service

Re: systemvm

2018-04-04 Thread soundar rajan
disabled firewalld service on the hostname and check. you should able to access using console window. On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Swastik Mittal wrote: > Hey, > > I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with management and host on same > server and out-of-band

Re: systemvm

2018-04-04 Thread Jagdish Patil
Hey Swastik, Which SSVM are you using? Install SSVM from this link: http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.11/ Regards, Jagdish Patil On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM Swastik Mittal wrote: > Hey, > > I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with management and host