I am going to do my reply between the paragraphs.
So read down till the "end" note.
On 02/24/2018 03:51 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
LibreOffice is not like most programs. It has a large core program with a
few tiny modules / satellites / add-ons / plug-ins / apps that kinda
plug-in to that
Hi :)
LibreOffice is not like most programs. It has a large core program with a
few tiny modules / satellites / add-ons / plug-ins / apps that kinda
plug-in to that core. Removing one or a handful of those modules does very
little to affect the size or complexity of LibreOffice. At least that
Hi Tim,
>
> Robert The custom install as you stated seems to come up in Windows, not
> DEB based Linux install, unless you install through the repository, and
> package managers like Synaptic.
I have never installed LibreOffice on a Windows-system. You could choose
the packages under OpenSUSE,
2018-02-24 17:03 GMT+01:00 Tim-L :
> On 02/24/2018 05:19 AM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
>
>> On 24/02/2018 09:35, zahra a wrote:
>>
>> since i am not programmer and cant use linux, i should use xp.
>>>
>> Everyone can use Linux, not only developers. I have a degree in
>>
On 02/24/2018 05:19 AM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 24/02/2018 09:35, zahra a wrote:
since i am not programmer and cant use linux, i should use xp.
Everyone can use Linux, not only developers. I have a degree in
humanities and have never written a single line of code, but I am a very
happy Linux
Hi :)
Sorry, i don't know what PYOO is so i have redirected this question back to
the LO mailing list - even though it is really a question for Calligra
forums/mailing-lists.
I've only used their spreadsheets for very straight-forwards sums, to add
columns of figures.
Is PYOO something that can
2018-02-24 12:23 GMT+01:00 Robert Großkopf :
> Hi Henri,
> >
> > Surprised to hear that the Ubuntu respositories don't provide a complete
> LO
> > package - I install via the PPA on my Linux Mint machine, which is an
> > Ubuntu fork, and get everything, including Math
Hi Henri,
>
> Surprised to hear that the Ubuntu respositories don't provide a complete LO
> package - I install via the PPA on my Linux Mint machine, which is an
> Ubuntu fork, and get everything, including Math and Base. What gives ?...
Every Linux-distribution does allow to install only parts
2018-02-24 11:19 GMT+01:00 Italo Vignoli :
> On 24/02/2018 09:35, zahra a wrote:
>
> > since i am not programmer and cant use linux, i should use xp.
>
> Everyone can use Linux, not only developers. I have a degree in
> humanities and have never written a single line of
On 24/02/2018 09:35, zahra a wrote:
> since i am not programmer and cant use linux, i should use xp.
Everyone can use Linux, not only developers. I have a degree in
humanities and have never written a single line of code, but I am a very
happy Linux user and will never switch back to macOS or
2018-02-23 22:27 GMT+01:00 Tim-L :
>
> Hey Guys. I found two 512MB memory sticks. It now gives me about 800MB
> after the shared video memory.
>
> Did you know that the Ubuntu repositories do not install LO Math with LO?
> Found that out about an hour ago.
>
Good
Since you use Ubuntu the unwanted parts can be uninstalled, or, better,
unselected when preparing LO installation
Je la 24/02/2018 09:35, zahra a skribis :
i wished that LO has one version for home users to not install
engineering programs like math, draw, base.
i only need writer and have to
On 02/24/2018 08:35 AM, zahra a wrote:
>to not install engineering programs like math, draw, base.
Sounds like you want OOoLight, which is no longer maintained.
jonathon
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
On 02/23/2018 09:27 PM, Tim-L wrote:
> Did you know that the Ubuntu repositories do not install LO Math with LO?
The last time I installed LibO from the Ubuntu repository, it also left
out Base, the Help files, and something else (printing, perhaps.)
jonathon
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to:
i wished that LO has one version for home users to not install
engineering programs like math, draw, base.
i only need writer and have to have one office suite which most
features are for engineers, businesses, companies etc.
since i am not programmer and cant use linux, i should use xp.
On
Hey Guys. I found two 512MB memory sticks. It now gives me about 800MB
after the shared video memory.
Did you know that the Ubuntu repositories do not install LO Math with
LO? Found that out about an hour ago.
On 02/23/2018 03:40 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Yeh, the KDE people put a
Hi :)
Sorry, my keyboard is still suffering from when i crunched it's usb-plug.
It's still a beautiful keyboard but sometimes gets it's signals a bit
muddled.
Apols from
a Tom :)
On 23 February 2018 at 20:40, Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi :)
> Yeh, the KDE people put a serious
Hi :)
Yeh, the KDE people put a serious amount of work into it a lot lighter and
faster. Initially i only tried it out for a laugh but i was quite
flabergasted at how phenomenally slick it had become.
Regards from
a Tom :)
On 23 February 2018 at 18:11, David Burleigh
It's interesting to hear of Kubuntu working well on an old machine.
When I last tried using it a few years ago, Nepumuk and Aconadi bogged
it down so much that it became unusable.
On Fri, 2018-02-23 at 16:42 +, Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi :)
> Would Gnome Office (ie Abiword and Gnumeric) be
Hi :)
Again, good points. It is much easier to support people using a system
that you use yourself. I gave up on using Kubuntu when i no longer had to
support anyone using it. It is interesting and has tons of nice features
but i just prefer stock Ubuntu for my main use. If i had to support
On 02/23/2018 09:43 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
2018-02-23 3:02 GMT+01:00 Tim-L >:
I am getting an old HP desktop, that originally WinXP, ready to
give away.
It has 64-bit AMD 3300+ CPU, 512MB ram, and only 160GB drive.
Hi :)
Would Gnome Office (ie Abiword and Gnumeric) be better?
Also last time i tried distro-hopping on 'old' machines i found that
Kubuntu was much faster and lighter-weight than even Lubuntu and Xubuntu.
There was a ton of stuff to figure out and apps etc to add o really get the
most out of it
2018-02-23 3:02 GMT+01:00 Tim-L :
>
> I am getting an old HP desktop, that originally WinXP, ready to give away.
>
> It has 64-bit AMD 3300+ CPU, 512MB ram, and only 160GB drive. It was an
> original Windows XP 32-bit OS system on a 64-bit hardware. Since it needs
>
hello.
linux support i think did not change in libreoffice newer versions.
but libreoffice 5.4 on windows have some issues and bugs on windows xp
as i studied bug reports and other websites.
not sure about 5.4.4 that works on xp or not, but 5.4.3 works properly.
by the way, i have windows xp and
On that note then, I'd like to record that as an ex-Excel guru and
Office trainer, I am permanently delighted by the quality and stunned by
the price of LibreOffice.
There may be no such thing as a free lunch in Economics, but in the IT
world, LO (and of course oOo) are the closest things to a
On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 18:10:50 +0200
Errol Goetsch er...@xe4.org wrote:
[snip]
Thank you to the developers who have given so much to so many for
so little.
[snip]
Hear, hear!
Regards,
Jim
--
Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam
filtering. If you reply to this email and
+1
On Aug 10, 2014 7:19 AM, Jim Seymour jseym...@linxnet.com wrote:
On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 18:10:50 +0200
Errol Goetsch er...@xe4.org wrote:
[snip]
Thank you to the developers who have given so much to so many for
so little.
[snip]
Hear, hear!
Regards,
Jim
--
Note: My mail server
Hi :)
+1
Also a big thanks to everyone else who helps or has helped, especially
those who seldom get any recognition.
Regards from
Tom :)
On 10 August 2014 15:32, J. Van Brimmer jerry...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Aug 10, 2014 7:19 AM, Jim Seymour jseym...@linxnet.com wrote:
On Thu, 07 Aug
On 8/8/2014 11:15 AM, Pikov Andropov wrote:
MSO 2013 is incompatible with itself
I think he meant that MSO 2013 isn't fully compatible with MSO2010 o
No.
I meant that MSO 2013 is completely, utterly, and absolutely
incompatible with MSO 2013.
Likewise, MSO 2010 is completely,
On 08/08/2014 12:47 PM, Pikov Andropov wrote:
Joel Madero wrote on 8/8/2014 12:39 PM:
I really just got a little laugh (not following the thread generally) but:
Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote on 8/8/2014 9:59 AM:
Everything really depends on you neighbors' needs, and
On 08/08/2014 12:54 PM, Sophie wrote:
Hi Pikov,
Le 08/08/2014 18:47, Pikov Andropov a écrit :
Joel Madero wrote on 8/8/2014 12:39 PM:
I really just got a little laugh (not following the thread generally) but:
Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote on 8/8/2014 9:59 AM:
Everything
At the risk of adding to the political noise...
On Sat, 09 Aug 2014 09:46:12 -0400
Kracked_P_P---webmaster webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:
[snip]
For MS Office, the formats ending with
x is a problem even for their older version. MSO 2007 might have
trouble reading DOCX files created from
Jim Seymour wrote on 8/9/2014 10:48 AM:
At the risk of adding to the political noise...
As for home: I solved the entire problem once-and-for-all by
replacing my wife's MS-Win install with Linux Mint. (MS-Win8 was the
last straw, even for her.)
What do you use in place of PowerPoint Viewer?
On Sat, 09 Aug 2014 12:01:27 -0400
Pikov Andropov piko...@gmail.com wrote:
Jim Seymour wrote on 8/9/2014 10:48 AM:
At the risk of adding to the political noise...
As for home: I solved the entire problem once-and-for-all by
replacing my wife's MS-Win install with Linux Mint. (MS-Win8
I use impress.
regards,
Tomáš Matýs
2014-08-09 18:22 GMT+02:00 Jim Seymour jseym...@linxnet.com:
On Sat, 09 Aug 2014 12:01:27 -0400
Pikov Andropov piko...@gmail.com wrote:
Jim Seymour wrote on 8/9/2014 10:48 AM:
At the risk of adding to the political noise...
Is there a way to get Impress to start in slide-show mode when I click
on a PPT icon?
Thanks.
Tomáš Matýs wrote on 8/9/2014 12:57 PM:
I use impress.
regards,
Tomáš Matýs
2014-08-09 18:22 GMT+02:00 Jim Seymour jseym...@linxnet.com:
On Sat, 09 Aug 2014 12:01:27
Hi :)
I think it is
.Pps
that plays as a slide-show straight-away. I think
.Ppt
normally opens in editable/design view. I'm not sure if it's possible to
just rename the file-ending between the 2 or whether you have to use Save
As I've got a feeling it's one of the rare ones where you can
Tom Davies wrote on 8/9/2014 2:25 PM:
Hi :)
I think it is
.Pps
that plays as a slide-show straight-away. I think
.Ppt
normally opens in editable/design view. I'm not sure if it's possible
to just rename the file-ending between the 2 or whether you have to use
Save As I've got a
Completely as an aside...
On Sat, 09 Aug 2014 17:49:03 -0400
Pikov Andropov piko...@gmail.com wrote:
Tom Davies wrote on 8/9/2014 2:25 PM:
Italo's techno-babble was brilliant and i thought fairly easy to
understand. It's good to have it laid out so clearly!
I don't think you mean
Not exclusively, but you are indeed correct, sir. A quick squizz at
Wikipedia shows that it's use to obfuscate or deceive is considered the
more common one, though my experience makes no such distinction.
On Sat, 09 Aug 2014 21:37:54 -0400
chainsawchihuahua chainsawchihua...@gmail.com wrote:
Italo makes a good point, perhaps the best thing to do is to explain
the situation to your neighbours and let them decide.
I'm not sure if that's an option; I know at least one couple I have
installed LO for that keep confusing LO and their mailreader,
firewall, firefox, etc... Trying to explain
One has Windows XP.
4.2.6
One has Windows 7 and one has Windows 8.
4.2.6 for Win7, same for Win8.x
but I never used Win8 before, only XP through Win7.
there is only one Windows install for both 32-bit and 64-bit.
One has Ubuntu and one has Linux Mint.
Paul wrote on 8/8/2014 9:24 AM:
Italo makes a good point, perhaps the best thing to do is to explain
the situation to your neighbours and let them decide.
My neighbors wouldn't know what I was talking about! :-) They treat
their computers like they treat their cars -- get, turn the key, put the
I really just got a little laugh (not following the thread generally) but:
Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote on 8/8/2014 9:59 AM:
Everything really depends on you neighbors' needs, and wants. You need
to discuss with them what they want our of the software packages you
install for them.
Joel Madero wrote on 8/8/2014 12:39 PM:
I really just got a little laugh (not following the thread generally) but:
Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote on 8/8/2014 9:59 AM:
Everything really depends on you neighbors' needs, and wants. You need
to discuss with them what
What difference does it make that a file was produced by a proprietary
program?
The operator of LO would like to be able to just click on that file's
icon or name have LO open it, without having to know anything else about
LO or Microsoft.
That's what I meant by transparent.
Sure - and
On August 8, 2014 9:47:51 AM PDT, Pikov Andropov wrote:
What difference does it make that a file was produced by a proprietary program?
The issue s whether or not the end user can, in theory at least, go in and fix
whatever is causing the incompatibility with the documents
From my POV, MSO
jonathon wrote on 8/8/2014 1:49 PM:
On August 8, 2014 9:47:51 AM PDT, Pikov Andropov wrote:
What difference does it make that a file was produced by a proprietary
program?
The issue s whether or not the end user can, in theory at least, go in and
fix whatever is causing the
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Pikov Andropov piko...@gmail.com wrote:
jonathon wrote on 8/8/2014 1:49 PM:
On August 8, 2014 9:47:51 AM PDT, Pikov Andropov wrote:
What difference does it make that a file was produced by a proprietary
program?
The issue s whether or not the end user
Hi,
Commnts inline...
Liebe Grüße, / Yours,
Florian Reisinger
Am 08.08.2014 um 20:09 schrieb Pikov Andropov piko...@gmail.com:
jonathon wrote on 8/8/2014 1:49 PM:
MSO 2013 is incompatible with itself
Yes! Open Excel, use THE Date bug (a Feb 29th which never exists in reality,
Hi :)
Yes, MSO formats are tricky. MS keep changing the spec without changing
the name. I find the best work-around is to use the older MS formats
Doc instead of DocX
Xls instead of XlsX
Ppt instead of PptX
and so on.
In LibreOffice you can set the default to be these older formats and i
think
On 08/08/14 11:15, Pikov Andropov wrote:
I didn't know that. So if I have MSO 2007 and get a DOCX file from
someone with MSO 10 or 13, can I expect to have trouble opening it?
Unfortunately, yes, but in a totally unpredictable way.
Sorry for the technical details, but they are necessary to
Italo - no need to apologize. Your ability to make even non tech savvy
people (or less tech savvy) understand the absurdities of it all is truly
an art. Thanks!
Best,
Joel
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 08/08/14 11:15, Pikov Andropov wrote:
Hello again,
On 6 août 2014 23:29:44 CEST, Pikov Andropov piko...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm so confused by the multiple version that I have to ask.
Several neighbors are eligible for me to install LibreOffice.
One has Windows XP.
One has Windows 7 and o9ne has Windows 8.
One has Ubuntu and one has
Le 07.08.2014 09:54, Tom Davies a écrit :
Hi :)
+1
(to James's suggestion.)
I think most people on this mailing list would probably agree with
getting
the 4.2.6.
That is your own wild call and your own opinion. I don't agree with you.
Many people don't agree with you. Stop saying somebody
On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 09:59:46 +0200
Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Le 07.08.2014 09:54, Tom Davies a écrit :
Hi :)
+1
(to James's suggestion.)
I think most people on this mailing list would probably agree with
getting
the 4.2.6.
That is your own
Le 07.08.2014 14:50, Paul a écrit :
On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 09:59:46 +0200
Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Le 07.08.2014 09:54, Tom Davies a écrit :
Hi :)
+1
(to James's suggestion.)
I think most people on this mailing list would probably agree with
getting
the
On 8/6/2014 6:34 PM, V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu wrote:
No great mystery.
If they are more conservative--LibreOffice 4.2.6 is a solid build, somewhat
lacking in the latest office features.
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-still/
Not for everyone... the fact that the
Tom,
Please stop this passive-aggressive behaviour. Users' request are not
spam. Why do you call them that?
Anyway, you ask a good question. On these channels we receive three kind
of questions and here's how things tend to work:
1) request for feature : people or the biggest majority of
Personally, I would do the following for Windows XP through Win7. I do
not work with 8 or 8.1.
Install 4.2.6. When 4.2.7 comes out, you might want to update to that
one, but it is not really needed.
Once 4.3.x gets to 4.3.3 or 4.3.4, then go to the 4.3.x line - if
wanted. I may or may
Hi Charles,
Thanks for the info on a different feedback system generating a
different view of the topic. That was very useful, and I think should
have been mentioned *much* earlier.
It is likely the the people who mostly come to this list are the ones
with problems, so we are likely to see a
Hi :)
Oddly on the Users Support mailing list we tend to get a lot of questions
asking for support and not so many posts telling us that they don't need
support.
I guess if people were asking for technical support in the social media
thing then they would be a bit lost, right! Would you solve
Hello Paul,
On 7 août 2014 16:44:25 CEST, Paul paulste...@afrihost.co.za wrote:
Hi Charles,
Thanks for the info on a different feedback system generating a
different view of the topic. That was very useful, and I think should
have been mentioned *much* earlier.
It is likely the the people who
Hi Charles,
On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 18:23:17 +0200
Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Fyi maybe it is my browser but I see that on the homepage clicking on
download will dispmay a menu with the two branches. Surely that is an
acceptable behaviour?
Yes, I see that
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 8/7/2014 3:05 AM:
Hello Pikov,
On 7 août 2014 01:30:57 CEST, Pikov Andropov piko...@gmail.com wrote:
V Stuart Foote wrote on 8/6/2014 6:34 PM:
No great mystery.
If they are more conservative--LibreOffice 4.2.6 is a solid build,
somewhat lacking in the latest
Tom Davies wrote on 8/7/2014 4:05 AM:
Hi :)
With all due respect Charles it is not your reputation on the line
here. It's Pikov's.
Why? Because I asked the original question?
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 8/7/2014 3:12 AM:
Hello again,
On 6 août 2014 23:29:44 CEST, Pikov Andropov piko...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm so confused by the multiple version that I have to ask.
Several neighbors are eligible for me to install LibreOffice.
One has Windows XP.
One has Windows 7 and
On 7 août 2014 21:09:34 CEST, Pikov Andropov piko...@gmail.com wrote:
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 8/7/2014 3:12 AM:
Hello again,
On 6 août 2014 23:29:44 CEST, Pikov Andropov piko...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm so confused by the multiple version that I have to ask.
Several neighbors are eligible
On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 21:25:12 +0200
Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
As for which version: they are your neighbours? They do not stream
financial data in real time in and out of their office suite? They
don't do the accounting nor the legal documents
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 8/7/2014 3:25 PM:
On 7 août 2014 21:09:34 CEST, Pikov Andropov piko...@gmail.com wrote:
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 8/7/2014 3:12 AM:
Hello again,
On 6 août 2014 23:29:44 CEST, Pikov Andropov piko...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm so confused by the multiple version that I
On 07/08/14 14:14, Paul wrote:
The big debate recently has been over exactly this issue. A lot of
people on this list (myself included) have expressed the opinion that it
is best in this sort of circumstance to go for Still, but Charles is
among those that feel that it is best to go for
No great mystery.
If they are more conservative--LibreOffice 4.2.6 is a solid build, somewhat
lacking in the latest office features.
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-still/
If they have more tolerance for change, and accept the potential for some as
yet undescribed bugs
V Stuart Foote wrote on 8/6/2014 6:34 PM:
No great mystery.
If they are more conservative--LibreOffice 4.2.6 is a solid build, somewhat
lacking in the latest office features.
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-still/
If they have more tolerance for change, and accept the
Pikov, *,
-Original Message-
From: Pikov Andropov [mailto:piko...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 6:31 PM
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] What version?
V Stuart Foote wrote on 8/6/2014 6:34 PM:
No great mystery.
If they are more
On 08/06/2014 05:29 PM, Pikov Andropov wrote:
I'm so confused by the multiple version that I have to ask.
Several neighbors are eligible for me to install LibreOffice.
One has Windows XP.
One has Windows 7 and o9ne has Windows 8.
One has Ubuntu and one has Linux Mint.
Another has Red Hat
75 matches
Mail list logo