Hi Grace,
I would like to ask if a feature be added so that form fields can be set as
transparent not just colors. This has been something that many users would
like to see added:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106810
Would this be possible, and if so how soon could this b
Gentle Grace,
unfortunately it is not possible to guess any date for enhancements as well
as for many bugs, unless there is someone funding for that work
specifically.
In fact, many developers are volunteers and thus it's up to them and their
choices and willing to select which bugs or features to
Hello,
I would like to ask if a feature be added so that form fields can be set as
transparent not just colors. This has been something that many users would
like to see added:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106810
Would this be possible, and if so how soon could this be adde
At 15:22 28/03/2015 +0100, Stefan Weigel wrote:
When sorting, it's not recommended to select a range, rather than a
single cell. Calc (or Excel) will select the range to be sorted by
its own. Selecting a specific range before sorting is only helpful
for very special cases, when automatic select
Hi,
Am 26.03.2015 um 01:57 schrieb Richard VINCK:
> For logical and safety reasons, and for compatibility with Microsoft
> Excel, I suggest that:
> * The Sort Option "Range contains column labels" be_unticked by
> default.
Your suggestion does *not* establish compatibility with Microsoft
Ex
For logical and safety reasons, and for compatibility with Microsoft
Excel, I suggest that:
* The Sort Option "Range contains column labels" be_unticked by
default_.
* Allow the sort options to be customized (optional).
It is good that LibreOffice has this option, but a beginner don't k
Hi :)
Personally i would rather see Base becoming much easier and much more
reliable. So instead of duplicating the database functionality it would
just be easier to incorporate it's use into spreadsheets that have grown a
bit further than might have been planned.
I feel like there are signs of t
All,
Spreadsheets are wonderful applications for financial analysis and
collections of information. We use Calc to store information about the
tools in my tool chest, items in the pantry, and I know a lady that uses
a spreadsheet for the shoes in her closet. Basically, Calc is being
used as a fl
feature: view flash files in a power point document. i have a lot of power
point files that contain flash content, and i cant play them using libre offce
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffic
At 21:48 23/11/2013 +, David Gast wrote:
On a recent test, I noticed that the HTML ␣ entities did not
get changed when inserting, ...
Could that be because ␣ is not an HTML entity?!
That is, the Writer document showed something like ␣␣100 .
An HTML principle is that white space is cond
different fonts to find that character.
That is, the
Writer document showed something like ␣␣100 .
Best regards,
David Gast
From: Kracked_P_P---webmaster [webmas...@krackedpress.com]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 15:05
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
ent showed something like ␣␣100 .
Best regards,
David Gast
From: Kracked_P_P---webmaster [webmas...@krackedpress.com]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 15:05
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Feature Request - Categories for spec
On 11/22/2013 1:34 PM, Mark Bourne wrote:
Ruth Ann wrote:
OT maybe, but does anyone know the name for "@" ?
Something I have been trying to discover for years :-)
Ruth Ann,
Cincinnati, OH USA
It depends who you ask, and in what language ;o) Unicode calls it
"commercial at". The article about
On 11/21/2013 11:37 PM, Doug wrote:
I always think of # as being a sharp sign
I always think of a tic-tac-toe game.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more:
On 11/22/2013 01:20 PM, Mark Bourne wrote:
Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
On 11/21/2013 01:59 PM, Mark Bourne wrote:
David Gast wrote:
I have two ideas.
Interestingly, Windows Vista's "Character Map" utility (and probably
also Windows 7's?) has similar ideas...
1. Highlight the categories,
rom: James Knott
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 1:23 PM
To: LibreOffice
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Feature Request - Categories for
special characters
Mark Bourne wrote:
I always think of # as being a sharp sign.
The musical sharp symbol is slightly different: ♯
Yeah, it is a bit flat to
The recorded voicemail messages (at least here in the U.S.), always instruct
us to "press the pound key."
Virgil
-Original Message-
From: James Knott
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 1:23 PM
To: LibreOffice
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Feature Request - Categories f
Ruth Ann wrote:
OT maybe, but does anyone know the name for "@" ?
Something I have been trying to discover for years :-)
Ruth Ann,
Cincinnati, OH USA
It depends who you ask, and in what language ;o) Unicode calls it
"commercial at". The article about it on Wikipedia is titled "At sign",
and m
Mark Bourne wrote:
>> I always think of # as being a sharp sign.
>
> The musical sharp symbol is slightly different: ♯
Yeah, it is a bit flat to be a sharp sign. ;-)
I've always known it as a number sign.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www
Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
On 11/21/2013 01:59 PM, Mark Bourne wrote:
David Gast wrote:
I have two ideas.
Interestingly, Windows Vista's "Character Map" utility (and probably
also Windows 7's?) has similar ideas...
1. Highlight the categories, so it is easy to tell where the category
st
Doug wrote:
On 11/21/2013 02:00 PM, Mark Bourne wrote:
Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
Then there are the younger users that know "#" only as "hash-tag" and
not "pound-sign". Yes many of the "standard" characters have different
names depending on the languages used.
In the UK, "#" is more comm
On 11/21/2013 01:59 PM, Mark Bourne wrote:
David Gast wrote:
I have two ideas.
Interestingly, Windows Vista's "Character Map" utility (and probably
also Windows 7's?) has similar ideas...
1. Highlight the categories, so it is easy to tell where the category
starts and ends.
Vista's chara
At 01:37 22/11/2013 -0500, Doug McGarrett wrote:
When I was in grade school, over 60 years ago, "lb." meant pound(s).
That's only for pounds Avoirdupois (and it's
"lb", not "lb."), of course. Pounds Sterling is £.
Brian Barker
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoff
On 11/21/2013 02:00 PM, Mark Bourne wrote:
> Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
>> Then there are the younger users that know "#" only as "hash-tag" and
>> not "pound-sign". Yes many of the "standard" characters have different
>> names depending on the languages used.
>
> In the UK, "#" is more common
Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
Then there are the younger users that know "#" only as "hash-tag" and
not "pound-sign". Yes many of the "standard" characters have different
names depending on the languages used.
In the UK, "#" is more commonly known as "hash" or "number sign".
For us, "pound si
Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
Then there are the younger users that know "#" only as "hash-tag" and
not "pound-sign". Yes many of the "standard" characters have different
names depending on the languages used.
In the UK, "#" is more commonly known as "hash" or "number sign".
For us, "pound si
David Gast wrote:
I have two ideas.
Interestingly, Windows Vista's "Character Map" utility (and probably
also Windows 7's?) has similar ideas...
1. Highlight the categories, so it is easy to tell where the category starts
and ends.
Vista's character map has an option to group by Unicode
the more things change, the more they stay the same ;-)
This is quite an interesting list; thanks for sharing.
From: Kracked_P_P---webmaster
Date: Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Feature Request - Categories for special
characters
To: users
On 11/18/2013 10:17 AM, Dries Feys wrote:
Yes, I can imagine that some native French speaking people don't know
the meaning of "at", spoken for them as "èt", but the sign "@" is
ar(r)obas(e) in French.
In Dutch it is called "apestaartje" (monkey tale), but "at" is more
commonly used...
Met vri
At 09:02 18/11/2013 -0600, Anne Noname wrote:
Who doesn't know the word ampersand ...
This is a rather silly question: you can't expect me to name
names! But - as I said before - the answer is "many people". Just
ask around ...
who now days doesn't know the at-sign ...
You have made my
sn't know the word ampersand ...
>who now days doesn't know the at-sign ...
> and the tilde is one of the marks, in the Romance languages,
> placed over some of their letters to distinguish meanings ...
>
>
>
>
> From: Brian Barker
> Dat
at 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Feature Request - Categories for special
characters
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
At 17:35 16/11/2013 +, Toki "Jonathon" Kantoor wrote:
> Under what circumstances would one be using glyphs they know not the name
> of?
>
Man
On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 21:59:04 +
jonathon wrote:
> On 11/16/2013 08:17 PM, Paul wrote:
>
> >> Taking, thorn, for example, with the current setup, one knows to
> >> look in the Runic range.
> > You might, but that doesn't mean everybody does.
>
> Only if one has paid absolutely no attention to
On 11/16/2013 08:17 PM, Paul wrote:
>> Unicode allows for 1,114,112 different glyphs, excluding variants.
>> with variants, you are looking at roughly 1,750,000 glyphs.
> And so... how does this relate to 2000 pages?
The largest currently available Pan-Unicode font contains roughly
100,000 glyph
At 21:54 16/11/2013 +0200, Paul Steyn wrote:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 19:35:53 + Brian Barker wrote:
Some people think "~" is a tilde. (Hint: it's a swung dash.)
Actually, it *is* a tilde (or at least looks identical to).
The character I typed is mid-height and wouldn't fit over even a
lowe
Hi,
Brian Barker schrieb:
At 17:35 16/11/2013 +, Toki "Jonathon" Kantoor wrote:
Under what circumstances would one be using glyphs they know not the
name of?
Many people do not know the name "ampersand". No-one knows what "@" is
called.
Unicode has charts, where you can lookup the charac
On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 17:35:05 +
jonathon wrote:
> On 11/15/2013 10:17 PM, Paul wrote:
>
> > That still doesn't make any sense. What is this theoretical 2000
> > page maximum?
>
> Unicode allows for 1,114,112 different glyphs, excluding variants.
> with variants, you are looking at roughly 1
On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 19:35:53 +
Brian Barker wrote:
> Some people think "~" is a tilde. (Hint: it's a swung dash.)
Actually, it *is* a tilde (or at least looks identical to).
See the section "Keyboards" here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tilde
My keyboard only has one such symbol on it tha
At 17:35 16/11/2013 +, Toki "Jonathon" Kantoor wrote:
Under what circumstances would one be using glyphs they know not the name of?
Many people do not know the name "ampersand". No-one knows what "@"
is called. Some people think "~" is a tilde. (Hint: it's a swung dash.)
;^)
Brian Ba
On 11/15/2013 10:17 PM, Paul wrote:
> That still doesn't make any sense. What is this theoretical 2000 page maximum?
Unicode allows for 1,114,112 different glyphs, excluding variants.
with variants, you are looking at roughly 1,750,000 glyphs.
> And why would the glyph's position be known?
Tak
On 11/15/2013 05:17 PM, Paul wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:34:33 -0500
> Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
>
>> On 11/15/2013 01:19 PM, Paul wrote:
>>> On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:06:05 +
>>> jonathon wrote:
>>>
> Sounds simple enough (and useful) to me, and I'm not sure I agree
> with e-le
Gast
From: Regina Henschel [rb.hensc...@t-online.de]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 07:55
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Feature Request - Categories for special
characters
Hi Steve,
Steve Gruspier schrieb:
> Hello:
>
> I was wondering if this
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:34:33 -0500
Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
> On 11/15/2013 01:19 PM, Paul wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:06:05 +
> > jonathon wrote:
> >
> >>> Sounds simple enough (and useful) to me, and I'm not sure I agree
> >>> with e-letter's objection above,
> >> Instead of th
On 11/15/2013 01:19 PM, Paul wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:06:05 +
> jonathon wrote:
>
>>> Sounds simple enough (and useful) to me, and I'm not sure I agree
>>> with e-letter's objection above,
>> Instead of the current theoretical maximum of 2000 page to search for
>> a rarely used glyph, w
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:06:05 +
jonathon wrote:
>
> > Sounds simple enough (and useful) to me, and I'm not sure I agree
> > with e-letter's objection above,
>
> Instead of the current theoretical maximum of 2000 page to search for
> a rarely used glyph, whose position is known, you'd have to
> Sounds simple enough (and useful) to me, and I'm not sure I agree with
> e-letter's objection above,
Instead of the current theoretical maximum of 2000 page to search for a
rarely used glyph, whose position is known, you'd have to search through
25000 pages for a glyph whose position is both u
On 11/14/2013 10:55 AM, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi Steve,
Steve Gruspier schrieb:
Hello:
I was wondering if this was the place to request a feature. I was
thinking the "Special Character" section is very cluttered. My feature
request is a setting that would narrow down special characters to one
Hi Steve,
Steve Gruspier schrieb:
Hello:
I was wondering if this was the place to request a feature. I was
thinking the "Special Character" section is very cluttered. My feature
request is a setting that would narrow down special characters to ones
that are used in specific fields such as "Engi
On 11/13/2013 04:28 PM, Steve Gruspier wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I was wondering if this was the place to request a feature. I was
> thinking the "Special Character" section is very cluttered. My feature
> request is a setting that would narrow down special characters to ones
> that are used in specific
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:12:46 +
e-letter wrote:
> On 13/11/2013, Steve Gruspier wrote:
> > thinking the "Special Character" section is very cluttered. My
> > feature request is a setting that would narrow down special
> > characters to ones that are used in specific fields such as
> > "En
On 13/11/2013, Steve Gruspier wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I was wondering if this was the place to request a feature. I was
>
Perhaps as discussion, then submit via bugzilla.
> thinking the "Special Character" section is very cluttered. My feature
> request is a setting that would narrow down spec
Hello:
I was wondering if this was the place to request a feature. I was
thinking the "Special Character" section is very cluttered. My feature
request is a setting that would narrow down special characters to ones
that are used in specific fields such as "Engineering" or "Physics".
Something
Le 11/10/2013 00:09, CougarB a écrit :
> When I was a full-time journalist in the 1980s, I became very successful
> using a dedicated outliner called PCOutline. When all the major Word
> Processers came along--MS Word, Word Perfect, etc, the lack of outliner
> functionality kept me with my archaic
On 10/10/2013 10:50 PM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
> I am not a Macro person, but I wonder how much of this can be done with
> Macros.
This is where it would have been extremely useful to have access to
source code for OOo extensions.
Everything requested was not only doable, but done by pe
On 10/10/2013, CougarB wrote:
>
> I used outlining as my main method of work when a full-time technical
> writer
> in the 90s (e.g., Fujitsu Software in San Jose). While working for a java
> house, I was so influenced by the negative developer reactions to MS, that
> I've been wishing to move to O
I Know that the DEVs do not have much time to read these posts, but I
hoped that some poeple on this list might know enough about the Macros
to know if it was possible.
Since I am not on the DEVs list, maybe someone can forward the original
posting to their list
I did not know a feature requ
Just a friendly reminder that devs rarely track this mailing list. If
you have a feature request it belongs on our bug tracker
(bugs.freedesktop.org) else it will never get implemented.
Best,
Joel
On 10/10/2013 03:50 PM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
I am not a Macro person, but I wonder ho
I've been using opml editor (on Windows, unfortunately) which seems to
do all these things. Once stuff is in place it can be copied and pasted
into a LO document, I believe. I've even been able to do a bit in Text
Pad with indents and then copying it into the opml editor creates a good
outline. I t
I am not a Macro person, but I wonder how much of this can be done with
Macros.
I know one book writer that does a great deal of his work through macros
he created over the years. He could not find any word processor package
that did what he wanted so he learned to write macros. First with Star
When I was a full-time journalist in the 1980s, I became very successful
using a dedicated outliner called PCOutline. When all the major Word
Processers came along--MS Word, Word Perfect, etc, the lack of outliner
functionality kept me with my archaic outliner until MS Word beat the
functionality o
Apols and regards from
Tom :)
>
> From: John Sowden
>To: users@global.libreoffice.org
>Sent: Friday, 9 August 2013, 5:20
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Feature Request
>
>
>
>
>Well, where do I start?
>1) Unlike many helpful
On 08/08/2013 05:47 PM, Girvin R. Herr wrote:
John,
In Linux X/KDE, and I suppose Ubuntu too, you can use Alt-left-button
to drag windows beyond the desktop boundaries. Therefore, if your
window is outside the desktop at the bottom and you cannot get to that
lower right corner, place the mouse
t: Friday, 9 August 2013, 1:47
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Feature Request
>
>
>John,
>In Linux X/KDE, and I suppose Ubuntu too, you can use Alt-left-button to
>drag windows beyond the desktop boundaries. Therefore, if your window is
>outside the desktop at the
John,
In Linux X/KDE, and I suppose Ubuntu too, you can use Alt-left-button to
drag windows beyond the desktop boundaries. Therefore, if your window is
outside the desktop at the bottom and you cannot get to that lower right
corner, place the mouse cursor anywhere in the window you wish to move
Similar to gedit (ubuntu), it would be nice if I could point my mouse
_near_ the lower right corner to adjust the size of a libre office
window, as opposed to placing the tip of the mouse pointer arrow on the
pixel where the vertical and horizontal lines meet. Usually I cannot
even get to the b
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 13:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
RamonTavarez wrote:
> Hi.
>
> It would be a good enhacement include into MATH's docking window a section
> for greek letters and other mathematicals symbols.
>
> Just to simplify the edition's time on academics jobs.
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
> --
> View thi
Hi.
It would be a good enhacement include into MATH's docking window a section
for greek letters and other mathematicals symbols.
Just to simplify the edition's time on academics jobs.
Regards.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Feature-request-MATH-Include
On 2/12/2013 2:04 PM, John R. Sowden wrote:
I know this is a bad time, since 4.0 was just released, but
improvement is an ongoing process.
For the 'recent documents' menu selection under 'file', it
would be nice to:
1) allow us to set the number of recent documents, under
tools/options.
2) al
At 11:04 12/02/2013 -0800, John R. Sowden wrote:
For the 'recent documents' menu selection under 'file', it would be
nice to: 1) allow us to set the number of recent documents, under
tools/options.
I know this is not quite what you are asking for, but in the absence
of exactly what you want,
On 2013-02-12 3:11 PM, John R. Sowden wrote:
I will follow your advice, although I think that this process needs
review. I feel that it is disrespectful to the people that are creating
this great program to say that since My Idea (emphasis added) is not
there, then it is a bug.
Hi John,
You
re and more
> complex stuff.
> Regards from
> Tom :)
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > From: John R. Sowden
> >To: users@global.libreoffice.org
> >Sent: Tuesday, 12 February 2013, 20:11
> >Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Feature Re
On 02/12/2013 03:11 PM, John R. Sowden wrote:
I will follow your advice, although I think that this process needs
review. I feel that it is disrespectful to the people that are
creating this great program to say that since My Idea (emphasis added)
is not there, then it is a bug. Secondly, goo
stuff.
Regards from
Tom :)
>
> From: John R. Sowden
>To: users@global.libreoffice.org
>Sent: Tuesday, 12 February 2013, 20:11
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Feature Request
>
>I will follow your advice, although I think that this process needs review. I
>feel that it is d
On 02/12/2013 03:01 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:
On 02/12/2013 02:04 PM, John R. Sowden wrote:
I know this is a bad time, since 4.0 was just released, but
improvement is an ongoing process.
For the 'recent documents' menu selection under 'file', it would be
nice to:
1) allow us to set th
I will follow your advice, although I think that this process needs
review. I feel that it is disrespectful to the people that are creating
this great program to say that since My Idea (emphasis added) is not
there, then it is a bug. Secondly, good improvements from actual users
might not be
Don't worry, just file it as a bug, and explain that it is a feature
request. The devs will understand.
On Tuesday, 12 February 2013, John R. Sowden wrote:
> I went to the site that you recommended. I could not find any feature
> request link. I searched for 'feature', no luck. I also could no
On 02/12/2013 02:04 PM, John R. Sowden wrote:
I know this is a bad time, since 4.0 was just released, but
improvement is an ongoing process.
For the 'recent documents' menu selection under 'file', it would be
nice to:
1) allow us to set the number of recent documents, under tools/options.
2)
I went to the site that you recommended. I could not find any feature
request link. I searched for 'feature', no luck. I also could not find
a reference to 'recent', as my 'feature request' might be interpreted to
mean that it is a 'bug'. I searched the entire page.
John
On 02/12/201
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:04 AM, John R. Sowden wrote:
> I know this is a bad time, since 4.0 was just released, but improvement is
> an ongoing process.
>
> For the 'recent documents' menu selection under 'file', it would be nice
> to:
> 1) allow us to set the number of recent documents, under
I know this is a bad time, since 4.0 was just released, but improvement
is an ongoing process.
For the 'recent documents' menu selection under 'file', it would be nice to:
1) allow us to set the number of recent documents, under tools/options.
2) allow us, in the recent menu, to right click and
Hi Johnny,
Johnny Rosenberg schrieb:
https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60183
Thoughts?
=SUBSTITUTE("123123123";"3";"abc";2) returns 12312abc123.
is already implemented. You can use as forth parameter everything, which
gives a positive integer.
"I think this would be a
https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60183
Thoughts?
Johnny Rosenberg
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoun
Feature request should be made via our bug tracking system at
bugs.freedesktop.org, mark "enhancement" on priority. Thanks for the help
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Jean-Pascal Richir wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> Happy 2013!
> I'm new to this list, so I hope I'm in the right place (please tell
Hello everyone,
Happy 2013!
I'm new to this list, so I hope I'm in the right place (please tell me if I'm
not). I've been using LibreOffice (OpenOffice before the fork of the project)
for several years, and for the first time I would like to suggest a new feature
for Impress. Well, actually it's
Hi,
You are most welcome. I am a farmer among other things. A 50 horsepower
tractor will take twice as long to do the same amount of work as a 100
horsepower tractor. A computer processor only has so many cycles in a
given time frame. If another processor had twice as many cycles, things
shou
ull of the images you use before they run
into trouble.
It's not clear what operating system you are using. Xp or a Gnu&Linux such as
Ubuntu?
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Sun, 18/3/12, minhsien0330 wrote:
From: minhsien0330
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] [Feature request] Allow
Hi, Don:
I do belive a newer computer would minimize the saving time, but I have no
money to buy a new one.
I think "allow typing while saving files" would be a good feature for many
old computer users.
Such feature will save our working time when using Libreoffice on old
machines, we don't need to
Hi,
I think that Tom was thinking he made a double post, not you. Do you
know anyone who has a newer computer with a faster processor and more
memory that you could run your files on to see if there is any
difference between theirs and yours? Then we would know if it is a
hardware issue with
Hi~Tom and Daniel:
I set the cache to 256MB (Tools - Options - Memory), but the saving time
did not change, and Writer still did not accepting any keyboard input
during saving the file.
Maybe my machine is really too old?
(CPU type : Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2300 @ 1.66GHz with 2G DDR2-ram)
I am
n0330
Subject: [libreoffice-users] [Feature request] Allow typing when saving file
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Saturday, 17 March, 2012, 0:36
Dear all:
I have some "big" *.odt files, it contains many pictures and pages.
When I press Ctrl+S to save the file (or When LibreOffice
Hi :)
Thanks for trying it. I'm really sorry it didn't work. Perhaps post as a
feature request?
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Sat, 17/3/12, Daniel Wibbing wrote:
From: Daniel Wibbing
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] [Feature request] Al
t very slow about showing it
> on-screen? Keep typing and see if your typing appears rapidly once the save
> has finished in a cheesy 80's film type of way.
> Regards from
> Tom :)
>
>
> --- On Sat, 17/3/12, Daniel Wibbing wrote:
>
> From: Daniel Wibbing
> Sub
bbing
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] [Feature request] Allow typing when saving file
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Saturday, 17 March, 2012, 10:04
Although it does not help you, I just want to agree to you. This waiting time
bothers me too.
Saving while typing would be really nice.
D
Although it does not help you, I just want to agree to you. This waiting time
bothers me too.
Saving while typing would be really nice.
Daniel
Am 17.03.2012 um 01:36 schrieb minhsien0330:
> Dear all:
> I have some "big" *.odt files, it contains many pictures and pages.
> When I press Ctrl+S t
Hi,
I've never had any LibreOffice/OpenOffice files that large. I do a fair
amount of work with video though, which can tax a system. Without
knowing the processor speed and memory in your computer, based on how
you described the file(s), I'm guessing that this may be more of a
hardware limit
Hi,
There is a button on the format toolbar to merge and unmerge cells. The
button appears as grayed out until you select some cells. It has always
worked great for me.
Don
On 12/16/2011 05:58 PM, Jochen Betz wrote:
I had some problems to find a way to place my feature request. So my
first
Of course you are free to send feature-request to LO developers (as Jean-
Baptiste Faure pointed out). But in the meantime, you can use keyboard
shortcut.
In Tools -> Customize -> Keyboard find keyboard shortcut of choice (think of
something you can press with one hand (perhaps left, if you use
Le 16/12/2011 23:58, Jochen Betz a écrit :
> I had some problems to find a way to place my feature request. So my
> first request would be to make this task itself easier.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=LibreOffice&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED
and choose "enhancement" in severity dro
I had some problems to find a way to place my feature request. So my
first request would be to make this task itself easier.
So I hope this is (a|the right) way to address my concerns.
But what I'm missing in LibreOffice Calc (and I have to admit that
MSOffice has this feature) to merge cells by
Il 14/07/2011 16:03, David B Teague sr ha scritto:
On 7/14/2011 9:17 AM, Marcello Romani wrote:
Yes, MSO has faster startup times also IME, at least on windows. On
Ubuntu 10.04 I must say that the provided OOo takes a little time when
first started after a reboot, but from then on, given suffici
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
