Try Microsoft.Dynamic.dll ;)
Dave
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of mohammad mustaq
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 5:49 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: [IronPython] Microsoft.Scripting Assembly Version 1.0 does not contain
All the team can say at this point is that there's an official comment from
Microsoft on Mary-Jo Foley's blog - see Update (August 10) on
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft/whats-next-for-microsofts-ironruby/7034?tag=mantle_skin;content.
Dave
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
It's nothing new, and probably needs a less confusing name;) This is just what
we refer to the generic IronPython Tools bits as. E.g., IronPython Tools is to
IronStudio as IronPython is to DLR.
My best,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
In this particular case, the exclusion was intentional and because CPython
2.7's ssl module is busted under IronPython 2.7A1:
D:\rft\vsl\dlr\External.LCA_RESTRICTED\Languages\IronPython\27\DLLsipyd
IronPython 2.7 Alpha 1 DEBUG (2.7.0.10) on .NET 4.0.30319.1
Type help,
Yup, I think you'll find the situation in IronPython 2.7A1 to be a bit better
in this respect:
D:\rft\vsl\dlr\bintype blah.py
from System.Diagnostics import Stopwatch
t = Stopwatch()
try:
t.Start()
x = 1/0
except Exception,
?
--
-- Lukas
On 27.7.2010 19:18, Dave Fugate wrote:
Hi Lukas, the deal is IronPython 2.6.x (where x0) will run against .NET 2.0
SP1, .NET 4.0, Silverlight 3, and Silverlight 4. You'll only be able to build
IronPython 2.6.x against .NET 2.0 SP1, .NET 4.0, and Silverlight 3 though. In
other
\Interpreter\Instructions\CallInstruction.Generated.cs
27870Microsoft.Dynamic
How can I tell Visual Studio to use reference from Microsoft.Scripting.Utils?
Thanks.
--
-- Lukas
On 26.7.2010 18:21, Dave Fugate wrote:
Hi Lukas, the error message below is because you don't have the version
not support Silverlight 4 + .NET 2 SP1 or
Silverlight 4 + .NET 4
* IronPython 2.7 will support Silverlight 4 + .NET 4
What will IronPython 2.6.2 support?
--
-- Lukas
On 27.7.2010 17:31, Dave Fugate wrote:
I'd actually suggest doing this with 2.7 Alpha 1 sources...
Building 2.6.1 requires
Hi Lukas, the error message below is because you don't have the version of
Silverlight installed which was used to build IronPython 2.6.1. For this
particular release, I believe it was something like %ProgramFiles%\Microsoft
Silverlight\3.0.40624.0. You can find out for sure by examining the
These assemblies are all in the GAC now instead of the install folder. There's
likely some way to pull them from the GAC, but the simpler option would be the
-Bin.zip file.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On
Hello Python Community,
We're pleased to announce the Alpha release of IronPython 2.7 which can be
downloaded at http://ironpython.codeplex.com/releases/view/42434. This is a
major new version of IronPython with a number of significant updates. Because
this is an Alpha release it is not yet
for IronPython
On 01/07/2010 20:14, Dave Fugate wrote:
Enthoughthttp://www.enthought.com/, a company specialized in Python-based
scientific computing solutions,
announcedhttp://www.enthought.com/media/SciPyNumPyDotNet.pdf a partnership
with Microsoft several hours ago at the SciPy
2010https
Enthoughthttp://www.enthought.com/, a company specialized in Python-based
scientific computing solutions,
announcedhttp://www.enthought.com/media/SciPyNumPyDotNet.pdf a partnership
with Microsoft several hours ago at the SciPy
2010https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2010/index.html conference in
Thanks for spotting this. It should be fixed now.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Steve Dower
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 2:49 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Missing
ourselves. .NET 2.0
SP1 will be dropped completely and we won't be doing our normal extensive test
passes on .NET 3.5.
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com [mailto:users-
boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Dave Fugate
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 10:38 AM
That's our current thinking.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Hardy
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 9:01 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] IronPython 2.6 CodePlex Source
The snippet below isn't Python... For Python you'd call:
import sys
sys.exit(0)
replacing 0 with whatever exit code you want to use.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Thomas Gagne
Sent:
Yes and no. Take the 2010 source zip file (IronPython-2.6.1-Src-Net40.zip)
from http://ironpython.codeplex.com/releases/view/36280 and run:
Msbuild /t:rebuild /p:configuration=V4 Release IronPython4.sln
from the src directory.
If you have only .NET 4.0 installed (that is, no VS 2010
A newer version of Dino's World's Worst Paint Program sample has just been
uploaded to the 2.6.1 download page as (Sample)
BadPaint.ziphttp://ironpython.codeplex.com/releases/view/36280#DownloadId=116523.
This sample shows how to utilize the DLR/IronPython hosting APIs to manipulate
the
Hehe...yeah I noticed I forgot that as soon as the check-in went through. The
check-in comments consisted of something similar to:
- nt.cs: implemented nt.kill. Please note that CPython doesn't implement this
on Windows
- sys.cs: I've added another _getframeImpl signature. This one
The short story here is Windows XP does not come with .NET 2.0 preinstalled on
it, and IronPython.msi requires the .NET 2.0 version of the CLR's 'ngen.exe'
utility to install IronPython assemblies.
The full story is that we use an older version of the Wix toolset to generate
IronPython.msi.
Straight to RTM.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Hardy
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 9:07 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Django, __unicode__, and #20366
On Tue,
, and #20366
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Dave Fugate dfug...@microsoft.com wrote:
Straight to RTM.
Is there a timeline? At one point I thought it was to coincide with
VS2010 RTM, but I may be thinking of something else...
- Jeff
___
Users mailing list
You're running Windows XP, right?
Thanks,
Dave
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Zhichao Hong
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 6:53 AM
To: users@lists.ironpython.com
Subject: [IronPython] Failed to install IronPython 2.6.1 rc1 for
Please ignore this and the last IronPython 2.6 CodePlex Source Update
message. We're working through a couple of issues with our automated source
updates to CodePlex.
Thanks,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com]
, February 23, 2010 3:08 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Running the IronPython tests (on Mono)
I don't see a harness.py. Maybe the snapshot I'm working from is too old.
8/5/2009
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 21:59 +, Dave Fugate wrote:
For IronPython, try running
For IronPython, try running:
IronPython\Tests ipy.exe harness.py
I haven't tried running this recently, but it did work about a year ago...
Dave
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of C.J. Adams-Collier
shameless plug
For anyone attending PyCon, I'll be presenting a poster session entitled
Behind the Iron Curtain: How Python is Tested at Microsoft. Any ways, one of
the focuses of this session is our old performance lab infrastructure. Not
only will you hear some details about how performance
Offhand, the Python snippet you've sent appears fine. When you run this
against IronPython, can you pass the -X:ExceptionDetail flag to ipy.exe and
send back the results?
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf
Thanks for reporting this Frank! Looks like a legit bug to me, and I've filed
it on CodePlex - see
http://ironpython.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=25994.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On
There's one major benefit of n different IronPython versions though - testing.
Right now, we run all CPy 2.6 tests for every IronPython (2.6) check-in. If IP
2.6 were to support CPy 2.5 as well, we'd also need to run all CPy 2.5 tests =
the check-in times would nearly double. Don't even get
Hello Python Community,
We're pleased to announce the third and hopefully final release candidate of
IronPython 2.6 which can be downloaded at
http://ironpython.codeplex.com/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=36150.
Release Candidate 3 only includes Silverlight-related changes pertaining
: [IronPython] [ANN]: IronPython 2.6 Release Candidate 3
Dave Fugate wrote:
Hello Python Community,
We're pleased to announce the third and hopefully final release
candidate of IronPython 2.6 which can be downloaded at
http://ironpython.codeplex.com/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=36150
Creating a file named ipy.exe.config alongside ipy.exe that looks similar to:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
configuration
startup
requiredRuntime version=v2.0.50727 safemode=true /
/startup
/configuration
will force IronPython to run against the given CLR runtime.
Dave
From:
Just a hunch, but you might want to try passing -X:MaxRecursion 1000 to
ipy.exe. By default, IronPython has a very high recursion limit compared to
CPython. On occasion this can cause the entire interactive session/process to
die with a StackOverflowException rather than emit a catchable
Hello Python Community,
We're pleased to announce the release of IronPython 2.6 Release Candidate 2
which can be freely downloaded at
http://ironpython.codeplex.com/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=34451.
Since the public availability of Release Candidate 1, we've addressed the
package for the final version?
Michael
Dave Fugate wrote:
Hello Python Community,
We're pleased to announce the release of IronPython 2.6 Release
Candidate 2 which can be freely downloaded at
http://ironpython.codeplex.com/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=34451.
Since the public
It'll be released tomorrow when .NET 4.0 Beta 2 is available to all;)
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Hardy
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 11:33 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject:
Hello Python Community,
We're pleased to announce the release of IronPython 2.6 Release Candidate 1
which can be freely downloaded at
http://ironpython.codeplex.com/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=30315.
Over the development span of IronPython 2.6, exactly 417 bugs have been fixed.
Just curious; what happens if you cd to site-packages and try to run the same
import directly from ipy.exe (with the -X:ExceptionDetail flag)? Based on the
fact you can get this to work with IDLE, I'd guess packetlogic is C-based and
hence subject to
No need for a new bug. This was already covered by
http://ironpython.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=19456.
Dave
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Dino Viehland
Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 12:57 PM
To: Discussion
Please note that IronPython sources found on IronRuby's GIT repository are NOT
actually an exact match or completely compatible with IronPython sources on
CodePlex. You see for IronPython we transform some uses of the System C#
namespaces into Microsoft. IronRuby doesn't do this last time I
Try:
clr.GetClrType(type(''))
David Fugate
Microsoft - IronPython
http://knowbody.livejournal.com
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Robert Smallshire
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 1:53 PM
To:
We're pleased to announce the release of IronPython 2.6 Beta 2 which can be
freely downloaded at
http://ironpython.codeplex.com/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=27350.
At this point we are essentially feature complete from a CPython 2.6
perspective, and look forward to making available
Thanks Tony! You reported this just in time for it to get fixed in 2.6 Beta 2.
If you're interested, here's a little background on the problem and the fix.
The code module is dependent upon codeop which in turn has a dependency on
__future__.all_feature_names. IronPython's own implementation
On a related note, I strongly suspect we'll be using different assembly version
numbers for IronPython 2.6.0/2.6.1/etc...
Dave
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Michael Foord
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009
.NET 2.0 was never released for Vista (which came with .NET 3.0). This is why
you're unable to install .NET 2.0 SP1 on Vista. Furthermore, there was never a
.NET 3.0 SP1 release for Vista...only .NET 3.5 which includes the .NET 2.0 SP1
changes and you can download this from here -
Thanks for reporting this Michael. It's a known issue (see
http://ironpython.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=14022), but
actually should be working under IP 2.0...
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Dave Fugate
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 4:19 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] IronPython 2.0.1 repr of floats on non UK Windows
Thanks for reporting
I think it's a safe bet that when the final version of .NET 4.0 is released
we'll either:
* re-release the latest final version of IronPython against it. If .NET 4.0
had already shipped today, this would end up being IronPython 2.0.1 for .NET
4.0
* release the next version of IronPython
Unfortunately we forgot to mention this in the release notes. Quite late in
2.6 Beta 1 testing we discovered the MSI upgrade code wasn't updated for this
release. The net effect of this being that the Windows Installer acts like 2.6
Beta 1 is actually 2.6 Alpha 1. The workaround as you've
Hello Python Community,
We're quite pleased to announce the release of IronPython 2.6 CTP for .NET 4.0
Beta 1. This is our second preview of IronPython running under the Dynamic
Language Runtime that is built directly into a .NET 4.0 release! As before,
this release allows you to use
-X:Python26 was removed before 2.6A1 was shipped. This should work out of the
box with 2.6A1:
C:\Users\dfugate.REDMONDC:\Program Files\IronPython 2.6\ipy.exe
IronPython 2.6 Alpha 1 (2.6.0.1) on .NET 2.0.50727.3053
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
It's because we strip out CPython modules that aren't importable by ipy. That
is, the sys._getframe issue I talked about at
http://knowbody.livejournal.com/13271.html is the underlying culprit here:
C:\Program Files\IronPython 2.6ipy.exe
IronPython 2.6 Alpha 1 (2.6.0.1) on .NET
At first glance, I'd say there's no need for the dssCatalog = IDSSCatalog(db)
line which doesn't work because you're attempting to instantiate an interface.
That is, if DSSDatabase truly implements IDSSCatalog; just call
db.MakeNewCatalog('').
Dave
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
] pywin32 on Iron Python?
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Jeff Hardy jdha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Dave Fugate dfug...@microsoft.com wrote:
That said, there is something extremely useful the community can do for
IronPython that our team simply cannot: get
Hi Jeff, we really do appreciate the work you did on ctypes. Unfortunately, we
would indeed not be able to (currently) take the contribution or even look at
it due to legal concerns. I realize it's fairly frustrating not being able to
contribute back to IronPython and being limited to filing
We already have a bug on this one. Please vote for
http://ironpython.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=17235.
Thanks,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Michael Foord
Sent: Monday, April
It just so happens that not too long ago we received permission from
the Microsoft legal team to run pywin32's tests against IronPython. Late
last week I started investigating which of pywin32's tests are appropriate to
hook into our own source control checkin system. By this, I simply mean
Add %ProgramFiles%\IronPython 2.0.1 to %PATH%, not %ProgramFiles%\Iron
Python 2.0.1.
Also, change 'c:\program files\syncfusion\essential
studio\7.1.0.30\assemblies\3.5' to 'rc:\program files\syncfusion\essential
studio\7.1.0.30\assemblies\3.5'.
Dave
-Original Message-
From:
...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Davy Mitchell
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 1:39 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Modifying The PYC Stub EXE
Dave - +1 :-)
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Dave Fugate dfug...@microsoft.com wrote:
I've been working on making this happen
I've been working on making this happen for a few days now. It should be
available in the IronPython_Main branch on CodePlex's TFS server within a day
or so.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Davy
Hello Python Community,
We're pleased to announce the release of IronPython 2.6 Alpha 1. As you might
imagine, this release is all about supporting new CPython 2.6 features such as
the 'bytes' and 'bytearray' types (PEP 3112), decorators for classes (PEP
3129), advanced string formatting (PEP
Thanking for reporting this. These are indeed IP 2.0.1 binaries in
IronPython-2.0.1-Bin.zip. sys.version was kept the same between IP 2.0.0 and
IP 2.0.1 similarly to what was done for the assembly versions. If this is
causing any specific issues or is too confusing, please let us know and we
Look into using sys.path_hooks and sys.meta_path (see
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0302/).
Dave
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Slutter
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 10:24 AM
To:
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Michael Foord
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 11:55 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] IronPython 2.1 Renamed to IronPython 2.6
Slide wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Dave Fugate dfug...@microsoft.com wrote
The 1.0 samples that were ported over to 2.0 have now been added to
IronPython-2.0-Samples.zip on the 2.0 release page - see
http://www.codeplex.com/IronPython/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=8365.
If you encounter any issues, please let us know or file a bug on CodePlex.
Please
I think the following might be a workaround for this:
import clr
clr.AddReference('System.Windows.Forms')
clr.AddReference('IronPython')
from System.Windows.Forms import Form, Application, TextBox
class MyTextBox(TextBox):
ProcessDialogKeyCopy = TextBox.ProcessDialogKey
def
How does python.exe compare directly to ipy.exe? That is, try running date
+%M:%S;ipy.exe interpolate.py;date +%M:%S instead of using the DLR hosting
APIs.
Thanks,
Dave
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wilfredo Lugo
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 8:32 AM
To:
This is just a small note that the IronPython Team is aware of the fact that
most IronPython documentation (e.g., Tutorial, readme, etc) included in IP
2.0RC1 is out of date with respect to IP 2.0. We'll be spending the next
couple of weeks revising this and working on the samples assuming no
The sources have just been updated and I believe this includes the changes you
wanted.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Dave Fugate
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 8:52 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: RE: [IronPython] What happened to source drops?
My best guess is the fixes
] On Behalf Of Michael Foord
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 12:17 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] What happened to source drops?
Dave Fugate wrote:
Actually there was a little confusion internally and the 40877 changeset
uploaded to CodePlex yesterday corresponds to our
Actually there was a little confusion internally and the 40877 changeset
uploaded to CodePlex yesterday corresponds to our new IronPython 2.1 branch.
In turn, the 2.1 branch was the reason there's been no source pushes for the
past two weeks - some scripts and TFS enlistments needed updating
I've now added couple of sentences about this to the IMPORTANT NOTES section
on the 2.0B5 download page along with a link to the 2.0B4 download page.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Foord
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008
Ipy.exe startup time took a ~60% hit a couple weeks ago which we're trying to
get fixed before IP 2.0B5. Also, there might be a few socket issues we're also
in the process of fixing for Beta 5.
That said, there have been a huge number of bugs that have been fixed since
Beta 4.
Dave
Hi, the source updates to CodePlex's TFS repository and the source zip files
should not even include the ability to delay-sign assemblies. I've just
verified this is still the case with the update to CodePlex yesterday. Which
IronPython binaries are you trying to run and what error message
(or alternatively .NET
3.5) installed though.
It hasn't been possible to build IronPython.sln under Visual Studio 2005 for a
couple of release cycles.
From: hellosticky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 9:34 AM
To: Dave Fugate; 'Discussion of IronPython'; 'Curt Hagenlocher
submit results back to you?
(By email to the list I guess.) We could even setup some external 'buildbot'
machines that automatically sync to codeplex.
Anyway - I'd be happy to run benchmark suites occasionally.
Michael
2008/8/19 Dave Fugate [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi everyone
the x86 and x64 CLRs. My disclaimer on this statement is
that deltas can vary widely depending upon which benchmark we look at (e.g.,
the delta for PyBench Lists between x86/x64 is under 10%).
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Fugate
Sent: Monday, August 18
Hi everyone, one of the things the IronPython test team does daily is run a set
of standardized benchmarks against the latest internal build of IronPython.
We're in the process of reevaluating the platforms we measure these benchmarks
on with the end goal of increasing the number of tests we
Hi Michael, I knew we forgot to mention something in the release notes but just
couldn't put my finger on it. Thanks for spotting this.
The omission of IronPython-2.0B4-Doc.zip which included Microsoft.Scripting.chm
from IP 2.0B4 was actually intentional. Microsoft.Scripting.chm has been out
Hello IronPython Community,
It's been several weeks since we released IronPython 1.1.2 RC1 and this build
does not appear to have caused any new issues. As a result I'm pleased to
announce the release of IronPython 1.1.2.
IronPython v1.1.2 is a minor update in which we fixed the most
Hi Michael, this seems like as good of a time as any to shed some light on our
thoughts around the IronPython samples. First Pyc - Pyc.py was indeed updated
for IronPython 2.x in our internal TFS repository last month, but as most
people are already aware we don't reship the samples with every
FYI
I've just updated
http://www.codeplex.com/IronPython/Wiki/View.aspx?title=DifferencesreferringTitle=Home
to make this clearer and added an IronPython 2.0.x/CPython 2.5.2 differences
wiki which we'll populate before releasing IP 2.0.0.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
This is most definitely a bug (should be able to import static variables from
.NET types) and thanks for spotting this Michael! Filed as CodePlex 17236.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Armes
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 1:36 PM
To:
You might want to check out the tests we have in the source distribution of
IronPython in IronPython-2.0B3\Src\Tests. Our tests are based on a custom test
harness, lib.assert_util, and look similar to py.test tests. The general
pattern they follow is:
from lib.assert_util
Just out of curiosity, what's the perf like when you utilize the -X:Interpret
flag?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian
Muirhead
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 4:57 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: [IronPython] upgrading to ip
Easy=) Check the value of sys.platform which will be cli under IronPython.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slide
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 4:20 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: [IronPython] determine if running under IP
Is
Hello IronPython Community,
We're pleased to announce the release of IronPython 2.0 Beta 2. In addition to
the usual bug fixes (~25 reported on CodePlex and ~50 reported internally),
this release has been partially focused on improving the performance of
IronPython, in particular startup
Just out of curiosity, has anyone tried using IronPython with py.test?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kamil Dworakowski
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 6:09 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] IronPython and nose
Current SVN trunk *almost*
Thanks for reporting this Michael! We actually discovered this internally
about a year ago in one of the 2.0 Alphas, and made a few changes to get it
(mostly) working again:
E:\Merlin\Main\Languages\IronPython\Samples\IPPowerShellipyd
IronPython 2.0 Beta (2.0.0.1000) on .NET
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Foord
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 1:54 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Powershell Sample and IP 2
Dave Fugate wrote:
Thanks for reporting this Michael! We actually discovered this internally
about a year ago in one of the 2.0 Alphas
Strange... Filed as
http://www.codeplex.com/IronPython/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=15571 and
thanks for reporting this!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Foord
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 3:16 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Thanks for the bug report. Filed as CodePlex 15484 -
http://www.codeplex.com/IronPython/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=15484.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Reade
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 3:02 AM
To:
IronPythonStudio is developed by Clarius Consulting Labs
(http://www.codeplex.com/clarius), and I'm a little unsure as to whether they
monitor this list. Have you tried contacting them directly about your
question(s)? If not, I found an email address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL
Hello IronPython Community,
We have just released IronPython 2.0 Alpha 8. Aside from the usual bugs fixes
this release includes a fairly major change. This is the first release of
IronPython where the Visual Studio solution file, IronPython.sln, is in Visual
Studio 2008 (VS2008) format.
Hello IronPython Community,
It's been a couple of weeks since we released IronPython 1.1.1 RC1 and this
build does not appear to have caused any new issues. As a result I'm pleased
to announce the release of IronPython 1.1.1.
IronPython v1.1.1 is a minor update in which we fixed the most
Thanks for the report Seo! Filed at
http://www.codeplex.com/IronPython/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=14835.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanghyeon Seo
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 6:57 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject:
Hello IronPython Community,
I'm pleased to announce the release of IronPython 1.1.1 Release Candidate 1.
For this release we fixed the most requested CodePlex bugs and also a handful
of trivial bugs. In total around twenty bugs have been resolved for 1.1.1 RC1.
Additionally, an issue that
The Prerequisites section of the readme.htm distributed with the Direct3D
sample contains info on fixing this (i.e., using Managed DirectX 1 instead of
the 2.0 Beta). Basically please replace all occurrences of:
clr.AddReference(Microsoft.DirectX)
with:
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
