Re: list of libraries in maven local repository

you should find your artifact. Am 09.03.21 um 11:25 schrieb Nikos Karamolegkos: Hello, I am trying to add a library to my maven local repository using ./gradlew publishToMavenLocal. How can I check that the library is really installed to the repository? Thank you -- N Oliver B. Fischer A S

Re: list of libraries in maven local repository

Karamolegkos: Hello, I am trying to add a library to my maven local repository using ./gradlew publishToMavenLocal. How can I check that the library is really installed to the repository? Thank you -- Nikos Karamolegkos R & D engineer at ICS-FORTH Telecommunications and Networks Lab

Re: list of libraries in maven local repository

The default configuration of Maven is to have its local repository in the directory ./m2/repository. Below this directory you should find your artifact. Am 09.03.21 um 11:25 schrieb Nikos Karamolegkos: Hello, I am trying to add a library to my maven local repository using ./gradlew

list of libraries in maven local repository

Hello, I am trying to add a library to my maven local repository using ./gradlew publishToMavenLocal. How can I check that the library is really installed to the repository? Thank you -- Nikos Karamolegkos R & D engineer at ICS-FORTH Telecommunications and Networks Lab

Re: Maven extension's repository

what is exact URL of 'maven website'? -D On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 5:26 PM, Vivi An wrote: > Hi All, > > I’m using takari extension through extensions.xml file under ./mvn, it > downloads extensions from maven website. Wondering if we can change > configuration in some way so

Maven extension's repository

Hi All, I’m using takari extension through extensions.xml file under ./mvn, it downloads extensions from maven website. Wondering if we can change configuration in some way so it could download all extensions from some internal repository? Thank you all! Regards, ~ Vivi

Initial Maven Install - repository download fails on large files

I have just installed: C:\workspacesmvn --version Apache Maven 3.0.4 (r1232337; 2012-01-17 09:44:56+0100) Maven home: C:\apps\apache-maven-3.0.4\bin\.. Java version: 1.7.0_03, vendor: Oracle Corporation Java home: C:\Java\jdk1.7.0_03\jre Default locale: no_NO, platform encoding: Cp1252 OS name:

Re: Maven central repository

Ok thanks to both of you! Now I've been able to update (rerunning the update a couple of times) Bye, Stefano -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Maven-central-repository-tp4901567p4909808.html Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Maven central repository

Hi everybody, I've been using Maven for a while, but now I'm facing a problem I can't understand. In the last days I've not been able to update index for maven central repository at http://repo1.maven.org/maven2 both from m2eclipse and from a proxy on my Nexus. Nothing changed in my network

Re: Maven central repository

days I've not been able to update index for maven central repository at http://repo1.maven.org/maven2 both from m2eclipse and from a proxy on my Nexus. Nothing changed in my network configuration, so I was wodering if there's a problem on the repo. Thanks, Stefano -- View this message

Re: Maven central repository

...@gmail.com: Hi everybody, I've been using Maven for a while, but now I'm facing a problem I can't understand. In the last days I've not been able to update index for maven central repository at http://repo1.maven.org/maven2 both from m2eclipse and from a proxy on my Nexus. Nothing changed in my

Maven Central Repository Bad Checksums

Once upon a time, I filed a JIRA at Codehaus: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-641. Eleven months elapsed before someone finally fixed the checksum metadata to match the jar in the repository. Yesterday, I filed another pair of issues: MEV-675 and MEV-676. I was wondering if I have to wait

Re: Maven Central Repository Bad Checksums

You should file tickets for Maven Central at [1] instead. /Anders [1] https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/MVNCENTRAL On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 15:21, Scott Parkerson s...@snortasprocket.netwrote: Once upon a time, I filed a JIRA at Codehaus: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-641. Eleven months

Re: Maven Central Repository Bad Checksums

On Dec 2, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Anders Hammar wrote: You should file tickets for Maven Central at [1] instead. [1] https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/MVNCENTRAL Sigh. This is what I get for not reading *closely* (and assuming that things were as they were 11 months ago). So Sonatype is in

Re: Maven Central Repository Bad Checksums

Furthermore, it would seem that automating this process would be the answer, as it probably wouldn't be difficult to crawl the repository and check checksums and either (a) add them where they are missing or (b) fix them where they are there and are incorrect. I don't think you want to

Re: Maven Central Repository Bad Checksums

I don't think that checksums are for detecting compromised jars. Checksums are for checking that a file was transferred correctly, regardless of it being compromised or not. So, I also think that all checksums should be corrected. However, pgp signatures are for detecting compromised files.

Re: Maven Central Repository Bad Checksums

I don't think that checksums are for detecting compromised jars. Checksums are for checking that a file was transferred correctly, regardless of it being compromised or not. So, I also think that all checksums should be corrected. But how does a bot know that the Jar was uploaded ok into

Re: Maven Central Repository Bad Checksums

We do a little bit of sleuthing when resolving these types of issues to make sure the file hasn't been changed, which is why automatic correction isn't implemented. We are working on process to ensure that no new things come in this way. It can only happen today via the old rsync mechanisms and

Maven Site Repository

What are common practices in terms of where to deploy maven sites to? I'm specifically asking for projects built internally within a company (i.e. only available to internal users). Initially I thought that our artifact repository itself would be a logical place but that doesn't seem to be a

Re: Maven Site Repository

Our artifacts go In our internal Nexus repo. Ron On 30/11/2010 11:42 AM, Mike Lenner wrote: What are common practices in terms of where to deploy maven sites to? I'm specifically asking for projects built internally within a company (i.e. only available to internal users). Initially I thought

Re: Maven Site Repository

Yes, using the maven site feature of Nexus Pro makes it one place less to manage authorization (compared to having a separate web server). /Anders On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 18:03, Ron Wheeler rwhee...@artifact-software.comwrote: Our artifacts go In our internal Nexus repo. Ron On 30/11/2010

How to create a maven local repository

Hi, In preceeding Maven version, there was a way to build and initiate a local repository via the CLI : %MAVEN_HOME%\bin\install_repo.bat %HOME%\.maven\repository And this command created a repository and loaded some core .jar By now, when I unzip maven2, under \bin I don't find

Re: How to create a maven local repository

%HOME%\.maven\repository And this command created a repository and loaded some core .jar By now, when I unzip maven2, under \bin I don't find any more a script to build a local repository. Looking at the Maven doc, I found I have to use Nexus ?!? Why not, but it's a so different way

RE: How to create a maven local repository

notes. Alain -Message d'origine- De : Roland Asmann [mailto:roland.asm...@adesso.at] Envoyé : jeudi 31 décembre 2009 1:42 Juliane À : Maven Users List Objet : Re: How to create a maven local repository Hi, Just run Maven on a project and everything will solve itself

Re: How to create a maven local repository

On 12/31/09 10:15 AM, Mezigue wrote: Hi Roland, Thanks for your advice. You are certainly right ; to be true, I should say you are surely right ! :) Of course, I have no reason to initiate a local repository, but, why was this necessary in the previous version of Maven ?? And I've not found

Re: How to create a maven local repository

On 12/31/09 10:15 AM, Mezigue wrote: Hi Roland, Thanks for your advice. You are certainly right ; to be true, I should say you are surely right ! :) Of course, I have no reason to initiate a local repository, but, why was this necessary in the previous version of Maven ?? And I've not

Re: Amazon EC2 EBS Volume for Maven central repository

What's the current storage requirements for the central repository at this time? Per Jarvana, Central is around 100gb, as of mid October 2009: http://www.jarvana.com/jarvana/info/repository_statistics Wayne - To

Re: Amazon EC2 EBS Volume for Maven central repository

a bit with EC2, It seems it would be ideal if there were an EBS volume that had all the Maven central repository within it. Does anyone know of such a thing? thanks, Mark

Re: Amazon EC2 EBS Volume for Maven central repository

On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Mark Diggory mdigg...@gmail.com wrote: I imagine there have to be a number of projects/companies out there using Maven artifacts and incurring bandwidth costs to build systems. Atlassian seems to be recommending the practice to its Bamboo users... They should

Re: Amazon EC2 EBS Volume for Maven central repository

you can set s3 buckets where requester pays http://developer.amazonwebservices.com/connect/message.jspa?messageID=123715 On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Brian Fox bri...@infinity.nu wrote: On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Mark Diggory mdigg...@gmail.com wrote: I imagine there have to be a

Re: Amazon EC2 EBS Volume for Maven central repository

FYI Initiating a thread here to see its effect. http://developer.amazonwebservices.com/connect/thread.jspa?messageID=158762#158762 Cheers, Mark On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Carlos Sanchez car...@apache.org wrote: you can set s3 buckets where requester pays

Re: Amazon EC2 EBS Volume for Maven central repository

the problem for a public dataset it's that AFAIK they are static while the repo keeps changing On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Mark Diggory mdigg...@gmail.com wrote: FYI Initiating a thread here to see its effect.

Amazon EC2 EBS Volume for Maven central repository

Cheers, After experimenting a bit with EC2, It seems it would be ideal if there were an EBS volume that had all the Maven central repository within it. Does anyone know of such a thing? thanks, Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: Amazon EC2 EBS Volume for Maven central repository

with EC2, It seems it would be ideal if there were an EBS volume that had all the Maven central repository within it.  Does anyone know of such a thing? thanks, Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org

Help to get Android artifacts to be published to Maven central repository

As a Maven and Android user and committer with the Maven Android plugin I have created a feature request on google code to get the android jar into the maven central repository. More technical details are with the bugreport: http://bit.ly/1HoyoZ If you are a Android or Maven user I would

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

Then make your own repository. See how useful that is. Jason, you are probably right. http://xircles.codehaus.org/projects/pinin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

Please see my response on the maven-dev list for how this problem is best approached. For everyone's sanity, lets keep the discussion thread on the dev list. On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Albert Kurucz albert.kur...@gmail.com wrote: Then make your own repository. See how useful that is.

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

Somebody just gave me an idea what would be an excellent tool to crawl through a repository and create an index of the artifacts, which pass some kind of acceptance criteria: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/M2ECLIPSE/Nexus+Indexer // get NexusIndexer component from Plexus PlexusContainer plexus

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

Do you really mean that you would like to enforce such -source-release.zip artefacts to be published? Not any qualities of the code should be enforced. But I very much want to be able to find those gems from the big pile of ... Therefore the artifacts on Central should be search-able and

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

For some start-ups, this could mean a business opportunity! Nobody said, that the quality info should be given away free. On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Albert Kurucz albert.kur...@gmail.com wrote: Do you really mean that you would like to enforce such -source-release.zip artefacts to be

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

Filtering is already used for another Maven feature. To avoid ambiguity, we should better call the one what I defined: repository-skinning or repository-certification. Do you think this new feature would hurt the repo or any Maven user? On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Albert Kurucz

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

Yes it would hurt. A build then becomes dependent on the certlist in order for it to function. In such a way, a cert list becomes directly equivalent to a repository definition in a pom.xml file. We do not allow repository definitions in pom files for a good reason. certlists is just another

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

Any other flaws? A build then becomes dependent on the certlist in order for it to function. The project's build will not become dependent of the certlist. If it was able to build with certlist feature turned on, it will certainly build without the certlist. We do not allow repository

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Albert Kurucz albert.kur...@gmail.com wrote: Any other flaws? A build then becomes dependent on the certlist in order for it to function. The project's build will not become dependent of the certlist. If it was able to build with certlist feature turned on, it

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

One unwritten? rule of Maven good practice is that you change the undefined dependency version definitions to fixed versions before release. If you have done that, resolution will not be effected by certlist on or off status. The value (benefit) what certlist would provide to a Maven user, is

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

Sorry for thread hijack, but was not able to resist... Another thing to think about, since it's adoption: On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: We do not allow repository definitions in pom files for a good reason. This seemed as a good

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

I did not propose point system to describe the quality of repository alone, I thought of it just to be able to compare two different repositories... (ie. you find same thing in two of them, decide which one will you want to use, etc). But now I understand that this would provide a lot less value

Re : Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

- Message d'origine De : Albert Kurucz albert.kur...@gmail.com À : Maven Users List users@maven.apache.org Envoyé le : Lundi, 28 Septembre 2009, 19h39mn 00s Objet : Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts Tamas, could explain MRMs + grouping + mirrorOf or send a link

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

, since we all talk about quality (we all agreed upon the basic things unanimously). What is the quality of a maven repository (in general)? Can we measure it? Can we define it? A wiki page with piled up (even personal) opinions would be good -- don't hesitate to start one on MAVENUSER Wiki [1

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: Le samedi 26 septembre 2009, Tamás Cservenák a écrit : I think we all need some clarification, since we all talk about quality (we all agreed upon the basic things unanimously). What is the quality of a maven repository (in general)? Can we measure

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

septembre 2009, Tamás Cservenák a écrit : I think we all need some clarification, since we all talk about quality (we all agreed upon the basic things unanimously). What is the quality of a maven repository (in general)? Can we measure it? Can we define it? A wiki page with piled up (even

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

, Tamás Cservenák a écrit : I think we all need some clarification, since we all talk about quality (we all agreed upon the basic things unanimously). What is the quality of a maven repository (in general)? Can we measure it? Can we define it? A wiki page with piled up (even personal) opinions

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

, Sep 26, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: Le samedi 26 septembre 2009, Tamás Cservenák a écrit : I think we all need some clarification, since we all talk about quality (we all agreed upon the basic things unanimously). What is the quality of a maven repository

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

On 27/09/2009, at 5:15 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Not having a super high quality central repository actually makes our commercial efforts a lot harder. If I was devious I would have agreed with Brett and would make a completely clean central repository as our plans require intact

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

It is not necessary to create a new repo and it is not necessary to modify anything on Central or the policies how it is managed. Mess could be cleaned up virtually if I could attach a filter. In the ~/.m2/settings.xml for example, I should be able to add a list of repository addresses and for

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

A lot of +1-es to this quote ~t~ On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Albert Kurucz albert.kur...@gmail.comwrote: Non-buildable source is fine as a gesture of goodwill, but I think if the public source isn't buildable, we're gonna end up with egg on our faces. Quote from:

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

Le samedi 26 septembre 2009, Tamás Cservenák a écrit : I think we all need some clarification, since we all talk about quality (we all agreed upon the basic things unanimously). What is the quality of a maven repository (in general)? Can we measure it? Can we define it? A wiki page

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

Le samedi 26 septembre 2009, Albert Kurucz a écrit : For the additional requirement, getting into the pure Maven repo (The best), I really meant: build-able. Me too, I don't really care what tool you use to build it as long as the tool is already checked in and you only use the attached

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

Le samedi 26 septembre 2009, Albert Kurucz a écrit : For the additional requirement, getting into the pure Maven repo (The best), I really meant: build-able. Me too, I don't really care what tool you use to build it as long as the tool is already checked in and you only use the attached

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

I think we all need some clarification, since we all talk about quality (we all agreed upon the basic things unanimously). What is the quality of a maven repository (in general)? Can we measure it? Can we define it? A wiki page with piled up (even personal) opinions would be good -- whatever

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: Le samedi 26 septembre 2009, Tamás Cservenák a écrit : I think we all need some clarification, since we all talk about quality (we all agreed upon the basic things unanimously). What is the quality of a maven repository (in general)? Can we measure it? Can we

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

IMHO, being buildable by maven is a nice to have, but to be honest, if somebody wants to build their project with a DOS batch file and a piece of string I don't mind as long as they publish the artifact with a valid pom anything else is setting the repository up for failure Sent from my

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: Le samedi 26 septembre 2009, Tamás Cservenák a écrit : I think we all need some clarification, since we all talk about quality (we all agreed upon the basic things unanimously). What is the quality of a maven repository (in general)? Can we measure it? Can we

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

: I think we all need some clarification, since we all talk about quality (we all agreed upon the basic things unanimously). What is the quality of a maven repository (in general)? Can we measure it? Can we define it? A wiki page with piled up (even personal) opinions would be good -- don't

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

: Le samedi 26 septembre 2009, Tamás Cservenák a écrit : I think we all need some clarification, since we all talk about quality (we all agreed upon the basic things unanimously). What is the quality of a maven repository (in general)? Can we measure it? Can we define it? A wiki page

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

central it just too useful... it has gathered critical mass whereby it is nearly a right of passage for new java projects to get hosted on central... hosting on central becomes one of those things projects are asked to do... if we move the goalposts too far or too fast we will kill the

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

of a maven repository (in general)? Can we measure it? Can we define it? A wiki page with piled up (even personal) opinions would be good -- don't hesitate to start one on MAVENUSER Wiki [1] whatever they are -- and later we should cherry-pick the most relevant ones to build some tooling to build

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Albert Kurucz albert.kur...@gmail.com wrote: I don't want anyone to miss any of the numerous ok arifacts. Those could still be housed by the Good enough Central repo. I would like to have a setting in my Maven with 3 options: -Good enough -Good (verified

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

the basic things unanimously). What is the quality of a maven repository (in general)? Can we measure it? Can we define it? A wiki page with piled up (even personal) opinions would be good -- don't hesitate to start one on MAVENUSER Wiki [1] whatever they are -- and later we should cherry-pick

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

clarification, since we all talk about quality (we all agreed upon the basic things unanimously). What is the quality of a maven repository (in general)? Can we measure it? Can we define it? A wiki page with piled up (even personal) opinions would be good -- don't hesitate to start one

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

be another publicly Maven repository, which is maintained with rules enforced. This repo could even have a rule (additional to the old and unenforced rules) that only Maven built projects can enter, maybe even more restriction: only the designated Continuous Integration server can upload

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

...@sonatype.com wrote: On 2009-09-24, at 7:52 PM, Albert Kurucz wrote: Jason and Brian, thanks for the explanations. Understood, the policy of not removing anything from Maven Central serves a purpose. I wish there would be another publicly Maven repository, which is maintained with rules

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

-24, at 7:52 PM, Albert Kurucz wrote: Jason and Brian, thanks for the explanations. Understood, the policy of not removing anything from Maven Central serves a purpose. I wish there would be another publicly Maven repository, which is maintained with rules enforced. This repo could even have

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

. Understood, the policy of not removing anything from Maven Central serves a purpose. I wish there would be another publicly Maven repository, which is maintained with rules enforced. This repo could even have a rule (additional to the old and unenforced rules) that only Maven built projects can enter

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

, this doesn't change anything on the quality of the artifact itself and of its metadata = what counts for an artifact repository building with Maven, Ant+Maven Ant Tasks, or Ant + Ivy, Buildr, or any other tool doesn't change anything Hervé -Stephen

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

Le vendredi 25 septembre 2009, Stephen Connolly a écrit : 2009/9/25 Albert Kurucz albert.kur...@gmail.com: The pure Maven repo should say: We honestly don't care which Maven plugin the people build with, as long as that plugin is already checked into here. And why people would prefer to

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

On Fri September 25 2009 12:07:09 pm Stephen Connolly wrote: For me, High quality is that: /project/(?parent/)(groupId|artifactId|version) are valid and do not reference properties /project/dependencies is valid and if there are any properties defined they are defined within the pom or

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

on this one you can build your artifact the way you like, this doesn't change anything on the quality of the artifact itself and of its metadata = what counts for an artifact repository building with Maven, Ant+Maven Ant Tasks, or Ant + Ivy, Buildr, or any other tool doesn't change anything

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

2009/9/25 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr: Le vendredi 25 septembre 2009, Stephen Connolly a écrit : 2009/9/25 Albert Kurucz albert.kur...@gmail.com: The pure Maven repo should say: We honestly don't care which Maven plugin the people build with, as long as that plugin is already

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

Technically it is possible to manage 3 different OSS Maven repos. 1. The good enough This is the current Maven Central No rules, only recommendations: http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-central-repository-upload.html Note: it is not a rule what is not enforced! 2. The good This would be

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Albert Kurucz albert.kur...@gmail.com wrote: Technically it is possible to manage 3 different OSS Maven repos. 1. The good enough This is the current Maven Central No rules, only recommendations:

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

For the additional requirement, getting into the pure Maven repo (The best), I really meant: build-able. Me too, I don't really care what tool you use to build it as long as the tool is already checked in and you only use the attached metadata and the attached sources. But a tool like this, in

Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

According to http://www.think88.com/resources/Maven_white_paper_june_2009.pdf Sonatype maintains a central repository with more than 90,000 artifacts, consuming more than 60 GB of storage. In addition to the artifacts themselves, the Maven Central Repository also contains a POM-file for each

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

/Maven_white_paper_june_2009.pdf Sonatype maintains a central repository with more than 90,000 artifacts, consuming more than 60 GB of storage. In addition to the artifacts themselves, the Maven Central Repository also contains a POM-file for each of the artifacts, containing the meta data for these artifacts

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

/Maven_white_paper_june_2009.pdf Sonatype maintains a central repository with more than 90,000 artifacts, consuming more than 60 GB of storage. In addition to the artifacts themselves, the Maven Central Repository also contains a POM-file for each of the artifacts, containing the meta data

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

than 60 GB of storage. In addition to the artifacts themselves, the Maven Central Repository also contains a POM-file for each of the artifacts, containing the meta data for these artifacts. To protect the integrity of the repository, Sonatype checks the meta data for correctness. If the meta

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Albert Kurucz albert.kur...@gmail.com wrote: Brian, MEV is for Maven Evangelism issues. Are you sure maintenance issues of any given repo should belong to that? For any given repo no, for Central, yes.

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Albert Kurucz albert.kur...@gmail.com wrote: Brian, Probably no one ever suggested that the corrupt artifacts should be fixed, because fixing is not even possible (every artifact must be signed by the creator). The question is whether you prefer the corrupt

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

Requirements for the POMs are defined as: http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-central-repository-upload.html I call the artifact corrupt (regarding Maven Central Compliance) if the POM of the artifact does not fulfills the above requirements. There are corrupt ones have made it to the

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

Garbage collection? Identify corrupted ones and remove. On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Brian Fox bri...@infinity.nu wrote: On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Albert Kurucz albert.kur...@gmail.com wrote: Brian, Probably no one ever suggested that the corrupt artifacts should be fixed,

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

On 2009-09-24, at 3:16 PM, Albert Kurucz wrote: Requirements for the POMs are defined as: http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-central-repository-upload.html I call the artifact corrupt (regarding Maven Central Compliance) if the POM of the artifact does not fulfills the above

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Albert Kurucz albert.kur...@gmail.com wrote: Requirements for the POMs are defined as: http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-central-repository-upload.html I call the artifact corrupt (regarding Maven Central Compliance) if the POM of the artifact does not

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

Jason and Brian, thanks for the explanations. Understood, the policy of not removing anything from Maven Central serves a purpose. I wish there would be another publicly Maven repository, which is maintained with rules enforced. This repo could even have a rule (additional to the old

Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts

On 2009-09-24, at 7:52 PM, Albert Kurucz wrote: Jason and Brian, thanks for the explanations. Understood, the policy of not removing anything from Maven Central serves a purpose. I wish there would be another publicly Maven repository, which is maintained with rules enforced. This repo could

RE: Maven - POM repository, Freemind, Confluence

for help -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Maven---POM-repository%2C-Freemind%2C-Confluence-tp22906474p22922687.html Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail

RE: Maven - POM repository, Freemind, Confluence

Did you read the comment thread on that page? From: sigi9009 [mailto:sigi9...@web.de] Sent: Tue 4/7/2009 3:29 AM To: users@maven.apache.org Subject: RE: Maven - POM repository, Freemind, Confluence and why doesn't it work? I tried to follow this instructions

RE: Maven - POM repository, Freemind, Confluence

? From: sigi9009 [mailto:sigi9...@web.de] Sent: Tue 4/7/2009 3:29 AM To: users@maven.apache.org Subject: RE: Maven - POM repository, Freemind, Confluence and why doesn't it work? I tried to follow this instructions: http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/CONFEXT

Maven - POM repository, Freemind, Confluence

://www.nabble.com/Maven---POM-repository%2C-Freemind%2C-Confluence-tp22906474p22906474.html Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e

RE: Maven - POM repository, Freemind, Confluence

http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 is a namespace URI, not a link. From: sigi9009 [mailto:sigi9...@web.de] Sent: Mon 4/6/2009 6:58 AM To: users@maven.apache.org Subject: Maven - POM repository, Freemind, Confluence Hi forum, Does somebody know the link

Apache maven snapshots repository root links are invalid

Hello maven users, Links on http://repository.apache.org/snapshots are invalid, they are missing snapshots part. This is error only in the root of the repository, once in some directory e.g. http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org;, links work well. It seems to be some sort of (nexus)

  1   2   3   >