Il 2014-07-10 17:36 Nick I ha scritto:
Hi
In the following example our mx received message with ESMTPSA from
1.1.1.1 and that ip detected as trusted.
Our trusted_networks list do not have this ip configured.
I need to run rbl check against 1.1.1.1.
Is there any settings to not add
Hello,
Today a spam message from livingsocial.com got through. It was sent to
a
honey pot address (e.g. not used for legitimate mail). I don't even
have
an account with livingsocial.com. This spam message would have been
caught had SA not credited it -5 points with two RP rules:
On 4/25/2013 11:55 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
...
My understanding is that it's better (with respect to performance and
atomicity) to attempt the INSERT and have it fail than to check if the
ID/token combination already exists and UPDATE it if it does.
Please note that it would
Memory management is tricky though. Hard to tell which values sum up to
the
real thing.
Probably best meter on Linux is the actual free value highlighted
below?
Check it before starting amavisd/spamd/whatnot and check it again after
running for a while. Also double check it after killing
On 07/03/13 23:26, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
I see there would be problems in naming your project RSA.
Nevertheless, is there any plan to have the current rspamd features
in a library, in order to allow third-parties to develop their own
message handling interface wrapping
On 3/8/2013 8:39 AM, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Also, what if someone wants to integrate your product into some kind
of javamail server? (Apache James, in example
Vsevolod, do you have forum for your project that you can post as this
are a bit off topic for an SA list?
Regards,
KAM
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 13:47:55 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
the implementation of fork() in linux makes it nearly the same as
vfork().
That is completely wrong. Just because modern forks use copy-on-write
doesn't make them anything at all like vfork; the
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 11:37:33AM -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 17:47:22 +0200
Henrik K h...@hege.li wrote:
Memory measured with free (without buffers/cache etc):
begin 2588084
end 1296756
About 25MB non-shared memory used per child,
Are you sure your
the
linux memory stats mess.
Giampaolo
Henrik K h...@hege.li ha scritto:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 07:02:00PM +0100, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
I just got a snip into my amavisd's 5 children /proc/pid/smaps file,
summing together the count of Private_{Clean|Dirty} pages.
I got this:
p1
I see there would be problems in naming your project RSA. Nevertheless, is
there any plan to have the current rspamd features in a library, in order to
allow third-parties to develop their own message handling interface wrapping it?
Giampaolo
Vsevolod Stakhov vsevo...@highsecure.ru ha scritto:
Intriguing...
Giampaolo
dar...@chaosreigns.com ha scritto:
http://freecode.com/projects/rspamd
Somebody asked about it in IRC today. I don't know anything about it.
--
You will need: a big heavy rock, something with a bit of a swing to it...
perhaps Mars - How to destroy the Earth
http://freecode.com/projects/rspamd
Somebody asked about it in IRC today. I don't know anything about it.
It seems to me it is yet a bit immature project.
In example, it misses a message routing tool like amavisd, it probably
doesn't scale very well if you need to deploy it on a cluster (it
From: John Hardin [mailto:jhar...@impsec.org]
Agreed. I was speculating that multiple variants of SPF_PERMISSIVE
might be justified, e.g. SPF_PERMISSIVE_ALL, SPF_PERMISSIVE_1,
SPF_PERMISSIVE_8, etc. However, it is only speculation; I have no
data to support that level of complexity being
No, I'm not meaning that. I'm instead following the Hardin suggestion, which
works better with mass-check.
I'm suggesting to use CIDR::Lite to avoid being fooled by stuff like
+128.0.0.0/1 +0.0.0.0/1...
Giampaolo
Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org ha scritto:
Den 2012-07-13 19:44, Giampaolo
-Messaggio originale-
Da: jdow [mailto:j...@earthlink.net]
Inviato: sabato 23 giugno 2012 0.15
A: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Cc: Kevin A. McGrail; John Hardin
Oggetto: Re: 419 spammers aren't morons after all
They never performed the analysis we see in the Microsoft paper. They
From: Duane Hill [mailto:du...@duanemail.org]
Hello Giampaolo,
Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 4:09:57 PM, you wrote:
Did you create the bayes tables via the mysql script shipped with SA?
It
creates tables with TYPE=MyISAM, so I guess this may be why you
didn't see
any transaction
From: Daniel McDonald [mailto:dan.mcdon...@austinenergy.com]
We got a false positive recently of a message containing only a
uuencoded attachment being detected as UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY.
The message doesnt have a Content-type: header or an Encoding:
header. The message part has one
From: David F. Skoll [mailto:d...@roaringpenguin.com]
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 16:46:23 +0200
giampa...@tomassoni.biz wrote:
I think your suggestion is an overkill.
Not in my experience.
Iff I'm right about the problem being on transaction competition, it
can be solved by a much easier
-Original Message-
From: David F. Skoll [mailto:d...@roaringpenguin.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 8:58 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: MySQL Bayes - can slow MySql cause other tests not to run?
you may see that the contention per scan lasts at most
-Original Message-
From: David F. Skoll [mailto:d...@roaringpenguin.com]
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 21:15:16 +0200
Giampaolo Tomassoni giampa...@tomassoni.biz wrote:
Except that in real life, the write transaction lasts much longer,
What is it? 60ms? Granted. It is still a 1/100 of 6s
-Original Message-
From: David F. Skoll [mailto:d...@roaringpenguin.com]
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 22:02:53 +0200
Giampaolo Tomassoni giampa...@tomassoni.biz wrote:
However, since I like to win the last speech, my reply is that they
hopefully don't necessarily involve an fsync: most
From: David F. Skoll [mailto:d...@roaringpenguin.com]
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 15:19:07 -0500
Duane Hill du...@duanemail.org wrote:
I set MySQL to log all SQL queries. There has not been one query
contained within a transaction.
MySQL supports this by doing a START TRANSACTION which can
-Original Message-
From: Duane Hill [mailto:du...@duanemail.org]
Hello David,
Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 2:23:28 PM, you wrote:
I set MySQL to log all SQL queries. There has not been one query
contained within a transaction.
Hello Duane,
Are you using InnoDB?
Giampaolo
-Original Message-
From: Duane Hill [mailto:du...@duanemail.org]
Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 3:58:28 PM, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Duane Hill [mailto:du...@duanemail.org]
Hello David,
Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 2:23:28 PM, you wrote:
I set MySQL to
From: Marc Perkel [mailto:supp...@junkemailfilter.com]
I'm wondering if bayes is slow and causing SA to time out and not run
other tests? Or does bayes run in parallel? I'm beginning to wonder if
bayes is killing other tests allowing more spam to get through?
I'm not an expert of SQL-based
From: Kelson Vibber [mailto:k...@tollfreeforwarding.com]
...omissis...
If so, would you recommend:
1. Sticking with SA's Bayesian filter?
2. Running SpamAssassin without Bayes, then James' BayesianAnalysis
mailet?
3. Running James's BayesianAnalysis mailet first, then SpamAssassin
From: Michael Scheidell michael.scheid...@secnap.com
using amavisd-new, we can set up policies, per user, and per domain if
needed to match the end users needs.
Via Amavis one can even ban executable attachments. With few work, one can
develop a system which notifies users that such a
From: Ted Mittelstaedt [mailto:t...@ipinc.net]
And what prevents a spammer from forging this into a header and
bypassing SA? Just askin.
Ted
The fact that the authenticating server forwarding the request is trusted
and/or internal network.
SA doesn't look at any auth token outside of
SA also avails the msa_networks setting to allow a node to act both as
a MX and a MUA, making a message look like internally sourced iff the
node says it is from an authenticated source.
Of course, I meant:
SA also avails of the msa_networks setting to allow a node to act both as a
MTA and a
My experience with SA is that if it sees that flag anywhere in the
header, it will assume the mail is safe. I have also had the
experience
No, Ted. SA wouldn't accept an authenticated mark from outside its
trusted_network.
with earlier versions of SA that they ignore the flag completely
On 12/17/2010 10:15 AM, Kris Deugau wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I know that, Sendmail adds the same flag when setup for auth SMTP.
The
problem is that SA will see this and assume the mail is safe.
N if your trust path is set correctly, then SA won't run
tests
like eg PBL
I would strongly encourage your ISP to clean up their act by adding an
excursion detection system, that watches for bursty outbound traffic
patterns, like a sudden spike in outbound SMTP or HTTP connections to a
wide spread of addresses.
Is Aruba.it so poorly reputed?
g
-Philip
Le 12/12/2010 19:23, Giampaolo Tomassoni a écrit :
How does it work?
I just got blocked by the ATT's blacklist (in contacting
ab...@att.com,
besides...), but I'm pretty sure my MX is not an open relay or other
kind of
nifty thing.
Maybe ATT blocks whole address bunches from which
How does it work?
I just got blocked by the ATT's blacklist (in contacting ab...@att.com,
besides...), but I'm pretty sure my MX is not an open relay or other kind of
nifty thing.
Maybe ATT blocks whole address bunches from which some hosts are spamming?
Because this could explain me why: my MX
On 07.11.10 10:53, Martin Toombs wrote:
I have a Postfix/Dovcot/SpamAssassin setup with TSL required for all
SMTP users in the domain.
Is there a way I can globally whitelist any mail received from a
secured
connection?
Not yet and I don't think it's a wise idea. I'm going to allow
still incorrect:
$ perl -le 'use NetAddr::IP; print NetAddr::IP-new6(127/8)'
0:0:0:0:0:0:7F00:0/8
This seems way too ambiguos to me, isn't? How could the NetAddr::IP module
get you're instantiating an IPv6 net address, after all. That seems to me a
valid IPv6 syntax, too...
A workaround
Hi,
this morning Gentoo people liked to upgrade NetAddr::IP from 4.033 to 4.034.
People with stable systems (a Gentoo feature) actually runs SpamAssassin
3.3.1.
Soon after upgrading NetAddr::IP, a lint run reported these:
warn: netset: cannot include 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1/128 as it has already been
Looking into it...
I know NetAddr::IP recently got a re-design and probably SA have to
cope
with this.
Looks like a but in NetAddr::IP 4.034, it forgets to adjust the CIDR
mask
when converting an IPv4 address to an IPv6 notation:
correct (NetAddr-IP-4.033):
$ perl -le 'use
Mmmh.
In fact it seems they bobbed few lines from 4.033...
You sure new6 may be used with IPv4 address, huh?
If you confirm this, I can take care of reporting the bug to upstream.
Giampaolo
Aha, you're too fast! ;)
Giampaolo
Mark
If you confirm this, I can take care of reporting the bug to
upstream.
Please do so, thanks!
I'm too late: Steve Huff already did it...
See: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=62521 .
Giampaolo
Mark
I was going to suggest the footer should read:
To unsubscribe from this mailing list see the list-unsubscribe:
header
Ahaha! I vote yes to it. ;)
Furthermore, I suggest having a footer with unsubscription / help
information
in addition to the header because the header may not be visible, not
all E-
mail clients may display it, and people may otherwise be unaware of it.
I have
often seen some unsubscribe messages sent to mailing lists
From: Hans-Werner Friedemann [mailto:h-w.friedem...@vds-herzberg.de]
Hi @ all
sorry, but I have to pick up this issue once again.
I´ve installed Spamassassin with bayes on a SuseLinux-Client.
My mailserver (hmailserver) is running on a Windows machine.
The Mailserver has a mailbox
Hello,
i don't know spamassassin not very well, i am using 3.2.4 on Ubuntu
8.04
LTS.
I need a textfile where i can put in blacklist-words like Viagra,
Chronometer, Zeitmesser and so on, if an email has one of this
words,
this email should directly put to the Spam-folder.
Is this
SA goes farther than your simple idea. Have a look at how Bayes
works, and
all the available SA plugins.
I trained SA since months with all those chronometer-zeitmesser-spam
and
only 5% is now set to spam.
I want to get rid of it immediately.
Well, you may try putting this into
You're probably too late, Matus: you've got into his trash folder... ;)
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk]
What if a friend of yours sends you an email asking to lend your
chronometer...
--^
This is very unlikely because i have none. So even if he asked, it
I cannot find any special setting for autolearn (either
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam or
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam ) in either
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf or
~/.spamassassin/user_prefs . It probably means they are the default
which is
0.1 and 12.0 respectively which seems
Since they score 0.8, they wouldn't be learnt as ham with the default
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam value. So, probably at least this
setting had been overridden somewhere in your SA conf...
Probably not. 0.8 is the score for BAYES_50, which isn't counted in the
autolearning score.
Hi all,
Recently I've noticed that a lot of spam that I am getting is not
caught by
SpamAssassin, despite the fact that it is very similar to other spam I
got and
that I marked as spam using the Bayesian training. I've placed a sample
of
some of the recent messagess I got here:
It's more of the implementation that needs an update than TextCat
algorithm
itself.
Charset/case awareness:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6229
Better database:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4152
Etc.. feel free to chime in..
There is
I'm running SpamAssassin version 3.3.0 and we received some spam
recently
which contained a link to a .ru.gg domain. While investigating whether
it
was listed in any of the URIBLs I discovered that if a message contains
a
link to http://qwerty.ru.gg;, spamassassin only looks up the domain
.
Further, I would personally blacklist the whole .gg gTLD since their whois
service is ridiculous.
Giampaolo
Giampaolo Tomassoni-2 wrote:
I'm running SpamAssassin version 3.3.0 and we received some spam
recently
which contained a link to a .ru.gg domain. While investigating
whether
I don't think that's going to help - it's not going to tell us why
it's blacklisted.
Also I suspect those headers aren't added by SA alone. AFAIK
BLACKLISTED isn't added by SA like that - blacklist rule should show up
in tests=[], which is empty. And the score isn't consistent 64 and -5.
The documentation simply says run sa-learn. Does the creation of
the bayes db files effectively enable bayes?
No. You also need to teach enough ham and spam tokens to Bayes. By
default, you should train bayes with at least 200 ham messages and
200 spam
messages. At that point, you
Hello,
I have just setup spamassassin. A lot of spam is getting filtered. But
a lot is not.
What are the prevailing additional steps for improving filtering?
Is using bayes worth it?
Generally yes. However, it needs training before being reliable.
My default config does not appear
I have LearnAsSpam IMAP folders for everyone to drag spam that get's
through into. How can I run sa-learn so that it builds a /single/
database from all of these folders and so that spamd uses that single
database for scoring everyone's mail?
Huh, using spamd --nouser-config ?
Sorry, I
We are using the CommuniGate Pro mail server, which allows Outlook user
to submit messages using the Microsoft's MAPI protocol to submit
messages across the IMAP port. The problem that we are having is that
although the messages are submitted directly from an authenticated
client connection,
From: Jason Bertoch [mailto:ja...@i6ix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 3:34 PM
On 2010/05/25 7:02 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 10:35 +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
Not as far as ok_locales and the respective CHARSET_FARAWAY rules are
concerned, IIRC. They have been
On 05/25/2010 09:47 AM, RW wrote:.
My guess is that none of of these is being hit because there's
enough English mixed-in with the Arabic.
I think the FARAWAY rules and other locale checks are dependent on
email using the old, pre-Unicode charset formatting.
Yesterday I had some Greek
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 10:25 -0300, Daniel Iserhard wrote:
Have you tried setting a non-zero score for OBFU_TEXT_ATTACH?
Martin,
it seems to me the problem is in some SA rule update. 72_scores.cf states:
score OBFU_TEXT_ATTACH 2.299 0.000 2.299 0.000
which means 0 in network-based SA
On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 09:27 -0400, Jason Bertoch wrote:
A user reported the following FN [...]
It is not a FN. It isn't even a proper message.
That's some headers, plus a screen-scraped, rendered version of the
message, including the most common headers displayed to the user.
Without
On Mon, 24 May 2010, Jason Bertoch wrote:
At a guess I would say the bulk of your score is attributed to the
URI in the body that has been flagged as being on the SURBL blocklist.
Beyond that, the issue seems to be that they have used a body 'type' of
text/html without actually using HTML.
So is it the case according to what you´ve said below that with your
modified logic that setting your MX servers as trusted and MSA will no
longer result in all mail being trusted? And will that then trust mail
recieved via SMTP Auth and therefore solve my problem?
I actually only placed a
Also the SpamAssassin documentation mentions configuring msa_networks
which sounds relevant. Can I just list my SMTP server IP in here an
SMTP Auth connections will be trusted? Or will that cause all
connections to be trusted, as it sounds possible reading this
Warning: Never include an MSA
Open a bug.
To whom it may concern:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6430
... except, after checking their site just now, you now get a
personalized reporting address once you've signed up. *sigh*
AFAIK, the reporting e-mail addresses are all of the form
/^submit.\...@spam\.spamcop\.net$/ .
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 18:32:04 +0200
Giampaolo Tomassoni g.tomass...@libero.it wrote:
what you need to do write a script that divides the metadata
num_spam value and all the token Nspam counts by 3. The updated
database can then be loaded back in with --restore.
I don't know
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:25:29 -0400
Frank Bures lisfr...@chem.toronto.edu wrote:
what you need to do write a script that divides the metadata num_spam
value and all the token Nspam counts by 3. The updated database can
then be loaded back in with --restore.
I don't know if this is going to be
Hi,
I would instead, in order of effectiveness:
a) expire old tokens;
b) eliminate tokens with very few ham/spam occurrences.
c) eliminate tokens with very close nham to nspam values;
Can you explain how to do this, or point to documentation that would
Hi everybody.
Recently I updated my Gentoo installations to spamassassin-3.3.1-r1 (the
'r1' thing means a 'stock' SA-3.3.1 with some -often few - patches applied).
Everything worked fine after upgrading, but now I see that some rules I have
in my local.cf doesn't seem to work anymore.
Since
Both the effects are quite weird to me. Maybe I didn't pay attention
to some
post in this list announcing a different behaviour of the body rules
and a
new score override mechanism?
No change in this logic and behavior.
Did you --lint check? Does it complain perhaps? To see which cf
Do ANY of the rules in your local.cf fire?
Yes, they do. The __IN_ITALIAN rule referred by SOMMA and SOMMA2, in
example.
However,
Try putting a test rule that
will 'always' fire (like 'header From =~ /\@/') at the end of local.cf,
then if it doesn't fire, start moving it up, to see if you
It turn out I put this and other stuff in a if(0) endif block, such that it
of course didn't fire...
Thanks everybody!
Giampaolo
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Do ANY of the rules in your local.cf fire?
Yes, they do. The __IN_ITALIAN rule referred by SOMMA and SOMMA2, in
example.
Just a side thought, but are we checking for SOMMA or SOMA? One 'm' or
two? FRT_SOMA2
Try 'retyping' the __SOMMA
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Also, why
body __SOMMA m'\Wsomma\W'i
doesn't fire?
This is more a sylistic comment, but: you don't need to alter the
delimiters on that RE. Does this behave any better?
body __SOMMA /\Wsomma\W/i
John
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Kaleb Hosie
kho...@spectraaluminum.com wrote:
Another (more automated way) is to use the following command:
spamassassin -r the_spam_message_file
Thanks for that info! I think the 'automated' suggestion sounds very
nice! When I submit it using 'SA'
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
But, anyway, I see SA 3.3.1 comes with a very good HTMLEval plugin.
However,
it seems to me that it misses a way to, in example, count the length
of the
text commented out with respect to the uncommented one and eventually
trigger a rule if the ratio is above
Dear users,
I felt I didn't advertise our GERMAN ruleset since a long time:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets
Good hint. Thank you.
Giampaolo
Hi everybody,
I recently got this:
http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z3936411477z440d5f10ba6037ca7b75c78c52292721z;a
ction=display
in which you may see that a lot of text, probably meant to deceive and/or
poison the Bayes detector, is embedded in html comments.
Now, this particular message scores
Having this in the bayes db:
335424 nspam
144915 nham
129892 ntokens
and a fairly good hit rate by Bayes in detecting both spam and ham, how
would you improve Bayes scores?
In example, would you increase every bayes scores by a fixed percentage, or
instead would you
I have increased BAYES_00 and BAYES_99. It seems that those are pretty
good and cause no FP's, but BAYES_05 may sometimes be spam. I have
BAYES_99 as a killer, it has 5 points, sending the mail to a 'probable
spam' alone.
Ah, that is even narrower and probably less prone to misclassification.
It seems that the yerp.org www server is irresponsive.
To my knowledge, that server was hosting the sought.rules.yerp.org update
channel.
Anybody knows if it is a transient problem or if that channel moved
elsewhere?
Regards,
Giampaolo
Michael Scheidell wrote:
...omissis...
If our clients were DELIBERATELY spamming, say they thought they
were going to send out a marketing mail or some such, then you would
be correct.
But they were not. They were simply using the largest software
company on Earth's products -
Daniel J McDonald wrote:
...omissis...
How can I? From what I know about razor-revoke, it's the recipients
who are using razor and who get messages that razor tags as spam who
are the ones that run this.
Their recipients who are saying that their messages are being marked
spam are
Reporting can't be automatic, as there will be or may be false
positives. As well as false negatives.
Razor, DCC, maybe IxHash and surely others do state in their policies that
automatic reporting is forbidden.
SpamCop, however, doesn't. This is probably because of the very nature of
the
as false negatives.
On 04.09.09 11:49, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Razor, DCC, maybe IxHash and surely others do state in their policies
that
automatic reporting is forbidden.
DCC? DCC is based on automatic submission, note that it measures
bulkiness
of mail, not spamminess...
Right
Are you experiencing the same?
Some of them are even sleeping through FuzzyOcr. Any tuning to suggest?
Giampaolo
-Original Message-
From: Bill Landry [mailto:b...@inetmsg.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 7:02 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Image spam is back
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Are you experiencing the same?
Some of them are even sleeping through FuzzyOcr
-Original Message-
From: R-Elists [mailto:list...@abbacomm.net]
Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 8:06 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: DKIM-Reputation list
is this DKIM-Reputation setup for any *general* current spamassassin
deployment or does it only work with
Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Martinec [mailto:mark.martinec...@ijs.si]
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 8:06 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: DKIM-Reputation list
Tobias, Giampaolo, Bill, and others
I'm interested too, thanks in advance
I've place
Hi,
I was looking at some kind of open-source DKIM-signing piece of code, and
fall into this site:
http://www.dkim-reputation.org/
It has nothing to do with what I'm looking for, nevertheless it seemed
interesting to me and I wanted to give it a try.
Unfortunately, the software they
-Original Message-
From: Mark Martinec [mailto:mark.martinec...@ijs.si]
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 6:04 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: DKIM-Reputation list
Giampaolo,
...omissis...
Back in April (2009) I send to Florian Sager my version of
the
Tobias, Giampaolo, Bill, and others
I'm interested too, thanks in advance
I've place it on the web page:
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/DKIMrep.pm
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/effectiveTLDs.pm
Aaaah! Surfing time!
...omissis... (albeit interesting)
I tested it
We can use antiword to render text from MSWord files, and unrtf to
render text from RTF files. What is the best tool to render text from
PDF files?
(We are running Solaris 9)
FWIK, antiword is the best tradeoff between speed and conversion quality.
The best converter I know of, even for
-Original Message-
From: Maurice Lucas - TAOS-IT [mailto:mslu...@taos-it.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 5:06 PM
To: ryefish; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: best way to mark TLDs as spam
Hello: I am attempting to configure SA to mark as spam all email from
-Original Message-
From: Pete McNeil [mailto:madscient...@microneil.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 5:12 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: New Message Sniffer Plugin Released SNF4SA
Hello SA folks,
We have significantly upgraded our plugin for SpamAssassin.
You
-Original Message-
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk]
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 1:19 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Message Sniffer Plugin Released SNF4SA
On 19.05.09 11:12, Pete McNeil wrote:
...omissis...
looks to me like
,razor.pyzor,blacklists) and bayes
On 20.05.09 15:26, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
It looks to me that it goes a bit further by allowing your own SNF
training and, maybe, rules to be globally available.
What's the difference between SA autolearn combined with manual
training? :)
The main difference
-Original Message-
From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 2:48 PM
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 02:39 -0700, Marcelo Galeti wrote:
Hello Guys,
Wow, a Nabble user with a real name. :)
Do you know if are there something like the old
-Original Message-
From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 8:48 PM
...omissis...
Not strictly a list of the top 200, but isn't this covered by the
more
extensive RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET dnsbl test?
As you already pointed out,
1 - 100 of 413 matches
Mail list logo
