om: Chuck Caldarale
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2024 4:00 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: [EXT]Re: [EXT]Re: Tomcat 10 session replication fails
On Apr 11, 2024, at 09:07, Rick Noel wrote:
We are getting closer
Changing ports from the 5000 range to the 4000 range stopped two
errors But now
er | Westwood One
rn...@westwoodone.com
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Caldarale
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2024 4:00 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: [EXT]Re: [EXT]Re: Tomcat 10 session replication fails
> On Apr 11, 2024, at 09:07, Rick Noel wrote:
>
> We are getting closer
> Changing
uts (weeks).
I hate to see people struggle with session replication, as I think it
really is the secret to making server-side-rendering scale out.
On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 3:01 PM Chuck Caldarale wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 11, 2024, at 09:07, Rick Noel wrote:
> >
> > We are get
> On Apr 11, 2024, at 09:07, Rick Noel wrote:
>
> We are getting closer
> Changing ports from the 5000 range to the 4000 range stopped two errors
> But now I get this..
>
> INFO: Manager [##0001]: skipping state transfer. No members active in cluster
> group
>
> How to I make the me
Systems Programmer | Westwood One
rn...@westwoodone.com
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Caldarale
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2024 9:14 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: [EXT]Re: Tomcat 10 session replication fails
[You don't often get email from n82...@gmail.com. Learn why this is impo
> On Apr 11, 2024, at 07:56, Rick Noel wrote:
>
> We have our app running on Tomcat10 and doing clustering,but are getting the
> following errors seen int the Catalina log...
>
> Apr 11, 2024 8:14:43 AM org.apache.catalina.ha.session.DeltaManager
> waitForSendAllSessions
> SEVERE: Manager
Hi,
We have our app running on Tomcat10 and doing clustering,but are getting the
following errors seen int the Catalina log...
Apr 11, 2024 8:14:43 AM org.apache.catalina.ha.session.DeltaManager
waitForSendAllSessions
SEVERE: Manager [##0001]: No session state sent at [4/11/24, 8:13 AM] rec
PM
To: Tomcat Users List ; Rick Noel
Subject: Re: [EXT]Re: Tomcat session replication issue -
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: setAttribute: Non-serializable attribute :
Rick,
On 3/22/24 13:33, Rick Noel wrote:
> I do not want to replicate customer because that class does not
> imp
T]Re: Tomcat session replication issue -
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: setAttribute: Non-serializable attribute :
On 22/03/2024 15:43, Rick Noel wrote:
Mark,
So if my customer object is failing to get set in the session
replication, I could add this to the config snippet?
sessionAttribute
22, 2024 1:27 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EXT]Re: Tomcat session replication issue -
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: setAttribute: Non-serializable attribute :
On 22/03/2024 15:43, Rick Noel wrote:
> Mark,
>
> So if my customer object is failing to get set in th
On 22/03/2024 15:43, Rick Noel wrote:
Mark,
So if my customer object is failing to get set in the session replication,
I could add this to the config snippet?
sessionAttributeNameFilter="customer"
You set that to the attributes you DO want to replicate, not the ones
you don'
the application code itself)
Rick Noel
Systems Programmer | Westwood One
rn...@westwoodone.com
-Original Message-
From: Rick Noel
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2024 11:43 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: [EXT]Re: Tomcat session replication issue -
java.lang.IllegalArgumentExceptio
Mark,
So if my customer object is failing to get set in the session replication,
I could add this to the config snippet?
sessionAttributeNameFilter="customer"
so
On 22/03/2024 15:15, Rick Noel wrote:
Is there a way to configure DeltaManager or the Cluster element so it does not
cause my application to throw this error.
22-Mar-2024 10:56:34.382 SEVERE [http-nio-8586-exec-5]
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke Servlet.service() for
Is there a way to configure DeltaManager or the Cluster element so it does not
cause my application to throw this error.
22-Mar-2024 10:56:34.382 SEVERE [http-nio-8586-exec-5]
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke Servlet.service() for
servlet [jsp] in context with path [##00
Many thanks Mark!
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas
Sent: 01 February 2022 09:25
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tomcat 9 Session replication
On 31/01/2022 14:54, Alan F wrote:
> Many thanks Chris,
>
> Don't laugh I was looking at those values after
om: Christopher Schultz
Sent: 31 January 2022 14:46
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tomcat 9 Session replication
All,
On 1/31/22 08:04, Keiichi Fujino wrote:
If you use StaticMembershipService, you must set
Cluster#channelStartOptions to 15 (default).
To spell that out (since the docs aren&
h other non-members. Just make sure you have your ports
unique for each cluster and your membership ids unique for each node in
each cluster.
-chris
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz
Sent: 31 January 2022 14:46
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tomcat 9 Session replica
thout
interference ie specifying group or unique id etc.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz
Sent: 31 January 2022 14:46
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tomcat 9 Session replication
All,
On 1/31/22 08:04, Keiichi Fujino wrote:
> If you use StaticMembershipService, you
rom: Mark Thomas
Sent: 28 January 2022 18:15
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tomcat 9 Session replication
On 28/01/2022 17:05, Alan F wrote:
We are currently getting traffic from all cluster members in other
environments using .staticmember opposed to multicast can I confirm why
this is see below
>
>
>
>
>filter=""/>
>className="org.apache.catalina.ha.session.JvmRouteBinderValve"/>
>
>className="org.apache.catalina.ha.deploy.FarmWarDeployer"
> tempDir="/opt/tomcat/war-te
users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tomcat 9 Session replication
On 28/01/2022 17:05, Alan F wrote:
> We are currently getting traffic from all cluster members in other
> environments using .staticmember opposed to multicast can I confirm why this
> is see below.
>
> What do we need to set
On 28/01/2022 17:05, Alan F wrote:
We are currently getting traffic from all cluster members in other environments
using .staticmember opposed to multicast can I confirm why this is see below.
What do we need to set here for a clustered pair to make them unique and talk
to eachother only witho
We are currently getting traffic from all cluster members in other environments
using .staticmember opposed to multicast can I confirm why this is see below.
What do we need to set here for a clustered pair to make them unique and talk
to eachother only without seeing traffic from other members
via the FarmWarDeployer that has
the distributable flag set to false in web.xml
Mark
On 27/01/2021 05:44, Kamal Wickramanayake wrote:
> Is it ever possible to configure a Tomcat 9 cluster with the FarmWarDeployer
> enabled but without session replication? Any guidelines?
>
, Kamal Wickramanayake wrote:
> Is it ever possible to configure a Tomcat 9 cluster with the FarmWarDeployer
> enabled but without session replication? Any guidelines?
> TIAKamal
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: us
Is it ever possible to configure a Tomcat 9 cluster with the FarmWarDeployer
enabled but without session replication? Any guidelines?
TIAKamal
:29, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>>> On 27/06/2020 10:19, Thomas Meyer wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A few questions regarding tomcat session replication:
>>>>
>>>>> load-balancing and session replicati
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> A few questions regarding tomcat session replication:
>>>
>>>> load-balancing and session replication are two separate parts of
>>>> an overall clustering solution.
>>>
>>>>> 1)
Am 30. Juni 2020 11:07:36 MESZ schrieb Mark Thomas :
>On 29/06/2020 21:41, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Mark,
>>
>> On 6/27/20 05:29, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 27/06/2020 10:19, Thomas Meyer wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> A few ques
On 29/06/2020 21:41, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 6/27/20 05:29, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 27/06/2020 10:19, Thomas Meyer wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> A few questions regarding tomcat session replication:
>
>> load-balancing and session
s Meyer wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> A few questions regarding tomcat session replication:
>>>
>>> load-balancing and session replication are two separate parts of
>>> an overall clustering solution.
>>>
>>>> 1) is t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thomas,
On 6/27/20 05:52, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> Am 27. Juni 2020 11:29:03 MESZ schrieb Mark Thomas
> :
>> On 27/06/2020 10:19, Thomas Meyer wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> A few questions regarding tomcat sessio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 6/27/20 05:29, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 27/06/2020 10:19, Thomas Meyer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> A few questions regarding tomcat session replication:
>
> load-balancing and session replication are two separate parts
Am 27. Juni 2020 11:29:03 MESZ schrieb Mark Thomas :
>On 27/06/2020 10:19, Thomas Meyer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> A few questions regarding tomcat session replication:
>
>load-balancing and session replication are two separate parts of an
>overall clustering solution.
>
On 27/06/2020 10:19, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A few questions regarding tomcat session replication:
load-balancing and session replication are two separate parts of an
overall clustering solution.
> 1) is the jvmRoute attribute on Engine object necessary for session
> repl
Hi,
A few questions regarding tomcat session replication:
1) is the jvmRoute attribute on Engine object necessary for session replication
to work correctly?
2) does session replication only work correctly with sticky load balancer
routing?
My setup is
1) load balancer without sticky session
t some help.
>
> I'm seeing many posts achieving Tomcat session replication in
> docker swarm using traefik. But I just don't want to add another
> component. I use httpd as frontend for tomcat. Tomcat will be
> deployed as a service with 4 replicas and will be scaled when
&
Hello,
I'm not sure if this is the right forum to ask this question. Since this is
a bigger community, I hope someone might have faced this issue and hope I
will get some help.
I'm seeing many posts achieving Tomcat session replication in docker swarm
using traefik. But I just don
I am researching if a packaged application built on Tomcat (not 100% sure of
version but assuming 9 until I know 100% sure) using session state replication
as described here http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-9.0-doc/cluster-howto.html
would work in an environment where broadcast/multicast is not e
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62723
Mitch
On 09/14/2018 10:10 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mitch,
On 9/14/18 09:43, Mitch Claborn wrote:
On 09/13/2018 08:10 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: Mitch,
On 9/13/18 10:29, Mitch Clab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mitch,
On 9/14/18 09:43, Mitch Claborn wrote:
> On 09/13/2018 08:10 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: Mitch,
>
> On 9/13/18 10:29, Mitch Claborn wrote:
On 09/12/2018 11:37 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Would you care to submit a documentat
git
I've used subversion in the past, but it's been a LONG time.
Mitch
On 09/13/2018 08:10 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mitch,
On 9/13/18 10:29, Mitch Claborn wrote:
On 09/12/2018 11:37 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Would you care to subm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mitch,
On 9/13/18 10:29, Mitch Claborn wrote:
> On 09/12/2018 11:37 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Would you care to submit a documentation patch/PR?
>>
>> Get your name in the ChangeLog and you get the text that makes
>> the most sense to you:)
Sure. How do I go about that?
Mitch
On 09/12/2018 11:37 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Would you care to submit a documentation patch/PR?
Get your name in the ChangeLog and you get the text that makes the
most sense to you:)
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mitch,
On 9/12/18 12:01 PM, Mitch Claborn wrote:
> Thanks Mark. I changed to channelSendOptions="2" and the failure
> rate of my health check program has dropped significantly, down to
> 1 - 2 per 24 hours.
>
> I did quite a bit of reading in the d
Thanks Mark. I changed to channelSendOptions="2" and the failure rate of
my health check program has dropped significantly, down to 1 - 2 per 24
hours.
I did quite a bit of reading in the doc before posting this, but your
explanation of the options is much better than the doc. I suggest that
On 10/09/18 17:33, Mitch Claborn wrote:
> Further information and questions.
>
> I created my own interceptor based on ThroughputInterceptor so that I
> could log the timing of specific sessions to correlate them with the
> failures in my health check program. I was surprised to find that in
> th
omcat
9.0.11. I've set channelSendOptions="8" (asynchronous session replication).
I have a "health check" app that I run periodically, one of the
functions being to check that sessions are being replicated properly.
That app
1) Does a GET to tomcat A, calling a Str
I'm using a cluster with the DeltaManager between two servers on Tomcat
9.0.11. I've set channelSendOptions="8" (asynchronous session replication).
I have a "health check" app that I run periodically, one of the
functions being to check that sessions are being re
On 29 September 2017 15:38:12 BST, "Singh, Rahul (CWM-NR)"
wrote:
>Hi,
>We are using Tomcat 7
>My question is - Why does Tomcat Session Replication require Sticky
>sessions to be enabled?
It doesn't.
>We cannot have a sticky session setup in our servers, due
Hi,
We are using Tomcat 7
My question is - Why does Tomcat Session Replication require Sticky sessions to
be enabled?
We cannot have a sticky session setup in our servers, due to policy issues. To
maintain session state across different machines, we were planning to use
session replication. But
Good Day!
In the documentation, it says that with autobind, if port is unavailable it
will try to work its way up to the port+autobind.
But Members' port and Receiver's port should be the same. Is this correct?
I would like to ask how does port behaves on Receiver with autobind and the
Members
Yes, I think if uncommented the
The ClustedManage could be disabled even if is defined.
在 16/4/25 下午12:57, Keiichi Fujino 写道:
2016-04-23 15:29 GMT+09:00 sanigo :
Hi!
I have tested quite a few times to confirm that session replication
will not happen after uncommenting in
conf
2016-04-23 15:29 GMT+09:00 sanigo :
> Hi!
>I have tested quite a few times to confirm that session replication
> will not happen after uncommenting in
> conf/context.xml.
>If the line is commented out, the session replication will work
> happily.
>
Is there
Hi!
I have tested quite a few times to confirm that session
replication will not happen after uncommenting
in conf/context.xml.
If the line is commented out, the session replication will work
happily.
The versions I have tested are 7.0.68 and 7.0.69.
Any ideas
ts specified in server.xml. This all
happens relatively smoothly in testing without any appreciable load.
However when the box is added back into our webserver farm (via
hardware load balancer), or if I create artificial load against the
box using apache jmeter, session replication is not succe
Thank you David, but this is happening on service restart, not operating
system restart. But, yes, you can modify startup scripts to happen in
sequence, or add a sleep delay.
Thank you,
-Anthony
On 3/25/2016 10:11 AM, David kerber wrote:
On 3/25/2016 9:41 AM, Anthony Sturchio wrote:
Hello
thly in testing without any appreciable load.
However when the box is added back into our webserver farm (via hardware
load balancer), or if I create artificial load against the box using
apache jmeter, session replication is not successful, and the coldfusion
server never loads. I don&#
On 3/25/2016 9:41 AM, Anthony Sturchio wrote:
Hello
We recently updated our Coldfusion 10 server to update 18, which moved
us up to Tomcat 7.0.64, and we are now experiencing issues when
restarting a CF instance. I understand that this is not a coldfuison
forum, but since CF10 is based on top o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anthony,
On 3/25/16 9:41 AM, Anthony Sturchio wrote:
> We recently updated our Coldfusion 10 server to update 18, which
> moved us up to Tomcat 7.0.64, and we are now experiencing issues
> when restarting a CF instance. I understand that this is not
Hello
We recently updated our Coldfusion 10 server to update 18, which moved
us up to Tomcat 7.0.64, and we are now experiencing issues when
restarting a CF instance. I understand that this is not a coldfuison
forum, but since CF10 is based on top of a tomcat back end, which is
where the iss
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Charles Richard <
charle...@thelearningbar.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Charles Richard <
> > charle...@thelearningbar.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We are currently using a product
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Charles Richard <
> charle...@thelearningbar.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are currently using a product called Terracotta to do session
> > fail-over/replication but are considering moving away from this pr
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Charles Richard <
charle...@thelearningbar.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are currently using a product called Terracotta to do session
> fail-over/replication but are considering moving away from this product as
> it doesn't seem to support Java 7 and Tomcat 7.
>
> What
Hi,
We are currently using a product called Terracotta to do session
fail-over/replication but are considering moving away from this product as
it doesn't seem to support Java 7 and Tomcat 7.
What products exist out there that would help with session
fail-over/replication? I only know of 3:
- T
> On 22 Apr 2015, at 02:32, Keiichi Fujino wrote:
>
> Fixed at r1675020.
>
> --
> Keiichi.Fujino
Hello,
Sorry for not having replied earlier. Thank you for your investigation and your
bug correction.
I will try to apply my test case to the trunk in the next few days, I’ll let
you know if it
s mapSendOptions?
>> - Which Interceptor do you use?
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-04-15 3:55 GMT+09:00 Théo Chamley :
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have a working Tomcat 8.0.15 cluster with 3 members with the
>>> BackupManager as session manage
>>
>> I have a working Tomcat 8.0.15 cluster with 3 members with the
>> BackupManager as session manager.
>> The session replication is mostly working except in a few cases. In those
>> cases, I get the fol
with the
> BackupManager as session manager.
> The session replication is mostly working except in a few cases. In those
> cases, I get the following error:
>
> 09-Apr-2015 12:16:58.369 SEVERE [Tribes-Task-Receiver-6]
> org.apache.catalina.tribes.tipis.AbstractReplicatedMap.messag
Hello,
I have a working Tomcat 8.0.15 cluster with 3 members with the BackupManager as
session manager.
The session replication is mostly working except in a few cases. In those
cases, I get the following error:
09-Apr-2015 12:16:58.369 SEVERE [Tribes-Task-Receiver-6
2015-02-06 19:09 GMT+03:00 Junek Leoš :
> Hello to all,
>
> Would anyone know why session replication does not work for me? Load balancer
> with session afinity works great, but after reconfiguration settings to
> session replication my sessions are not persisted. I am runni
Hello to all,
Would anyone know why session replication does not work for me? Load balancer
with session afinity works great, but after reconfiguration settings to session
replication my sessions are not persisted. I am running Oracle Linux 6.5
(almost same as RHEL 6.5) with Tomcat 8.0.18
Hi Guys,
Any solution for this??
On 03-01-2014 02:31 PM, Sanket Paranjape wrote:
Hi,
I am using Tomcat 7.0.47 on windows 7 with JDK 1.7.
I want to achieve session replications on multiple subdomains. If I
have a domain as xyz.example.com and abc.example.com, then I would
like to store sessi
Hi,
I am using Tomcat 7.0.47 on windows 7 with JDK 1.7.
I want to achieve session replications on multiple subdomains. If I have
a domain as xyz.example.com and abc.example.com, then I would like to
store session cookie on "example.com" and hence then I would be able to
access same session on
Hi Daniel,
At last we managed to solve the replication issue. (not exactly a solution
but a workaround) :
the problem was:
The multicast tried to broadcast to local ip written in the hosts file
127.0.1.1
We had to write the actual ip adress in the hosts file
instead :
127.0.1.1 - Tomcat1
we ch
On Dec 29, 2013, at 10:51 AM, Nir A wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If i want to create a cluster of 2 tomcats:
>
> Tomcat1 - ip 111.111.111.111
> Tomcat2 - ip 222.222.222.222
>
>
> Where exactly the in the server.xml i should say that my cluster contains
> both of these ips?
By default, you don't. If you
On Dec 29, 2013, at 10:11 AM, Nir A wrote:
> Hi,
> So we have 3 tomcats in our cluster and we are failing to make them
> replicate our sessions still.
>
> Our IT guy said it might has something to do with the machines of the
> tomcats.
>
> He said that since the machines the tomcats in the clus
Hi,
If i want to create a cluster of 2 tomcats:
Tomcat1 - ip 111.111.111.111
Tomcat2 - ip 222.222.222.222
Where exactly the in the server.xml i should say that my cluster contains
both of these ips?
If you will take alook at my server.xml (which i copy pasted from the
tutorial) it looks like th
Hi,
So we have 3 tomcats in our cluster and we are failing to make them
replicate our sessions still.
Our IT guy said it might has something to do with the machines of the
tomcats.
He said that since the machines the tomcats in the cluster are installed at
are Virtual machines there might be a pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dhaval,
On 12/9/13, 3:04 PM, Dhaval Jaiswal wrote:
> setting of session replication worked well. However, we do have
> threading in some products. Like we are hitting the target API and
> getting response from there servers. If will no
setting of session replication worked well. However, we do have threading
in some products. Like we are hitting the target API and getting response
from there servers. If will not get the response will hit them after some
time and in this case threading not handled by session replication because
Yeah but, I would like to link the websocket session with the http session
of the handshake. and that way i will be able to imitiate the session
replication abilities for websocket.
This mechanism works as intended only problem is the replication not
replicate http session attribute while the
ge is loaded and a new http
> handshake is taking place. when that happens all the attributes do
> replicate!!!
>
> Is there a way to make the attribute replicate without the need of
> refreshing the page?
>
In HTTP you have many requests associated with a session id. With session
mcat doesn't notice anything
>
> And also is it not a "spec" or behavior requirement that you don't hold on
> to your http session objects outside of requests?
>
>
>
>
> On 1 December 2013 15:33, Nir A wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Ive ask
15:33, Nir A wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ive asked here before about how do i get a session replication over
> websockets sessions.
> Mark Thomas answered me that i should try and link the httpsession with
> the websocket and then i will gain the replication abilities.
>
> So, I li
Hi,
Ive asked here before about how do i get a session replication over
websockets sessions.
Mark Thomas answered me that i should try and link the httpsession with
the websocket and then i will gain the replication abilities.
So, I listended and implemented it just like in this url:
http
Hi,
I'm using tomcat clustering of 2 tomcats, and session replication via
backup manager.
on session creation in one tomcat instance, the other tomcat replicates the
session successfully but the attribute list is empty no matter how much i
add to it. (the primary session attribute list is
;
>> 4.) Simplify as much as possible. Start with two fresh Tomcat instance.
>> Add the simplest possible cluster configuration and go from there.
>>
>>
>> https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/cluster-howto.html#For_the_impatient
>>
>> Sorry I can'
ion and go from there.
>
>
> https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/cluster-howto.html#For_the_impatient
>
> Sorry I can't be of more help.
>
> Dan
>
Hi all,
Thanks for all your hard work last month on my session replication issue. I
think I've found a so
;
>> <%
>>Integer count = (Integer) session.getAttribute("counter");
>>if (count == null) {
>>count = 0;
>>session.setAttribute("counter", 0);
>>} else {
>>session.setAttribute("counter", count +
= 0;
> session.setAttribute("counter", 0);
> } else {
> session.setAttribute("counter", count + 1);
> }
> %>
>
>
> Index
>
>
> Session [<%= session.getId() %>]
> Current count is <%= count %>
ruled out as the
> culprit, maybe my webapp is not dealing with sessions appropriately? Would
> you mind sending me your counter test app?
Here's what I've been using:
WEB-INF/web.xml:
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
alternatively try an explicit address in the
Receiver configuration
instead of address="auto" try address="192.168.1.43"
this should alter the log displayed at start-up and I would be very
interested if you still had a problem.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Vince Stewart wrote:
> Hi Nicho
Hi Nicholas,
I'm am a bit of a novice but I did have a very similar problem when I
started using the clustering modules.
My Tomcat output was referring to localhost (10.x.x.x) addresses while my
netstat was reporting LISTEN on network addresses (192.x.x.x:400?).
You have the same disparity. My sys
On 9/18/2013 6:00 AM, Nicholas Violi wrote:
Thanks Daniel.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
Tried a quick two node setup on my Mac w/out HTTPD and it worked OK. Go
to one Tomcat instance's port in chrome, it increments the counter in my
app. Refresh a few times. Open a
Thanks Daniel.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
>
> Tried a quick two node setup on my Mac w/out HTTPD and it worked OK. Go
> to one Tomcat instance's port in chrome, it increments the counter in my
> app. Refresh a few times. Open a second tab, go to the second Tomcat
> in
On Sep 17, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
> On Sep 17, 2013, at 3:39 PM, Nicholas Violi wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
>>
>>> What is your purpose with this configuration and with this setup? It's a
>>> legit setup, but may not be doing what you want
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Nicholas,
On 9/17/13 4:33 PM, Nicholas Violi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Daniel Mikusa
> wrote:
>
>> I would disagree with this conclusion. In your test setup you
>> absolutely need this. In production, you don't need HTTPD
>> becau
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
> I would disagree with this conclusion. In your test setup you absolutely
> need this. In production, you don't need HTTPD because you have a
> dedicated hardware load balancer. Unless you have one of those on your
> desk, you need HTTPD to
1 - 100 of 557 matches
Mail list logo
