I thought wicket's goal was to be agnostic to this debate.
D/
On Apr 28, 2010, at 9:09 AM, nicolas melendez wrote:
+1 YUI.
I have been working with it, and it is a very good js framework, non
intrusive with the markup, also was easy (i mean REALLY easy) to integrate
to wicket.
i used YUI
Yes, but Wicket has a lot of JS functionality built in (for AJAX, DOM
manipulation related to AJAX, modal window, autocomplete, etc...). Right
now all the AJAX stuff is done in home-grown JS. There's no reason for us
to continue to support something that does things like DOM manipulation. We
there is also no reason to bundle all the components that need that
kind of js as part of core, they can be stand alone modules.
-igor
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
Yes, but Wicket has a lot of JS functionality built in (for AJAX, DOM
In that case +1 JQuery.
D/
On May 1, 2010, at 3:21 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
there is also no reason to bundle all the components that need that
kind of js as part of core, they can be stand alone modules.
-igor
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com
+1
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard now ,
used by all the big companies , even microsoft
and although YUI is great, Yahoo has its own problem these days and we
cannot consider the
+1 Jquery I mean
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Fernando Wermus fernando.wer...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard now ,
used by all the big companies , even
I also agree that we should use jQuery. jQuery seems more aligned with
Wicket than YUI.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Fernando Wermus
fernando.wer...@gmail.comwrote:
+1 Jquery I mean
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Fernando Wermus
I remember there was a long discussion on this list, some time ago,
about this...
About jQuery... jQuery isn't perfect either and I have heard of people
having bad experiences about their support. For instance, I have
reported a bug related to DD, IE and its usage in combination with
Wicket AJAX
iirc the new implementation of Wicket ajax is slated for post 1.5.
Something with too many irons in the fire...
Martijn
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
I also agree that we should use jQuery. jQuery seems more aligned with
Wicket than YUI.
+1 YUI.
I have been working with it, and it is a very good js framework, non
intrusive with the markup, also was easy (i mean REALLY easy) to integrate
to wicket.
i used YUI components, like rich text editor or modal windows. I don't know
the ajax how it is, because i use wicket ajax.
NM
On Wed,
Yes, it's experimental, and it is not 100% decided that YUI will be used.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't this an experimental branch?
Ernesto
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM,
I actually was working on this two weeks ago for a client. Hopefully in the
next week I will have a very minimal base project available for you to build
from.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is
Hi
i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard now ,
used by all the big companies , even microsoft
and although YUI is great, Yahoo has its own problem these days and we
cannot consider the commited to the lib, they dropped support for many of
their products and abandond
Hi,
Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration library to
use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested
specifically in YUI 3...
Thanks,
Istvan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/
2010/4/26 Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com
Hi,
Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration library to
use
Isn't this an experimental branch?
Ernesto
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, danisevsky danisev...@gmail.com wrote:
I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/
16 matches
Mail list logo
