I'm using datetextfield from the wicket-extensions.
Alex.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> actually we do trim them.
>
> convertinput() calls convertvalue() which does trim. so if you override
> convertvalue() itself you need to trim yourself. however i do not see it
> being overwritten anywhere. is
actually we do trim them.
convertinput() calls convertvalue() which does trim. so if you override
convertvalue() itself you need to trim yourself. however i do not see it
being overwritten anywhere. is this datetextfield from extensions or
wicket-datetime?
-igor
On 9/6/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL P
Indeed, onbeforerendercalled is an ugly name for a method (maybe choose other
name? :) ... just kidding.
My point is: as long as I want to override the onBeforeRender, I am aware of
the fact that I must call super to make it working properly, otherwise I
will get a nasty exception or unexpected b
That's because of JualianS' use case. Changing the first dropdown
should reset the second and third ones' model to null. Maybe it's a
Country/State/City trio. Suppose the model of the first was
"Argentina" and the model of the second was "Buenos Aires" when
submission was done (of course, this is p
The point of having a detachable model is to avoid storing the domain
object into the wicket session. The constructor you mention is wrongly
quoted, the code is in fact:
public DetachableContactModel(Contact c)
{
this(c.getId());
}
There isn't even a contact field in the class. If
so the validation fails yet you are still updating the models???
-igor
On 9/6/07, Carlos Pita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've debugged a simple example and what I described before happens to
> the letter, both for ajax updating behavior and for
> wantOnSelectionChangedNotifications/onSelecti
I've debugged a simple example and what I described before happens to
the letter, both for ajax updating behavior and for
wantOnSelectionChangedNotifications/onSelectionChanged. I don't think
it's a bug at all, but imo it would be reasonable to clear out the
input if the explicit intention of chang
does it work properly without ajax?
-igor
On 9/6/07, JulianS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I am using Wicket 1.2.6. I have 3 DropDownChoices (and some other fields)
> on
> a form.
>
> The first DropDownChoice resets the selections in the other
> DropDownChoices
> using AjaxFormComponentUpdati
Now that I think about it: maybe input should be automatically cleared
out in case the model is explicitly changed, don't you think?
On 9/6/07, Carlos Pita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe it's because your second and third dropdowns are taking their
> input from the posted parameters (the raw i
Maybe it's because your second and third dropdowns are taking their
input from the posted parameters (the raw input) instead of from their
model. See the source for FormComponent.getValue():
if (NO_RAW_INPUT.equals(rawInput))
{
return getMode
Hi,
Hacking away at some tests, I figured the proper way to test an
AjaxSubmitLink would have been as follows:
Panel p = tester.startPanel(EventPanel.class);
FormTester ft = tester.newFormTester(p.getId() + ":eventForm");
ft.setValue("messageField", ALARM_MESSAGE);
actually it is cleaner/better to pass the model to the link directly, so
item.add(new IndicatingAjaxFallbackLink("link", item.getModel()) {
public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
Object o=getModelObject();
}
}
-igor
On 9/6/07, Kent Tong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> p
pokkie wrote:
>
> Worked like a charm, thanks Kent.
>
> You the same Kent Tong that wrote a online Tapestry book?
>
Yep.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/AjaxFallbackLink-inside-ListView-tf4389622.html#a12534270
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nab
Hello Jean-Baptiste,
what i want to see is a dialog to save downloaded file in browser, therefore it is slightly not my case.
Viewing the source of DownloadLink seems get nessesary info.
BTW, there is no example with DownloadLink in the codebase at all. I found it would be useful to add, ma
Johan,
Anything I can do to help isolate the problem?
I'm using trunk, btw...
> not the case that David has..
> If i write a test case for the ValueMap and i get and put username
> in it everything works.
> Ofcourse if i set the debug logging level then i get a debug
> warning because we do
Hello,
In the repeteater samples, the one with ajax capability you have
DetachableContactModel.
My question is why
protected Object load()
{
// loads contact from the database
return getContactsDB().get(id);
}
does not just return the Contact object?
It is already determined by the co
Something like the following should work:
decorateScript:
"this.onclick_=this.onclick; this.onclick=function() { return false;
};" + script;
onSuccess,onFailureScript:
this.onclick=this.onclick_; + script;
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Anthony J Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to cr
sure no problem, just point them out :)
On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> well, whenever those emails comein...why doesnt onbeforerender is getting
> called...you can answer them :)
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 9/6/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > who? that overri
well, whenever those emails comein...why doesnt onbeforerender is getting
called...you can answer them :)
-igor
On 9/6/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> who? that overrides onBeforeRender?
> why should those call super last?
> that depends on what they want.
>
> On 9/6/07, Igor
who? that overrides onBeforeRender?
why should those call super last?
that depends on what they want.
On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> because we are going in circles here
>
> even with onpopulate you still have to make sure you call super last!
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 9/6/07
because we are going in circles here
even with onpopulate you still have to make sure you call super last!
-igor
On 9/6/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ok,
> i don't like to have onBeforeRender final because we have the whole i
> called
> the super check for that.
> But i
you can build your own component very easily. listview can contain
labels and/or images in any way you desire.
Aaron Hutchings wrote:
>
> Is there something like listview that I configure for displaying text and
> images? I do not need any sorting ..
>
>
>
> --
I am using Wicket 1.2.6. I have 3 DropDownChoices (and some other fields) on
a form.
The first DropDownChoice resets the selections in the other DropDownChoices
using AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior("onchange"). All the DropDownChoices
use PropertyModels.
This all works fine until the form is
ok,
i don't like to have onBeforeRender final because we have the whole i called
the super check for that.
But i do like the onPopulate because that makes much more clear that the
repeaters do there there work
because why should that happen in onBeforeRender? The api does speak for
them self then
i will leave it up to you guys as to what you want to do and how. honestly
discussions like this drain my attention span.
the only reason i introduced onpopulate is so that i could make
onbeforerender final.
-igor
On 9/6/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> thats why i said the co
Hi,
I'm trying to create a disableable AjaxSubmitLink. When a user clicks on the
link further clicks must not result in anything until the 'submission' is
complete. This call be achieved by adding "return false;" in a call decorator.
However I'm stuggling with the re-enabling. I need to strip t
Is there something like listview that I configure for displaying text and
images? I do not need any sorting ..
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thats why i said the concreet repeaters that implement onPopulate should
make them final
also what do you mean with funny errors,
you only get funny errors when you override both or 1 and start calling the
other.
calling super on different times in your onBeforeRender doesn't create
anything funny
On 9/6/07, Arinté <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok when the user press the submit button on a wicket form, how do you make
> it go to another page? onSubmit has a void return
Use setResponsePage.
Eelco
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
Ok when the user press the submit button on a wicket form, how do you make
it go to another page? onSubmit has a void return
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i think onPopulate() is there for just about 2 or 3 weeks and before the docs
stated that calling super() would be vital.
so, i really don't see a benefit in having a onpopulate() _and_ a non-final
onbeforerender(). actually, if i override both, i could get funny errors
changing a call to super.o
If you care about the product of your own work, it 's personal. O.S.S. is
based on self motivated developers who, by definition, care about their
work.
On 06 Sep 2007 19:36:36 +0200 (CEST), Robo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No Igor. Software is never personal. war is personal, dying of my mother
No Igor. Software is never personal. war is personal, dying of my mother,
father and youg brother bombed by army aircraft is personal but software sure
not ;-)
If you can point me please to ANY of the disrespect sentences, except AL`s
\"why are you still bitching about it\" please do it ... :-)
no not for the onces that make a Repeater.
Because then we aren't being able to tell that the populate should really be
done before the call to super.onBeforeRender
So having an onPopulate is fine. Repeaters should use that method to
populate them selfs and we then also take care of the order
but
Sorry Eelco but I did not start this small personal war. In my previus of topic
marked post I said lot of good about wicket and made lot of PLEASE do this ...
I know you have lot of work ... IMHO ... and so on ... Also thanked to Gwyn?
... :-))) Al getted touched about my troubles with Maven, yo
that worked - thank you
Best Regards,
Korbinian
Francis De Brabandere schrieb:
You can override newConverterLocator in your Application
@Override
protected IConverterLocator newConverterLocator() {
ConverterLocator locator = new ConverterLocator();
locator.set(java.sql
if it was not final then there would be little point for keeping onpopulate,
it would just be confusing
-igor
On 9/6/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> and?
> why can't AbstractRepeater.onBeforeRender() be not final?
> If i overwrite to do what ever i want (but i do need to call
the custom serialization is already off by default for quite some time
the
org.apache.wicket.util.io.SerializableChecker$WicketNotSerializableException:
only kicks in (so also for the default) when an IOException happens with
writeObject
So that you get a nice trace which field it exactly is of wha
On 9/6/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> looking at the sourcefile I saw this option:
>
> -Dwicket.replace.expected.results=true
>
> could this be what I was looking for to genereate the expected results?
> I think so:)
Yep :)
Eelco
---
and?
why can't AbstractRepeater.onBeforeRender() be not final?
If i overwrite to do what ever i want (but i do need to call onBeforeRender
at some point else we generate an error)
then it comes in AbstractRepeater.onBeforeRender()
that first does the onPopulate so the items are created and then cal
On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the problem with this stuff is that there is no single pattern that will
> work
>
> sometimes you want a chain where if a link fails the chain shortcircuits
> other times you dont want the shortcircuit
>
> sometimes you care about the order, oth
On 06 Sep 2007 18:32:44 +0200 (CEST), Robo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes I know Eelco. That is why there are so much troubles in Java programming
> land. Misusing of basic concepts ... That is why one needs some sort of COC,
> because there is lot`s of b.s. around ... J2EE 1.4 countained so mu
On 06 Sep 2007 18:24:44 +0200 (CEST), Robo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry Eelco but me and also quite a lot of other developers(I know, contrary
> to others developers) consider same b.s. libraries which are \"alive\" just
> because they are in classpath. It is like talking when nobody asks y
since component.onbeforerender() is what cascades the onbeforerender() call
to the children, when it comes to repeaters it is absolutely vital that
super.onbeforerender() be called last, that way it will cascade to any new
items added in repeater's onbeforerender().
-igor
On 9/6/07, Johan Compagn
Worked like a charm, thanks Kent.
You the same Kent Tong that wrote a online Tapestry book?
Kent Tong wrote:
>
>
>
> pokkie wrote:
>>
>> My question is, how do I use this information to get the selected entity
>> which represents a row in my listView?
>>
>
> Try:
>
> public class Test
On 06 Sep 2007 17:35:26 +0200 (CEST), Robo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Stop it now please Al. You take oo personal aproach. Nobody forced you in
> responding.
heh, what you have to understand is that wicket is oss - so it IS personal.
it is something we work on in our spare time so it is kind
You can use Ivy to resolve wicket dependencies and produce a report, if you
have trouble to generate a report with maven ATM. The report details may be
slightly different from what you get with m2, since Ivy is not 100%
compatible with m2, but it's better than nothing. If you're interested, I
can p
the problem with this stuff is that there is no single pattern that will
work
sometimes you want a chain where if a link fails the chain shortcircuits
other times you dont want the shortcircuit
sometimes you care about the order, other times you do not
there are many variations of this and they
Or a PropertyModel.
On 9/6/07, Carlos Pita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Per,
> use a AbstractReadOnlyModel or a DetachableLoadableModel for the
> attribute value.
> Regards,
> Carlos
>
> On 9/6/07, Per Newgro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok. I tried the Attribute Modifier(String, String, boolea
Per,
use a AbstractReadOnlyModel or a DetachableLoadableModel for the
attribute value.
Regards,
Carlos
On 9/6/07, Per Newgro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok. I tried the Attribute Modifier(String, String, boolean, Model)
> Constructor but it didn't worked. There have been exactly the same results
can you send some over?
On 9/6/07, Evan Chooly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> T-37 minutes until sushi time!
>
> On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > sushi
> >
> >
> > -igor
> >
> >
> > On 9/6/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > new PropertyM
please tell me, tell me!
johan
On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> because the final is there for a very important reason?
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 9/6/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I take the discussion is about removing onPopulate now?
> > why not keep on
Yes I know Eelco. That is why there are so much troubles in Java programming
land. Misusing of basic concepts ... That is why one needs some sort of COC,
because there is lot`s of b.s. around ... J2EE 1.4 countained so much of it
that lots of developers refused to use it And it had to be rewrite
you suck!
-igor
On 9/6/07, Evan Chooly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> T-37 minutes until sushi time!
>
> On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > sushi
> >
> >
> > -igor
> >
> >
> > On 9/6/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > new PropertyModel(P
I JUST LOVED HIS POST BECAUSE HE DOESNT SAY WHAT IS BROKEN. ID HATE TO SEE
HIS BUG REPORTS.
-IGOR
On 9/6/07, cwilkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> UR RIGHT. THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN XHTML AND HTML IS THAT ATTRIBUTES MUST
> BE
> QUOTED:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#diffs
>
>
>
> Nino Saturn
i dont think our custom serialization works right with proxies yet is the
thing
-igor
On 9/6/07, leok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> It's a little hard for me to tear out all the @SpringBean declarations in
> my
> webapp. I could try using the standard serialization method you speak of
> and
>
because the final is there for a very important reason?
-igor
On 9/6/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I take the discussion is about removing onPopulate now?
> why not keep onPopulate and remove the final?
>
>
> On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > the re
Sorry Eelco but me and also quite a lot of other developers(I know, contrary to
others developers) consider same b.s. libraries which are \"alive\" just
because they are in classpath. It is like talking when nobody asks you ... Look
at Java SDK do you need all packages to build console \"Hello W
Alex:
We implemented a subclass of Form that has some sophisticated
validation and customized feedback panels built-in. This form
automatically "instruments" its fields with an ajax validating
behavior. But sometimes -not that often- a field needs to ajax-do a
bit more than just being validated, s
On 06 Sep 2007 18:11:09 +0200 (CEST), Robo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After small troubles I had with it I know it. But from my point of view it is
> not correct to initiatie not used libraries just by including it in App
> Server classpath. From my point of view lib is lib, and when nto called
After small troubles I had with it I know it. But from my point of view it is
not correct to initiatie not used libraries just by including it in App Server
classpath. From my point of view lib is lib, and when nto called by developer
it sould not be initiated by App server. I runned into troubl
> Java jars are nto at all complex beast. They become tricky in situation where
> you just put some of them inclasspath and they do what you normally do not
> expect. Lib should be lib and when not called by developer they should do
> nothing. Deliberatly breaking this rule makes the jars, beast
Stop it now please Al. You take oo personal aproach. Nobody forced you in
responding.
You make Wicket And I`m the user. If you do not like it do not do it. But there
is some responsibilities about product you develop towards product users so do
not confuse roles please. And besides that I`m als
Tauren Mills tauren.com> writes:
>
> Thanks everyone for the help. I got it working with the following jars:
>
> log4j-1.2.15.jar
> slf4j-api-1.4.2.jar
> slf4j-log4j12-1.4.2.jar
>
> Is that what others are using?
>
> I had troubles while using logback, but I may not have used the right
> jar
You can override newConverterLocator in your Application
@Override
protected IConverterLocator newConverterLocator() {
ConverterLocator locator = new ConverterLocator();
locator.set(java.sql.Date.class, dateConverter);
locator.set(Date.class, dateConverter);
T-37 minutes until sushi time!
On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> sushi
>
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 9/6/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > new PropertyModel(Page.this, "session.foo.sushi.bar");
> >
> > ?
> >
> >
> > On 9/6/07, Gabor Szokoli <[EMAIL PROTE
Hi Dipu,
well, the problem is that i have here the Locale("de","DE") which has
default pattern "dd.MM.yy" while I need "dd.MM." - so how can this
be changed? (so MEDIUM instead of SHORT is used)
Regards
Korbinian
Dipu Seminlal schrieb:
try using session.setLocale()
thats how i do it.
On 06 Sep 2007 17:23:13 +0200 (CEST), Robo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And why not? Besides that Wicket is doing some initialization of not used
> libraries is there any restriction of not including not neccesary libraries
> in classpath? Most time I develop someting I have many libraries in my
> really? i thought it was German Build Quality! The best there is!
> Are there even better? (don't mention now ofcourse other german brands ;) )
Trabant is German :)
Eelco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additio
And why not? Besides that Wicket is doing some initialization of not used
libraries is there any restriction of not including not neccesary libraries in
classpath? Most time I develop someting I have many libraries in my classpath
even if I do not use them ...
Robo
- Originálna Správa ---
On 06 Sep 2007 11:44:56 +0200 (CEST), Robo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok Thnaks for explanation.
>
> And do not look for truth in jokes. Jokes are just jokes ;-)
But you are not using Velocity panel right? Why do you include that
jar in the first place? You can just include the core wicket jar.
>
> In Germany, the best sold car is the VW Golf. But does this mean I should
> buy one? No, there are a lot of better alternatives (in the meaning of
> quality and design, for example).
really? i thought it was German Build Quality! The best there is!
Are there even better? (don't mention now o
Well, such charts do not make me fear to placed the bet on the wrong horse.
I've taken a look at a large number of frameworks and found Wicket to be the
best one for our purposes. This cannot be changed by such charts, but only
by JSF being better than Wicket.
In Germany, the best sold car is
Would it make sense to have a behavior that was implemented as a Chain
of Responsibility
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chain-of-responsibility_pattern
Then it would just be a matter of adding that behavior to your component.
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am curious, w
Robo wrote:
Ok, seems removing \"wicket-velocity-1.3.0-beta3.jar\" from build
path solved problem with velocity problem. But please explain me why
removing package from build path solves the problem if nowhere in my
Hello World code i call for any of the velocity packages. Is there
some dupliciti
UR RIGHT. THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN XHTML AND HTML IS THAT ATTRIBUTES MUST BE
QUOTED:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#diffs
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
>
> hmm should'nt it be in "" or '' like this:
> ?
>
> regards Nino
>
> bhupat parmar wrote:
>> THE HEADER IS NOT WORKING
>>
>>
http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=java%2C+jsf&l=
java is all you need to know for wicket
so jsf seems pretty low to me in that picture..
On 9/6/07, cowwoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> This might be of interest to the Wicket community:
>
> http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t101110.html
> --
On 9/6/07, cowwoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> This might be of interest to the Wicket community:
>>>
>>>
If you really think about this.. It just means that it takes more
developers (jobs) in order to accomplish the same thing it takes with
just a handful of wicket developers :P So I gu
TSEE IS THAT AS LOUD AS YOU CAN GET?
On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> WHAT IS WRONG WITH IT?
>
> -IGOR
>
> On 9/6/07, bhupat parmar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > THE HEADER IS NOT WORKING
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Home
> > Trend
> > Archive
> >
I take the discussion is about removing onPopulate now?
why not keep onPopulate and remove the final?
On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> the reason for it being final is that the super.onbeforerender() call HAS
> to
> be done last, otherwise new items do not get onbeforerende
It's a little hard for me to tear out all the @SpringBean declarations in my
webapp. I could try using the standard serialization method you speak of and
monitor the behavior. It seemed a little strange that this Exception would
pop up with such a basic config so I figured that I was missing somet
which version???
ahh php5+ because that is real OO
On 9/6/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> starting to learn php right now.
>
> On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > why would it be of interest? he does this every six months...weve seen
> > the
> > results.
starting to learn php right now.
On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> why would it be of interest? he does this every six months...weve seen the
> results.
>
> by the same logic we should all be learning php or jsp as those eclipse
> jsf
> when put into the search.
>
> -igor
>
>
why would it be of interest? he does this every six months...weve seen the
results.
by the same logic we should all be learning php or jsp as those eclipse jsf
when put into the search.
-igor
On 9/6/07, cowwoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> This might be of interest to the Wicket community:
>
a javadoc warning wont stop emails coming to this list :)
onbeforerendercalled() is also an ugly way, uglier then onpopulate() which
is at least more semantically named.
the root problem is that java does not contain a compiler directive that
would check for this, there is some support for this i
try using session.setLocale()
thats how i do it.
Regards
Dipu
On 9/6/07, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> can anyone tell me how to change the default date pattern wicket should
> use in the whole app?
>
> I mean i can do:
>
> add(new DatePicker() {
>
I see at least one drawback of using this kind of project: when you are
dealing with a css change, you have to rebuild your application because your
presentation code resides in JAVA, instead of being clearly separated from
it. This way, you get a mix of the presentation&logic concerns.
PS: still
This might be of interest to the Wicket community:
http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t101110.html
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/And-The-Fastest-Growing-Web-Framework-Is...-tf4392768.html#a12524620
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
can anyone tell me how to change the default date pattern wicket should
use in the whole app?
I mean i can do:
add(new DatePicker() {
protected String getDatePattern() {
return "dd.MM.";
}
on each component manually, bu
The way I do it, is this:
protected void onBeforeRender() {
//my init code
super.onBeforeRender();
}
I think it can be documented in the javadoc, that it is mandatory to call
super at the end.
User can also have a problem if just override the onBeforeRender without
calling the super.
I
WHAT IS WRONG WITH IT?
-IGOR
On 9/6/07, bhupat parmar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> THE HEADER IS NOT WORKING
>
>
>
>
> Home
> Trend
> Archive
> The Latest
> Looks
>href="#">Pepsi
> Style
> My Closet
> Submit Style
>
>
so if you remove @SpringBean dao the errors go away?
it def shouldnt be happening, maybe its a problem in wicket's custom
serialization. there is a way to make wicket use standard
serialization...cant remember off the top of my head right now...
-igor
On 9/6/07, leok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
The source code is available:
https://svn.cedarsoft.eu/open/eu.cedarsoft.wicket/trunk/yaml-integration/
Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
Hi Johannes
I think YAML looks extremely interesting. I did not know about it. But
commenting on your framework is difficult without sourcecode.
Best regards,
Jan Mi
Yes, you are right. All integration is just about adding something :-) .
The benefit of integration projects is that they care about the
integration. You don't have to manually download and install all those
resources.
But of couse you don't have to use it. Just add the CSS resources
manually.
sushi
-igor
On 9/6/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> new PropertyModel(Page.this, "session.foo.sushi.bar");
>
> ?
>
>
> On 9/6/07, Gabor Szokoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/5/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > can you make an jira issue for
the reason for it being final is that the super.onbeforerender() call HAS to
be done last, otherwise new items do not get onbeforerender called on them.
so if we remove final will you remember to always call it last? i think the
chances are that are pretty small, thus its final.
-igor
On 9/6/07
Ok. I tried the Attribute Modifier(String, String, boolean, Model) Constructor
but it didn't worked. There have been exactly the same results.
Thanks for your help
Per
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 15:34:14 +0200
> Von: "Gerolf Seitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: user
You're welcome :)
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's only a false alarm. Sorry. My fault. Probably I didn't perform a 'clean'
> before the application has been deployed. The issue is CLOSED!
>
> PS: Big 'THANK YOU' to Matej :).
>
>
> Alex Objelean wrote:
> >
> > Last post
It's only a false alarm. Sorry. My fault. Probably I didn't perform a 'clean'
before the application has been deployed. The issue is CLOSED!
PS: Big 'THANK YOU' to Matej :).
Alex Objelean wrote:
>
> Last post was completely wrong.
> Here is another handler which works ok:
>
> var
> wcall=wick
hmm should'nt it be in "" or '' like this:
?
regards Nino
bhupat parmar wrote:
THE HEADER IS NOT WORKING
Home
Trend
Archive
The Latest
Looks
Pepsi
Style
My Closet
Submit Style
--
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
