I would like to support different layout structure, not only CSS.
I will follow your help and try to do it. Thank you for your help, I really
appreciated it.
Duy
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:40 AM, Russell Simpkins <
russellsimpk...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I would like to support multiple the
Even Im trying to implement the remove link as:
- item.add(removeLink("removeKeyword", item));
and it doesnt work... always remove the last row...
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/ListView-dynamic-rows-always-remove-last-row-tp2260480p2261045.html
Hi,
I've written a tutorial on this topic. You may check it out at
http://www.dzone.com/links/getting_started_with_scala_spring_hibernate_wicket.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional
Why is spring-orm version 3.0.1.RELEASE and not 3.0.3.RELEASE? Why
not just uset a {spring.version} property in your POM so that it all
stays in synch?
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Kent Tong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've written a tutorial on this topic. You may check it out at
> http://www.dzone.co
Why do you have page -> service -> dao? Why not just talk directly to
the DAO for the getAll() method. This level of indirection just
causes more code (and confusion) in your simple example. Is this just
a "best practice" that you've devised? I've never really understood
folks' aversion to talk
Hi,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1974 describes a way to
make all URLs absolute.
Unfortunately the patch attached to the issue is still not applied so
you'll have to build wicket yourself.
Regards,
Erik.
Op 18-06-10 21:56, b...@actrix.gen.nz schreef:
Hi Fernando,
obv
Try to use the RemoveLink that is available as inner class of ListView.
Regards,
Erik.
Op 18-06-10 18:29, jOki wrote:
Hi!!
Im trying to implement a dynamic Form, where you can add textfields and
remove as you want. The add button works fine, but the remove button always
remove the last te
Just as a test, turn off the reuseItems property. See what happens.
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 5:04 AM, jOki wrote:
>
> Even Im trying to implement the remove link as:
>
> - item.add(removeLink("removeKeyword", item));
>
> and it doesnt work... always remove the last row...
>
>
> --
> View this me
Also, is the item you're trying to remove a null in the list? Or, is it a
problem with equals/hashcode not being implemented correctly? I just fixed
a bug in ListView this week with the remove link and move up/down links. It
was relying on the equals of the model object of the item to find which
Hi,
not sure if I should post this in "Apache Roller" or Wicket; but is there
any way to integrate "Apache ROller" and Wicket?
..are there any good blog engines with Wicket, or perhaps Some blog
components within Wicket?
Frankly I like ROllers feature set and I doubt wicket itself would have a
f
Did not hear any feedback. Just curious about whether I explained clearly or
about what others may think about my suggestions.
Regards.
--- On Fri, 6/18/10, David Chang wrote:
> From: David Chang
> Subject: Suggestion about wicket's Wizard
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Date: Friday, June 18
Hi James,
> Why is spring-orm version 3.0.1.RELEASE and not 3.0.3.RELEASE? Why
> not just uset a {spring.version} property in your POM so that it all
> stays in synch?
Thanks for your good advice. I've updated the tutorial.
> Why do you have page -> service -> dao? Why not just talk directly t
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Kent Tong wrote:
> I agree that if the service is simply delegating to the DAO without
> adding anything, then it is probably be a good idea to merge them.
> However, this sample application is meant to demonstrate how to do
> it in a general case where the servic
The best reason for me to keep a service/business layer talking to the DAO is
to provide a clean transactional boundary. Then, all I have to do is add a
Spring @Transactional annotation to the method and I'm fully atomic.
If my view logic is calling a half dozen DAO methods to effect an updat
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Brian Topping wrote:
> The best reason for me to keep a service/business layer talking to the DAO is
> to provide a clean transactional boundary. Then, all I have to do is add a
> Spring @Transactional annotation to the method and I'm fully atomic.
>
> If my vi
Thats ok. I never understood folks who dont use layers.
-Original Message-
From: jcar...@carmanconsulting.com [mailto:jcar...@carmanconsulting.com] On
Behalf Of James Carman
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 5:07 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting started with Scala, Spri
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Tim L Casey wrote:
>
>
> That’s ok. I never understood folks who don’t use layers.
>
I do use layers, when it makes sense. It's just a matter of taste, I
guess. Some folks like to stick with their paradigm no matter what.
I guess I've just become a bit more fl
The reaction comes from years of watching UI centric people, who have a
different design goal, use dao code poorly; and then watching dao type
people use UI code poorly.
I guess I view the layering as inevitable. Even if it is as simple as
moving a tag, I am not sure I want anyone to have that
On Jun 19, 2010, at 12:05 PM, James Carman wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Brian Topping
> wrote:
>> The best reason for me to keep a service/business layer talking to the DAO
>> is to provide a clean transactional boundary. Then, all I have to do is add
>> a Spring @Transactional
Hi,
I tried with/without setReuseItems and the behaviour is the same.
I think you can be right with equals/hashcode not being implemented
correctly...
I tried another time with a List with different values and its
working...
I tried as well to implement these methods (equals/hashcode) in my co
What kind of objects are they? For entities, I use a uuid for the primary
key and it's assigned when the object is created. That way you make
equals/hashcode based on the uuid so that everything stays consistent
On Jun 19, 2010 1:42 PM, "jOki" wrote:
Hi,
I tried with/without setReuseItems an
Thanks Erik.
Why are you using absolute URLS?
Are you using absolute URLs to support editing in the web directory,
with a directory structure the same as the java package structure,
without breaking images?
Then it would look like you have found a different solution for the
same problem. Interes
Hi Bernard,
We are using absolute URLs in one application (http://tipspot.com) that
does not use the wicket ajax library, only javascript (based on jquery)
written by the frontend developer. One of the things we do there is
filling popups through ajax requests. As most of that information is
The latest and greatest in the domain-driven world would be CQRS where
the UI code needs two types of dependencies: the command bus and a
repository. No more need of a 'services' layer.
I adore CQRS because it provides a simple and clear view of what code to
put where. Though the amount of cod
24 matches
Mail list logo
