I would like to support different layout structure, not only CSS.
I will follow your help and try to do it. Thank you for your help, I really
appreciated it.
Duy
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:40 AM, Russell Simpkins
russellsimpk...@hotmail.com wrote:
I would like to support multiple themes
Even Im trying to implement the remove link as:
- item.add(removeLink(removeKeyword, item));
and it doesnt work... always remove the last row...
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/ListView-dynamic-rows-always-remove-last-row-tp2260480p2261045.html
Hi,
I've written a tutorial on this topic. You may check it out at
http://www.dzone.com/links/getting_started_with_scala_spring_hibernate_wicket.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For
Why is spring-orm version 3.0.1.RELEASE and not 3.0.3.RELEASE? Why
not just uset a {spring.version} property in your POM so that it all
stays in synch?
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Kent Tong k...@cpttm.org.mo wrote:
Hi,
I've written a tutorial on this topic. You may check it out at
Why do you have page - service - dao? Why not just talk directly to
the DAO for the getAll() method. This level of indirection just
causes more code (and confusion) in your simple example. Is this just
a best practice that you've devised? I've never really understood
folks' aversion to talking
Hi,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1974 describes a way to
make all URLs absolute.
Unfortunately the patch attached to the issue is still not applied so
you'll have to build wicket yourself.
Regards,
Erik.
Op 18-06-10 21:56, b...@actrix.gen.nz schreef:
Hi Fernando,
Try to use the RemoveLink that is available as inner class of ListView.
Regards,
Erik.
Op 18-06-10 18:29, jOki wrote:
Hi!!
Im trying to implement a dynamic Form, where you can add textfields and
remove as you want. The add button works fine, but the remove button always
remove the last
Just as a test, turn off the reuseItems property. See what happens.
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 5:04 AM, jOki joa...@gmail.com wrote:
Even Im trying to implement the remove link as:
- item.add(removeLink(removeKeyword, item));
and it doesnt work... always remove the last row...
--
View
Also, is the item you're trying to remove a null in the list? Or, is it a
problem with equals/hashcode not being implemented correctly? I just fixed
a bug in ListView this week with the remove link and move up/down links. It
was relying on the equals of the model object of the item to find
Hi,
not sure if I should post this in Apache Roller or Wicket; but is there
any way to integrate Apache ROller and Wicket?
..are there any good blog engines with Wicket, or perhaps Some blog
components within Wicket?
Frankly I like ROllers feature set and I doubt wicket itself would have a
full
Did not hear any feedback. Just curious about whether I explained clearly or
about what others may think about my suggestions.
Regards.
--- On Fri, 6/18/10, David Chang david_q_zh...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: David Chang david_q_zh...@yahoo.com
Subject: Suggestion about wicket's Wizard
To:
Hi James,
Why is spring-orm version 3.0.1.RELEASE and not 3.0.3.RELEASE? Why
not just uset a {spring.version} property in your POM so that it all
stays in synch?
Thanks for your good advice. I've updated the tutorial.
Why do you have page - service - dao? Why not just talk directly to
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Kent Tong k...@cpttm.org.mo wrote:
I agree that if the service is simply delegating to the DAO without
adding anything, then it is probably be a good idea to merge them.
However, this sample application is meant to demonstrate how to do
it in a general case
The best reason for me to keep a service/business layer talking to the DAO is
to provide a clean transactional boundary. Then, all I have to do is add a
Spring @Transactional annotation to the method and I'm fully atomic.
If my view logic is calling a half dozen DAO methods to effect an
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Brian Topping brian.topp...@gmail.com wrote:
The best reason for me to keep a service/business layer talking to the DAO is
to provide a clean transactional boundary. Then, all I have to do is add a
Spring @Transactional annotation to the method and I'm fully
Thats ok. I never understood folks who dont use layers.
-Original Message-
From: jcar...@carmanconsulting.com [mailto:jcar...@carmanconsulting.com] On
Behalf Of James Carman
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 5:07 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting started with Scala,
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Tim L Casey tca...@cataphora.com wrote:
That’s ok. I never understood folks who don’t use layers.
I do use layers, when it makes sense. It's just a matter of taste, I
guess. Some folks like to stick with their paradigm no matter what.
I guess I've just
The reaction comes from years of watching UI centric people, who have a
different design goal, use dao code poorly; and then watching dao type
people use UI code poorly.
I guess I view the layering as inevitable. Even if it is as simple as
moving a tag, I am not sure I want anyone to have that
On Jun 19, 2010, at 12:05 PM, James Carman wrote:
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Brian Topping brian.topp...@gmail.com
wrote:
The best reason for me to keep a service/business layer talking to the DAO
is to provide a clean transactional boundary. Then, all I have to do is add
a
Hi,
I tried with/without setReuseItems and the behaviour is the same.
I think you can be right with equals/hashcode not being implemented
correctly...
I tried another time with a ListString with different values and its
working...
I tried as well to implement these methods (equals/hashcode)
What kind of objects are they? For entities, I use a uuid for the primary
key and it's assigned when the object is created. That way you make
equals/hashcode based on the uuid so that everything stays consistent
On Jun 19, 2010 1:42 PM, jOki joa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I tried with/without
Thanks Erik.
Why are you using absolute URLS?
Are you using absolute URLs to support editing in the web directory,
with a directory structure the same as the java package structure,
without breaking images?
Then it would look like you have found a different solution for the
same problem.
Hi Bernard,
We are using absolute URLs in one application (http://tipspot.com) that
does not use the wicket ajax library, only javascript (based on jquery)
written by the frontend developer. One of the things we do there is
filling popups through ajax requests. As most of that information is
The latest and greatest in the domain-driven world would be CQRS where
the UI code needs two types of dependencies: the command bus and a
repository. No more need of a 'services' layer.
I adore CQRS because it provides a simple and clear view of what code to
put where. Though the amount of
24 matches
Mail list logo
