RE: JWicket drag/drop handle
You are right! jWicket is missing a setHandle method. I will implement this in the future. For now you can use the setRawOption() method for all unimplemented options. In your case you sould try setRawOptions(cancel:'p.ui-widget-header' ); Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: flavius [mailto:flav...@silverlion.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 1. Februar 2011 05:17 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: JWicket drag/drop handle I'm trying to create a widget/gadget (similar to google's home page or yahoo). I've got it largely figured out except for one thing. I'm trying to restrict the drag operation to just the top div (the header). So my widget will look like this: div class=widget div class=wheaderDrag here/div div class=wbodystuff goes here.../div /div This functionality is described in JQuery here: http://jqueryui.com/demos/draggable/#handle It seems like DraggableBehavior should have a setHandle method so I can define the draggable region. Any thoughts? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/JWicket-drag-drop-handle-tp3250469p3250469.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Wickettester, cookies and redirects in Wicket 1.4.15
Hi, I currently have an application reading a cookie in my session. All
of my unit tests where the pattern is: Create page - submit form -
redirect to new page fails to read this cookie after the redirect to new
page.
The cookie is added both to the response and request before each new
test (WicketTester gets recreated):
tester.getWicketResponse().addCookie(cookie);
tester.getServletRequest().setCookies(new Cookie[]{cookie});
This works fine during first page rendering and form submission. But
after the form has been submitted and the redirect to new page takes
place the cookie does not exist in the new request.
Since I'm a bit unsure if this is the wanted behavior for WicketTester
or not I'm posting this to all users out there.
In my particular use case I would like the cookie to be persisted
between original request and new request since that's how it is working
in the real application.
Codewise (with Wicket 1.4.15):
In MockWebApplication.postProcessRequestCycle:
if (httpResponse.isRedirect())
{
lastRenderedPage = generateLastRenderedPage(cycle);
MockHttpServletRequest newHttpRequest = new
MockHttpServletRequest(application, servletSession,
application.getServletContext());
...
}
The call to new MockHttpServletRequest will clear all cookies set during
initialize() and thus my cookie will not be set in the redirect request.
Any ideas on how to tackle this? For me I'd like the WicketTester to
copy any existing cookies from the original request to the redirect
request. I'd also be happy if there's another place in the code where I
can set the cookie to have it available during the redirect request
phase as well.
I also found an old bug (WICKET-1886) that felt like the same issue when
I read it.
Regards
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Mapping wicket:id to component without changing Java code
Hi Alec,
I don't think Wicket has a configuration option that can help you. But
you can create a web page superclass that parses HTML and adds your form
if it finds tag div wicket:id=creditCardForm/.
For example you can override onInitialize method and add something like
this:
MarkupParser markupParser = new MarkupParser(new XmlPullParser(), new
MarkupResourceStream(getMarkupStream().getResource()));
Markup markup = markupParser.parse();
for(int i = 0; i markup.size(); i++) {
if(markup.get(i) instanceof ComponentTag){
String markupId = (ComponentTag) markup.get(i);
//if markupid is equals to creditCardForm add form
}
}
bye.
Hello,
I would like to add credit card processing form to many different pages in
my application. However, I don't know which pages it will be added to and it
is up to the web designer to decide.
I would like to allow the web designer to be able to putdiv
wicket:id=creditCardForm/ anywhere in HTML. This would typically cause
Wicket to throw an error saying that a matching component was not added.
Is there a way to configure Wicket to somehow add an instance of
CreditCardForm class whenever it seesdiv wicket:id=creditCardForm/?
Thanks,
Alec
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Provide the user with immediate feedback
Hey! In our wicket application we are using a lot of Ajax links/forms. Sometimes, those requests take a second or two. We now want to give the user some feedback, that his request is being processed (to avoid double clicking or the impression that the webapp is slow). What would be the best way to execute custom javascript methods BEFORE the request gets sent to the webapp? Those javascript methods would then show a progress bar, a message like Your request is being processed.. etc. For example: The user clicks an AjaxLink to delete an entry from the table and before the request gets sent to the server, some javascript method adds a small progress bar at the top of the table. Once the ajax request is done, the progress bar disappears. Another example would be how Facebook handles sending private messages. As soon as I click the send button, the text area gets disabled / greyed out immediately and after the Ajax request has gone through, I get access again to the text area. Cheers, Patrick - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Provide the user with immediate feedback
You can register an handler to show some message and another one to remove it at the end of request. See Wicket.Ajax.registerPreCallHandler / registerPostCallHandler and https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/generic-busy-indicator-for-both-ajax-and-non-ajax-submits.html https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/generic-busy-indicator-for-both-ajax-and-non-ajax-submits.html On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Patrick Petermair patrick.peterm...@openforce.com wrote: Hey! In our wicket application we are using a lot of Ajax links/forms. Sometimes, those requests take a second or two. We now want to give the user some feedback, that his request is being processed (to avoid double clicking or the impression that the webapp is slow). What would be the best way to execute custom javascript methods BEFORE the request gets sent to the webapp? Those javascript methods would then show a progress bar, a message like Your request is being processed.. etc. For example: The user clicks an AjaxLink to delete an entry from the table and before the request gets sent to the server, some javascript method adds a small progress bar at the top of the table. Once the ajax request is done, the progress bar disappears. Another example would be how Facebook handles sending private messages. As soon as I click the send button, the text area gets disabled / greyed out immediately and after the Ajax request has gone through, I get access again to the text area. Cheers, Patrick - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Re: Provide the user with immediate feedback
Patrick, I think you can: 1-use interface IAjaxIndicatorAware to mark a page or Panel as a context for showing some indicator of AJAX activity (usually a veil + some activity icon) 2- or you can use IAjaxCallDecorator to manually decorate your links. Ernesto On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Patrick Petermair patrick.peterm...@openforce.com wrote: Hey! In our wicket application we are using a lot of Ajax links/forms. Sometimes, those requests take a second or two. We now want to give the user some feedback, that his request is being processed (to avoid double clicking or the impression that the webapp is slow). What would be the best way to execute custom javascript methods BEFORE the request gets sent to the webapp? Those javascript methods would then show a progress bar, a message like Your request is being processed.. etc. For example: The user clicks an AjaxLink to delete an entry from the table and before the request gets sent to the server, some javascript method adds a small progress bar at the top of the table. Once the ajax request is done, the progress bar disappears. Another example would be how Facebook handles sending private messages. As soon as I click the send button, the text area gets disabled / greyed out immediately and after the Ajax request has gone through, I get access again to the text area. Cheers, Patrick - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wickettester, cookies and redirects in Wicket 1.4.15
Hi Hobert, I reopened the WICKET-1886
2011/2/1 Robert Dahlström robert.dahlst...@bwin.org
Hi, I currently have an application reading a cookie in my session. All of
my unit tests where the pattern is: Create page - submit form - redirect
to new page fails to read this cookie after the redirect to new page.
The cookie is added both to the response and request before each new test
(WicketTester gets recreated):
tester.getWicketResponse().addCookie(cookie);
tester.getServletRequest().setCookies(new Cookie[]{cookie});
This works fine during first page rendering and form submission. But after
the form has been submitted and the redirect to new page takes place the
cookie does not exist in the new request.
Since I'm a bit unsure if this is the wanted behavior for WicketTester or
not I'm posting this to all users out there.
In my particular use case I would like the cookie to be persisted between
original request and new request since that's how it is working in the real
application.
Codewise (with Wicket 1.4.15):
In MockWebApplication.postProcessRequestCycle:
if (httpResponse.isRedirect())
{
lastRenderedPage = generateLastRenderedPage(cycle);
MockHttpServletRequest newHttpRequest = new
MockHttpServletRequest(application, servletSession,
application.getServletContext());
...
}
The call to new MockHttpServletRequest will clear all cookies set during
initialize() and thus my cookie will not be set in the redirect request.
Any ideas on how to tackle this? For me I'd like the WicketTester to copy
any existing cookies from the original request to the redirect request. I'd
also be happy if there's another place in the code where I can set the
cookie to have it available during the redirect request phase as well.
I also found an old bug (WICKET-1886) that felt like the same issue when I
read it.
Regards
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Re: Wickettester, cookies and redirects in Wicket 1.4.15
Thanks, I'll add the info I have to the bug.
Regards
Robert
On 02/01/2011 01:02 PM, Pedro Santos wrote:
Hi Hobert, I reopened the WICKET-1886
2011/2/1 Robert Dahlströmrobert.dahlst...@bwin.org
Hi, I currently have an application reading a cookie in my session. All of
my unit tests where the pattern is: Create page - submit form - redirect
to new page fails to read this cookie after the redirect to new page.
The cookie is added both to the response and request before each new test
(WicketTester gets recreated):
tester.getWicketResponse().addCookie(cookie);
tester.getServletRequest().setCookies(new Cookie[]{cookie});
This works fine during first page rendering and form submission. But after
the form has been submitted and the redirect to new page takes place the
cookie does not exist in the new request.
Since I'm a bit unsure if this is the wanted behavior for WicketTester or
not I'm posting this to all users out there.
In my particular use case I would like the cookie to be persisted between
original request and new request since that's how it is working in the real
application.
Codewise (with Wicket 1.4.15):
In MockWebApplication.postProcessRequestCycle:
if (httpResponse.isRedirect())
{
lastRenderedPage = generateLastRenderedPage(cycle);
MockHttpServletRequest newHttpRequest = new
MockHttpServletRequest(application, servletSession,
application.getServletContext());
...
}
The call to new MockHttpServletRequest will clear all cookies set during
initialize() and thus my cookie will not be set in the redirect request.
Any ideas on how to tackle this? For me I'd like the WicketTester to copy
any existing cookies from the original request to the redirect request. I'd
also be happy if there's another place in the code where I can set the
cookie to have it available during the redirect request phase as well.
I also found an old bug (WICKET-1886) that felt like the same issue when I
read it.
Regards
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wickettester, cookies and redirects in Wicket 1.4.15
I attached an test case, possible simulating your described bug
2011/2/1 Robert Dahlström robert.dahlst...@bwin.org
Thanks, I'll add the info I have to the bug.
Regards
Robert
On 02/01/2011 01:02 PM, Pedro Santos wrote:
Hi Hobert, I reopened the WICKET-1886
2011/2/1 Robert Dahlströmrobert.dahlst...@bwin.org
Hi, I currently have an application reading a cookie in my session. All
of
my unit tests where the pattern is: Create page - submit form -
redirect
to new page fails to read this cookie after the redirect to new page.
The cookie is added both to the response and request before each new test
(WicketTester gets recreated):
tester.getWicketResponse().addCookie(cookie);
tester.getServletRequest().setCookies(new Cookie[]{cookie});
This works fine during first page rendering and form submission. But
after
the form has been submitted and the redirect to new page takes place the
cookie does not exist in the new request.
Since I'm a bit unsure if this is the wanted behavior for WicketTester or
not I'm posting this to all users out there.
In my particular use case I would like the cookie to be persisted between
original request and new request since that's how it is working in the
real
application.
Codewise (with Wicket 1.4.15):
In MockWebApplication.postProcessRequestCycle:
if (httpResponse.isRedirect())
{
lastRenderedPage = generateLastRenderedPage(cycle);
MockHttpServletRequest newHttpRequest = new
MockHttpServletRequest(application, servletSession,
application.getServletContext());
...
}
The call to new MockHttpServletRequest will clear all cookies set during
initialize() and thus my cookie will not be set in the redirect request.
Any ideas on how to tackle this? For me I'd like the WicketTester to copy
any existing cookies from the original request to the redirect request.
I'd
also be happy if there's another place in the code where I can set the
cookie to have it available during the redirect request phase as well.
I also found an old bug (WICKET-1886) that felt like the same issue when
I
read it.
Regards
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Problem with Wickettester and Maven
Hello everybody, I have problems with unit testing. All the time I have used NetBeans 6.9.1 with Glassfish and there wasn't any problems. Just create a new UnitTest with WicketTester and it worked pretty fine. Today I changed the project infrastructure to Maven with surifire plug-in. The problem is following: usual unit test will be executet without failures but not the tests with wickettester. Surifire report showed me following exception: java.lang. NoClassDefFoundError: javax/servlet/http/HttpSession at de.pentasys.test.web.TestRenderPages.setUp(TestRenderPages.java:22) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44) at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:27) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runNotIgnored(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:79) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:71) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:49) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:35) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:115) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:97) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ClassLoaderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:103) at $Proxy0.invoke(Unknown Source) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.invokeProvider(SurefireStarter.java:150) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireStarter.java:91) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:69) Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: javax.servlet.http.HttpSession at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248) ... 30 more The test itself is very simple: it checkt if the start page will be rendered. Nothing more. Any ideas? Thank you!
Re: Problem with Wickettester and Maven
You need to add the test or provided scope servlet-api dependency in your project pom On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote: Hello everybody, I have problems with unit testing. All the time I have used NetBeans 6.9.1 with Glassfish and there wasn't any problems. Just create a new UnitTest with WicketTester and it worked pretty fine. Today I changed the project infrastructure to Maven with surifire plug-in. The problem is following: usual unit test will be executet without failures but not the tests with wickettester. Surifire report showed me following exception: java.lang. NoClassDefFoundError: javax/servlet/http/HttpSession at de.pentasys.test.web.TestRenderPages.setUp(TestRenderPages.java:22) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44) at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:27) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runNotIgnored(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:79) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:71) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:49) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:35) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:115) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:97) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ClassLoaderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:103) at $Proxy0.invoke(Unknown Source) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.invokeProvider(SurefireStarter.java:150) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireStarter.java:91) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:69) Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: javax.servlet.http.HttpSession at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248) ... 30 more The test itself is very simple: it checkt if the start page will be rendered. Nothing more. Any ideas? Thank you! -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Re: Problem with Wickettester and Maven
I don't really understand how to do that? On 1 February 2011 14:46, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote: You need to add the test or provided scope servlet-api dependency in your project pom On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote: Hello everybody, I have problems with unit testing. All the time I have used NetBeans 6.9.1 with Glassfish and there wasn't any problems. Just create a new UnitTest with WicketTester and it worked pretty fine. Today I changed the project infrastructure to Maven with surifire plug-in. The problem is following: usual unit test will be executet without failures but not the tests with wickettester. Surifire report showed me following exception: java.lang. NoClassDefFoundError: javax/servlet/http/HttpSession at de.pentasys.test.web.TestRenderPages.setUp(TestRenderPages.java:22) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44) at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:27) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runNotIgnored(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:79) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:71) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:49) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:35) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:115) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:97) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ClassLoaderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:103) at $Proxy0.invoke(Unknown Source) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.invokeProvider(SurefireStarter.java:150) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireStarter.java:91) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:69) Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: javax.servlet.http.HttpSession at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248) ... 30 more The test itself is very simple: it checkt if the start page will be rendered. Nothing more. Any ideas? Thank you! -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Re: Problem with Wickettester and Maven
Oh sorry!!! It works now! Thank you! I should add this to my pom: dependency groupIdjavax.servlet/groupId artifactIdservlet-api/artifactId version2.4/version scopeprovided/scope /dependency On 1 February 2011 14:51, Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.comwrote: I don't really understand how to do that? On 1 February 2011 14:46, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote: You need to add the test or provided scope servlet-api dependency in your project pom On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote: Hello everybody, I have problems with unit testing. All the time I have used NetBeans 6.9.1 with Glassfish and there wasn't any problems. Just create a new UnitTest with WicketTester and it worked pretty fine. Today I changed the project infrastructure to Maven with surifire plug-in. The problem is following: usual unit test will be executet without failures but not the tests with wickettester. Surifire report showed me following exception: java.lang. NoClassDefFoundError: javax/servlet/http/HttpSession at de.pentasys.test.web.TestRenderPages.setUp(TestRenderPages.java:22) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44) at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:27) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runNotIgnored(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:79) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:71) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:49) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:35) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:115) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:97) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ClassLoaderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:103) at $Proxy0.invoke(Unknown Source) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.invokeProvider(SurefireStarter.java:150) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireStarter.java:91) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:69) Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: javax.servlet.http.HttpSession at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248) ... 30 more The test itself is very simple: it checkt if the start page will be rendered. Nothing more. Any ideas? Thank you! -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Re: setResponsePage weirdness
Worse case scenario, though I understand not wanting to do it, is using a javascript/html redirect and by passing Wicket, not the nicest scenario, I wish I knew more about redirects, sorry. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/setResponsePage-weirdness-tp3248650p3251802.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Using non-Model fields in Form
I'm a newbie also but Can't you just create a new model specifically for the RadioChoice component? Each component can have its own model. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Using-non-Model-fields-in-Form-tp3251063p3251807.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Mapping wicket:id to component without changing Java code
You can add an empty label to replace the content if not adding the component. You can have a repeating list if you have lots of dynamic content, this way whatever you add to the list is added or you can just add an empty component. It does seem odd to me that in your html you know whether to add the credit card div, but in Wicket you do not... that is certainly unclear to me. Btw, I am building an e-commerce solution myself, are you using an opensource platform or building it yourself? Hello, I would like to add credit card processing form to many different pages in my application. However, I don't know which pages it will be added to and it is up to the web designer to decide. I would like to allow the web designer to be able to putdiv wicket:id=creditCardForm/ anywhere in HTML. This would typically cause Wicket to throw an error saying that a matching component was not added. Is there a way to configure Wicket to somehow add an instance of CreditCardForm class whenever it seesdiv wicket:id=creditCardForm/? Thanks, Alec -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Mapping-wicket-id-to-component-without-changing-Java-code-tp3250381p3251809.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Using non-Model fields in Form
As Nimmy said you should be able to supply your own model to the RadioChoice which will override the CompoundPropertyModel Assuming NUMBERS is a list... RadioChoiceString rc = new RadioChoiceString(numberRadioChoice, new Model(),NUMBERS); Look at https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/working-with-wicket-models.html for more information. nimmy wrote: I'm a newbie also but Can't you just create a new model specifically for the RadioChoice component? Each component can have its own model. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Using-non-Model-fields-in-Form-tp3251063p3251822.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Using non-Model fields in Form
Sure. When you create an radio choice like: RadioChoiceString rc = new RadioChoiceString(numberRadioChoice, NUMBERS); your are passing the wicket id and a list of choices to the component, but no model. Components without model inherit one from the first parent CompoundPropertyModel based on the child wicket id, in this case: numberRadioChoice. The problem is that the object at the first parament CPM don't have de property numberRa(...), so I guess you missed to provide your own model to the component. On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:25 PM, nimmy nim_sa...@hotmail.com wrote: I'm a newbie also but Can't you just create a new model specifically for the RadioChoice component? Each component can have its own model. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Using-non-Model-fields-in-Form-tp3251063p3251807.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Re: Provide the user with immediate feedback
Interesting the Ajax call decorator mentioned above sounds like a good
choice, I don't know the transactional steps for each solution, but to have
the javascript written entirely in the page without requiring some sort of
connection to the wicket server, does sound like it will be more immediate
if your worried about that 1 or 2 seconds of idle time however you want to
accomplish that.
http://radio.javaranch.com/pascarello/2005/05/17/1116340367337.html If you
need a script:
function DisableEnableForm(xForm,xHow){
objElems = xForm.elements;
for(i=0;iobjElems.length;i++){
objElems[i].disabled = xHow;
}
}
Just my two cents,
Matthew
Patrick Petermair wrote:
In our wicket application we are using a lot of Ajax links/forms.
Sometimes, those requests take a second or two. We now want to give the
user some feedback, that his request is being processed (to avoid double
clicking or the impression that the webapp is slow).
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Provide-the-user-with-immediate-feedback-tp3250978p3251879.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Mapping wicket:id to component without changing Java code
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:27 AM, msj121 msj...@gmail.com wrote: You can add an empty label to replace the content if not adding the component. Or, use EmptyPanel or a plain ole WebMarkupContainer? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Dynamic tab question - now to pass a model to the panel?
I don't quite understand the problem... some code might help. But why can't
you do something like the following:
tabs.add(new AbstractTab(item.getModel()) {
public Panel getPanel(String panelId) {
return new AlbumPanel(panelId, );// can be item.getModelObject() or
something
}
});
The above assumes your inside some sort of Wicket Repeater (I assumed this
as you mentioned it was dynamic). Like I said, some more code might help.
nimmy wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having a bit of confusion with dynamic tabs and would appreciate your
help.
My page has a LDM model. The model wraps an AlbumGroup object, which has a
list of Album objects.
I'm creating a tab for each Album object by extending AbstractTab. I'm
passing in a ModelAlbum as a constructor to the tab. This model is used
to set the title of the tab and should also be used to populate the
contents of the tab panel.
How can I pass the ModelAlbum to the tab Panel?
I don't think I can hold the model as an instance variable in the Tab
until the getPanel() method is called as detach will never be called on
the LDM.
I cannot simply implement the IDetachable interface because AbstractTab is
not a component and detach will not be called on it.
Am I overthinking the LDM?
Cheers,
Nim
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Dynamic-tab-question-now-to-pass-a-model-to-the-panel-tp3250387p3251937.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Using non-Model fields in Form
This is exactly why I tell folks not to use CPM. People start relying on them too heavily and when all doesn't work as planned, they freak out. It's like the blonde that got locked in her car because the battery died and her automatic locks didn't work. On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:25 AM, nimmy nim_sa...@hotmail.com wrote: I'm a newbie also but Can't you just create a new model specifically for the RadioChoice component? Each component can have its own model. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Using-non-Model-fields-in-Form-tp3251063p3251807.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
[1.4.15] FLAG_INHERITABLE_MODEL and default model change
Hi,
I have the question about correctness of Component#setDefaultModel
(Component#setModelImpl) method behavior. I expect that the flag
FLAG_INHERITABLE_MODEL should be checked there and turned off if the
provided model is not a IComponentInheritedModel.
Let check the next code:
public MyPanel(String id) {
super(id);
...
form.setModel(new CompoundPropertyModel(this));
DropDownChoice ddc = new DropDownChoice(variant, Arrays.ofList(...)) {
// p1
@Override
protected void onInitialize() {
super.onInitialize();
setModel(new DefaultingWrapModel(getModel(), Model.of(default
value));// p2
}
};
ddc.setNullValid(false);
ddc.setRequired(true);
form.add(ddc);
...
}
In the (p1) the DDC will initialize with CompoundPropertyModel and the
FLAG_INHERITABLE_MODEL will be turned on soon by the first invocation of
FormComponent#getModel().
In the (p2) we wrap the DDC model with the model which provide the default
value (DefaultingWrapModel implements IWrapModel). So we change the model,
but the FLAG_INHERITABLE_MODEL is still turned on.
On the Component#detach() event, the method Component#setModelImpl(null)
will be invoked for the ddc and the DefaultingWrapModel instance will be
lost
// reset the model to null when the current model is a
IWrapModel and
// the model that created it/wrapped in it is a
IComponentInheritedModel
// The model will be created next time.
if (getFlag(FLAG_INHERITABLE_MODEL))
{
setModelImpl(null);
setFlag(FLAG_INHERITABLE_MODEL, false);
}
I think that such behavior is unexpected. Am I right :) ?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/1-4-15-FLAG-INHERITABLE-MODEL-and-default-model-change-tp3252093p3252093.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: export to excel AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable
Now I want to export the same table in PDF , I did the export to excel using apache POI, Now I have to export the same table to PDF. Is there any libray which serves export to various formats ? I saw display Tag http://displaytag.sourceforge.net/10/export.html it provides export to pdf , xml , excel , I am looking for a similar solution , is there any way I can use the display tag to export from wicket datatable ? Please suggest me what are the available options to provide export to various formats from a wicket datatable ? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/export-to-excel-AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable-tp3225458p3252116.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Dynamic tab question - now to pass a model to the panel?
Hi,
Thanks for your reply. I'm pretty much doing what you suggested but have a
concrete Tab class as it is reused on another page:
public class AlbumTab extends AbstractTab {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
private IModelAlbum model;
public AlbumTab(IModelAlbum model) {
super(new PropertyModelString(model, name));
this.model = model;
}
@Override
public Panel getPanel(String id) {
return new TabPanel(id, model);
}
}
The Page has a hibernate backed LoadableDetachableModel - AlbumGroup.
AlbumGroup has a list of Albums. I iterate through the list and create a tab
for each Album and create a tabbed panel:
//create a tab for each album
ListITab tabs = new ArrayListITab();
for (Album album: model.getObject().getAlbums()) {
ITab tab = new AlbumTab(new ModelAlbum(album));
tabs.add(tab);
}
add(new TabbedPanel(content-tabs, tabs));
My confusion was/is on who calls detach() on the LDM. Each tab will have a
reference to the LDM.
I am now setting the LDM as the default model for the page (even though the
page does not use it). My reasoning is that once the page is Serialised, it
will call detach() on the LDM.
Any thoughts on my approach?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Dynamic-tab-question-now-to-pass-a-model-to-the-panel-tp3250387p3252157.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Using DataView newItem method to display a BreadCrumbPanel
Hi All,
I am trying to add an onclick event to a table row -- each row is created
using a DataView.
To make an entire row clickable, I add an AjaxEventBehavior via the
DataView's Item newItem method.
This seems to work as far as an onEvent event being raised when I click on a
table row.
However, I am trying to activate a BreadCrumbPanel from within the onEvent
event. Nothing seems
to happen as far as showing the next panel (called JobDescPanel). If I click
on the row again
then a component not found on page exception is thrown. I have supplied a
snippet of code below.
Is it wrong to try and activate a breadcrumb from this Ajax event?
Thanks,
Steve
P.S. Using Wicket 1.4.10
private void buildDataView()
{
final DataViewJobSearchResult dv = new
DataViewJobSearchResult(dataView, jsdp) {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
protected ItemJobSearchResult newItem(String id, int
index, final
IModelJobSearchResult model) {
ItemJobSearchResult item = super.newItem(id,
index, model);
item.add(new AjaxEventBehavior(onclick) {
private static final long
serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
protected void
onEvent(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
activate(new
IBreadCrumbPanelFactory() {
private static final
long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public BreadCrumbPanel
create(String componentId, IBreadCrumbModel
bcm) {
JobSearchResult
jsr = model.getObject();
return new
JobDescPanel(componentId, bcm, homePage,
jsr.getOrderId());
}
});
}
});
return item;
}
...
}
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Using-DataView-newItem-method-to-display-a-BreadCrumbPanel-tp3252215p3252215.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [1.4.15] FLAG_INHERITABLE_MODEL and default model change
please file a jira
-igor
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Alexander Morozov
alexander.v.moro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have the question about correctness of Component#setDefaultModel
(Component#setModelImpl) method behavior. I expect that the flag
FLAG_INHERITABLE_MODEL should be checked there and turned off if the
provided model is not a IComponentInheritedModel.
Let check the next code:
public MyPanel(String id) {
super(id);
...
form.setModel(new CompoundPropertyModel(this));
DropDownChoice ddc = new DropDownChoice(variant, Arrays.ofList(...)) {
// p1
@Override
protected void onInitialize() {
super.onInitialize();
setModel(new DefaultingWrapModel(getModel(), Model.of(default
value)); // p2
}
};
ddc.setNullValid(false);
ddc.setRequired(true);
form.add(ddc);
...
}
In the (p1) the DDC will initialize with CompoundPropertyModel and the
FLAG_INHERITABLE_MODEL will be turned on soon by the first invocation of
FormComponent#getModel().
In the (p2) we wrap the DDC model with the model which provide the default
value (DefaultingWrapModel implements IWrapModel). So we change the model,
but the FLAG_INHERITABLE_MODEL is still turned on.
On the Component#detach() event, the method Component#setModelImpl(null)
will be invoked for the ddc and the DefaultingWrapModel instance will be
lost
// reset the model to null when the current model is a
IWrapModel and
// the model that created it/wrapped in it is a
IComponentInheritedModel
// The model will be created next time.
if (getFlag(FLAG_INHERITABLE_MODEL))
{
setModelImpl(null);
setFlag(FLAG_INHERITABLE_MODEL, false);
}
I think that such behavior is unexpected. Am I right :) ?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/1-4-15-FLAG-INHERITABLE-MODEL-and-default-model-change-tp3252093p3252093.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Set default locale when suitable locale not found
In project i have several *.properties files for custom locale (page_en_GB and page_ru_RU).When user with default locale en US come, hes got exception. Can I do that if a suitable location has not been found to use my custom locale ? I try to use Locale.setDafault(...), but it doesnt work. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Set-default-locale-when-suitable-locale-not-found-tp3252800p3252800.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Dynamic tab question - now to pass a model to the panel?
the method .detach() or some variation should be called on every Loadable Detachable Model (LDM) if your model is being used as a default model to any component in the page hierarchy. To make this LDM your page model, I think there is a trick in the sense you should call super(model), and not just set the page's default model. It should be detached automatically. The best way is probably to test the code with a breakpoint or override the method and print with log4j or something Sorry I misunderstood the question. Matthew -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Dynamic-tab-question-now-to-pass-a-model-to-the-panel-tp3250387p3252947.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Using DataView newItem method to display a BreadCrumbPanel
not sure what activate does, I would hope though that it would add the object
to a panel on the page, and then you call target.addComponent(panel); As
this target (the AjaxRequestTarget) deals with actually updating the front
end of the page.
Also Data Repeaters are somewhat dubious in that they refresh their content
on each reload, so don't try to add the content to the DataView itself
(which I assume you are not). Similarly using the model and not the value of
the model might cause some issues, I am not sure. The stack error trace
after this first visual issue is fixed would be useful.
I do presume they are somewhat separate (ie: fixing one won't solve the
other).
Matthew
shetc wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to add an onclick event to a table row -- each row is created
using a DataView.
To make an entire row clickable, I add an AjaxEventBehavior via the
DataView's Item newItem method.
This seems to work as far as an onEvent event being raised when I click on
a table row.
However, I am trying to activate a BreadCrumbPanel from within the onEvent
event. Nothing seems
to happen as far as showing the next panel (called JobDescPanel). If I
click on the row again
then a component not found on page exception is thrown. I have supplied a
snippet of code below.
Is it wrong to try and activate a breadcrumb from this Ajax event?
Thanks,
Steve
P.S. Using Wicket 1.4.10
private void buildDataView()
{
final DataViewJobSearchResult dv = new
DataViewJobSearchResult(dataView, jsdp) {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
protected ItemJobSearchResult newItem(String id, int
index, final
IModelJobSearchResult model) {
ItemJobSearchResult item = super.newItem(id,
index, model);
item.add(new AjaxEventBehavior(onclick) {
private static final long
serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
protected void
onEvent(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
activate(new
IBreadCrumbPanelFactory() {
private static final
long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public BreadCrumbPanel
create(String componentId, IBreadCrumbModel
bcm) {
JobSearchResult
jsr = model.getObject();
return new
JobDescPanel(componentId, bcm, homePage,
jsr.getOrderId());
}
});
}
});
return item;
}
...
}
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Using-DataView-newItem-method-to-display-a-BreadCrumbPanel-tp3252215p3252973.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Set default locale when suitable locale not found
if no matches are made the user should fall back to page.html and page.properties. so put your default locale into those files instead of specific locales. otherwise you can call session.setlocale() to force it. -igor On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:36 AM, planime planime...@mailforspam.com wrote: In project i have several *.properties files for custom locale (page_en_GB and page_ru_RU).When user with default locale en US come, hes got exception. Can I do that if a suitable location has not been found to use my custom locale ? I try to use Locale.setDafault(...), but it doesnt work. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Set-default-locale-when-suitable-locale-not-found-tp3252800p3252800.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: export to excel AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable
See http://itextpdf.com/ On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:21 PM, fachhoch [via Apache Wicket] ml-node+3252116-297151156-65...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b3252116-297151156-65...@n4.nabble.com wrote: Now I want to export the same table in PDF , I did the export to excel using apache POI, Now I have to export the same table to PDF. Is there any libray which serves export to various formats ? I saw display Tag http://displaytag.sourceforge.net/10/export.html it provides export to pdf , xml , excel , I am looking for a similar solution , is there any way I can use the display tag to export from wicket datatable ? Please suggest me what are the available options to provide export to various formats from a wicket datatable ? -- If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/export-to-excel-AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable-tp3225458p3252116.html To start a new topic under Apache Wicket, email ml-node+1842946-398011874-65...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b1842946-398011874-65...@n4.nabble.com To unsubscribe from Apache Wicket, click herehttp://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=1842946code=amNnYXJjaWFtQGdtYWlsLmNvbXwxODQyOTQ2fDEyNTYxMzc3ODY=. -- Sincerely, JC (http://www.linkedin.com/in/jcgarciam) --Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new.-- -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/export-to-excel-AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable-tp3225458p3253047.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: JWicket drag/drop handle
This did the trick. setRawOptions is exactly what I needed. Thanks Stefan -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/JWicket-drag-drop-handle-tp3250469p3253344.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
how to set cookie domain?
Hi,
I want add a cookie, and I saw on this site, how to do this.
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/dealing-with-cookies.html
((WebResponse)RequestCycle.get().getResponse()).addCookie(new
Cookie(cookieName, cookieValue));
but I need to specify also the domanin.
I need something like this PHP code, but for Wicket:
ini_set('session.cookie_domain', '.otherdomain.com');
thank you!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Mapping wicket:id to component without changing Java code
Thank you everybody for the clever ideas. msj121, I just started building the credit card form and was planning to just use Authorize.net APIs. This is not directly related to Wicket, so we should take this discussion off this forum. Email me directly if you have some thoughts or just wanted to bounce ideas off. Thanks, Alec On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:50 AM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.comwrote: On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:27 AM, msj121 msj...@gmail.com wrote: You can add an empty label to replace the content if not adding the component. Or, use EmptyPanel or a plain ole WebMarkupContainer? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
How to set cookie domain?
Hi,
I want add a cookie, and I saw on this site, how to do this.
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/dealing-with-cookies.html
((WebResponse)RequestCycle.get().getResponse()).addCookie(new
Cookie(cookieName, cookieValue));
but I need to specify also the domanin.
I need something like this PHP code, but for Wicket:
ini_set('session.cookie_domain', '.otherdomain.com');
thank you!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
