So my project has used Wicket (albeit perhaps not well) on it's last couple
projects. We are now adopting ExtJS. If I use a page transition style
(reloading the browser page in it's entirely each time), I can populate the
onReady() in each load, and I only have on Wicket stateful page on the
That looks pretty good. I too am attempting to build a RIA with ExtJS using
Wicket as my back-end. On first look it seems like the two should be a
great fit as both rely heavily on building a hierarchical tree of
components. If I could build a set of custom wicket components to output
That looks pretty good. I too am attempting to build a RIA with ExtJS using
Wicket as my back-end. On first look it seems like the two should be a
great fit as both rely heavily on building a hierarchical tree of
components. If I could build a set of custom wicket components to output
I have a javascript component that updates a HiddenField. Then I want to
submit to the server via an AjaxButton. It all works fine until I try to
get the value of the hiddenField which evidently did NOT hitch a ride on the
Ajax request. How do I get the hiddenfield to join the ajax request?
Okay, so the only AjaxRequestTarget I am aware of is the one passed to me in
the onSubmit. This being after the ajax has submitted. I thought that was
for OUTPUT, ie what controls will the ajax update when it returns from the
ajax event.
I am not trying to update the hiddenfield in the
To elaborate, I already made the Hidden a HiddenField, it just doesn't get
updated before the onSubmit(). The Hidden's value is set via javascript on
the client, and I want that value as INPUT into the code tha truns in
onSubmit.
--
View this message in context:
Yes, I have a form (wicket Form) around both the hidden and the ajaxbutton.
We appear to be on 1.4.7.
The java for the ajaxbutton looks like so:
form.add(new AjaxButton(gridtestbutton) {
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget arg0, Form? arg1) {
//some code that gets the HiddenField,
Well, I solved it and it turns out that it wasn't a Wicket issue. I was
setting the value in javascript, but I eventually realized that I was
setting it to the wrong object...so when i stepped and saw the value, I
assumed that it was in the hidden, but I was wrong.
Ooops. Thanks for your effort
So I am trying to do the package resource reference thing.
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/adding-javascript-or-css-using-a-resource.html
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/including-css-resources.html
However, I am clearly not doing it right. The URLs rendered look like:
script
That's exactly what i am doing. Notice the comment marks /* and */ around
the package stuff. I tried it both ways. And this in this case is
ExtGrid.java. So I am also sending in that class.
So I have to pre-register these resources in some way or something? Note
that ExtGrid is a panel not a
Hi all,
I have a wizard upon which resides a third party js control. This control
needs a callbackUrl to contact me at. I did this find within a page by
using an AbstractAjaxBehavior and the following line:
callbackUrl =
Googling, I found an old post by a guy promising to post some examples of
customizing the wizard extension, but I can't seem to find those, so I will
ask here instead:
How exactly does one customize the wicket wizard? I have three steps,
fairly simple, all three are mandatory and can be done in
Question 3: Also, my page is being thrown off by the nested table structures
that the Wizard component generates. My webby guy says he didn't anticipate
that when he wrote our templates and it really demolishes the look and feel.
Is there a way I can control the HTML the wizard generates? To
I am Eugene's co-worker. The entire code block would be unreasonable as it
contains alot of business rules that have nothing to do with the technical
issue. The basic code summary is this:
Inside a re-usable panel orgPanel:
final DropDownChoiceStructureL structureDropDown = new
Yeah, that is what I do with my panels I write. In this case though, I'd
/RATHER/ just add the extra behavior because it means I don't have to alter
any of that orgPanel's code.
The panel build is done within a factory method and the inheritance and
design of it doesn't really make exposing
I had an ajaxbutton to add selected items from a multiple choice control to
another multiple choice control. This worked spendidly with me getting the
selected via the getInput() method. Well, along comes time for me to write
and add a validator to the form, and suddenly the event does not
Thanks Sven, that was what I needed.
Just for my learning, why doesn't AjaxLink report the user input? If it is
not meant to, it doesn't seem to serve a purpose, so I have to assume I did
something wrong there as well.
--
View this message in context:
Form and button works fine without my validator (sounds similar to my last
message but this is the next problem). Validator puts up message, and
reloads page with error in it on form submit. But the following exception
appears in my console. The situation is that a re-usable panel has an
I meant to also mention that while other pages in the app use this panel and
do NOT have this problem, those other pages do not have an extension of that
class. I know some annotations do not inherit, but again, the lookupService
is loaded at first.
Entropy wrote
Form and button works fine
I tried marking the properties as transient, which got me past that error,
but then the properties are null after the validation and that is not really
better. :(
Entropy wrote
Form and button works fine without my validator (sounds similar to my last
message but this is the next problem
, so I don't know if this would
qualify. I certainly will run it up the flagpole. But I wouldn't
hold my breath.
Regards
Sven
On 03/27/2013 07:49 PM, Entropy wrote:
I tried marking the properties as transient, which got me past that error,
but then the properties are null after
I wrote a checkboxmultiple choice that looks like the following:
CheckBoxMultipleChoiceFilterValue forfTypes =
new CheckBoxMultipleChoiceFilterValue(
forfeitureTypes,
lookupService.fetchFilterValuesByFilterName(Forfeiture Type),
new
Sven Meier wrote
Seems like you're having an issue with generics. Introducing local
variables should help identifying the problem.
Yeah, I am definitely in generics hell. I tried spreading it out, and get
the same problem.
ArrayListFilterValue list = (ArrayListFilterValue)
Solved.
CheckBoxMultipleChoiceFilterValue adTypes =
new CheckBoxMultipleChoiceFilterValue(
adTypes,
new Model((Serializable) model.getAdTypes()),
lookupService.fetchFilterValuesByFilterName(Advertisement Type),
Maybe I just need this explained to me a little clearer, but I was wondering
about what appears to me to be a contradiction in how validation and
model-setting and the setDefaultFormProcessing(false) works. Maybe
contradiction is the wrong word. Let's say inconvenience.
So I get that when I set
Bernard wrote
Hi,
Perhaps you can use a combination of what is avaliable in the javadoc
of org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form e.g.
FormComponent#updateModel()
That ALMOST works. The javadoc for updateModel says it assumes that
convertInput() has been called. But convertInput() is
I have a panel that consists of several combo boxes that hierarchically allow
selection of an office/org hierarchy. Mostly the 1st combo filters the
second which filters the third and so forth.
I have a requirement to use this in a fashion that allows multiple
selection. I am also being
That appears to have done it. clearInput solved my issue.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wierd-ajax-thing-tp4658543p4658574.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Okay, I've got a riddle wrapped in an enigma wrapped in bacon for you.
My page works perfectly in IE8. When I use the developer tools to go to IE7
compatability for testing, the submit button on my page stops working (I'll
describe exact symptoms below). It works in IE8. Works in Firefox.
Presuming you meant on the form, no it does not.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/IE7-Submit-button-stops-working-tp4658857p4658866.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
New info: It works in IE8 from my localhost (using IBM RAD) but does NOT
work in IE8 from a standalone server (WebSphere). However, it DOES still
work in Firefox on the standalone server.
--
View this message in context:
More Info:
So I was able, through experimentation and heavy commenting in/out to narrow
it down. It's an ajax behavior earlier in the page that is causing the
button to misbehave.
UserMultiSelect recipients = (UserMultiSelect)
form.get(recipients_section);
More More Info: Tried keeping the recipients panel enabled, wondering if it
being enabled was the problem or changing it via ajax was the problem. It
appears that if it is always enabled the bug happens. So it's not the act
of changing it.
--
View this message in context:
Still more info: I drilled into my panel, and began removing things to find
what component might be interacting poorly with the enabling. I found that
it is my ajaxbuttons. If I remove all four, the page works. If I put ANY
of the four back in, it interacts with the enabling to cause the form
SOLUTION:
It was the button tags. Replace them with input type=button ... and
it works fine. What a simple little cause of a wierd @ss problem.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/IE7-Submit-button-stops-working-tp4658857p4658907.html
Sent from the
We are doing the annotation based approach described in this link
(https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/spring.html). At least, we think we are.
We get:
[6/3/13 8:26:00:907 EDT] 0023 SystemOut O ERROR [WebContainer : 0]
(RequestCycle.java:1521) - Could not deserialize object using
At the risk of turning this into a Spring discussion on a Wicket forum, how
does one control that? I would like to try your suggestion, but am not sure
what knob to twist.
We just implement ApplicationContextAware, and point to our spring config
file in web.xml. I don't set anywhere asking for
My project uses wicket 1.4.7. We need to run some standard code before and
after every request (including ajax). How can I register sucha listener?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-1-4-7-request-listener-tp4660248.html
Sent from the Users
1) Many of those suggestions appear to be 1.5 or greater. I am in 1.4.7.
2) A simple filter does indeed get me the events, but at that point, how am
I to know what page is being worked with?
My objective is to set some properties that our database code picks up for
the audit log. We want this
We have alot of ajax events in our app. Wicket makes it very easy to do so.
However, all of our applications have Novell Access Manager (NAM) in front
of them for single-sign-on. When the NAM session times out, it sends a
redirect to the browser to bring them to a login page. But for ajax
.
--Groucho Marx
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Martin Grigorov-4 [via Apache
Wicket] ml-node+s1842946n4661314...@n4.nabble.com wrote:
how you would do it with naked Ajax?
On Sep 13, 2013 10:50 PM, Entropy [hidden email] wrote:
We have alot of ajax events in our app. Wicket makes it very easy
Hi, I'm converting one of our apps from 1.4.7 to 6.12. the old code extended
WebResource. I changed it to extend ByteArrayResource. I changed
setheaders to setResponseHeaders. But the code inside, I am not sure how to
change to Wicket 6 as the parameters are very different.
@Override
Second question (the first is still open), in 1.4.7 the page object supported
a removePersistedFormData() method and the TextField has a method
setPersistent() on it. Both appear gone, and I don't see anything in the6
or 1.5 conversion guides about them. What is the replacement?
--
View this
Thanks Francois,
Second question:
In 1.4.7 the page object supported a removePersistedFormData() method and
the TextField has a method setPersistent() on it. Both appear gone, and I
don't see anything in the 6 or 1.5 conversion guides about them. What is
the replacement?
--
View this
Hi, it's me again. I'm still converting to 6.12 from 1.4.7. Thanks for your
help on previous questions. Here's the next item I didn't see in the
conversion docs. In one of our pages, someone did this:
So I am past my compile errors and am now running my shiny new 6.12
application. But it breaks down before I can get it off the dealer's lot.
:(
The problem is that the error is kind of ambiguous. The console says:
[12/11/13 14:47:30:437 EST] 0026 servlet I
So, the app worked before I made my 1.4.7 - 6.12 changes. The general flow
is that when I hit the URL for the app (with no parameters...that 404 URL is
not something I typed from the browser) it goes to the
Application.getHomePage(), which returns the home page (not the login page).
We have a
I know it is a web container page. I may not have been clear on this before.
The URL I hit is:
http://localhost:9080/EquitableSharing
Wicket the forwards me to:
http://localhost:9080/EquitableSharing/gov.usdoj.afms.esp.modules.login.LoginPage?1
But Wicket is involved because the WicketFilter is
I just tried replacing the exception line with:
try {
throw new RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException((Page)
getLoginPageClass().newInstance());
} catch (IllegalAccessException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (InstantiationException
Thanks Martin, that did it. It now works with the class instead of an
instantiated page. I guess now pages passed through that exception must be
mounted?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Converting-1-4-7-to-6-12-Login-Error-tp4662916p4663000.html
Converting from 1.4.7 to 6.12. The page runs, but the autocomplete field has
stopped working. It never produces an autocomplete, acting as if it were
simply a normal . More strangely, no code in the containing panel was
changed, nor do I see anything in the migration guide about
Solved.
Not long after posting this I found
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14481767/wicket-autocomplete-in-wicket-6-2-0
which explains that Wicket now includes it's own jQuery...which I'd read,
but hadn't made the connection to this problem. When I took out the jQuery
base js include, the
Hi, it's me again, and I am still converting from 1.4.7 to 6.12. I think I
am starting to get down to the last few errors.
I have an AjaxLazyLoadPanel that loads a grid of data that takes a little
time to load. It worked fine in the 1.4.7 version of the app, though there
are code changes from
I think so. Here's the output. It seems like the component id is wrong.
Indeed, I DO see that show up. But that isn't the full set of what should
show. Because the method I referenced previously was not called, the data
that should be part of this isn't ever retrieved.
I also notice that the
This is in one of our Wicket 1.4.7 apps that we have not converted yet. The
problem does not happen in localhost test environments, but does happen on
the server. Moreover, the problem only happens when a data condition causes
a particular panel to be visible.
When this panel is visible (and I
Yeah, I get that. The problem with that is that I can't reproduce the issue
locally with the FULL APPLICATION, so I am reasonably certain that I won't
be able to reproduce it with a quickstart. It only happens on the server
AND when this panel is visible. I attached the panel as a file if that
New Info:
So I've been promoting over and over, having backed the panel out and slowly
building it back up. When I don't build the buttons in the middle, the page
submits normally. The html for the buttons is:
div id=tabbuttons
button type=button title=Add
I can now add that if only the addSelected button is added, the problem
happens, likewise if only addAll is included. So it appears that any of the
four buttons creates the problem.
add(new AjaxButton(addSelected) {
private static final long
SOLVED
I don't know why i didn't see this earlier, but the issue was using the
button tag instead of input type=button. Somewhere along the line,
someone started using button tags in our shop and we've noticed quirky
behavior from them before (though nothing this quirky). Changed it to input
Hi, Does anyone have some insight on this?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AjaxLazyLoadPanel-in-wicket-6-tp4663083p4663163.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hello, I am just converted to Wicket 6, and I have a line like this in one
component:
response.render(JavaScriptHeaderItem.forScript(writeGridJS(), getId() +
_js));
That writes some custom javascript which in turn run when Ext.onReady() is
ready. However, this script generated so early that
+s1842946n466391...@n4.nabble.com wrote:
Hi,
Read http://wicketinaction.com/2012/07/wicket-6-resource-management/
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Entropy [hidden
email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=4663911i=0
wrote:
Hello, I am
(DefaultMarkupSourcingStrategy.java:71)
at
org.apache.wicket.Component.internalRenderComponent(Component.java:2549)
... 80 more
Entropy wrote
Browser giving me a little trouble. Apologies if I double-submitted this.
My respoonse:
I didn't even know such a website existed. Thanks.
I am trying
For posterity, the solution that eventually worked for me:
response.render(JavaScriptHeaderItem.forReference(new
JavaScriptResourceReference(ExtGrid.class, ExtGridSupport.js)));
response.render(OnDomReadyHeaderItem.forScript(writeGridJS()));
The on dom ready delays my init long enough to serve
I want a javascript method to wrap the wicket invocation. I passed the
following to Wicket.Ajax.ajax. This is what I see in firebug.
attrs {
c=grid6,
u=./?3-6.IBehaviorListene...ent-assetListTable-grid,
ep=[{action=cellClick},
{key=8},
{column=caseNumber}
]
}
But
Thanks. Using the advanced method worked. Though I wasn't repeating
parameters, so I am not sure why the previous didn't work. But it doesn't
matter now.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Invoke-Wicket-from-JavaSctipt-tp4664043p4664050.html
Sent from
I think this is a problem in spring and wicket working together. This is in
1.4.7.
In spring:
bean id=portalResources
class=gov.usdoj.afms.afmsportal.application.AFMSPortalResources
init-method=init scope=singleton
property name=portalService ref=portalService/
Is there a way to have my textfield show as plain text when in a readonly
mode rather than as a disabled textbox?
Backup question: I can imagine making a panel to do this...having a
textfield and label and hiding whichever I didn't want, but I would want my
panel to bind to a textbox in the
What a great bunch of ideas. I'll be implementing at least one of them.
Thanks for all your ideas. Does anyone have similar techniques for
dropdowns?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Show-textfield-as-plaintext-when-disabled-tp4664723p4664771.html
Igor,
This was great. Exactly what I needed. I applied this to my TextField and
DropDownChoice with a few tweaks and it's perfect. But when I went to do
the same to TextArea, I am told that onComponentTagBody is final and cannot
be overridden.
So i tired without that method overidden like so:
I have a list view that will have a button on the left to expand or contract
a section that starts out hidden. this section will have some additional
details. Code and HTML below.
When I click the button, the event arrives in my onActivityLogExpansion, and
the wicket ajax debug control turns
*bump*
I still need help making this technique work for TextAreas whose
onComponentTagBody methods are final. I have also discovered the need for
this in a RadioGroup. I apply RadioGroup to a wicket:container which
wraps some markup that includes my radio buttons. Works fine. In readonly,
I
Of course the instant I submit the question, I thought of something else to
try. I stopped overriding onComponentTag and changed the body to:
@SuppressWarnings(unchecked)
public void onComponentTagBody(final MarkupStream markupStream, final
ComponentTag openTag) {
I have a listview where each row has an expandable section in it to show
additonal detail on some rows. That works. But two aspects aren't working.
1) I am trying to change the + on the button to a -, and then back again
when we collapse. My code looks like:
Setting that AND adding the form that contains the list to the target (which
was inspired by that bit of text) seems to have solved issue #2, the
collapse. Thanks!
However, issue #1, the button label, is still not working correctly. Any
insight there?
--
View this message in context:
A wierd requirement was just handed to me. We have a form that gets
enabled/disabled depending on business rules as normal. However, now I am
being told to disable ALL BUT TWO fields in a particular state. Is my only
option here to leave the form enabled and then disable EVERY other control
Yeah, I considered that. Unfortunately the hierarchy is such that these two
are in the middle and buried a bit in the HTML hierarchy. In a simpler
situation, that would've worked spendidly.
--
View this message in context:
We have a modal popup in an app that uses Wicket 1.4.7. We recently upgraded
out first app to Wicket 6.8, and we want to add a modal popup to it.
However, and it comes up okay, but on close, I get a JS error.
Firebug says: this.content.contentWindow.Wicket.Window is undefined on line
785 of
Just discovered that this happens in Firefox, not in IE, and even then only
when firebug is open. So maybe not a real problem? But it is a little
alarming to me that I get it even then. I'd still like to solve it, but
obviously, that makes it less important.
--
View this message in context:
1) I have a feedback panel and when i add messages under info(), they do not
show up. When I add the message via error(), it shows as expected. Why
might this be?
2) I am using the @SpringBean annotation, works fine. But I want to inject
a string property value that came from the properties
I have an ajaxlink on my modal window that takes the user to a new page, one
the modal window is not on. I have traditionall done stuff like this with
RestartResponseException. But when I use that from the modal window, the
new page renders INSIDE the modal window. Not the desired behavior.
I
I have an ajax button that launches a modal form. It binds to:
input type=button wicket:id=btnCopy onclick='return false;' value=Copy
To
I've replace the javascript call that checks the condition with a flat
return false to simplify things. This still launches the event, and renders
the modal
So I figured out that what's happening is that evidently wicket 6 doesn't put
the javascript inline, but uses event listener registration or whatever.
And it seems like this overwrites my inline event in an AjaxButton. The
solution:
@Override
Nevermind. This secondary issue was caused by one of my many experiments to
solve the original issue. Further, I also found that if I had needed to do
this, the method to override is getOnClickScript().
I will say, that I am a little uncertain if this new style is a good thing.
Traditionally,
My analysis team has made some requests on how to show errors that I'd like
some advice on how to accomplish in wicket.
We have a page level feedback panel as well as a component level feedback
panel. Currently, errors show in both and as plain text.
Request #1 - Can we put links in the page
Is it possible to put some HTML inside the feedback panel that isn't
messages? Possibly for some formatting or a title/instructions? The stuff
would become visible at the same time as the error panel, but is static
content otherwise outside the messages? I tried just sticking some HTML in
I just tried putting some text inside the feedback panel's html like so:
div class=errorpanel id=errorpanel wicket:id=feedbackThis is a
test/div
That didn't work. This is a test was overwritten when the feedback panel
rendered. Which is exactly what I expected it to do.
--
View this message
I am currently putting a link into one of our feedback messages so give the
user a quick way to navigate in response to a particular condition. I am
doing it by just writing the tags into the message like so:String url =
this.urlFor(SearchResultPage.class, new PageParameters().set(newSearch,
I am mystified. I have an error panel at the top of my page that show the
errors for the page, but near each control is ALSO a ComponentFeedbackPanel
to show the error near the control. These work fine for every control
except this radio group. The error shows up top, has the right label, but
On the group. It's the required rule. You can see group is set to required.
And group is bound to the component feedback panel.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/ComponentFeedbackPanel-near-radio-group-not-working-tp4666077p4666079.html
Sent from
.
--Groucho Marx
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Paul Bors [via Apache Wicket]
ml-node+s1842946n4666109...@n4.nabble.com wrote:
Do you use any custom feedback filters?
Have a great day,
Paul Bors
On May 31, 2014, at 9:29 AM, Entropy [hidden email] wrote:
On the group. It's the required rule
We set our error page via setInternalErrorPage on IApplicationSettings in
1.6. I'd like to bury the stack trace in a comment in the rendered page in
our staging and dev environments to save time. But I have no idea how to
get the originating trace in the error page.
--
View this message in
The meta data facility looks intriguing but is a bit confusing. How is this
supposed to work? I was expecting something like a map, but the key has to
be this abstract object that takes an arrya of entry objects? And each
entry object demands reference back to it's key? This is a confusing
Nevermind, I figured out from other examples that they tend to share the key
in a static constant so that it becomes the object identity that allows you
to access the meta data object. I wonder if that is really the intended
use, but intended or not, it works.
--
View this message in context:
I have a third party js library I am applying to my page. I have to mark the
fields I want excluded with a particular HTML attribute. So I am
implementing a custom behavior to do the work, and I want the behavior to
act like it's an opt-in behavior instead of opt-out.
So I wrote my behavior to
Instead of doing:
page.add(new MyBehavior(components))
do
Behavior b = AttributeModifier.append();
for (Component c : components) {
c.add(b)
}
Certainly that would work, I am trying to create a re-usable Behavior for
my app that any page wishing to incorporate this
Oh, I just tried it in my common page's onBeforeRender. Evidently I can do
this from the page.onBeforeRender, just not from the behavior
onBeforeRender. Which is probably what you meant. Okay, I can work with
that.
--
View this message in context:
We're getting alot of these in the logs from a Wicket 1.4.7 app. I presume
that it came from some link somewhere that built improperly. Our classes
aren't on the stack, so it's hard to know where in the app it's coming from.
Any suggestions on how to track this down?
I do know that by
I am considering subclassing WebRequestCodingStrategy to override that one
method (and otherwise just call super() everywhere) and forward that
condition to the HomePage instead of exceptioning. But I am a little unsure
how to get my subclassed WebRequestCodingStrategy into use.
--
View this
It turns out our ops team runs a script every ten minutes to test whether the
app was up. The script was issuing this wierd URL a couple times per run
due to it being broken.
However, to protect against the future possibility, i implemented the
forward to HomePage thingy discussed above. For
1 - 100 of 232 matches
Mail list logo
