Hi!
Or should I say, "boldly go where no man has gone before" or "Do, or
do not. There is no 'try.' ".
**
Martin
2010/11/9 Martin Makundi :
> Chicken.
>
> 2010/11/9 Eelco Hillenius :
>>> But all really depends on your approach. Some people think
Chicken.
2010/11/9 Eelco Hillenius :
>> But all really depends on your approach. Some people think dabbling in
>> a swamp gives you a firm grip. I cosinder it the opposite: swamp has a
>> firm grip on you.
>
> I consider it asking for trouble. Wicket would sacrifice
> predictability and conceptual
> ...and that makes the queue method a candidate to replace the add method
> without breaking anything.
Yes :)
**
Martin
>
>
> Seb
>
> On 08.11.2010 18:03, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Martin Makundi
>> wrote:
>>>&g
> as I understand the readme the queue method basically has only a slightly
> different behavior compared to the add method in the way that it either adds
> a component as a direct child to the parent or as a sub-child as defined in
> the markup. So the markup is only used to determine the child's
> My only hope is that the solution you end up with will not make us
> running some sort of script against all the sorces we have.
We ended up with the requirement that it should 100% compatible with
existing code and tests.
**
Martin
>
>
-
>> I'm sorry to say, but the whole discussion makes little sense to me and
>> these attempts to fix something that is not broken actually scares me a bit.
>
> +1
It's maybe not broken for you. For me it's like dabbling in a swamp
(http://kuvablogi.com/nayta/prev/img1483294.jpg,
http://www.lansi-sa
Hi!
Thanks. The issue is not only "forgetting to refactor", but it is also
difficult to make reusable components that only have fixed
functionaltity but leave freedom for the designer to position
components. Often when same functionality is needed on another page
that has slightly different layout
Hi!
>> + private Map componentIdMapAidedComponent = new
>> HashMap();
>
> So, you just added a new Map to all markup containers that keeps components
> in it? Why would you do that?
We need to wait until all components are added so that we can arrange
them into correct hireracy before rendering.
Hi!
>> I'm not scared that easily. Private members have a place and purpose.
> Yes, please don't make us have to expose our private parts.
;) Here's a first attempt with few TODOs, however:
### Eclipse Workspace Patch 1.0
Index: src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/MarkupContainer.java
=
>> The security example is quite extreme and should be implemented in
>> traditional way if there is no regression test for it.
>
> there is nothing extreme about it, it is a common use of containers
> when implementing visibility/security. just the fact that this
> "forces" the traditional approac
Hi!
> Please make sure that it passes all current test cases before submitting the
> patch. Also, it would be good to take the examples that have been given to
> you in this thread and create tests from them that demonstrate that they all
> work. Particularly important will be demonstrating the
>> We will provide a patch if possible. However, we might need some help
>> onto our endevor.
>
> If it's not possible, why would you expect someone else to do it?
> Step up and make it happen! Avoid the misunderstandings, show what it should
> do!
>
> If you are demonstrating progress on somethi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> now the developer takes the "salary" div and moves it out of the
>>> "for-admins-only" div. guess what, your *designer* has just opened a
>>> huge security hole in your application. who would use wicket if such
>>> things were so easily possible?
Traditional way can b
>> Duh.. I think there can be _no_ excuse to not reduce manual work where
>> it is really not needed. It's not like we are talking about airline
>> autopilots here.
>
> So we don't need Wicket to work predictably and reliably all the time?
We are only proposing a new way of doing things faster wit
> because the designer delivers only part of the solution - the markup.
I meant software designer.
>
>
>
>
>
> now the developer takes the "salary" div and moves it out of the
> "for-admins-only" div. guess what, your *designer* has just opened a
> huge security hole in your application. wh
>> I don't think it is. Keeping the two hierarchies in sync is not really that
>> difficult. The funny thing about the proposed approach is that it is in an
>> effort to make things "simpler". But, as you pointed out, the more complex
>> things won't work with the proposed approach (without prob
Hi!
> As time and time again research shows is that the real cost is not in
> the initial development, but in maintaining (which of course starts
> often while you're still doing the initial development, as it also
> includes refactoring on initial ideas etc).
I believe poorly developed software
Hi!
> its not about the list *items* its about the components you add to them
>
> onpopuateitem(item item) {
> add(new label("name"));
> add(new label("email"));
> }
>
> wont work
Why should it? Won't make it any easier than:
item.add(new label("name"));
item.add(new label("email"));
>> The d
fficult, it's all about being efficient.
Redundancy is waste. Waste is bad. "Intentional waste" is even worse.
So let's lean it out ;]
**
Martin
>
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Martin Makundi
> wrote:
>> I propose "Free Wicket" from component-hier
Yeah, Panel always has id, so what you do is:
add( new PanelA("id1", new Model1() );
add( new PanelA("id2", new Model2() );
add( new PanelA("id3", new Model3() );
All Panels would have their own namespace within themselves.
**
Martin
2010/11/5 James Carman :
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:36 AM,
Hi!
>> To be more precise: namespace would always be per each markupcontainer
>> which has its own markup.
>>
> So the "hell" is still here. It is just moved one level up.
> It seems you didn't think of all cases.
I must have miscommunicated myself, this is not at all what I meant.
**
Martin
>
> If the project gets complicated, I think there is no possible way to control
> the uniqueness of the component in the page. The advantages of adding a
> component wherever you cant along the hierarchy are true, I don't think that
> your proposal gives the best of both worlds.
This is a misunders
s independent namespace.
> Then your application has a page MyPage which includes both PanelA and
> PanelB and the problem arises.
MyPage defines new namespace.
PanelA and PanelB are independent.
No problems.
**
Martin
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Martin Makundi &
To be more precise: namespace would always be per each markupcontainer
which has its own markup.
**
Martin
> Please give a concrete example of such situation. If names are panel
> or page scope I cannot immagine many worthwile items that can be
> imported onto panels and pages that cannot be refa
> Let's say both libraries are "modern" (because private scope is old-fashion,
> right) and export "message" with Page scope.
> Then project X (Lombok, Bindgen) finds the problem at compile time and
> explain you that both lib A and B export component with the same id.
> What would you do now ?
> T
Hi!
> If you have to use libraries A and B that provide Wicket components and both
> of them use "message" or "feedback" as component id in any of their
> components then how your application will deal with that ?
You make decision: feedback is either private (traditional) or
protected/panel-scop
> I know that in this case (Jeremy wrote that) you must provide
> uniqueness of components in whole page but it also can be resolved somehow
+1
Also DOM requires id uniqueness according to spec so it is nothing new
to web developers.
**
Martin
>
>> I think if you find component hierarchies to b
Hi!
We could also make so that "wicket:id" is old-school and
"wicket:id:protected" is new-school.
No need to refactor anything.
Just pros without any cons.
**
Martin
2010/11/5 Martin Makundi :
> Hi!
>
>> Can you see how this would fail?
>>
>>
>
Hi!
> Can you see how this would fail?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
That's old-school-wicket ;)
This would not be allowed anymore. An application would have to be
refactored (using an automated script) into:
We would simply change wicket syntax: panels and pages requir
Can you see the matrix?
;)
If you have:
public class MyPage extends WebPage {
public MyPage () {
add(new Form("form"));
add(new TextField("input", model)); // Wicket could
automatically handle parse hierarchy from markup
}
}
**
Mart
1. I want freedom inside panels.
2. Doubly defined hierarhices are redundant. Server-side hierarchy can
be automatically deduced from markup hierarcy. Such tasks should be
done by COMPUTER. Not coder.
**
Martin
2010/11/5 Jonathan Locke :
>
> I think if you find component hierarchies to be "hell"
I propose "Free Wicket" from component-hierarchy hell
We have discussd before that Wicket has unnecessary binding to
wicket:id and component hierarchy
[http://www.mail-archive.com/users@wicket.apache.org/msg53941.html].
I think I found a simple solution: "wicket:id" should be allowed to be
on any
gt; return (MySession) Session.get();
> }
These seem just fine.
**
Martin
>
> Martin Makundi wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>> Yeah, migrate ;)
>>
>> Apart from that.. session leak can occur for quite some reasons. It
>> might be proxy bug or maybe you have static varia
Hi!
Yeah, migrate ;)
Apart from that.. session leak can occur for quite some reasons. It
might be proxy bug or maybe you have static variables in places where
they should not be.
**
Martin
2010/11/4 Daniel Toffetti :
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have a problem when two users log in the application from
Hi!
Is there a resolution to this bug/issue listviews with
setreuseitems=true but with radiochoice have some problems:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/users@wicket.apache.org/msg06560.html
*
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/RadioGroup-test-fails-td1912239.html
*
http://stackoverflow.com
In my opinnion best way to learn is by trial and error ;)
Not the most profitable way, though ;)
**
Martin
2010/11/1 Brian Topping :
> Adam,
>
> If you are just getting started, models are one of the most important and
> underappreciated aspects of mastering Wicket. It's really worth puttin
Look at https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/type-safe-testing-in-wicket.html
to get rid of fragile string:component:paths.
Also look at compoundpropertymodel (try avoid using it for
suprisitivity) and propertymodel:
* https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/working-with-wicket-models.html
**
Martin
2010/11/
heir values from input when nested form submits.
> Anyway, good to know it's supposed to be.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Marek Šabo
>
>
> On 11/01/2010 05:49 AM, Martin Makundi wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Yes. Every time form is processed the form com
Hi!
Yes. Every time form is processed the form component values are
processed from rawinput. That is the normal usecase = you want to know
what user has entered.
However, if you want to explicitly dismiss user input, you can call
clearInput or set a new model.
Alternatively there are behaviors l
Hi!
> Yeah, but then I would create new panel for every single click on that
> link. I know it's a bit edge-case, but still... So I can't achieve this
> without some own initialization logic?
You don't need to create new panel, just use lazy initialization.
modalWidnow.setContent(getContentPane
> then when I construct the page containing this modalwindow, I also will
> construct the modalwindow content, but the user can just decide to not
> to click on this link, so skip the modal, and then I have an unnecessary
> constructed panel.
Yeah.. you can construct panel in onClick before .show(
Hi!
Yes, we did this kind of settop with wicket. We use ajax timer to
update page and keep session alive. The "originating page" problem we
had to resolve using a cookie because wicket does not support multi
homing.
**
Martin
2010/10/28 nino martinez wael :
> Hi
>
> Im working on a product where
t; multipart encoding should be used to transfer the "file" components
> - when submitting the inner form then just its own form components are
> submitted thus if at least one of the component is "file" then it needs
> multipart encoding, otherwise there is no need
>
>
I mean: should nested form internally return ismultipart=true if its
parent form is a multipart form?
**
Martin
2010/10/26 Martin Grigorov :
> On HTML level nested form is just .
> Give more details
>
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Martin Makundi <
> martin.maku...@koodarip
Hi!
Should nested form become multipart if parent is multipart? Because it
is on html level...
**
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Make normal stateless form and look what are the ids in the html and
then you can send same parameters via post from external site. There
is really nothing special about it.
**
Martin
2010/10/20 ali :
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> Can you please come up with any example?
>
> Thanks
> --
> View this message
Would you show the html of this mainpanel and also its super panel?
**
Martin
2010/10/19 Wayne W :
> Hi,
>
> I've got a problem in production whereby our application home page
> throws a :Unable to find component with id 'mainPanel' in
> [MarkupContainer [Component id = _extend48]]
>
> This only
Why not?
**
Martin
2010/10/19 ali :
>
> Hi,
>
> I am a new user of Wicket. Is it possible that wicket Form (that intends to
> receive the data posted from an external link) use the Model object(POJO)
> that matches the expecting data fields/parameters? Actually I am thinking to
> avoid PageParame
Maybe you can clear the session object in the "previous" screen (the
page that renders as result of Back button)?
**
Martin
2010/10/17 drf :
>
> Does anyone have ideas on how to handle the following issue:
>
> During processing of a wizard, I store a boolean flag in the Session object
> to indica
Hi!
Try this:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/WebPage-geting-string-tp2993717p2993717.html
**
Martin
2010/10/14 elesi :
>
> Hello guys,
>
> I'm trying to send a email with a body that is HTML-formatted...and I would
> to use wicket to write it out...
>
> Is there a way that I could s
Here:
/**
* Renders given page
* @param pageClass to render
* @param pageParameters to render with
* @param clean
* @return String of HTML produced
*/
public static String renderPageToString(
final Class pageClass,
final PageParameters pageParameters, boolean clean
Hi!
I have this problem "Error reading from remote server" with
Wicket<->Jetty<->Apache mod_proxy integration.
It occurs only for page requests that take long time (couple of
minutes) to process.
Did anybody find a solution for it?
http://serverfault.com/questions/185894/proxy-error-502-reason-
()',
> 'onComponentTag()' methods from the Link class. But, did not manage to
> get it working.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> On 7 October 2010 16:00, Martin Makundi
> wrote:
>> Add onclickbehavior?
>>
>> **
>> Martin
>>
>> 2010/10
Add onclickbehavior?
**
Martin
2010/10/7 Abid K :
> Hi,
>
> I am using the ExternalLink class for external sites. I've noticed
> this class does not implement the ILinkListener interface and I am not
> able to monitor these clicks.
>
> I tried to implement the listener, but I did not get far. e.g
rtinez wael <
>> nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hmm, it's pretty intrusive. I wanted to have a "simple" selenium test
>>> running. I'll get back once we find a solution.
>>>
>>> regards Nino
>>>
>>&g
"Impossible is nothing" ;]
**
Martin
2010/10/4 Altuğ Bilgin Altıntaş :
> +1
>
> 2010/10/4 Cemal Bayramoglu
>
>> Ernesto,
>>
>> ... nothing is impossible.
>>
>> Regards - Cemal
>> jWeekend
>> Training, Consulting, Development
>> http://jWeekend.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4 October 2010 10:55, Ernesto
Hi!
Maybe you can integrate wickettester with selenium in a way that you
can use live paths:
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/type-safe-testing-in-wicket.html
**
Martin
2010/10/4 nino martinez wael :
> Hi
>
> has anyone created a regex to find wicket paths to use with selenium?
> I did search na
)
at com.view.TakpWebPage.(TakpWebPage.java:64)
at com.view.AbstractStylePage.(AbstractStylePage.java:103)
at com.view.AbstractStylePage.(AbstractStylePage.java:96)
at com.view.application.MainPage.(MainPage.java:92)
... 36 more
**
Martin
2010/9/28 Martin Makundi
apps/tests/examples use this and this is first time I see such problem.
> Can you create a ticket with a quickstart, please.
>
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Martin Makundi <
> martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> How is it p
Hi!
How is it possible that this error occurs at page constructor?
Caused by: org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Cannot modify
component hierarchy after render phase has started (page version cant
change then anymore)
at org.apache.wicket.Component.checkHierarchyChange(Component.ja
e are prettier way? I feel that calling
> org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object)
> inside my panels sort of violates the IOC principle?
>
> 2010/9/23 Martin Makundi :
>> What is your need exactly?
>>
>> **
>> Martin
>>
>> 201
What is your need exactly?
**
Martin
2010/9/23 nino martinez wael :
> Hi
>
> what should I do if I want to use IOC in my panels? In short I need a
> sort of a provider injected into a panel, what's the prettiest way to
> do it?
>
> regards Nino
>
>
> @Override
> public String getObject() {
> return ".date_style {\n" + _get_css_string_here + "\n}";
> };
> };
> Label label = new Label("style-container", styleModel);
> label.setEscapeModelStrings(false);
>
> As you can see I've re
}
});
**
Martin
2010/9/20 Bas Gooren :
> Martin,
>
> Wicket tags need to be part of a valid (x)html tree. So what you want can be
> achieved by giving the tag a wicket:id and generating the CSS
> including the ".container { ... }" code.
>
> Sebastian
>
Hi!
I am making a page that can be opened into office and equivalents.
This seems to require all HTML and CSS is contained within a single
file.
I have a section in my WebPage and I would like to parametrize
some css values "on the fly".
However, the following does not seem to work:
.cont
You can set session timeout per-session:
((ServletWebRequest)
request).getHttpServletRequest().getSession().setMaxInactiveInterval(seconds);
**
Martin
2010/9/15 Jeremy Thomerson :
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Alec Swan wrote:
>
>> Isn't there a way to instruct Wicket not to create a
Hi!
Yeah, try something like this:
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{SERVER_NAME} !^www\.mydomain\.com
RewriteRule /(.*) http://www.mydomain.com/$1 [redirect=301L]
*
*Martin
2010/9/15 Igor Vaynberg :
> it is most likely the servlet container. wicket passes in a relative
> url
Try stackoverflow.com
2010/9/9 arunarapole :
>
> Hi
>
> I have a IE Issues
>
> i have some css styles with images all the styles are displayed in Mozilla
> Firefox perfectly
> but in IE Some of the features are not supporting .if i change CSS file it
> is effecting in Mozilla.
> is their any solu
You can get it only at render phase... not in constructor for example.
**
Martin
2010/9/5 Igor Vaynberg :
> yes and yes
>
> -igor
>
> On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Ervis Zikas wrote:
>> Hello guys, is there a way i can get which page is the user navigating??
>> I have a menu that i want to ch
Hi!
Does this wicket error message make sense? To me it looks like renderhead:
2010-09-02 13:46:31,307 267219809 [18145...@qtp-23684178-2226] ERROR
RequestCycle - Only methods that can be called on IHeaderResponse
outside renderHead() are renderOnLoadJavascript and
renderOnDomReadyJavascript
org
);
2010/8/31 Altuğ Bilgin Altıntaş :
> Any code example ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> 2010/8/31 Martin Makundi
>
>> Re-render it before going to excel..
>>
>> 2010/8/31 Altuğ Bilgin Altıntaş :
>> > Hi all;
>> >
>> > How can i disable Listview'
Re-render it before going to excel..
2010/8/31 Altuğ Bilgin Altıntaş :
> Hi all;
>
> How can i disable Listview's column/s while post it to excel on the fly. I
> mean i don't want to post all columns into excel.
>
> Link linkExcel = new Link("linkExcel") {
> private static final long se
Hi!
Just change the mime type of the page to "application/vnd.ms-excel".
**
Martin
2010/8/30 Altuğ Bilgin Altıntaş :
> Hi all;
>
> Is it possible to export a ListView to excel. Should i use always Datatable
> ?
>
> Thanks.
>
-
Quickstart is better.
**
Martin
2010/8/22 zoran :
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> I was trying to make this quick start but it's very difficult to make this
> works, as it is dependent on many Tuscany web services. Does it works for
> you to send you the whole maven project or just a files containing the code
Can you make a wicket quickstart that repeats the problem?
**
Martin
2010/8/21 zoran :
>
> Yes. Everything looks fine.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Problem-to-replace-panel-tp2333462p2333782.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list ar
Do you see the markup-id (to be replaced) in firebug?
**
Martin
2010/8/21 zoran :
>
> Firebug shows that there is an old version of panel, and there is no
> indication of some problem in firebug.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Problem-to-replace
Can you see it in html with firebug?
**
Martin
2010/8/21 zoran :
>
> Wicket dialog first shows info about HTML code that indicates that this panel
> is created, than afterward, there is error line pointed out that
> setOutputMarkupId is not set to true. However, as you can see from my
> previous
What does wicket debug dialog say?
**
Martin
2010/8/21 zoran :
>
> Hi,
>
> I have one wicket page containing two different panel. Based on the same
> event, these panels should be changed with new instances of the same panels.
> The methods that performs change of these panels are called after th
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket14/nested/?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:org.apache.wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.modal.ModalWindowPage
2010/8/18 james yong :
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there any suggestion on creating a dialog?
>
> I have look at the following:
> 1. wiquery has little documentation on creating dialog
Hi!
It might (and does) depend on other form component values.
**
Martin
2010/8/15 Jeremy Thomerson :
> Why should the validation value be able to change? Why should it be a
> moving target?
>
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Martin Makundi <
> martin.maku...@koodarip
ug 14, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Martin Makundi
> wrote:
>> Ok. That's pretty much same as my inline override. Is there a way to
>> adjust mini/max value on the fly?
>>
>> **
>> Martin
>>
>> 2010/8/14 Igor Vaynberg :
>>> it would mean add(new CachingDe
Ok. That's pretty much same as my inline override. Is there a way to
adjust mini/max value on the fly?
**
Martin
2010/8/14 Igor Vaynberg :
> it would mean add(new CachingDecorator(new MinimumValidator()));
>
> -igor
>
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Martin Makundi
>
ignoring
browsers without JS!
**
Martin
2010/8/14 Sebastian :
> Hi Martin,
>
> how would I use this in my case? I am relatively new to Wicket. Also does it
> have a graceful fallback for browsers having JS disabled?
>
> Seb
>
> On 14.08.2010 18:39, Martin Makundi wrote:
>&g
?
**
Martin
2010/8/14 Igor Vaynberg :
> You can create a validator decorator that does caching however you want
>
> -igor
>
> On Aug 14, 2010 9:16 AM, "Martin Makundi" <
> martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Is it a necessary feature that
link implementations based on the SubmitLink class. I am attaching all files
> of my working example as reference.
>
> Generally I think it makes great sense to have this behaviour as part of the
> ListView. At least I expected it to work this way in the first place.
>
> Rega
Ah.. we need to ofcourse validate "first" time.
**
Martin
2010/8/14 Martin Makundi :
> Still.. if value not changed, what does it matter?
>
> 2010/8/14 James Carman :
>> What if the validation criteria is
Still.. if value not changed, what does it matter?
2010/8/14 James Carman :
> What if the validation criteria is based on other fields too?
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands,
Hi!
Is it a necessary feature that validation occurs on components whose
values have not changed?
We have quite heavy validation criteria so it would be nice to
optimize initializing the validator only for cases where component
value has actually changed.
We can do this with !getModelComparator(
Hi!
You can solve this in a robust manner using reusemanager:
http://osdir.com/ml/users-wicket.apache.org/2010-08/msg00161.html
2010/8/14 Sebastian :
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to use a list view component on a page where rows with text
> fields can be added, removed or moved around. I am using the r
You can put your business logic "elsewhere".
Say:
1. Project Wicket GUI
2. Project Business Logic
Minimum business logic into wicket gui or gui constructors.
**
Martin
2010/8/14 Brown, Berlin [GCG-PFS] :
> What is the best practice for where to put business logic in Wicket.
>
> At first, I had
2010-08-13 00:09:08,581 41529562 [9113...@qtp-14820907-371] ERROR
Session - Current stack trace of the thread that holds the lock
follows:
java.lang.Throwable
2010-08-13 00:09:08,610 41529591 [9113...@qtp-14820907-371] ERROR
RequestCycle - org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: After 3
minut
Please use debugger and find out why it does not work. Should work.
**
Martin
2010/8/8 zoran :
>
> Martin,
>
> I've tried this, but it doesn't work.
>
> Any other idea?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/how-to-dinamically-add-a-wicket-property-to-t
Try getString("alertmessage",
Model.ofMap(Collections.singletonMap("pagetitle", "My page title")));
**
Martin
2010/8/8 zoran :
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to use key from properties file with wicket page property added in
> this
> value. I tried this way, but it doesn't work.
>
> String js="alert('"+getS
Not really...
2010/8/8 Nikita Tovstoles :
> ..that assumes that the app's context path is "/".
>
> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Martin Makundi <
> martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> You can insert static stuff in weba
Hi!
You can insert static stuff in webapp/. directory.
**
Martin
2010/8/8 Sefa Irken :
> This is a ridicilous question, I am pretty new to web and servlet world
> (coming from desktop java). I couldn't figure out, how to serve my
> robots.txt under www.site.com/robots.txt. How can I do that in
You don't lose for all fols if you check whether it is a bot or not...
but the question remains.. what else do you strip by skipping
super.encodeUrl except just jsessionid.. some other encoding happening
there?
**
Martin
2010/8/6 James Carman :
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:06 PM, wrote:
>> Right
ncodedUrl;
Depends what you want to strip/not-strip... skipping encoding also
strips but I am not sure if there is any other encoding happening...
**
Martin
>
>
>
>
>
> Martin Makundi
> 08/06/2010 11:32 AM
> Please respond to
> users@wicket.apache.org
>
>
ribed before.
**
Martin
>
>
>
> Martin Makundi
> 08/04/2010 02:21 PM
> Please respond to
> users@wicket.apache.org
>
>
> To
> users@wicket.apache.org
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: Wicket adds jsessionid to redirect onto external page
>
>
>
>
>
>
> C
Use a reusemanager that manages the rawinput values.
public class FormComponentReuseManager implements Serializable {
private final Map> idMapRow = new
HashMap>();
/**
* @param
* @param
* @param rowId
* @param componentId
* @param newComponent
* @return FormComponent
*
Hi!
Also use of compoundpropertymodel is confusing and misleading in a
professional sense. In my opinnion it adds too much dependencies and
it is not so transparent. Instead you should promote usage of
bindgens, for example.
http://wicketinaction.com/2009/11/removing-fragile-string-expressions-fr
301 - 400 of 1479 matches
Mail list logo
