In that case +1 JQuery.
D/
On May 1, 2010, at 3:21 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> there is also no reason to bundle all the components that need that
> kind of js as part of core, they can be stand alone modules.
>
> -igor
>
> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
> wrote:
>> Yes, but
there is also no reason to bundle all the components that need that
kind of js as part of core, they can be stand alone modules.
-igor
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
wrote:
> Yes, but Wicket has a lot of JS functionality built in (for AJAX, DOM
> manipulation related to AJAX,
Yes, but Wicket has a lot of JS functionality built in (for AJAX, DOM
manipulation related to AJAX, modal window, autocomplete, etc...). Right
now all the AJAX stuff is done in home-grown JS. There's no reason for us
to continue to support something that does things like DOM manipulation. We
sho
I thought wicket's goal was to be agnostic to this debate.
D/
On Apr 28, 2010, at 9:09 AM, nicolas melendez wrote:
> +1 YUI.
> I have been working with it, and it is a very good js framework, non
> intrusive with the markup, also was easy (i mean REALLY easy) to integrate
> to wicket.
> i used Y
+1 YUI.
I have been working with it, and it is a very good js framework, non
intrusive with the markup, also was easy (i mean REALLY easy) to integrate
to wicket.
i used YUI components, like rich text editor or modal windows. I don't know
the ajax how it is, because i use wicket ajax.
NM
On Wed, A
iirc the new implementation of Wicket ajax is slated for post 1.5.
Something with too many irons in the fire...
Martijn
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
wrote:
> I also agree that we should use jQuery. jQuery seems more aligned with
> Wicket than YUI.
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
I remember there was a long discussion on this list, some time ago,
about this...
About jQuery... jQuery isn't perfect either and I have heard of people
having bad experiences about their support. For instance, I have
reported a bug related to D&D, IE and its usage in combination with
Wicket AJAX
I also agree that we should use jQuery. jQuery seems more aligned with
Wicket than YUI.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Fernando Wermus
wrote:
> +1 Jquery I mean
>
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Fernando Wermus <
> fernando.wer...@gmail.
+1 Jquery I mean
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Fernando Wermus wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Joe Fawzy wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard now ,
>> used by all the big companies , even microsoft
>> and although YUI is g
+1
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Joe Fawzy wrote:
> Hi
> i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard now ,
> used by all the big companies , even microsoft
> and although YUI is great, Yahoo has its own problem these days and we
> cannot consider the commited to the l
Hi
i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard now ,
used by all the big companies , even microsoft
and although YUI is great, Yahoo has its own problem these days and we
cannot consider the commited to the lib, they dropped support for many of
their products and abandond m
I actually was working on this two weeks ago for a client. Hopefully in the
next week I will have a very minimal base project available for you to build
from.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Istvan Soos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a cool best-
Yes, it's experimental, and it is not 100% decided that YUI will be used.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Isn't this an experimental branch?
>
> Ernesto
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34
Isn't this an experimental branch?
Ernesto
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, danisevsky wrote:
> I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/
>
>
> 2010/4/26 Istvan Soos
I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/
2010/4/26 Istvan Soos
> Hi,
>
> Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration library to
> use YUI 3? I know the
Hi,
Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration library to
use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested
specifically in YUI 3...
Thanks,
Istvan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.
16 matches
Mail list logo