Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-05-01 Thread Douglas Ferguson
In that case +1 JQuery. D/ On May 1, 2010, at 3:21 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote: > there is also no reason to bundle all the components that need that > kind of js as part of core, they can be stand alone modules. > > -igor > > On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Jeremy Thomerson > wrote: >> Yes, but

Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-05-01 Thread Igor Vaynberg
there is also no reason to bundle all the components that need that kind of js as part of core, they can be stand alone modules. -igor On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Jeremy Thomerson wrote: > Yes, but Wicket has a lot of JS functionality built in (for AJAX, DOM > manipulation related to AJAX,

Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-05-01 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
Yes, but Wicket has a lot of JS functionality built in (for AJAX, DOM manipulation related to AJAX, modal window, autocomplete, etc...). Right now all the AJAX stuff is done in home-grown JS. There's no reason for us to continue to support something that does things like DOM manipulation. We sho

Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-05-01 Thread Douglas Ferguson
I thought wicket's goal was to be agnostic to this debate. D/ On Apr 28, 2010, at 9:09 AM, nicolas melendez wrote: > +1 YUI. > I have been working with it, and it is a very good js framework, non > intrusive with the markup, also was easy (i mean REALLY easy) to integrate > to wicket. > i used Y

Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-28 Thread nicolas melendez
+1 YUI. I have been working with it, and it is a very good js framework, non intrusive with the markup, also was easy (i mean REALLY easy) to integrate to wicket. i used YUI components, like rich text editor or modal windows. I don't know the ajax how it is, because i use wicket ajax. NM On Wed, A

Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-28 Thread Martijn Dashorst
iirc the new implementation of Wicket ajax is slated for post 1.5. Something with too many irons in the fire... Martijn On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jeremy Thomerson wrote: > I also agree that we should use jQuery.  jQuery seems more aligned with > Wicket than YUI. > > -- > Jeremy Thomerson

Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-28 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
I remember there was a long discussion on this list, some time ago, about this... About jQuery... jQuery isn't perfect either and I have heard of people having bad experiences about their support. For instance, I have reported a bug related to D&D, IE and its usage in combination with Wicket AJAX

Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-28 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
I also agree that we should use jQuery. jQuery seems more aligned with Wicket than YUI. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Fernando Wermus wrote: > +1 Jquery I mean > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Fernando Wermus < > fernando.wer...@gmail.

Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-28 Thread Fernando Wermus
+1 Jquery I mean On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Fernando Wermus wrote: > +1 > > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Joe Fawzy wrote: > >> Hi >> i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard now , >> used by all the big companies , even microsoft >> and although YUI is g

Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-28 Thread Fernando Wermus
+1 On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Joe Fawzy wrote: > Hi > i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard now , > used by all the big companies , even microsoft > and although YUI is great, Yahoo has its own problem these days and we > cannot consider the commited to the l

Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-27 Thread Joe Fawzy
Hi i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard now , used by all the big companies , even microsoft and although YUI is great, Yahoo has its own problem these days and we cannot consider the commited to the lib, they dropped support for many of their products and abandond m

Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-27 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
I actually was working on this two weeks ago for a client. Hopefully in the next week I will have a very minimal base project available for you to build from. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Istvan Soos wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a cool best-

Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-27 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
Yes, it's experimental, and it is not 100% decided that YUI will be used. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < reier...@gmail.com> wrote: > Isn't this an experimental branch? > > Ernesto > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34

Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-26 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Isn't this an experimental branch? Ernesto On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, danisevsky wrote: > I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/ > > > 2010/4/26 Istvan Soos

Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-26 Thread danisevsky
I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/ 2010/4/26 Istvan Soos > Hi, > > Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration library to > use YUI 3? I know the

YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-26 Thread Istvan Soos
Hi, Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration library to use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested specifically in YUI 3... Thanks, Istvan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.