And you have added all the users, that need access to the users group in
/etc/group?
IE your /etc/group file contains a line like:
users:x:100:user1,user2,user3,user4,useretc
If so, than it is spamassassin that does not switch the user context correctly.
-Sietse
From: Robert S
Sent: Tue
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, twofers wrote:
I would like to know what local rule I could invoke to tag email that the
subject is not in english.
header NOT_IN_ENGLISH Subject !~ /English/i
describe NOT_IN_ENGLISH Subject Contains Non English
So used to be mail from Richard Smith, subject Me again Richard.
Now they're using the last name, ie Me again Smith
I'm almost at the point of rejecting anything with the subject Me again...
Off topic:
In postfix in header_checks, can I specity something at the START? ie if I say
/Me again/
On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 12:07 -0500, DAve wrote:
Thomas Lindell wrote:
Att mail servers use his service.
Which means I can't send to mediacom which is an att partner
I couldn't believe att used his service.
What's odd is that my company uses att backhaul bandwidth in the form of
I've installed this FuzzyOcrPlugin on two machines (debian and
gentoo). Everything works fine on the gentoo box, but on the debian
box I get the following in the error log:
[2006-11-20 04:06:11] Unable to open/create Image Hash database at
/usr/local/var/FuzzyOcr/FuzzyOcr.hashdb, check
* Mark Martinec [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As far as invoking SA and getting its results, it should be about the same.
You forget your own p0f fingerprinting :)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49 (0)30-450
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
My suggestion was going to be to have the plugin define tags that can
be used via add_header. No need for calling add_header() internally.
Sounds like an interesting idea. Since I've never written plugins for
SA: what is the best starting point / documentation?
Nope - it's not that.
Looking through my syslog more closely reveals that I'm getting 'SA TIMED
OUT' messages all over the place, and referring to rules as well as Bayes.
So, I'm just as confused as ever, and don't know what's going on.
More analysis needed, I suppose, but I'm not sure where to
Just to add to the pot I have started working for a company who was receiving
+30,000 emails a day and acknowledged they had a spam problem. I got the go
ahead to pilot Postfix, MailScanner, SpamAssassin + FuzzyOCR and PolicyD and
have now reduced that to ~ 40 emails per day being delivered.
Thomas Lindell wrote:
Att mail servers use his service.
Which means I can't send to mediacom which is an att partner
I couldn't believe att used his service.
What's odd is that my company uses att backhaul bandwidth in the form of 4
t1's
Grr the whole thing is frustrating
Tom
Hello users,
Does anyone thing it might be nice to have if plugin lines with else
functionality?
Say we create some nice rules that rely on plugins but those plugins
aren't available, if we could create alternate rules for when the
plugins are not available it might help in some cases.
On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 12:33 -0800, Evan Platt wrote:
In postfix in header_checks, can I specity something at the START? ie if I say
/Me again/Reject
I only want to reject
Me again Smith but not Hey, it's Me again...
Put a caret at the start of the pattern: /^Me again/. To anchor
Thomas Lindell wrote:
Has anyone had any dealings with this guy.
I take my mail server very seriously. Further I take spamming very
seriously in general.
Even when I detect one of my customers sending spam I disable there internet
until the problem is resolved
The guy that runs the
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 12:33:36PM -0800, Evan Platt wrote:
So used to be mail from Richard Smith, subject Me again Richard.
Now they're using the last name, ie Me again Smith
FWIW, this is why it's pointless to try keeping up with those things.
There's an infinite
Are you saying that you have separate rules in user_prefs and those rules are
not being processed? or are you talking about just configuration lines in
user_prefs like use_bayes 1?
Wes
Chris Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I am using spamd and calling spamc from .procmail
lol, just got a spam with the image obfuscated like captchas in a bbs,
to avoid detection by ocr.
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 02:06:45PM -0600, Jorge Valdes wrote:
Gary V wrote:
This morning I received my copy of networkworld. Here is an
interesting article:
On 11/20/06, itdelany [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
François Rousseau wrote:
In your log, do you have any things like top 10 spammer, 10 top spam
...
or something like this?
URIBL_AB_SURBL=3.812, URIBL_PH_SURBL=2.8, URIBL_SC_SURBL=4.498,
URIBL_WS_SURBL=2.14]
those tags indicate
You can try:
mkdir /var/lib/MailScanner/
#Creates the directory
cp /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes* /var/lib/MailScanner/
#Copies the bayes databases from the default spamassassin directory to the
bayes_path directory
/etc/init.d/spamassassin restart or /etc/init.d/psa-spamassassin
CREATE TABLE bayes_token (
PRIMARY KEY (id, token),
INDEX bayes_token_idx1 (token),
INDEX bayes_token_idx2 (id, atime)
) TYPE=MyISAM;
PRIMARY for `id` and `token` should not have INDEX for `id` and `token`
added, too.
Why not?
IIRC the three indexes above makes perfect sense. Like
Anyone else seeing anything like this? I've been getting these for about two
days or so now:
Return-Path:
Received: from pop.earthlink.net [209.86.93.201]
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.5)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:19:50
-0600 (CST)
Giampaolo Tomassoni writes:
Recently in the perl blead code, one of the perl hackers has
added a trie-based regexp matcher (with Aho-Corasick
optimisations) to efficiently match multiple regular expressions
in parallel, to the perl core regexp matching code. That's pretty
Matthias Keller wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm running the latest one that is not the devel version.
Bill Landry wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote the following on 11/19/2006 6:15 PM -0800:
Does FuzzyOCR not skip blank lines?
* 33 FUZZY_OCR BODY: Mail contains an image with common spam
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: host gateway.mchsi.com[204.127.203.150] said:
550-12.175.23.161 blocked by ldap:ou=rblmx,dc=mso,dc=att,dc=net
550 Blocked
for abuse. Please contact the administrator of your ISP or sending
mailservice. (in reply to MAIL FROM command)
aha. the mchsi-variant of
DAve wrote:
Thomas Lindell wrote:
Has anyone had any dealings with this guy.
I take my mail server very seriously. Further I take spamming very
seriously in general.
Even when I detect one of my customers sending spam I disable there
internet
until the problem is resolved
The guy that
On 11/21/06, Thomas Lindell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Att mail servers use his service.
can you please share/point-to some evidence of that fact? if that
*is* the case, i'll be chatting with my reps at att!
if i've missed it here, i apologize in advance ...
thanks.
I got the following spam. I've included the header:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.libertysurf.net (webmail-out.libertysurf.net
[213.36.80.105])
by mail.redfish-solutions.com (8.13.8/8.13.7) with ESMTP id
kAM1ckKs008704
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 21 Nov
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Leon Kolchinsky wrote:
Hello,
There is a Mail-Relay administered by another person and its MX record stand
before MX record of my mail server, so theoretically mail should go first
through Mail-Relay to my server.
The thing is that for some reason there are much
Looks like what happens when your giflib/libungif binaries are not where
FuzzyOcr expects them to be. Check your actual paths against those in
FuzzyOcr.cf.
snowcrash+spamassassin wrote:
GIF-LIB error: Failed to Read from given file.
but, the message does score:
1.5
Here my FuzzyOCR runs with spamd (the daemon of spamassassin)
and the default user that run it is the user spamd
-rw-r--r-- 1 spamd spamd 433905 Nov 21 08:51 FuzzyOcr.hashdb
my FuzzyOcr.hashdb is set to user spamd
and all works fine... :)
On 11/20/06, Robert S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
On 20-Nov-2006, at 05:52, twofers wrote:
header NOT_IN_ENGLISH Subject !~ /English/i
describe NOT_IN_ENGLISH Subject Contains Non English
Characters
score NOT_IN_ENGLISH 3.5
What regexp could I use?
Well, that's tricky. Sometimes the subject is
I have two mailservers running SA. On one (with a very small number
of users), there is a shared bayes database (bayes_path
/var/work/bayes/bayes in local.cf), and in the other one I use the
default per-user databases.
In both machines I run sa-learn as a weekly cron job on spam in a
Spam
Actually I was replying to my forum thread and deleted my original message
that it quoted as I thought it had already hit the list.
Sietse van Zanen wrote:
Probably with him being too lazy to copy and paste his original message
from the other board, or list..
Well, I am too lazy to
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:29:15 -0600, you wrote:
Has anyone had any dealings with this guy.
I take my mail server very seriously. Further I take spamming very
seriously in general.
Even when I detect one of my customers sending spam I disable there internet
until the problem is resolved
The
Hello all!
I am relatively new to SpamAssassin and subscribing to this group had really
helped me in understanding many of SpamAssassin's intricacies. Thanks to
everybody who posts replies to the questions asked here.
Also, if this is not the proper place for me to post this question, I
Hi!
Yesterday we had a sudden drop in spam-percentage from 80% to near 60%.
Parallel to it I got six copies of an undetectable (by NAI and ClamAV)
new trojan 'exe' in the Mail.
Do we have to prepare for a new flood by an updated
(just now reorganizing) botnet?
Stucki
--
Christoph von Stuckrad
Am 21.11.2006 um 01:12 schrieb John Andersen:
On Monday 20 November 2006 15:08, Rick Macdougall wrote:
It's possible that they could send it all twice but I've never
seen it.
Remember that some unbelievable number of infected Windows
clients are
the main source of spam and it would just
Mark Adams wrote:
One of the many spammers around has sent out a LOAD of email from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Currently our server is
being over-run by the bounce backs, spamassassin is choking due to the
extensive checking it is doing and exim will not accept any more
connections.
OK, keep in mind
Thanks David,
I didn't thought of that simple solution :)
Firewall will certainly do the job here.
Best Regards,
Leon
-Original Message-
From: David B Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 5:59 AM
To: לאון קולצ'ינסקי
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Robert Nicholson wrote:
Is this practical without static ip?
Free public dynamic DNS services can make it tolerable.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
key:
I started out using amavisd-new then switched to MailScanner as my
mail tester 'framework' (SpamAssassin has been a constant)
Looking thru the docs of Mailscanner, it doesn't come out and SAY that
it just does the 'basic' spam test features, but reading between the
lines it seems to - I have a
Hi,
I recently got a call from someone trying to send to my email @t-online.de
(this is a division
of german telecom). While I believe that my friend's ISP might occasionally
send spam (any
big isp might get unwanted customers), I searched for blacklists and found that
isplisted only
at blars.
My postfix queue is climbing like crazy, and I'm getting *lots* of messages
in my syslog that look like this:
2006-11-21 16:50:39 Mail.Warningzetmail3Nov 21 16:54:43
amavis[29824]: (29824-01-4) SA TIMED OUT, backtrace: at
On 11/21/06, itdelany [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Panagiotis Christias wrote:
Thanks for your answer, and yes, spam word is everywhere in that email, I
forgot to say that I already did an sa-learn -ham on this email. What
else
can I do ?
Hello,
you have probably not setup correctly
On Nov 20, 2006, at 7:29 PM, Mike Jackson wrote:
FYI, I work for a large hosting provider, and I've seen customers
who have implemented greylisting, but spammers are getting smart
enough to work around it. I doubt that they're wasting resources on
queuing for redelivery, but they are
Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
CREATE TABLE bayes_token (
PRIMARY KEY (id, token),
INDEX bayes_token_idx1 (token),
INDEX bayes_token_idx2 (id, atime)
) TYPE=MyISAM;
If the primary key was changed to (token, id), it should be able to be
used in the second sort of query as well as the first,
* On 21/11/06 12:48 -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
| On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 08:12:03PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
| I'd like to run SA with only the minimalist set of config ( and .cf
| files) that would suffice to just run FuzzyOCR checks only.
| SA version is 3.1.7.
|
| Interesting.
Here is what I can give you
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: host gateway.mchsi.com[204.127.203.150] said:
550-12.175.23.161 blocked by ldap:ou=rblmx,dc=mso,dc=att,dc=net
550 Blocked
for abuse. Please contact the administrator of your ISP or sending
mailservice. (in reply to MAIL FROM command)
-Original Message-
From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 2:36 PM
To: spamassassin
Subject: Re: Not all Stock Spam is bad
DAve wrote:
Randal, Phil wrote:
With FuzzyOCR 3.4.2 and using ocrad,
$ocrad -s5 -i $pfile
should catch them,
On Tue, November 21, 2006 00:23, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote:
Dylan Bouterse wrote:
Do you have a compiled list of those IPs? And what method are you using
to whitelist? Email offlist if more appropriate. Thanks!
We whitelist the main Irish ISPs, so our list wouldn't be of much use to
leemansvg wrote:
I see in my spam.assassin.pref.conf file this entry,
bayes_path /var/lib/MailScanner/bayes
however when I navigate to this directory this database is not there, is
there a way to generate this database. I've been noticing a lot of spam
getting through and
John Andersen wrote:
On Monday 20 November 2006 15:08, Rick Macdougall wrote:
It's possible that they could send it all twice but I've never seen it.
Remember that some unbelievable number of infected Windows clients are
the main source of spam and it would just be too much trouble for the
On Mon, November 20, 2006 15:00, Nathan Zabaldo wrote:
I am getting pounded by these types of emails. Does anyone else get
these? What rule can I apply to have them killed. It's driving me nuts.
SARE Stock ruleset. Available from fine ninjas everywhere. Well trained
Bayes would probably
Hi all,
I am using spamd and calling spamc from .procmail using
| /usr/bin/spamc -u chris
Only the rules in /ec/mail/spamassassin/local.cf are being processed.
My $HOME/.spamassassin/user_prefs file is not being used!
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf has allow_user_rules 1 in it but I can
not
Michael W Cocke wrote:
He is. My system is on his list too, which is pretty amazing when you
consider that my mail server supports 3, count them, 3 users - myself,
my wife, and my 10 year old son - and he's somehow determined that my
site hosts spammers.
Last I looked, he listed all of
Matt Kettler wrote:
leemansvg wrote:
I see in my spam.assassin.pref.conf file this entry,
bayes_path /var/lib/MailScanner/bayes
however when I navigate to this directory this database is not there, is
there a way to generate this database. I've been noticing a lot of
* Matt Hampton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What do you mean by more than the 'basic' features? Bear in mind as
well that MailScanner and amavisd-new check for spam at completely
different stages of the mail processing - amavisd-new at connection time
and MailScanner after it has been queued.
Tha's
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Matt Hampton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What do you mean by more than the 'basic' features? Bear in mind as
well that MailScanner and amavisd-new check for spam at completely
different stages of the mail processing - amavisd-new at connection time
and MailScanner after it
I see in my spam.assassin.pref.conf file this entry,
bayes_path /var/lib/MailScanner/bayes
however when I navigate to this directory this database is not there, is
there a way to generate this database. I've been noticing a lot of spam
getting through and would like to tighten
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:42:09 +0100
Jonas Eckerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CREATE TABLE bayes_token (
PRIMARY KEY (id, token),
INDEX bayes_token_idx1 (token),
INDEX bayes_token_idx2 (id, atime)
) TYPE=MyISAM;
PRIMARY for `id` and `token` should not have INDEX for `id` and
-Original Message-
From: Vahric MUHTARYAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Everybody,
I'm using SA for a long time without any problem, nowadays spammers
are using too much graphical objects and they are tring to change it day by
day. I'm tring to use fuzzyocr but it's
Did you restart spamd after changing any options?
Loren
Duncan Hill writes:
On Mon, November 20, 2006 15:00, Nathan Zabaldo wrote:
I am getting pounded by these types of emails. Does anyone else get
these? What rule can I apply to have them killed. It's driving me nuts.
SARE Stock ruleset. Available from fine ninjas everywhere. Well
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Of course, that would exclude messages with ISO Latin 1 (8859.1)
characters like Yen, Pound Sterling, Trademark, etc. Plus, there are
words in English that when properly written do contain accents,
such as resume, dais, cliche, cooperation, etc.
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 03:21:12PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
And a third and last point: Is it possible to add a dedicated header
when one of the rules triggered? I see that add_header can only
differentiate between spam, ham and all -- any additional options? The
idea is that MUAs could
Has anyone had any dealings with this guy.
I take my mail server very seriously. Further I take spamming very
seriously in general.
Even when I detect one of my customers sending spam I disable there internet
until the problem is resolved
The guy that runs the blarsbl list wants to charge my
sorry, I there's no bayes files in /etc/mail/spamassassin/ directory. I'm
using MailScanner.
twofers wrote:
You can try:
mkdir /var/lib/MailScanner/
#Creates the directory
cp /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes* /var/lib/MailScanner/
#Copies the bayes databases from the default
John Andersen wrote:
On Monday 20 November 2006 15:08, Rick Macdougall wrote:
It's possible that they could send it all twice but I've never seen it.
Remember that some unbelievable number of infected Windows clients are
the main source of spam and it would just be too much trouble for the
On Sunday 19 November 2006 18:04, CosmicPerl wrote:
Hi,
I installed the latest SpamAssassin on my server. At first all my tests
looked good, apart from load. So I setup spamc and spamd and everything
seemed great, for a short while at least.
A day later my mqueue had about 1500 messages in
These mails stay there for 5 days. At least if you set up sendmail according to
RFC's.
that's the whole idea of SMTP store and forward. If address is unavailable,
keep trying for a while before giving up. You can set the grace time to any
period you like btw.
-Sietse
From: CosmicPerl
There is a new wave hitting. I've already written rules to catch this simple
change the spammers did over the weekend. I expect the results will be very
very good. I hope to have the SARE stock ruleset updated later today.
So, no you aren't teh only one seeing stock spams slip buy over the
Well, I tried to contact some people responsible for
the servers below that what they were doing was broken,
including citing chapter and verse where in RFC-2822 in
syntax of the Received: lines was spec'd out:
Received: from Gate2-sandiego.nmci.navy.mil (gate2-sandiego.nmci.navy.mil
Leon Kolchinsky wrote:
Hello,
There is a Mail-Relay administered by another person and its MX record stand
before MX record of my mail server, so theoretically mail should go first
through Mail-Relay to my server.
The thing is that for some reason there are much e-mails (and spam among them
Hi All,
Ok, I've figured that having define(`confSEPARATE_PROC', `True') in my
SendMail config was what was causing the flushing of the mail queue to
create such a huge server load as it was spawning a new sendmail, procmail,
and spamassassin child for each message in the mqueue. So I've
Vahric MUHTARYAN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/20/2006 04:33:23 PM:
Hello Everybody,
I'm using SA for a long time without any problem, nowadays
spammers are using too much graphical objects and they are tring to
change it day by day. I'm tring to use fuzzyocr but it's taking too
Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote:
Hello,
Do you come across with any problem from your clients for mails are not
arriving at right time ? Because I afraid of people mta's all of them
are configured with different retry times .
We whitelist the main ISPs SMTPs to avoid this issue
--
Mr Michele
Not to mention that the mail queues are backing up for over half an hour
because of all the spam in the first place :-p
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: uxbod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 November 2006 15:13
To:
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote:
Do you come across with any problem from your clients for mails are not
arriving at right time ? Because I afraid of people mta's all of them are
configured with different retry times .
Whitelist your clients' known MTA IP addresses.
On Tuesday 21 November 2006 12:07, Rene Caspari wrote:
Hi,
I have a little problem with SPF:
For domain.tld there is a SPF record, which says that mail.domain.tld is
allowed to sending mails from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If I use mail.domain.tld with a dialin account by SMTP AUTH,
spamassassin
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 12:33:36PM -0800, Evan Platt wrote:
So used to be mail from Richard Smith, subject Me again Richard.
Now they're using the last name, ie Me again Smith
FWIW, this is why it's pointless to try keeping up with those things.
There's an infinite number of ways they can
Hello,
Actually we are receiving too much mail, and % 60 - % 70 of this are spam ,
also my hardwares are not enough to handle all load because of this I can miss
some mails and they are spam. Instead of using fuzzy ocr or any other think I
guess that I can use greylisting How they
Hello Everybody,
I'm using SA for a long time without any problem, nowadays spammers are
using too much graphical objects and they are tring to change it day by day.
I'm tring to use fuzzyocr but it's taking too much cpu. I think that try
greylisting . I wonder are there anybody use
With FuzzyOCR 3.4.2 and using ocrad,
$ocrad -s5 -i $pfile
should catch them, according to a post from decoder on the FuzzyOCR
list.
And it seems to here.
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: DAve
I'm sure the FTC and US Attorny General's office would like to know about this.
All you have to do is write a a letter addressed to Attn: of Consumer Affairs
and these guys will check it outin a big way.
Wes
Thomas Lindell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone had any dealings
On 20-nov-2006, at 23:33, Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote:
Hello Everybody,
I'm using SA for a long time without any problem, nowadays
spammers are using too much graphical objects and they are tring to
change it day by day. I'm tring to use fuzzyocr but it's taking too
much cpu. I think
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tue, November 21, 2006 00:23, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote:
Dylan Bouterse wrote:
Do you have a compiled list of those IPs? And what method are you using
to whitelist? Email offlist if more appropriate. Thanks!
We whitelist the main Irish ISPs, so our list
Can anyone help with this?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Problems-running-Spam-Assassin-tf2664618.html#a7471981
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Well, I tried to contact some people responsible for
the servers below that what they were doing was broken,
including citing chapter and verse where in RFC-2822 in
syntax of the Received: lines was spec'd out:
snip
It just boggles my mind why anyone would go
-Original Message-
From: Maccie Roux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 4:47 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Spamassassin
I think amvis is not looking at spamassassin, I also struggle
to get the
system
to send the spam mail to a
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote:
I'm using SA for a long time without any problem, nowadays
spammers are using too much graphical objects and they are tring
to change it day by day. I'm tring to use fuzzyocr but it's taking
Same Problem here ...
too much cpu. I
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
...omissis
But if we are speaking of a /10 mem*cpu factor, well, it could
easily be interesting, isn't it?
No. I think it would be patently stupid because of the massive effort
involved and loss of mind-power.
Hello,
Do you come across with any problem from your clients for mails are not
arriving at right time ? Because I afraid of people mta's all of them are
configured with different retry times .
Regards
Vahric
- Original Message -
From: Rick Macdougall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
These are scoring at about 4X my threshold without the SARE stock
ruleset. You may need to tweak you scoring. I find bayes_99 to be
reliable.
FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL
FORGED_RCVD_HELO
BAYES_99
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL
RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL
On Nov 20, 2006, at 10:00 AM, Nathan Zabaldo wrote:
I am getting
I have multiple shell accounts with my ISP that function as multiple
inboxes.
I want to run SA on all three, and it would be convenient to share
the bayesian DB between all three accounts so I only have to train
one. I've installed everything in a way that I think should work,
but only
On Monday 20 November 2006 21:06, Duncan Hill wrote:
Greylisting has been used now for over 2 years. I haven't seen any
spammer adapt their botnets to handle it in that time frame.
But its used on .0002% of MTAs. Not worth anybody's effort
until it goes mainstream, or gets talked up here on
That's not even mentioning the metaprogramming and higher-order
programming techniques that we use extensively in SpamAssassin -- those
are basically *just not possible* in C/C++. ;)
--j.
Matt Kettler writes:
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Larry Rosenman writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As would running sa-update.
--j.
Speaking of sa-update
Is there a list of the changes from day-to-day with sa-update?
I have an auto-update script that runs for it, but I'd like to see what
Gets added as time goes on.
Hmm.
Can anyone suggest a 'sendmail' mailing list?
I am aware of NNTP comp.mail.sendmail Usenet news.
Thanks,
Jerry
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote:
Hello Everybody,
I'm using SA for a long time without any problem, nowadays
spammers are using too much graphical objects and
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 06:16:15AM -0800, CosmicPerl wrote:
Can anyone help with this?
With what?
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
... the menu is written in more elementary Spanish than a Dora the
Explorer episode ...
- Karl Chalabala about a lunch menu at work
pgpDc6YlHHGbl.pgp
John Tice wrote:
On Nov 20, 2006, at 10:00 AM, Nathan Zabaldo wrote:
I am getting pounded by these types of emails. Does anyone else get
these? What rule can I apply to have them killed. It's driving me
nuts. Please help!!!
These are scoring at about 4X my threshold without the SARE
On Monday 20 November 2006 19:06, Rick Macdougall wrote:
John Andersen wrote:
... the spammers are not actually
storing the email addresses on the infected machines, they just send an
email to go out).
I'm not saying they won't do it, I'm saying they aren't doing it currently.
Actually they
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
