-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
aledr wrote:
Here it is! Do not worry about the RPM errors at the end, I need to
fix It on my spec file.
You will need to also package in the vusage daemon. It's basically a
requirement
for the 5.5 tree. It's just not required when building
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Okay, here's a patch that does the following:
Only chown if root
Only mkdir if root or DESTDIR is set
I haven't committed it to the repository yet because I'm not sure if it
addresses the issues correctly. If you're working on packaging
Thanks Matt, I'll test it in minutes...
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Matt Brookings m...@inter7.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Okay, here's a patch that does the following:
Only chown if root
Only mkdir if root or DESTDIR is set
I haven't committed it to
Patch reject on latest on r879:
cat Makefile.in.rej
***
*** 58,62
rm -rf config.log config.status Makefile autom4te.cache
contrib/rc.vusaged
install: $(BINS)
- $(INSTALL) -s -m 0700 vusaged $(DESTDIR)$(VPOPMAIL_DIR_BIN)
if test ! -r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
aledr wrote:
Patch reject on latest on r879:
cat Makefile.in.rej
***
*** 58,62
rm -rf config.log config.status Makefile autom4te.cache
contrib/rc.vusaged
install: $(BINS)
- $(INSTALL) -s -m 0700 vusaged
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Matt Brookings m...@inter7.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
aledr wrote:
Patch reject on latest on r879:
cat Makefile.in.rej
***
*** 58,62
rm -rf config.log config.status Makefile autom4te.cache
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Matt Brookings m...@inter7.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
aledr wrote:
+ make DESTDIR=/var/tmp/vpopmail-5.5.0-build install -C backends/mysql
make: Entering directory
`/usr/src/packages/BUILD/vpopmail-5.5.0/backends/mysql'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Test
- --
/*
Matt Brookings [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG Key 0x88999334
Software developer Systems technician
Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. (815)776-9465
*/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6
--
Oliver A. Rojo
__
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error
please notify
--
AIM: FucPsSht
OK, so I'm not the only one that noticed the day-long lag, eh?
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Positive Negative wrote:
--
AIM: FucPsSht
test
ping
- Original Message -
From: Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think it works pretty nicely. A single . on a line by itself
represents End of File when sending or receiving multiple
lines of infomation.
Nice idea.
[cut]
Any votes on which way of specifying directories would be easier
from
- Original Message -
From: Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 05 April 2004 8:08 pm, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote:
I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
is using a POP3 type protocol.
Sounds good to me, this is getting
Marcin Soltysiak wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any votes on which way of specifying directories would be easier
from the client program's point of view?
a) full paths
b) relative based on user or command
+1 for b) First, it would be a bit like
- Original Message -
From: Rick Widmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marcin Soltysiak wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any votes on which way of specifying directories would be easier
from the client program's point of view?
a) full paths
b)
Marcin Soltysiak wrote:
Either I am missing something or... If we use full path then same operations
would look like:
Sys Admin would send same as
The Domain admin would send same as
And the user would send:
write_file /path/to/vpopmail/home/domains/test.com/user/VacationMessage
And
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Rick Widmer wrote:
There is no need to send the ~vpopmail/domains/ part of the path,
because the user has no choice on that part. If we always send the full
path from that point down, then the path is always:
$Domain/$User/$whatever
or maybe
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 20:18, Ken Jones wrote:
One little question... What are you thinking of as far as encryption?
I'm sure there's going to be some people running the client on a box
seperate from the server. You looking at adding ssl support, or are you
thinking of just letting
Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild
before it gets posted? It could use another
set of eyes.
Ken
Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild
before it gets posted? It could use another
set of eyes.
Show me the money :-)
Solt
Ken Jones wrote:
Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild
before it gets posted? It could use another
set of eyes.
Yes please.
Regards,
Rick
Ken Jones wrote:
Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild
before it gets posted? It could use another
set of eyes.
Yes, please.
Rick
- Original Message -
From: Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here ya go.
Look at README.vpopmaild
Short test procedure:
./configure (your options)
make
./vpopmaild
login [EMAIL PROTECTED] user
help
./configure with option PASSED
make PASSED
./vpopmaild
./vpopmaild
+OK
login [EMAIL
On Monday 05 April 2004 2:46 pm, Ken Jones wrote:
[snip]
I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
is using a POP3 type protocol.
I think it works pretty nicely. A single . on a line by itself
represents End of File when sending or receiving multiple
lines of infomation.
From the
Ken Jones wrote:
On Monday 05 April 2004 4:05 pm, you wrote:
Ken Jones wrote:
Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild
before it gets posted? It could use another
set of eyes.
Got it! It compiled and ran the first time. Good job Ken!
Am I correct that any user can be a System admin, if given
Ken Jones wrote:
On Monday 05 April 2004 2:46 pm, Ken Jones wrote:
[snip]
I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
is using a POP3 type protocol.
I like it very much so far!
The way you put the user name and password on the same transaction is
even better than following pop3
On Monday 05 April 2004 7:36 pm, Rick Widmer wrote:
Ken Jones wrote:
On Monday 05 April 2004 2:46 pm, Ken Jones wrote:
[snip]
I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
is using a POP3 type protocol.
I like it very much so far!
The way you put the user name and password on
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote:
I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
is using a POP3 type protocol.
Sounds good to me, this is getting exciting!
One little question... What are you thinking of as far as encryption?
I'm sure there's going to be some people running the
Hi,
Ken Jones wrote:
So the mod_user function would take it's
options on additional lines, like:
moduser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
no_smtp
quota 1234
.
And the server would reply back
+OK
or
-ERR XXX error message
I get this
list_dir /home/vpopmail/domains/nougen.com/naomi/Maildir/cur
+OK
.
On a user
On Monday 05 April 2004 8:08 pm, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote:
I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
is using a POP3 type protocol.
Sounds good to me, this is getting exciting!
One little question... What are you thinking of as far as
Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote:
I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
is using a POP3 type protocol.
Sounds good to me, this is getting exciting!
One little question... What are you thinking of as far as encryption?
I'm sure there's going to be
Rick Macdougall wrote:
I'm of the thought that it should be
line of text
line of text
+OK
Or even skip the . and just finish with +OK #more text available here
That way every single response ends in +OK or -ERR
+1.
Note, I removed the . in the response list. It will be easier to just
look
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote:
One little question... What are you thinking of as far as encryption?
I'm sure there's going to be some people running the client on a box
seperate from the server. You looking at adding ssl support, or are you
thinking of just letting something like
Ken Jones wrote:
Any votes on which way of specifying directories would be easier
from the client program's point of view?
a) full paths
b) relative based on user or command
As long as you tell me where ~vpopmail is when I login, always using
fully qualified paths will be easiest, I think.
Ken Jones wrote:
Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild
before it gets posted? It could use another
set of eyes.
Ken
Sure, shoot me a copy this way :)
X-Istence
vchkpw
test
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2003-11-22
Hi,
I get an error when I send out msgs to the mailing lists... but I wonder if
you guys knew what they mean. This is a test mail just to get the msg, and
then, if you even get this msg, I'll add the reply emails I get from a
server I know nothing about...
Shai
to these mailing lists?
Cheers,
Shai
-Original Message-
From: Chris Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 9:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OFF LIST - Re: [vchkpw] Test, is this msg going out at all?
Shai,
yes they are being received.
You obviously
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:14 PM
Subject: [vchkpw] RE: OFF LIST - Re: [vchkpw] Test, is this msg going out at
all?
Hi Chris,
I don't know what you mean but this virus warning.. but the errors I get
are
not exactly errors. They are two emails that come back to me
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I belive what you are seeing is reply from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Each time I send a message to
this list, I get a reply from him/She ...
Virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the culprit. There are many
different messages flying abut, not just this one.
If you to this
test
test
45 matches
Mail list logo
