On Tuesday 25 February 2003 02:56, Dave Weiner wrote:
> On Sunday 23 February 2003 21:56, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> > OK. Again, I admit lack of experience here. But, it still seems like a
> > vpopmail specific protocol would be faster than transfering and modifying
> > files over NFS. Does everyone
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Doug Clements" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "vpopmail"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 4:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail as a daemon
>
> > You're right. I don't care for NFS.
If you don't mind my asking, why don't you care for NFS?
--Doug
- Original Message -
From: "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Doug Clements" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "vpopmail"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 2
On Sunday 23 February 2003 21:56, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> OK. Again, I admit lack of experience here. But, it still seems like a
> vpopmail specific protocol would be faster than transfering and modifying
> files over NFS. Does everyone really think that NFS would be faster?
First off, I've desig
How about this for an Idea. Since I believe that we all agree in the
power of Qmail and its superiority over the other systems. I think that
we leave that portion of Qmail and Vpopmail alone.
As a suggestion I think that Jesse did bring up some valid points when
it comes to the administration of V
At 12:01 AM 02-24-2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi !!
> If you dislike NFS, then why did you go with qmail to begin with?
> That was the target for qmail. To use NFS without file locking.
I hope this never reaches djb since I'm 100% sure he never
thougth qmail to be designed for "Network Failure
Hi !!
> If you dislike NFS, then why did you go with qmail to begin with?
> That was the target for qmail. To use NFS without file locking.
I hope this never reaches djb since I'm 100% sure he never
thougth qmail to be designed for "Network Failure System"... :-)
=d0Mi=
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Kolaci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail as a daemon
>
> Like I said before, we already have the daemons. That
> > Well, I don't see the need. vpopmail was made for qmail.
> > Qmail invokes vpopmail using vdelivermail.
> >
> > What exactly would you daemonize?
>
> Authentication and access to vpopmail control functions. Creating users,
domains, aliases, etc...
>
> Of coarse parts of vpo
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Kolaci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail as a daemon
>
> Hi,
>
> Well, I don't see the need. vpopmail
Hi,
Well, I don't see the need. vpopmail was made for qmail.
Qmail invokes vpopmail using vdelivermail.
What exactly would you daemonize? You would only want to
make a daemon for things that are used *very* frequently
and you need the extra speed. The only thing I see is
authentication, for w
- Original Message -
From: "Anders Brander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 6:15 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail as a daemon
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 23 February 2003 19:03, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> &g
quot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail as a daemon
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "vpopmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, February 2
Hi,
On Sunday 23 February 2003 19:03, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> What does everyone think about the possibility of turning vpopmail
> into a daemon? Complete with network ports and the like. It would
> allow for a much more distributed architecture, IMHO.
How about:
ssh -l vpopmail your.mailserver.
On Sunday 23 February 2003 19:26, Ron Culler wrote:
> I agree with that it would make life alot easier to integrate other
> web-based email apps. I currently use vpopmail with a mysql backend and
> have compiled in the valias support. This works great except that if I
> use qmailadmin I loose the
TECTED]>
> To: vpopmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [vchkpw] vpopmail as a daemon
>
> Greetings list,
>
> I'm sure people have considered this before, but I'd like to collect
everyone's thoughts on the idea I'm about to present:
>
> VPopMail as a dae
- Original Message -
From: "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "vpopmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 10:03 AM
Subject: [vchkpw] vpopmail as a daemon
> Greetings list,
>
> I'm sure people have considered t
I agree with that it would make life alot easier to integrate other
web-based email apps. I currently use vpopmail with a mysql backend and
have compiled in the valias support. This works great except that if I
use qmailadmin I loose the valias(mysql) support as it only creates a
.qmail file in t
bruary 23, 2003 10:03 AM
Subject: [vchkpw] vpopmail as a daemon
> Greetings list,
>
> I'm sure people have considered this before, but I'd like to collect
everyone's thoughts on the idea I'm about to present:
>
> VPopMail as a daemon
>
>
Greetings list,
I'm sure people have considered this before, but I'd like to collect everyone's
thoughts on the idea I'm about to present:
VPopMail as a daemon
What does everyone think about the possibility of turning vpopmail into a daemon?
Complete with network ports and
20 matches
Mail list logo
